By
Viewed
73,624
Please choose the correct answer for each question below:
Questions: 0/386
Correct: 0
Translate:
Tell me about the letter cuz I don't
know what people are saying about the
letter.
>> Okay, here is the actual letter. I
haven't heard anything about like I I I
heard about it but I didn't read any of
it.
>> I It's pretty long.
>> I'm not I'm not going to read. It's I'll
summarize it.
>> Rob, can you put it on Chad GPT and say
summarize what's in the list?
>> Sure. Thank you.
>> And I'll do my best. Dear Mr. Prime
Minister, I'm your friend. I want the
best for you. I'll always be by your
side. At the same time, here's a few
suggestions that I would recommend to
win the hearts and minds of people to
come on your side,
>> which is the right way to write a
letter.
>> You're losing the PR war
>> because Tik Tok owned by China and the
the the youth is following the lead of
the Gays for Gaza Brigade and the Free
Palestine brigade and the Tik Tok owns
our youth. Here's my suggestion to
combat what we're seeing. I'm here for
you. I want to be your friend. Allow me
to help you. Here's my suggestions. It
came as a friend
>> here. Let me read it from his letters
from a place of deep love for Israel.
Jewish beggressives alarm over rising
anti-Israel anti-semitic numbers. Okay,
got it. His core argument is that Israel
lose an information over especially
online which he warns will erode
political and military support for us.
He states that this negative message
flows downstream from social media to
campuses to even conservative circles.
Kirk recounts how during the campus
speaking towards a large share of the
questions he received are hostile
towards Israel. apartheid, ethnic
cleansing, uh subsidizing genocide. He
notes that sometimes he feels like he
ends up defending Israel more vehemently
than the Israeli government itself on
those fronts. criticism Israel. He takes
issues with Israeli uh Israel relying
heavily on surrogates and non-Israel to
defend its narrative of he criticized uh
the style of Israel's public diplomacy
press briefings and spokespeople that
seem outdated and passive standing a at
a dimly lit podium reminiscent of 1970s
duce coverage in interesting very
detailed he gives a sevenpoint uh uh
proposal build a rapid response media
communications team a keen a political
campaign okay create an Israel truth
network a and central hub platform from
debunking misinformation aggressive
pro-Israel content and coordinating with
influencers, educators, and social media
voices. Okay, go a little bit higher,
Rob. Sending release hostages on a US
speaking tour. Interesting. Promote
Israel's everyday life stories.
Interviewing ordinary Israelis, Jews,
Arab, secular, religious about what they
love about Israel and responding to
misinformation directly. framing the
Israel narrative more like a political
campaign, defining Israel's uh identity,
proactively uh responding to attacks,
deploying surrogates, and building a
first-person voice for Israel in
English, more clearly articulating the
Iranian threat and Israel position
to skeptical younger audience and
targeting younger communicate recruit
more staff in their 20s, 30s. Let me
tell you, this is why I missed the guy.
Are you freaking kidding me? Like, this
is why I loved Charlie Kirk.
like this is how you this is diplomacy,
you know, he's telling you I'm talking
to kids and they're not siding with you.
But here's my suggestion to you. And he
didn't do this publicly to get credit
for it.
>> He had to get killed for us to read
this.
What I take away from this has nothing
to do with Israel, has nothing to do
with kids. It has to do with how special
of a guy this guy was.
>> Yes.
>> It upsets the hell out of me that we
lost this guy. The more I hear stories
like this, this guy was this guy was
truly a sinnerist get killed, man. It's
unfortunate. Synergist, you know, is a
very tough job to have because when
you're a synergist, you know what you're
trying to do? You're in the middle
telling both sides your stinks.
>> Yeah.
>> And guess who likes you? Both sides end
up hating you because you're willing to
stand up and say, "Relax. Pump the
brakes." Like, I'm giving sincere
feedback. And you take a guy out like
this that his influence was growing
exponentially. Anyways, what were you
gonna Were you going to make a point
with this letter because we didn't
address that or
>> the whole concept of what we're talking
about is Charlie Kirk. It was, you know,
people have used Charlie Kirk's death to
uh gain eyeballs and followers and
promote their own opinions and their own
agenda. And you know exactly who I'm
talking about. But the reality is this.
This letter of Charlie Kirk denouncing
Israel is anything but that. I want to
say something on that. Let me say
something on that. Let me say something
on that. And I I'm not one that is
>> uncomfortable
uh uh uh uh in any of these situations.
This is what I'll tell you.
If we follow Hanland's razor, okay, you
have to follow it for people you like
and people you don't like.
>> Mhm. Hanland's razors never attribute a
malice at that which is adequately
explained by stupidity or what it
encourages people to consider less
malleant more mundane explanation such
as incompetence error or lack of
information before assuming someone
acted with bad intentions there's also a
quote in this
>> by Napoleon which I'll read a lot of
time people quote give credit to this
quote to Napoleon here's what Napoleon
once said Napoleon once said I want to
read this to you never ascribe to malice
that which is adequate explained by
incompetence and Goet if I'm saying it
correctly old guy that would write plays
from 1774 in one of the plays he wrote
it said the following misunderstanding
and neglect create more confusion in the
world than deceit and malice let me read
it again misunderstanding and neglect
create more confusion in the world than
deceit and malice misunderstanding and
neglect it's a misunderstanding it's a
neglect more than the city of Malice. A
part of what you're saying right now is
to say that u they're using this to make
money. I don't know. I mean, somebody
could honestly say you guys have done 20
clips on Charlie Kirk and they could
actually make the argument about that.
We have and our AdSense is on. So, what
are people going to say? We're not doing
this and we're not doing this. You're
running a business and you're talking
about the story and and and you're doing
whatever questioning you may have on
this. What I will tell you with this on
where I'm at today personally and I want
to transition out of this cuz I didn't
mean to spend I wasn't planning on going
into reading this letter. I've not even
read this. I just know there was a
letter. I hadn't read the whole thing
for the first time. I read the seven
points that he had is the following. I
have no problem
with anybody questioning on what
happened here. No problem. Even if you
get paid, I have no problem. What upsets
me is federal employees whose job is you
get paid to question who has access to
the information. Why are you not? That's
where I'm at. The problem I had at the
beginning was jump into conclusion that
Israel's behind it. That's Hanland's
razor. That that's that's lack of, you
know, you just want to find somebody to
blame because it validates your
argument. We don't need that. That's
divisive. That's what gets even more.
But what I what I kind of want to know
is, you know, this guy was good for
America, the country I live in, with
raising four kids.
>> Selfishly, I wanted Charlie to live to
95 years old cuz I got four kids.
Selfishly, you need more brave men like
this. We lost one of the most important
guys in the future. Now, don't get me
wrong. This is not like it's the end of
the world. Let's sit there and we're not
going to be able to figure out leaders.
Step up. We're going to step up and do
our part. I'm not sitting here worried
about it. Neither should you. God is on
our side. We're going to figure this
thing out. Yep. collectively together.
But I don't mind if somebody who gets
paid to do a podcast asks some questions
who federal employees don't want to ask.
And whether you like or don't like that
individual, ask away. Oh, Pat, I I'm
with you. But there's a big distinction
here in my opinion. We've talked about
how many times when you have an opinion,
you say the following. Here's what I
think. This is my opinion. I could be
wrong, but this is what I think. I have
no problem with anybody, literally
anybody asking questions. This is what
happened.
>> There's a difference between a question,
my opinion, and then facts, and then I
have the receipts, trust me, trust me,
bro, and you're literally lying. So, we
have to call out
>> You know what I think? You know what I
think it is? You know what I think it
is?
>> Here's what I think. I think you're you
make a very good point when somebody
comes out and says, "What? I know
exactly what happened without showing
the receipts." Very annoying.
>> Yeah.
>> Very annoying. And you lose credibility
with that. gaslight everybody
>> and and and sometimes you know sometimes
there is that uh what's the word in
media where you have um uh
>> journalistic integrity. No, no, it's not
journalistic integrity
>> where you are tempted
>> to be the first to be like you got it
breaking news
>> cuz it brings so much eyeballs
>> of course
>> but dude if you were wrong man let me
we're on flight back I don't know what
flight I'm on a flight back yesterday
and we're talking about somebody in
business
>> and I I always ask this question I used
to ask this question on PHP 20 years ago
15 years I used to say who do you think
is going to be the biggest player 10
years from now in the company and I'll
never forget one time we're at this
event at Palm Springs Las Vegas July
15th of09 night,
July 15th of09. And this one girl gets
up on stage,
who was at our Arizona office. She gets
up on stage. She hands this gift to me.
It was a tsp gift with pictures and
everything in it and things written by
her. She's on stage crying for 5 10
minutes on how much I've changed her
life. And we're outside my office in
Northridge and we're walking
And I'm asking the question, who's going
to be the player? T on everybody's list.
She was on the list.
>> You know what she did a month later?
Left, took business, talk trash, and we
had the best relationship together.
>> Wow.
>> I was good with her boyfriend at the
time, her fiance. We'd go to church. We
introduced her to the church that we go
to. Phenomenal. Like overnight, this
happens because another guy got in her
ear and overnight this happened. What's
the point here, dude? We have no idea
what's going to happen with these
stories another 12, 24, 36 months. You
have no idea who's going to be in
business 5, 10 years from now. You have
no idea what's going to happen with
business. You You hear a lot of
different people.
>> But in the interim today, I have no
problem with anybody that's questioning
anything. I will say pump the brakes of
jumping into conclusion that you know
for a fact what happened. You lose
credibility when you do that. Fair point
there. But I have no problem with
anybody that's questioning things today.
Last night was a great night.
>> The Yankees beat the Red Sox. Okay.
Notice one person not clapping. Okay.
And that is none other than Tom
Ellsworth. So here's what we want to do
with you. Here's what Look at that. Look
at the Look at the Halo look. Zoom in on
his face. By the way, I want people Can
you zoom in on his face? Zoom in on his
face and tell me everybody in the group
text last night was texting back except
for one guy. And the one guy who didn't
respond back was this guy. He says he
doesn't have hate towards the Yankees. I
believe he does. Having said that, the
pitcher of the Yankees yesterday pitched
a
>> lights out
>> 12 strike. You know, he hasn't pitched a
12 strikeout, not in a minor leagues,
not this is the first time he does it.
Lights out. Great stuff.
>> But here's what we like to see. For some
of you guys that are Dodger fans, you're
from LA and you're on Tom's side. We got
the Dodger blue future looks bright.
Check this out. Look at the timing of
it.
>> What a sick hat that is. By the way,
whether you're a Dodgers fan or not,
that is legit one of the sickest blue
colored future looks bright hat we have.
But if you're a Yankees fan, folks, we
also got the Yankees hat.
>> The navy blue future looks bright hat.
So, here's a contest we're going to be
playing.
>> We're going to be watching to see which
of these two is going to get more love.
Now, Yankees Tom was upset because Tom
said people in LA are sleeping. Pat,
Yankees fans are up.
>> Yeah, we are.
>> But but listen, California is one of the
biggest viewers of the podcast. So Rob,
we have to find a way to put the links
of both hats there. Folks, if you're
searching it, you could put navy hat.
It'll come up. And what's the other
hat's title? If somebody is searching
this or they want to find it, it's royal
royal hat. You type in royal, but both
hats are colors. Maybe you're somebody
that's kind of like, you know, you're
you're neither the Yankees or the
Dodgers. Some of you guys may be
watching this. You're pirates. You're
ready to go after the ump.
>> Some of you guys are like, "Where's
that? Give me the I want to go find that
man. I'm going to go chase that man. I
don't know if you guys saw it or not.
They were chasing. Did you see that
afterward? Oh my god.
>> They chased the
>> They're holding the Pirates players back
from destroying this ump
>> because of couple bad pitches that they
had Cubs obviously.
>> Yeah, it's done, guys.
>> Next year is a robot.
>> Yeah. Yeah, it's true.
>> Well, we're going to see what's going to
happen. If you enjoyed this video, you
want to watch more videos like this,
click here. And if you want to watch the
entire podcast, click here.
Related Songs