By
Viewed
57,788
Please choose the correct answer for each question below:
Questions: 0/1350
Correct: 0
Translate:
AI is continuously developing super
super quickly and that means we need to
do the same. We're finding that as we go
deeper and deeper and deeper in the
entire legal software stack, we're also
seeing that the line between software
and service is blurring. I think that's
been one of our strengths as a company
to say we don't know exactly where the
future's going, but neither do you. So,
let's work together to make sure that
we're both winners in whatever happens.
[Music]
Today, I'm joined by Max Junior Strand.
He's the CEO and co-founder of Legora.
Legora was in winter 24 and they are the
leading AI workspace helping lawyers and
legal professionals do their work.
Welcome, Max.
>> Hey, thanks Gustav.
>> It's been 13 months since you did the
batch. It's been a really busy year for
you.
>> It has. Uh, it feels like it was a
really long time ago. I feel like I've
aged five years in the last one.
>> For those who don't know, tell us about
Legora. Yeah.
>> What are you guys building?
>> At Lagora, we're building the AI powered
workspace for lawyers. We're essentially
transforming the way that they complete
their work. Everything from reviewing,
drafting, researching. Essentially,
within legal, you've had this incredibly
fragmented software space where there
was a lot of point solutions and AI was
never good enough to actually work with
unstructured text, precedent, legal
documents. And when GPT 3.5 got out,
that just completely changed the game.
So we were quick to, you know, build a P
and then now we've scaled that all the
way to an enterpriseg grade system
serving tens of thousands of lawyers
daily.
>> Those point solutions were basically
workflow tools. So what were they
before? Because it's been a history of
of a legal technology industry that
existed before. This is not started
right now.
>> No, I mean legal tech has been a
category for a long time, but um it was
really unsexy for a long time, I think.
And you'd essentially have a broad range
of point solutions. Everything from
templating tools where you would sort of
codify a contract to special translation
tools or redline tools or research
tools. And all of them work with text
somehow. And generative AI came into the
game and just kind of threw up
everything off the off the table. And
then when it landed, you very clearly
saw how you could solve a lot for a lot
of these use cases with the same
underlying tech. So chatp came uh maybe
8 months prior to you guys starting this
company. Describe that moment. Was that
an important moment for the company's
founding?
>> We were playing around in AI and legal
way before Chat GPT and we were using
these early models from BERT coming from
Google. They were decent in English but
they were just horrendously bad in
Swedish and you know the first
observation that kind of sparked the
founding of the company was one of the
co-founders friend who was a lawyer
spent four months during a summer just
summarizing court cases for a big law
firm. We basically saw that GP 3.5 was
released to developers started building
I think the first thing that we built
was a stock option reader that would
explain how a stock option contract
worked
>> useful
>> right you know as startup founders with
no legal background that was seemed
reasonable and then very quickly the the
sort of focus changed to how do we build
this more wall-to-wall or or endto-end
system that every legal professional
wants to work with on a daily basis and
the first product was really quite
simple. Uh especially building for
Europe, you got to go through a lot of
hassle to kind of conform with all the
data processing requirements. So you
know all data hosted within Europe,
nothing for training, no retention,
exemption from human review when you
look at the way Ashure and AWS is
structured. And we we kind of jumped
through all those hoops and just built a
system that was compliant for law firms
to work with. And then very quickly as
the general sort of AI platforms
continued to develop with chat GBT with
cloud with Gemini the requirements for
what we had to build to be much much
better you know continuously increased
>> in some industries or some some
categories like coding or law for
example it seems like the models are
just magical like like they do things
that the people that were in those
industries before could not even imagine
be possible. Could you describe sort of
like the first time you um used Lora um
to do something that was magical for a
customer and and how they experienced
it?
>> Yes, I think the first time was when we
deployed Legora into the biggest law or
largest law firm in the Nordics, man. Um
they their managing partner had a famous
saying in the newspaper that AI was more
artificial than intelligent which was
back from the early models. Yeah. I mean
a lot of firms burnt themselves buying
expensive tools that didn't solve
anything. Mhm.
>> And I came into that meeting, you know,
I bring out my laptop and I just ask
him, you know, put in a query.
>> And he puts in this uh legal research
query and we've tied Legora to Swedish
legislation with a rag system. Yeah. And
it answers perfectly
>> and you know, you kind of see it on his
eyes like it's the aha moment and now
when we're
>> Is that your aha moment as well?
>> No, I think my personal aha moment was
just using chat GPT generally, right?
Like it was amazing. It felt complete
sci-fi that you could talk with the
computer and it talked back and you know
as an entrepreneur you you you kind of
quickly you know from that you
understand that all right we can apply
it in this space in this way and in that
space in this other way and I think for
legal specific the chat experience I
think was always cool but when we took
the the same models and and sort of
applied them differently um one of the
first use cases we did was due diligence
where you have hundreds or or you know a
lot of documents that you want to view
and instead of going through them one by
one by one, we just made this large grid
where essentially every document
represented a row
>> and then you could put your queries in
the columns,
>> right? And as you then put in, you know,
100 employment agreements and you ask uh
does does all of them include an IP
clause
>> where the company protects its
intellectual property and it just starts
to rattle and it goes yes yes yes no no
no yes yes yes and it always links backs
to the citation. and you realize like
holy this is transformational. It's
taking tasks which used to be you know
days or hours and it's turning them into
minutes.
>> By the time this is is live uh you will
have announced that you have raised uh
series B. How much did you raise?
>> We raised $80 million led by iconic and
general catalyst and you know grateful
for YC's continued participation as well
as benchmark and red points.
>> What is the software like? So, so as a
lawyer using Legora, what does my
day-to-day look like?
>> So, it's really broken up into two
pieces. The first one is the web
application and the second one is our
word addin. So, we integrate directly
into Microsoft Word. Right?
>> So, if we start with the web
application, the first thing that we had
was just a simple chat chat over your
own documents and files. This has
quickly developed into its own agent
that's able to use a lot of the other
endpoints in the app and also external
tools to solve more complex sort of
step-by-step workflows. Mhm.
>> So you could imagine saying um hey I
want to write a memo and the first step
of the memo is to go out and do some
research. The second step is to take all
that research and conform it into the
standard language of the firm and the
third step is to write the report and
then output is a report.
>> And does it do all that?
>> It does all of that. Wow.
>> Right. Um, and I think we can talk more
about it later, but MCP and the way that
you can scale the tool usage of these
agents is something that I'm super, you
know, keen on and and that we're leaning
very heavily into because a lot of firms
have different needs in terms of how
they want to adopt the tools to solve
for their specific workflows. And it's
different if you work in intellectual
property or if you work in restructuring
or if you work in corporate or if you
work in uh disputes. The second piece
outside of the chat is uh well the grid
that I talked about before. We call it
tabular review.
>> Y
>> um it's essentially input any number of
files and then input any number of
queries and we sort of cross run that
across each other. And the big
innovation there does not really come
from you know how do you prompt and and
work with the model but it's how do you
make this run at scale
>> right?
>> You know how do you run 100,000 queries
in parallel at the same time and make
sure nothing breaks all the citations
are correct. There's a lot of chunking
sort of rag searching within the
individual documents because sometimes
they're very very long. Y
>> and with legal docs there are certain
intricacies where you need to always
include things like the definitions y
>> and there might be cross references
within each clause to each other. So
taking all of that into consideration
that kind of serves the grid. Looking at
the word add in I think you could phrase
it as cursor for lawyers.
>> Lawyers basically use word that's that's
a like a known fact for a long time.
>> Yeah. I mean they draft and they review
contracts in word or PDF form and
>> what we really wanted to do is similar
to cursor how do we bring generative AI
into the you know existing work
environment of a legal professional and
that means integrating in word
>> now the difference is you can't fork
word and you can't take up all the real
estate you want you're basically
conformed to this sort of right hand
column
>> and then you got to get really creative
it's basically like designing a mobile
app almost because that's all the real
estate you get And the first thing that
we built there was just, you know, how
do we integrate an assistant or a chat
that's able to not only read the
document, but also create edits. So you
might say, I want you to um, you know,
renegotiate this MSA for the buyer. Y
>> and do that using this internal
checklist that I have or this internal
sort of playbook or precedent. And now
we've scaled that to not only work in a
chatby chat basis, but also more
extensive workflows. So you can say,
here's a contract. I want you to take my
playbook that consists of 20 different
steps and make sure we negotiate from
the starting positions and have, you
know, different fallbacks included.
>> Do you have a specific example of
something that was impossible a couple
years ago for a lawyer? Like literally,
you couldn't do it and now you can do
it.
>> Yeah, I mean I think well there's a lot
of it, right? The early ML models were
really bad at legal language and what
they were really bad at was when the
language looked different in across
documents, right? You could train a
system to find let's say a change of
control clause if it looked the same way
across all the documents. Yeah.
>> But it was really frankly bad at
>> finding the meaning of a change of
control if the class didn't look that
way.
>> Mhm.
>> And so what the LLMs have allowed us to
do is to just take tasks where
especially on like large contracting and
large document extraction. So how do we
pull the insights from this? Another one
is just you know redlinining. So
redlinining files within word against a
president or playbook completely
impossible. Or take deep research across
you know hundreds or thousands of
judgments where you need to conform not
only the judgments but also pull in
things like legislation and regulation
all into the same place that since the
cost of intelligence is going down it
also increases the amount of queries we
can do. Right? So, one pretty cool thing
is, you know, embedding making one
search against your own documents and
files. Yeah. Making another one on the
web and making another one against um
court cases and judgments and and
legislation and then combining all of it
to create effectively like a memo that
>> maybe they they couldn't afford to do in
the past. They just like just didn't do
it.
>> No. And similarly with with due
diligence when if you go way back, it
used to be a physical data room. That's
why it's called a room,
>> right? You used to go into the room, you
had all the documents and all the
contracts and then you'd sit down and
read through all of them. Yeah.
>> And you had to mark them with a pen. So
making and doing a due diligence on a
company was really expensive. And now
it's becoming almost a commodity where
you're expected to do it, but
>> clients are also not really that excited
to pay for very simple contract review
when they know that AI can do, you know,
99% of it.
>> Wow. Yeah.
>> So, in the time that I've been at, we
have funded some legal software
companies, but the hardest challenge for
all of them was selling to law firms
>> and selling to legal like most of them
would end up selling to companies cuz
law firms were just like not possible to
sell to. That radically changed um just
like two years ago.
>> Yeah.
>> Can you tell us sort of like what do you
think changed and how do you do it when
you go and sell to uh one of the major
law firms in the world? So for everybody
listening, this was also one of the
questions that I remember you pushing
really hard on during the interview.
>> And I think we were quite contrarian to
say, you know, no, it's different this
time. Trust us.
>> Y
>> I'm glad we were right.
>> I think the way that we approached the
problem was always with this idea of we
win if you win. So let's align our
incentives with saying as a law firm,
this technology is revolutionizing.
you're you're going to need to adopt it
in some sense, shape or form and we want
to be that long-term partner
>> and somehow they know that.
>> Well, so what what happens is um a lot
of legal work is low differentiation.
You know, if you're doing a DD from, you
know, law firm X or law firm Y kind of
getting the same deal
>> and so when you have this perfect
equilibrium of services and somebody
disrupts that by taking a new approach,
>> clients are quick to switch.
>> Yeah. I mean clients are under price
pressure. They want to be effective.
Legal fees are very high. And so if this
equilibrium breaks, you are almost
forced to adopt it. And you you are
incentivized.
>> It's kind of the same as when lawyers
adopted computers,
>> right? If you're billing by the hour,
you could say, well, let's have a person
walk to the library, you know, find the
right book, you know, find the right
cases or the right president and use
that for whatever work we do.
>> Or you press C++ F,
>> right? There's always this dilemma of
you want to serve your client in the
best way possible because that drives
you more revenue over time. Yeah. And
for a lot of a lot of the firms that we
work with their you know brand
reputation trust as always putting the
client first is what matters the most.
And so a lot of the firms also want to
be uh leaders here.
>> Yeah. You know, some of them want to be
fast second movers, but many want to be
first movers because they're
understanding if you have this perfect
equilibrium and you take a simple type
of work that gets disrupted, you should
get more market share by moving down
quicker.
>> Mhm.
>> But then it's not a race to the bottom,
right?
>> It's a question of okay, if we take
>> every country has a ranking of law firms
basically,
>> right? And and it's also not a race to
the bottom in terms of pricing because
if you pull down let's say the cost of a
due diligence, you free up more time to
spend with a board on advising them on,
you know, a really complex merger or a
really complex acquisition. And so what
typically ends up happening is you're
under time pressure. You could do more
work, but you just have all this stuff
that needs to get done. And that's what
AI is really good at. But it's also
serving lawyers in very creative ways. I
mean, we've had use cases where, you
know, we get a call from somebody and
they say, "I played a role role playing
game with Lora, you know, trying to win
this argument and I'm asking it to act
as the other party, right?" Wow.
>> There was this amazing uh situation that
one of the Spanish um partners at firm
called Perorka had where he went into
court. M
>> he had put all the evidence and all the
documents from the opposing party in
Lora and he was actively querying it
during the hearing and during you know
at the time when the other attorney was
speaking because then he could
immediately interrupt if he found
something that was uh that was wrong.
>> Wow.
>> And he phrased it very nicely. He said
when when he goes into the battlefield
having Legora is like having another
piece of armor. And I thought that was
that was very poetically.
>> Could you use Legora to do negotiation
on your behalf? Yeah. So the way that we
built that is I think the LLMs by
themselves are not good enough for that
yet and we can talk about that but it's
it's interesting to to build these
products knowing that the models will
get better. Yeah.
>> And where do you stop?
>> Yeah.
>> Right. On every feature but so so that
feature in the Gore is called playbooks.
>> A playbook is essentially a collection
of rules where you either approve or
disapprove something. So you might say
for the way that you would sign NDAs
here at YC, you always want the
definition within a confidentiality
agreement to look a certain way. So you
provide the rule, you provide some
example language and then you say, "All
right, if the opposing party will not
accept this definition, we have some
fallbacks." So fallback one and fall
back two. And you just open a document
in Agora, you open the playbook, and you
press play. And it goes through every
rule and runs it against the contract
and it marks it up.
>> Yeah. So if it does not conform with
your playbook, it gives you the
suggested language so that it will and
the really cool thing about this is it
scales outside of just legal
departments. So um at Lora every sales
rep is using Lora to negotiate NDAs
before sending it to our legal team. And
we just started working with this very
large bank in the Nordics and it's very
quickly moved from, you know, the legal
team to compliance to risk
>> and now to sales.
>> Wow.
>> Because everybody can leverage the
system. And the cool thing about it is
it's not only faster and more accurate,
but you agree on a standard
>> because the legal team then creates the
playbook and that becomes the standard
that everybody uses. So it actually
increases quality and consistency over
time.
>> YC's next batch is now taking
applications. Got a startup in you?
Apply at y combinator.com/apply.
It's never too early and filling out the
app will level up your idea. Okay, back
to the video. None of you guys when you
started were lawyers.
>> Oh,
>> so you still are building one of the
largest or fastest growing legal AI
company in the world. How do you do
that?
>> I think at this point I've become a
hobby lawyer. Uh but how we approached
it was being incredibly humble. Humble
for the fact that we did not know the
industry. We were quick to create
relationships with our early partners
where feedback was, you know, happening
daily. Yeah.
>> And I think that's been one of our
strengths as a company to say, we don't
know exactly where the future's going,
but neither do you. So, let's work
together to make sure that we're both
winners in, you know, whatever happens.
And I think now we of course have the
privilege of having hired a ton of
lawyers into the team that work directly
with the product teams and directly with
the customers. Especially in an industry
that is now going through such big
change. It was useful to come in with
more naivveness if you will saying
why does it work this way? You know it
could work this way instead.
>> Let's say you're a founder watching this
right now. You're like I want to build
AI software for logistics or for
insurance or finance. Is your advice
basically you don't need any expertise?
How do you how do you how would you
>> how do you learn about the things you
need to learn though?
>> I think my advice is, you know, learn
about them, right? Like we we went into
this and the first thing I did was I
interviewed 100 lawyers. I had this good
hack on LinkedIn. I I texted them asking
if we could have lunch and I would pay
their hourly rate and I I could def you
know definitely not afford it and none
of them would, you know, impose that.
They would just say, "Oh, that's
amazing. Like I'll have the lunch with
you anyways." One of the attributes that
have been very helpful in in my career
has been that I'm I'm I'm somebody
people want to help.
>> Um I think that's a very underrated
>> skill. I think there there are things
you can do to be more like that. Um you
can be a bit uh fearless in in your
approach to people and you can also be
very veryful and grateful and
appreciative of the work that other
people help you with. If we hadn't done
that, we would not be where we are
today.
>> And then how do you conduct a lunch with
a lawyer when you're starting a startup?
You know not much about law.
>> So you'd sit down like this. Uh you'd go
to somewhere decently nice because again
they make a lot of money. And it took me
some time to even understand that the
way that departments work are
fundamentally different. Like a
transactional lawyer works nothing the
way a lawyer within the corporate
department works. You just ask them a
ton of questions. And I think also
giving them something back. So, you
know, I'd reach out, they see my, you
know, tech background and you try to be,
you know, give them nuggets of, oh,
that's really cool. Have what do you
think about this like you give them
ideas, you make them engaged in wanting
to give you advice and Yeah.
>> And people generally feel good giving
giving founders advice of course like
it's like something that
>> you should take advantage of.
>> Yeah. and something that I'm you know
really happy to do now from the position
where we're at.
>> There are some large companies in in
legal technology. Um are you going up
against all of them or what how do you
think about the existing market of legal
tech?
>> Right. So there's been a lot of sort of
large M&A machines and incumbents in
this space for a long time. They're not
very popular with the end users.
>> Um I think they have very kind of
far faring roots. um there's some
advantages and you know data modes and
so on that that come into play but
effectively what AI has done is really
changed the game in terms of how quickly
you can ship something and it's created
a new category so a lot of again these
existing point solutions were in maybe
suites of of these M&A machines and now
a lot of it is becoming irrelevant very
quickly and the cost of building
software is also going down very very
rapidly So our ability to out ship or
you know uh outd deliver these teams of
you know thousands of engineers with
just 30
>> is insane
>> and so
>> we have instead
managed to build a company with I think
at the at the time of recording it's
about 100 where like our velocity is way
higher than companies you know 100 times
our size. I think that's interesting in
and of itself in terms of how we built
the company over the last year because
when we came out of YC we were roughly
10 people and now we're 100 and that
means we've onboarded on average like
two people a week and hiring correctly
it's really hard like it's a skill you
need to learn
>> and hiring for velocity hiring for you
know entrepreneurship and ownership of
different products and things but also
scale because the company is growing
exponentially so you need your your
teammates to scale exponentially as
well. If people scale linearly, at some
point it's a really large delta and then
you know things aren't working out
anymore.
>> Do these big companies have lock in like
the big legal tech companies?
>> So these big companies have a couple of
advantages but I think the the
disadvantages outweigh uh the advantages
almost 10 to1. There were very large
data advantages and you know being like
an incumbent where you lock in a large
contract.
>> Yeah. But I think the buyers have also
changed aptitude here. So we're not
seeing anybody want to lock in a
five-year contract,
>> right?
>> Because the world is moving so fast.
>> Um so we instead see them, you know,
doing one-year contract.
>> It sounds like a good motivation for
companies moving faster.
>> It is. Yes. And and but even law firms,
right? I mean, they don't want to be
locked in with a vendor. So they're
doing one or two year contracts. And you
know, as we see them now coming up in a
lot of places, they're also looking
outside of their existing alternatives.
So you might have made a bet back in
2023 or 2024 when it was experimentation
days, but now you're looking at what are
we going to deploy, you know, more long
term and there what I'm seeing is yes,
people look at the technology, but even
more so they're they're zooming out and
they're looking at your rate of change.
>> They want to work with the partner
that's going to get them from point A to
point B. And they can be different
things. It might be we want to be AI
first and drive our top line or we want
to drive profitability and you know
streamline our operations. It can be you
know very different motivations.
>> Right.
>> How does your tech stack look like
what's under the hood
>> internally? Yeah.
>> Yeah. So building our infrastructure I
think from the beginning it was pretty
clear that we wanted to be on Azure just
because it was the same that our
customers were were on and in the
beginning I think OpenAI and and GPT was
really the only model that you could
serve via Azure. Now we have much more
um you know options available to us. So
we we use AWS and claude and Gemini and
GPT and Mistrol kind of interchangeably.
The biggest thing there has been how do
we build everything in such a way where
we can hot swap the models whenever we
want and also build it in such a way
that the models become better everything
improves. And now we've also looked into
classification models where you know if
you do a simple query will serve you a
simple model. If you do a complex query
we'll serve you a complex model and
that's just because that's just you know
to keep the margins down but also you
know sometimes you don't need a bazooka
when you just need a you know water gun.
>> So who is the buyer? Uh my understanding
is that law firms have but maybe you
could explain to me like there's a bunch
of partners and there's other people
there too right. How is a law firm or a
legal team at a company generally
constructed and who are there and who
buys it and who uses software?
>> It changes a bit depending on size.
>> Uh so if you start with the with the
biggest firms of course you have the
partner group that kind of runs things
but you very often have an innovation
department which sometimes have more or
less influence. Um if it's a very strong
innovation department, they make their
own choices. They procure software and
they're responsible for the entire
innovation agenda. I've frankly got the
most energy out of working with the
innovation folks who are really smart
about these things. Uh because there's a
lot of people that just want to kind of
check the AI box and then others who
really want to push things forward. And
the interesting dilemma there is, you
know, they're basically driving
efficiency across the across the stack
or across the firm, but they're not the
users themselves, right? However, you
might often have innovation
practitioners that work in the M&A group
or the disputes group or arbitration and
then they will work with those teams to
drive an upskill. So they will have a
very kind like process-minded way of
working and then they might use Lora to
build use cases for the end users
because when you work in a big law firm
you need to hit your building targets.
Yeah,
>> they work a lot. Like we grind as
startup folks, but
>> lawyers
>> lawyers grind as well. And if you know
that there's a way to solve something
and it's going to take 6 hours for you
to do that
>> and you know a way how to do it in 6
hours, you might not take the chance of
exploring a way how you could
potentially solve it quicker or you know
with a with a with a higher quality.
You'll just conform to the way you're
used to working.
>> Yeah. So innovation teams have a huge um
opportunity and frankly you know mission
to drive that across the firm and if you
go down a bit so you have sort of
mid-size firms more often than not you
might not have an innovation department
and so it's the partners who are making
the move or or the decision and
>> what I found is
>> it's hard to get the entire partnership
to buy in. go deeper on this point
because I know a lot of founders is
asking me how do I sell to like a
financial firm or law firm or something
like that and it seems like this is the
the tricky part is like you have to
convince everybody.
>> You have to convince everybody or you
start smaller.
>> Okay.
>> You say let's work with this partner and
their team and make them rock stars.
>> Mhm.
>> And then everybody else looks at them
saying what's that guy doing?
>> Right.
>> That looks awesome. We also want in. And
then you expand. But the key here is to
sell sell sort of like not top down but
sell to the senior people first.
>> Right? So there's it's impossible to do
a bottom up motion in our industry
because you don't uh procure software
individually. You take it through
procurement and you take it through it.
>> Yeah.
>> And there's a lot of security checks.
There's a lot of uh data privacy checks
that you need to go through in order to
actually you know serve client data in
your systems.
>> You were 23 when you co-ounded Lora.
Yeah. Um,
>> by then you've already done a lot. You
had some stints at other YC companies
like multiple different ones.
>> Yeah.
>> What was your background before you
started this company?
>> When I was 18 and it was time to apply
to college, um, I actually had two
options. I was either going to go down
the route of becoming a professional
Dota Dota 2 player or go to college.
>> I knew this
>> and my thinking at the time was okay,
what's the best case scenario in each of
the outcomes? So best case scenario in
Dota would be to win the international
the biggest tournament in the world you
make $10 million that would be amazing.
Uh but then I was thinking what happens
then
>> you know it kind of feels like then life
stops.
>> Yeah.
>> And the best case scenario with going to
college was basically this what I'm
doing now. So I decided to go to
college. Um and when you apply to
college in Sweden um you go to one
school to do one program. So, the
engineering university is completely
separate from the business university,
which I think is really weird. Like, we
don't mix at all, which is bad. But
there was a hack so that you could you
could make an an admission to one of the
schools and then kind of pull the
admission to make another one
>> or pull your application to make another
one and then call them and say that you
messed it up and you wanted to get, you
know, reapplied. So, I I ended up uh
making it so that I could go to both
universities in parallel. It was a
really good timing during COVID to do
that because that means when you have
two lectures at the same time, you can
just have two laptops.
>> Record one. Yeah.
>> Yeah. And there were multiple times
where I had like exams at the same time
with both universities and you would you
kind of sit with one camera over here
and one camera over here pretending that
you were just doing one of the exams.
And so like one or two years into it, I
was working as a programmer. I was
building statistical models for esports
betting and that was really fun. But I
think I I also wanted to kind of see
what the business side looked like. So I
had the the the privilege of working at
a company called Norhen. It's like Y but
for impact and it's based in Stockholm.
And I think I got um a lot of exposure
to other entrepreneurs. And
>> what struck me then was one a few of
them were not super ambitious to build
companies that we're doing now, but they
sort of had this like fiveyear plan to
conquer Nordics. Yeah. So I think
immediately like I had a different take
on it and then did a short stint at
McKenzie um and worked at BAMLO and just
one week at Depict.
>> Depict was one of those companies uh is
is one of those companies that was an
incredible talent magnet. Yeah.
>> Like some incredible people have come
out of depict like an Lovable was one of
the founders. Um but there's a bunch of
others. You're starting the Gora even
though you spend a week there. But is it
it's like kind of cool how you have
these magnets that that that spun off to
a bunch of other cool companies. No,
they're amazing and u you know we're all
good friends in Stockholm. It's a small
ecosystem and it's really fun to kind of
cheer on each other as well.
>> And YC ended in uh April uh last year.
Can you walk us through sort of like the
company growth and your personal
development in this time like you were
10, now you're 100. Um what happened?
>> We grew really fast and we were also
feeling the
>> the the drag.
>> Yeah.
>> You know like we we took the product to
market and you know we would sell it in
a demo. Mhm.
>> And when law firms start to buy things
after one demo,
>> you're doing something right. And so the
rationale was like, we should be doing
more of this and we want to do it
everywhere all at once. And this is also
a space where it's kind of obvious that
legal and LLM is a good fit. And so
there were a lot of other companies in
the industry. I like to say like there
there were so many legal AI assistants
and now it just feels like many of them
have kind of fallen off and they're
emerging a couple of winners. With that
rationale, we wanted also to get
American capital uh on the in the
company because we wanted to be able to
make the move from Stockholm to the US
when the time was right. After we raised
the money during our first board
meeting, we sat down and I remembered
the look on on some of our board members
faces when I basically said, "We're not
going to sell for the next four to five
months." And the reason for that was
when we got the chance to onboard a
client, it took a lot of work. took a
lot of work to get them to a level of
understanding of what they could
accomplish in the platform. And also the
first experience of a of a legal
professional logging in is the one
chance you have. If you mess that up,
they're not coming back.
>> And we had a couple of of of situations
where we'd onboarded a lot of people and
we had done, you know, some misses and
we didn't want to ruin that. So we
worked really hard on reliability,
scalability, got the system to a place
where we could comfortably onboard a
thousand lawyers a day. And once we had
that, we kind of let it rip. And that's
also when we really started to hire. So
we were maybe 25 in the beginning of
October. And just 6 months later, we're
now 100.
>> So what we did was we said, "Okay, we're
now going to scale across every market
in Europe and we're going to start
scaling towards the US." and our initial
conversations in the US some time
because we were a small Swedish startup.
Um so I made you know multiple trips
back and forth to New York and now we
open up hubs both in New York, London,
Stockholm and also have people locally
in Spain, France and Germany.
>> So we've really gone at it and just said
hey we want to do everything everywhere
all at once and let's do it now.
>> And for you personally and Sig like what
was your experience in that? I think the
biggest takeaway and learning is going
from being an IC into delegating. Yeah.
>> And that move, you know, you know how to
do something, but you that's not going
to scale. So, you need to teach somebody
else to do it. And you need to hire
people who are way better than you
>> on a lot of different topics.
>> So, one of the early sort of hires that
we made were actually another YC founder
and we've ended up Jake. Yeah. And we
actually we've scaled the team with a
lot of entrepreneurs. And that's not
only like the skills we're looking for,
but it's also like the way that we built
the company because we're effectively
running multiple companies within the
company.
>> It's sort of like a secret playbook that
a lot of YC companies, some of the best
ones, are all following is that the
first people you want to hire all former
founders. And it's kind of actually an
advice I got from Paul Graham back in
the days is that um sometimes you think
you're a founder that I work in this
company for 3 years didn't go well. Am I
less attractive in the job market? Like
if you're here or if you're in a startup
center, you're actually more attractive
in the job market because people
actually want to work with people like
you.
>> Yeah. And we want to hire them. So um
it's been amazing. And also the agency
and the the attitude to problem solving.
That's kind of what you're looking for.
And then sometimes you need to hire for
scale, right? Like now we have a
significant sales team and you need
somebody who's seen the 100, you know,
10 million to 500 million because that's
the journey that we're on.
>> And my learning from M&B, which probably
I'm sure applies to you, is the culture
in the beginning is the people that you
hire,
>> of course. And when we've now scaled the
hubs, um, we always send a person from
Stockholm with them. It's the best
people from the Stockholm office that
then travels and set up the new hubs.
>> You seem like the kind of person who
embodied the attributes, you can just do
things. So can you tell me how that is
reflected in your company?
>> You can't just do things. And when we
started building this company, we didn't
know anything about law,
>> right?
>> Um I think that was pretty apparent in
our first interview and we you know made
the right moves from then from then to
the second one where we showed that we
could do it.
>> You apply for two different batches.
>> Yeah. The first one didn't go as well.
And so about this attribute, it's
something I look for in others as well.
Um during a lot of the interviews I do I
ask I often ask the question you know
what have you done outside of your role
for the company and here I'm looking for
creativity ability to spot problems and
solve them
>> and to take responsibility for more
things than just the stuff that you're
doing. Right. Right. And I think in
terms of starting companies and you know
building the future because frankly we
need to reimagine a lot of like the
stuff that we're doing we don't want
people who are bogged down by your boss
telling you to do something right we
have a very sort of flat organization
where let's say our marketing team we
want generalists who are using AI to do
10x more work than they could have done
in the past And where you might have
needed a 30 person marketing team, you
now need five.
>> And you want those five people then to
be complete, you know, yes. And to go
out, you know, above and beyond. And
that that characteristic, I think, is
increasingly important as well in an in
an age where if you're really ambitious,
you can get a lot of leverage out of
tools.
>> Absolutely. So, if we fast forward like
five or 10 years, uh how does the
day-to-day job of a lawyer look like?
That's interesting. We think about that
a lot, right? Um I I'm kind of viewing
it as you're more and more entering a
work space of reviewing work than
actually doing it
>> and you are managing the expectations
from your clients and the expectations
and the work from your AI agents, right?
You're you're effectively instructing
them. you're watching them go out and do
work and you're making sure that
everything they're doing is not only
correct and sort of at your standard but
you're also managing how that work gets
delivered to the client because I think
you know you you will always want
somebody who knows their stuff.
>> Yes.
>> On this and there's a big reason for why
we're working with lawyers and not with
the people who might you know use the
legal services because a lawyer is
needed and and necessary to deliver the
end product. But looking 5 10 years
ahead in in these days is also
>> it's hard.
>> It's hard, right? Um if I knew where the
AI models would be 10 years from now.
>> Yeah. We're looking weeks ahead now
right now.
>> Yeah. It's and and that's funny just
with our product road map. Um I tried to
do them kind of like many quarters
ahead.
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah. It's hard.
>> It's really hard.
>> Do you think uh that the large AI labs
are going to try to attempt at doing
law? Maybe not law specifically, but I I
do feel like they're more and more
becoming platform companies rather than
model providers. I mean, Google is
building Google Workspace with Gemini.
Anthropic is running very hard on the
MCP idea of building kind of a universal
entry point into a lot of applications.
>> I think the the expectations on
companies like us are pretty clear. you
know, whatever comes out of a model lab
is kind of expected and then
>> everything else we're adding on top is
kind of like icing on the cake.
>> How does it feel to product market fit?
>> I think the feeling is best summarized
by almost like this drag feeling or kind
of infinite
>> you're being pulled into the market,
>> right? um it like it literally feels
like we have infinite demand and I think
that's it's coming from a point of the
product is working and it's moved from
being in this experimental AI bucket
into we are relying on this for core
work that we are delivering right now if
something breaks you know immediately we
get a phone call saying hey we can't do
this like what's going on right and we
fix it it's basically been this point of
you start out. You hope that what you're
doing is the right thing and you try to
get early partners excited about what
you're doing. And in the beginning, to
be, you know, really frank, a lot of
people got on with us because they
wanted to be on the journey and they
took a bet.
>> Yeah.
>> And I am so thankful and happy that they
did that because now we've taken them
from from point A to point B and we're
continuously scaling from here.
>> So we tell companies to move to San
Francisco
>> generally.
>> Uh you decided to not take that advice.
Can you just like tell us a bit about
the thinking here and and maybe like if
you have some pros and cons?
>> Yeah.
>> About not being here?
>> Yeah. The reason why we stayed in
Stockholm was um we needed a market to
grow in. And if you go to the US, it's
not only more competitive, but I think
it kind of pushes you into becoming a
more narrow company. You start building
really horizontal and then you realize,
wait a minute, we're really good at
this. So you start to scale it in other
markets and you quickly notice ah we're
the best in Finland too and we're the
best in Denmark and we're the best in
Norway and then you scale to Spain,
France and Germany, London and then the
states and at that point we had always
you know we had already done
>> 15 new market entries. The algorithm or
the the method was already kind of
established. Of course, the US is a
bigger undertaking, but we had also then
grown from this small fish in a small
pond to crocodile or a shark in in the
bigger pond now.
>> So, you you've raised $80 million like
in midmay. You open an office in New
York. Uh you launched with one of the
most famous law firms here in the US.
>> Um it seems like you're trying to
position yourself as the category leader
of AI law in the world.
>> Yeah, I mean 100% and I think in many
aspects we're already there. It's for me
more of a question around ambition and
what's next. It's very easy to say, hey,
we see this problem. Let's go solve it.
And then you get satisfied.
>> But it feels to me like every time we
solve a problem, a new one emerges. And
we're finding that as we go deeper and
deeper and deeper in the entire legal
software stack, we're also seeing that
the line between software and service is
blurring. AI is continuously developing
super super quickly and that means we
need to do the same. And so in my mind,
the category leader in the space does
not only build software, they serve as
the strategic partner to these large
firms and they make them win in this
transition because it's a very large
transition. And that's also why we've
basically scaled headcount as as quickly
as we've could whilst maintaining kind
of culture, urgency, and velocity. So, a
lot of founders that I I meet are asking
me questions about how you build a
vertical AI company that seems like the
kind of companies people are building
now. Do you have any general advice you
want to give to those founders who are
just starting out?
>> The first kind of obvious tip is don't
get locked in with a provider and don't
compete with the AI labs.
>> The AI labs ship, right? And so does
companies like Perplexity and and
others. And so, I think you want to be
really clear and honest to yourself
where you're adding value and where
you're adding long-term moat. And this
is something that we've thought a lot
about at Leguire, like how do we build
things as boats so that when the tide
rises, just everything gets better.
>> If you're just starting out, you got to
realize that you do not have the
capacity to outperform any of those
companies.
>> You kind have to find a nar a narrow
category to do it where you know the
models won't get to or
>> either that or finding out a way to
leverage the models very creatively. I
mean in in a way that others haven't
done it. I think take AI scribing is a
good one. Like typical AI scribing is
hard to do
>> and you need to embed a lot of like
custom prompts and ways to get it right
so that it uses the right medical
language
>> which is very similar to law. Like you
needed to write clauses in a way that a
lawyer would write a clause,
>> not just what the model spits out as the
most probable answer.
>> If I'm watching this video and I'm like
I'm thinking about applying for a job at
Agora.
>> Yeah.
>> Uh tell me about what I should expect
either from the application process or
from working there. The things that we
look for are ambition and the
willingness to say we got this huge
problem. There's this huge mountain. How
do we climb it and we're also very
upfront with candidates that this is not
a 9 to5 and we're not the traditional
Swedish working environment? We have the
good stuff. We have the Fica, but uh we
we have a lot more hunger and you know,
frankly, a lot higher expectations and
we we want that not only for ourselves
but for each other because we want to
grow as people and we want to grow as
entrepreneurs and as a company as
leaders and I think there just looking
at like our our application process the
biggest thing we do is a lot of cases
right if you want to come in and work in
our go to market team, you need to come
and pitch us our product.
>> Yeah.
>> And you need to do a really strong
pitch. And you know, if you take the
engineering team, we basically ask you
to build a P of Legora
>> and you know, we want you to work with
AI generated code, but we also want you
to be able to explain it. Yeah. Right.
And to design systems that scale. And I
think
>> Stockholm is a small ecosystem. And so
it's also quite easy to make references
and see who's actually good and who's
who's been in a company and made them a
success. You know, not only was there
the right time exactly and another
really big piece is we're hiring all
over Europe. So um we've had people move
from Madrid, from Amsterdam, from
Germany, from Paris all the way to
Stockholm. uh we tend to not onboard
them in November when it gets nasty, but
I feel like we've started to build this
sort of AI hub together with many other
companies that is not only like super
fun, but also, you know, great companies
come out of it.
>> Thank you so much for coming back to IC.
>> Thanks, Gustau.
[Music]
Related Songs