[English]
[Music]
I'm well aware of the irony of me giving
a talk on hedging today because despite
spending nearly all day every day
researching and reading about gendered
and intentional language, I still
consistently use phrases like I think,
maybe, and sort of in nearly every
conversation I have. And I've always
thought that was just me, my
personality, my communication style,
until one winter day in 2019 when I met
up with two colleagues, Lynn and Emily,
for a brew to talk about software design
decisions.
Because for the first few months of my
PhD, I've been reading about design and
gender and really struggling to fill in
the gaps. But they mentioned this thing
called hedging. And suddenly everything
clicked.
For so long, I'd been reading books,
interviewing authors, writing music, and
playing with words to try and make sense
of them. But this one conversation led
me to realize that perhaps all of my
frustrations and interests were actually
linked.
And picking apart how language is used
and how conversations take place became
my way of making sense of the world I
felt so alien in.
So what actually is hedging?
Hedging is short for hedging your bets
in language, and it includes using
phrases like I think, maybe, and sort
of. And it was first introduced by
linguists in the 70s. What's wild to me
is not many of us have heard of it
since.
But despite this, hedging is something
most of us know that we do. We add
adjust in our emails. We downplay our
expertise. And in my case, we send a
thousand exclamation points with every
message we ever send.
So hedging is something most of us know
that we do. But understanding why we do
it and its impact is key to making it
work for us. Because more modern
research suggests that hedging is
actually a political tool and one that
allows us to enact agency.
But as researchers, it's really hard for
us to figure out why people are using
hedging without interrupting them as
soon as they speak, saying, "Why did you
say that? What did you mean by that?
What were you hoping would happen
there?"
And here's where it gets really
interesting. There's a gender dimension
to all of this, too. Research tells us
that women use hedging far more
frequently than men. And the same was
actually found to be true in TED talks
themselves.
But this disproportionate hedging
directly correlates with how women are
perceived in leadership roles.
This linguistic self-sabotage stems from
really valid concerns.
Women who speak more directly are more
likely to face negative performance
feedback compared to men using identical
language.
And this creates what we call the double
bind.
Assertiveness without mitigation risks
social penalties. And yet excessive
softening undermines our authority and
credibility.
I saw a tweet once which genuinely made
me laugh out loud. Which did get me some
funny looks on the bus and it said, "My
goal is to start being more assertive if
it's okay with you guys." And it just
perfectly captures the double bind.
But hedging isn't actually always a bad
thing. In fact, it can be a really
powerful tool when it's used
intentionally.
One of my favorite examples of this is
something I've coined the button example
because I work in software development.
So imagine you're in a design meeting.
Instead of saying I think the button
should go on the left, try saying as you
know the button should go on the left.
With those two words, you know, you're
hedging your bets, but not in the way
you're used to. You're hedging your bets
that they do in fact know that or that
social order dictates they won't correct
you. It's an entirely different approach
to I think the button should go on the
left.
You know, I have experience in this
area. You know, last time we went out at
11 p.m. we missed the brunch booking.
You know how meal times are a capitalist
scam? Those three projects, you know, I
finished them. Do you see how powerful
that is? You know,
but my favorite technique to unpick the
impact of hedging is a singular word,
why. I call this the power of why. And
I've been using it my whole life without
realizing, ironically, why.
As an autistic person, I have used why
to unpick uncertainty at nearly every
possible juncture of conversation I've
ever had.
But let's take it back to the button
example and see what it looks like in
practice. You're back in your design
meeting and person A says, "I think the
button should go on the left." And
person B disagrees and they say, "The
button should go on the right." Now,
historically, we may have been more
likely to listen to person B because
they said their answer with more
confidence. But not anymore, because
we're going to use that simple but
effective question, why?
Now both parties are given the
opportunity to explain their reasons
which might range from anything from
well I read the user research report
which accounts for 98% of users looking
for the button on the left all the way
through to I don't know
but what this does is it allows us to
figure out people's reasons when they
speak. It allows us to figure out who is
downplaying their expertise and who is
framing their opinion as a fact.
I have a core memory of being in year
six when my need to understand why led
to a notable falling out with my teacher
about whether or not one is considered a
prime number. And that's still a hill
I'm willing to die on if anyone wants to
correct me.
But my persistent questioning why wasn't
me trying to being wasn't me trying to
be difficult or awkward. I was genuinely
trying to reconcile this mathematical
concept with my understanding. I
couldn't accept just a statement of
fact. I needed to know the reasons why.
My questioning was so intense that a
couple of months ago when I bumped into
my year six teacher um he confessed to
me that later that day he had to go and
find out why so that he could tell me
that. Um the neurotypical world often
perceives my direct questioning as
rudeness. But now I know how my brain
works. I do two things and I suggest
everyone does these two.
The first thing is when I start working
with a new team, I let them know how I
need information and tasks. And I I got
this tip from previous TEDex speaker
Ellie Middleton. And she lets people
know that she needs information on a
what, by, when, and why basis. And the
why is really key for me because it
helps me stay motivated.
The sec second point is giving my why,
my reasons stops me from being
misunderstood in so many different areas
of my life.
So you might be sat there thinking,
well, should I just eliminate all
hedging from my language? And my answer
to that is no. As I mentioned before,
the blanket removal of hedging doesn't
necessarily improve outcomes for us. It
just means we're more likely to be
labeled as difficult or awkward.
And while we try and dismantle the
structures which give us those labels,
how do we navigate that as individuals?
This creates what some researchers,
myself included,
call the damned if I do, damned if I
don't predicament. It's the double bind
I mentioned earlier.
So, what's needed instead is intentional
language based on context. the ability
to deploy or withhold hedging based on
the context, our audience, and our
goals.
It's about being more intentional in the
way that we all speak. It's about
turning hedging from an unconscious
habit into a conscious choice.
And it's about reframing hedging not
from a weak, not as a weakness to be
overcome, but as a skill to be refined.
And that allows us to maintain our
authentic voices whilst navigating
spaces with spaces which were not
designed with everybody in mind.
So, with that, I'd like to leave you
with three things. First, when you're
tired of making decisions, instead of
hedging, try clearly articulating your
preference, which in this case would be,
"My preference is to not make a decision
today." I use it all the time, probably
so much so my husband's sick of hearing
it.
Second,
when you find yourself overusing, I
think, try strategically claiming the
knowledge that you have. Save the I
think for when it's going to serve your
purpose. I know or as you know the
research shows.
And three, when somebody boldly declares
something you disagree with. For
example, we don't have a racism problem.
A real example a client shared with me
recently. Ask them why. I'd be
interested to know why you've said that
when all the research says opposite.
Hedging is a tool that simultaneously
reflects humility and uncertainty whilst
also allowing for influence and persuas
persuasion.
Learning how to hedge intentionally is a
journey. It's a little bit like when you
decide the model of car you want to buy
and then you see it everywhere on the
roads. Is that just me? That was
hedging.
Once you know what hedging is, you will
see it everywhere. But learning how to
hedge intentionally is a journey worth
going on because once you master the
because when you master the art of
intentional hedging, you don't just
change how others perceive you, you
change how you perceive yourself.
Thank you