Display Bilingual:

[Music] 00:00
I'm well aware of the irony of me giving 00:05
a talk on hedging today because despite 00:07
spending nearly all day every day 00:09
researching and reading about gendered 00:11
and intentional language, I still 00:13
consistently use phrases like I think, 00:15
maybe, and sort of in nearly every 00:17
conversation I have. And I've always 00:19
thought that was just me, my 00:21
personality, my communication style, 00:22
until one winter day in 2019 when I met 00:25
up with two colleagues, Lynn and Emily, 00:28
for a brew to talk about software design 00:30
decisions. 00:32
Because for the first few months of my 00:34
PhD, I've been reading about design and 00:35
gender and really struggling to fill in 00:37
the gaps. But they mentioned this thing 00:39
called hedging. And suddenly everything 00:41
clicked. 00:43
For so long, I'd been reading books, 00:45
interviewing authors, writing music, and 00:47
playing with words to try and make sense 00:49
of them. But this one conversation led 00:51
me to realize that perhaps all of my 00:53
frustrations and interests were actually 00:55
linked. 00:56
And picking apart how language is used 00:58
and how conversations take place became 00:59
my way of making sense of the world I 01:02
felt so alien in. 01:03
So what actually is hedging? 01:05
Hedging is short for hedging your bets 01:08
in language, and it includes using 01:09
phrases like I think, maybe, and sort 01:11
of. And it was first introduced by 01:13
linguists in the 70s. What's wild to me 01:15
is not many of us have heard of it 01:17
since. 01:18
But despite this, hedging is something 01:20
most of us know that we do. We add 01:22
adjust in our emails. We downplay our 01:23
expertise. And in my case, we send a 01:25
thousand exclamation points with every 01:27
message we ever send. 01:29
So hedging is something most of us know 01:31
that we do. But understanding why we do 01:32
it and its impact is key to making it 01:34
work for us. Because more modern 01:36
research suggests that hedging is 01:38
actually a political tool and one that 01:40
allows us to enact agency. 01:42
But as researchers, it's really hard for 01:44
us to figure out why people are using 01:46
hedging without interrupting them as 01:48
soon as they speak, saying, "Why did you 01:49
say that? What did you mean by that? 01:51
What were you hoping would happen 01:52
there?" 01:53
And here's where it gets really 01:55
interesting. There's a gender dimension 01:56
to all of this, too. Research tells us 01:57
that women use hedging far more 02:00
frequently than men. And the same was 02:02
actually found to be true in TED talks 02:03
themselves. 02:04
But this disproportionate hedging 02:06
directly correlates with how women are 02:08
perceived in leadership roles. 02:09
This linguistic self-sabotage stems from 02:13
really valid concerns. 02:15
Women who speak more directly are more 02:18
likely to face negative performance 02:19
feedback compared to men using identical 02:21
language. 02:22
And this creates what we call the double 02:24
bind. 02:26
Assertiveness without mitigation risks 02:27
social penalties. And yet excessive 02:30
softening undermines our authority and 02:32
credibility. 02:33
I saw a tweet once which genuinely made 02:35
me laugh out loud. Which did get me some 02:37
funny looks on the bus and it said, "My 02:38
goal is to start being more assertive if 02:41
it's okay with you guys." And it just 02:42
perfectly captures the double bind. 02:45
But hedging isn't actually always a bad 02:48
thing. In fact, it can be a really 02:49
powerful tool when it's used 02:51
intentionally. 02:52
One of my favorite examples of this is 02:53
something I've coined the button example 02:55
because I work in software development. 02:56
So imagine you're in a design meeting. 02:59
Instead of saying I think the button 03:01
should go on the left, try saying as you 03:03
know the button should go on the left. 03:05
With those two words, you know, you're 03:08
hedging your bets, but not in the way 03:10
you're used to. You're hedging your bets 03:11
that they do in fact know that or that 03:13
social order dictates they won't correct 03:15
you. It's an entirely different approach 03:17
to I think the button should go on the 03:19
left. 03:21
You know, I have experience in this 03:24
area. You know, last time we went out at 03:25
11 p.m. we missed the brunch booking. 03:28
You know how meal times are a capitalist 03:30
scam? Those three projects, you know, I 03:32
finished them. Do you see how powerful 03:34
that is? You know, 03:36
but my favorite technique to unpick the 03:39
impact of hedging is a singular word, 03:41
why. I call this the power of why. And 03:43
I've been using it my whole life without 03:46
realizing, ironically, why. 03:47
As an autistic person, I have used why 03:50
to unpick uncertainty at nearly every 03:52
possible juncture of conversation I've 03:54
ever had. 03:55
But let's take it back to the button 03:57
example and see what it looks like in 03:58
practice. You're back in your design 03:59
meeting and person A says, "I think the 04:02
button should go on the left." And 04:04
person B disagrees and they say, "The 04:05
button should go on the right." Now, 04:07
historically, we may have been more 04:10
likely to listen to person B because 04:11
they said their answer with more 04:12
confidence. But not anymore, because 04:13
we're going to use that simple but 04:16
effective question, why? 04:18
Now both parties are given the 04:21
opportunity to explain their reasons 04:22
which might range from anything from 04:24
well I read the user research report 04:26
which accounts for 98% of users looking 04:27
for the button on the left all the way 04:29
through to I don't know 04:31
but what this does is it allows us to 04:35
figure out people's reasons when they 04:37
speak. It allows us to figure out who is 04:38
downplaying their expertise and who is 04:41
framing their opinion as a fact. 04:43
I have a core memory of being in year 04:47
six when my need to understand why led 04:49
to a notable falling out with my teacher 04:51
about whether or not one is considered a 04:53
prime number. And that's still a hill 04:54
I'm willing to die on if anyone wants to 04:56
correct me. 04:58
But my persistent questioning why wasn't 05:00
me trying to being wasn't me trying to 05:03
be difficult or awkward. I was genuinely 05:05
trying to reconcile this mathematical 05:07
concept with my understanding. I 05:09
couldn't accept just a statement of 05:10
fact. I needed to know the reasons why. 05:12
My questioning was so intense that a 05:16
couple of months ago when I bumped into 05:18
my year six teacher um he confessed to 05:19
me that later that day he had to go and 05:21
find out why so that he could tell me 05:23
that. Um the neurotypical world often 05:25
perceives my direct questioning as 05:29
rudeness. But now I know how my brain 05:30
works. I do two things and I suggest 05:32
everyone does these two. 05:34
The first thing is when I start working 05:36
with a new team, I let them know how I 05:38
need information and tasks. And I I got 05:40
this tip from previous TEDex speaker 05:42
Ellie Middleton. And she lets people 05:44
know that she needs information on a 05:46
what, by, when, and why basis. And the 05:48
why is really key for me because it 05:50
helps me stay motivated. 05:52
The sec second point is giving my why, 05:54
my reasons stops me from being 05:58
misunderstood in so many different areas 05:59
of my life. 06:01
So you might be sat there thinking, 06:03
well, should I just eliminate all 06:05
hedging from my language? And my answer 06:06
to that is no. As I mentioned before, 06:08
the blanket removal of hedging doesn't 06:11
necessarily improve outcomes for us. It 06:13
just means we're more likely to be 06:15
labeled as difficult or awkward. 06:16
And while we try and dismantle the 06:20
structures which give us those labels, 06:21
how do we navigate that as individuals? 06:22
This creates what some researchers, 06:25
myself included, 06:26
call the damned if I do, damned if I 06:28
don't predicament. It's the double bind 06:30
I mentioned earlier. 06:32
So, what's needed instead is intentional 06:35
language based on context. the ability 06:37
to deploy or withhold hedging based on 06:39
the context, our audience, and our 06:42
goals. 06:44
It's about being more intentional in the 06:46
way that we all speak. It's about 06:47
turning hedging from an unconscious 06:50
habit into a conscious choice. 06:51
And it's about reframing hedging not 06:54
from a weak, not as a weakness to be 06:57
overcome, but as a skill to be refined. 06:58
And that allows us to maintain our 07:01
authentic voices whilst navigating 07:02
spaces with spaces which were not 07:04
designed with everybody in mind. 07:06
So, with that, I'd like to leave you 07:09
with three things. First, when you're 07:10
tired of making decisions, instead of 07:13
hedging, try clearly articulating your 07:15
preference, which in this case would be, 07:17
"My preference is to not make a decision 07:19
today." I use it all the time, probably 07:21
so much so my husband's sick of hearing 07:23
it. 07:25
Second, 07:27
when you find yourself overusing, I 07:30
think, try strategically claiming the 07:32
knowledge that you have. Save the I 07:34
think for when it's going to serve your 07:37
purpose. I know or as you know the 07:38
research shows. 07:43
And three, when somebody boldly declares 07:46
something you disagree with. For 07:48
example, we don't have a racism problem. 07:49
A real example a client shared with me 07:52
recently. Ask them why. I'd be 07:53
interested to know why you've said that 07:56
when all the research says opposite. 07:57
Hedging is a tool that simultaneously 08:01
reflects humility and uncertainty whilst 08:03
also allowing for influence and persuas 08:04
persuasion. 08:06
Learning how to hedge intentionally is a 08:09
journey. It's a little bit like when you 08:11
decide the model of car you want to buy 08:13
and then you see it everywhere on the 08:14
roads. Is that just me? That was 08:16
hedging. 08:18
Once you know what hedging is, you will 08:20
see it everywhere. But learning how to 08:22
hedge intentionally is a journey worth 08:24
going on because once you master the 08:26
because when you master the art of 08:29
intentional hedging, you don't just 08:30
change how others perceive you, you 08:32
change how you perceive yourself. 08:34
Thank you 08:37

– English Lyrics

📲 "" is trending – don’t miss the chance to learn it in the app!
By
Viewed
17,806
Language
Learn this song

Lyrics & Translation

[English]
[Music]
I'm well aware of the irony of me giving
a talk on hedging today because despite
spending nearly all day every day
researching and reading about gendered
and intentional language, I still
consistently use phrases like I think,
maybe, and sort of in nearly every
conversation I have. And I've always
thought that was just me, my
personality, my communication style,
until one winter day in 2019 when I met
up with two colleagues, Lynn and Emily,
for a brew to talk about software design
decisions.
Because for the first few months of my
PhD, I've been reading about design and
gender and really struggling to fill in
the gaps. But they mentioned this thing
called hedging. And suddenly everything
clicked.
For so long, I'd been reading books,
interviewing authors, writing music, and
playing with words to try and make sense
of them. But this one conversation led
me to realize that perhaps all of my
frustrations and interests were actually
linked.
And picking apart how language is used
and how conversations take place became
my way of making sense of the world I
felt so alien in.
So what actually is hedging?
Hedging is short for hedging your bets
in language, and it includes using
phrases like I think, maybe, and sort
of. And it was first introduced by
linguists in the 70s. What's wild to me
is not many of us have heard of it
since.
But despite this, hedging is something
most of us know that we do. We add
adjust in our emails. We downplay our
expertise. And in my case, we send a
thousand exclamation points with every
message we ever send.
So hedging is something most of us know
that we do. But understanding why we do
it and its impact is key to making it
work for us. Because more modern
research suggests that hedging is
actually a political tool and one that
allows us to enact agency.
But as researchers, it's really hard for
us to figure out why people are using
hedging without interrupting them as
soon as they speak, saying, "Why did you
say that? What did you mean by that?
What were you hoping would happen
there?"
And here's where it gets really
interesting. There's a gender dimension
to all of this, too. Research tells us
that women use hedging far more
frequently than men. And the same was
actually found to be true in TED talks
themselves.
But this disproportionate hedging
directly correlates with how women are
perceived in leadership roles.
This linguistic self-sabotage stems from
really valid concerns.
Women who speak more directly are more
likely to face negative performance
feedback compared to men using identical
language.
And this creates what we call the double
bind.
Assertiveness without mitigation risks
social penalties. And yet excessive
softening undermines our authority and
credibility.
I saw a tweet once which genuinely made
me laugh out loud. Which did get me some
funny looks on the bus and it said, "My
goal is to start being more assertive if
it's okay with you guys." And it just
perfectly captures the double bind.
But hedging isn't actually always a bad
thing. In fact, it can be a really
powerful tool when it's used
intentionally.
One of my favorite examples of this is
something I've coined the button example
because I work in software development.
So imagine you're in a design meeting.
Instead of saying I think the button
should go on the left, try saying as you
know the button should go on the left.
With those two words, you know, you're
hedging your bets, but not in the way
you're used to. You're hedging your bets
that they do in fact know that or that
social order dictates they won't correct
you. It's an entirely different approach
to I think the button should go on the
left.
You know, I have experience in this
area. You know, last time we went out at
11 p.m. we missed the brunch booking.
You know how meal times are a capitalist
scam? Those three projects, you know, I
finished them. Do you see how powerful
that is? You know,
but my favorite technique to unpick the
impact of hedging is a singular word,
why. I call this the power of why. And
I've been using it my whole life without
realizing, ironically, why.
As an autistic person, I have used why
to unpick uncertainty at nearly every
possible juncture of conversation I've
ever had.
But let's take it back to the button
example and see what it looks like in
practice. You're back in your design
meeting and person A says, "I think the
button should go on the left." And
person B disagrees and they say, "The
button should go on the right." Now,
historically, we may have been more
likely to listen to person B because
they said their answer with more
confidence. But not anymore, because
we're going to use that simple but
effective question, why?
Now both parties are given the
opportunity to explain their reasons
which might range from anything from
well I read the user research report
which accounts for 98% of users looking
for the button on the left all the way
through to I don't know
but what this does is it allows us to
figure out people's reasons when they
speak. It allows us to figure out who is
downplaying their expertise and who is
framing their opinion as a fact.
I have a core memory of being in year
six when my need to understand why led
to a notable falling out with my teacher
about whether or not one is considered a
prime number. And that's still a hill
I'm willing to die on if anyone wants to
correct me.
But my persistent questioning why wasn't
me trying to being wasn't me trying to
be difficult or awkward. I was genuinely
trying to reconcile this mathematical
concept with my understanding. I
couldn't accept just a statement of
fact. I needed to know the reasons why.
My questioning was so intense that a
couple of months ago when I bumped into
my year six teacher um he confessed to
me that later that day he had to go and
find out why so that he could tell me
that. Um the neurotypical world often
perceives my direct questioning as
rudeness. But now I know how my brain
works. I do two things and I suggest
everyone does these two.
The first thing is when I start working
with a new team, I let them know how I
need information and tasks. And I I got
this tip from previous TEDex speaker
Ellie Middleton. And she lets people
know that she needs information on a
what, by, when, and why basis. And the
why is really key for me because it
helps me stay motivated.
The sec second point is giving my why,
my reasons stops me from being
misunderstood in so many different areas
of my life.
So you might be sat there thinking,
well, should I just eliminate all
hedging from my language? And my answer
to that is no. As I mentioned before,
the blanket removal of hedging doesn't
necessarily improve outcomes for us. It
just means we're more likely to be
labeled as difficult or awkward.
And while we try and dismantle the
structures which give us those labels,
how do we navigate that as individuals?
This creates what some researchers,
myself included,
call the damned if I do, damned if I
don't predicament. It's the double bind
I mentioned earlier.
So, what's needed instead is intentional
language based on context. the ability
to deploy or withhold hedging based on
the context, our audience, and our
goals.
It's about being more intentional in the
way that we all speak. It's about
turning hedging from an unconscious
habit into a conscious choice.
And it's about reframing hedging not
from a weak, not as a weakness to be
overcome, but as a skill to be refined.
And that allows us to maintain our
authentic voices whilst navigating
spaces with spaces which were not
designed with everybody in mind.
So, with that, I'd like to leave you
with three things. First, when you're
tired of making decisions, instead of
hedging, try clearly articulating your
preference, which in this case would be,
"My preference is to not make a decision
today." I use it all the time, probably
so much so my husband's sick of hearing
it.
Second,
when you find yourself overusing, I
think, try strategically claiming the
knowledge that you have. Save the I
think for when it's going to serve your
purpose. I know or as you know the
research shows.
And three, when somebody boldly declares
something you disagree with. For
example, we don't have a racism problem.
A real example a client shared with me
recently. Ask them why. I'd be
interested to know why you've said that
when all the research says opposite.
Hedging is a tool that simultaneously
reflects humility and uncertainty whilst
also allowing for influence and persuas
persuasion.
Learning how to hedge intentionally is a
journey. It's a little bit like when you
decide the model of car you want to buy
and then you see it everywhere on the
roads. Is that just me? That was
hedging.
Once you know what hedging is, you will
see it everywhere. But learning how to
hedge intentionally is a journey worth
going on because once you master the
because when you master the art of
intentional hedging, you don't just
change how others perceive you, you
change how you perceive yourself.
Thank you

Key Vocabulary

Start Practicing
Vocabulary Meanings

language

/ˈlæŋɡwɪdʒ/

A2
  • noun
  • - system of communication used by a particular country or community
  • verb
  • - to express in words

talk

/tɔːk/

A1
  • verb
  • - to speak in order to give information or express ideas
  • noun
  • - a conversation

think

/θɪŋk/

A1
  • verb
  • - to believe something or have an opinion

speak

/spiːk/

A1
  • verb
  • - to say words in order to communicate

decide

/dɪˈsaɪd/

A2
  • verb
  • - to choose something after thinking about it

design

/dɪˈzaɪn/

B1
  • noun
  • - the art or process of deciding how something will look or work
  • verb
  • - to plan or create something

meeting

/ˈmiːtɪŋ/

A2
  • noun
  • - an occasion when people meet to discuss or do something

button

/ˈbʌtn/

A2
  • noun
  • - a small round object sewn onto a garment used for fastening

why

/waɪ/

A1
  • adverb
  • - for what reason or purpose

research

/rɪˈsɜːrtʃ/

B1
  • noun
  • - careful study to find out more about a subject
  • verb
  • - to study something carefully

gender

/ˈdʒɛndər/

B1
  • noun
  • - the sex of a person or animal

authority

/əˈθɔːrəti/

B2
  • noun
  • - the power or right to give orders, make decisions, and enforce obedience

credibility

/ˌkrɛdəˈbɪləti/

B2
  • noun
  • - the quality of being trusted and believed in

example

/ɪɡˈzæmpəl/

A2
  • noun
  • - something shown to illustrate a rule or principle

question

/ˈkwɛstʃən/

A2
  • noun
  • - a sentence that asks something
  • verb
  • - to ask someone questions about something

influence

/ˈɪnfluəns/

B2
  • noun
  • - the power to affect someone or something
  • verb
  • - to have an effect on someone or something

persuasion

/pərˈsweɪʒən/

B2
  • noun
  • - the act of persuading someone

change

/tʃeɪndʒ/

A2
  • noun
  • - the act or process of becoming different
  • verb
  • - to make something different

learn

/lɜːrn/

A1
  • verb
  • - to gain knowledge or skill

perceive

/pərˈsiːv/

B2
  • verb
  • - to see or understand something, especially something that is not obvious

What does “language” mean in the song ""?

Learn fast – go deep – and remember longer with interactive exercises in the app!

Key Grammar Structures

Coming Soon!

We're updating this section. Stay tuned!

Related Songs