[English]
Where is Latin America?
Well, just like the question
“Who’s the most iconic
Spice Girl?”, the answer depends on who you ask.
Some people say Latin America is anywhere south
of the U.S.
Others say it’s anywhere south of the U.S. where
Romance languages are commonly spoken.
So, we're talking about anywhere from 20 to 52
countries and territories,
where hundreds of languages are spoken,
across millions of square miles.
As I scrolled through these debates in a few
scholarly tomes… and Reddit,
I couldn’t help but wonder:
Why lump so many distinct countries into one
identity?
What makes a Latin American, Latin American?
Hi! I'm Curly Velasquez, and this is Crash Course
Latin American Literature.
[THEME MUSIC]
Do we have to agree on what Latin America is
before talking about Latin American literature?
¿Cuánto tiempo tienes?
How much time do you have?
It turns out, the “Latin America”
label is surprisingly new.
Some historians say the term began with the
French in the 1830s.
In an attempt to seize power over Mexico,
Napoleon the Third —
no, not that Napoleon, the one with the big
bigote,
yes!
— wanted to emphasize that both France and
Mexico shared Latin roots in their languages.
Hence, Latin America.
This was an example of imperialism, where one
country takes power over another,
and it’s a critical part
of Latin American history.
But, so is resistance to imperialism.
Others credit the name “Latin America” to Chilean
politician Francisco Bilbao,
who called for dozens of countries to unite under
this shared identity in the fight against global
imperial powers.
Today, there’s disagreement about why the term
has stuck around, too.
Is “Latin America” still in use because outsiders
flatten other cultures into
falsely uniform identities?
Or because people from the region feel a shared
sense of community, despite national differences?
In this series, we’ll use “Latin America” to mean:
countries with a shared history of colonization by
Spain and Portugal, followed by independence.
But to get a bigger picture, we’ll also explore
Indigenous literature and
Latin American authors in
the U.S. who write in English.
One thing you’ll learn about me is that I don’t do
anything small.
And all of these questions — about what unites and
divides a region, about where its boundaries fall,
about who we are in relationship to each other —
they’re not simply hurdles we have to clear.
They’re some of the central questions at the heart
of so much of Latin American literature.
Now, because Latin Americans are diverse, it’s
challenging to choose just
one label to describe us.
Like, in the U.S., you may
hear the terms Latino or
Latina to refer to immigrants from Latin America
and their descendants, or gender-neutral
alternatives like Latinx or Latine.
You guys, it’s one letter
change, we will all survive.
I promise!
Meanwhile, the term Hispanic refers to people of
Spanish-speaking descent or origin.
So, someone from Spain would
be Hispanic, but not Latino.
And a Portuguese-speaking Brazilian might consider
themselves Latino, but not Hispanic.
And there are a lot of other community-specific
terms out there!
Like “Chicano” for people
of Mexican descent living
in the U.S.,
or “Afro-Latino” for those in Latin
America with African ancestry,
or even “Nuyorican” for Puerto
Ricans living in New York.
So, yeah, Latin America includes lots of different
communities, across lots of
different countries and languages!
Which means in literature,
we find lots of different
answers to the question: “Who are we?”
Some Latin American authors, like
Mexican-Canadian writer Silvia Moreno-Garcia,
write mostly in English.
Others write in both Spanish and English.
And some flip between languages
even within the same text.
Like, “Los ríos profundos,” “Deep Rivers,” by
José María Arguedas,
uses both Spanish and the Indigenous language
Quechua.
Sometimes you’ll find Spanglish
— a mixture of Spanish and English —
like in Sandra Cisneros’
“The House on Mango Street.”
You’ll also find Portuñol,
a blend of Portuguese and Spanish,
like in Fabián Severo’s novel “Noite
nu norte,” “Night in the North.”
And language plays a big role in the international
availability of Latin American literature too.
Well, language, power, and you know…capitalism.
Like, U.S. publishers have been more interested in
books from Argentina and Mexico for at least the
last decade.
So these are the books that tend to get translated
into English…
and that influences what can make its way into
English-language classes, and Crash Courses.
In this series, we’ll span
diverse genres and take a
broad view of what “literature” means.
Or lit-RAH-chure, if you’re Oprah.
We’ll cover the usual suspects — poetry, novels,
and short stories —
but also dive into historical accounts, political
essays, and other texts.
Do my ex’s text messages
count too, or not so much?
Oh, you’re saying no. Ok.
Often, we’ll encounter authors
with ties to multiple countries.
Like, Clarice Lispector was born in Ukraine but
spent much of her life in Brazil.
And the Cuban writer José Martí wrote for an
Argentine newspaper while in exile in New York.
So, it’s no surprise that
Latin American literature
often wrestles with big questions about identity.
Like: What’s our relationship to Europe
— and the rest of the world, for that matter —
after being colonized and gaining independence?
And what’s our relationship to our Indigenous
ancestors, and our African ancestors, too?
Given the blend of Indigenous, African, and
European influences… who even are we?!
Anyone? Anyone?!
Hoo, okay… How about we hash this out with the
Mexican writer Octavio Paz…
Here are the Curly Notes on Paz’s 1950 essay “Los
hijos de la Malinche,” “The Sons of Malinche.”
Malinche wasn’t your average señora.
She was a multilingual Indigenous woman who,
after being enslaved and handed over to the
Spanish as a teenager,
interpreted for Hernán Cortés during his conquest
of Tenochtitlán in 1521.
She and Cortés also had a son,
who’s seen as one of the first mestizos —
meaning, people of mixed Indigenous and Spanish
ancestry, which describes most of Mexico’s
population today.
Paz writes that Malinche is often remembered as a
traitor who “gave herself
voluntarily to the conquistador,”
and that “the Mexican people have not forgiven La
Malinche for her betrayal.”
He points out that the word “malinchista” became
a popular insult to, quote,
“denounce all those who have been corrupted by
foreign influences.”
Am I trippin’? Or is Cortés the real villain here?
Paz argues that the reason Mexicans condemn
Malinche is to try to distance themselves from a
painful part of their past…and transcend it:
“The Mexican does not want to be either an Indian
or a Spaniard.
Nor does he want to be descended from them. He
denies them.
And he does not affirm himself as a mixture, but
rather as an abstraction: [...] His
beginnings are in
his own self.”
I’m gonna need some cafecito to process this one.
[music]
Much better.
When your national identity
is a mix of cultures and
has been shaped by violent colonization,
how do you begin to answer a question like,
“Who are we?”
How far back should we go for answers?
And how close to home should we stay?
Another Mexican writer, Carlos Fuentes, explores
those questions in his 1975 novel “Terra Nostra.”
Rather than analyze a single
historical figure like Malinche,
Fuentes prowls for answers across history zooming
between ancient Rome, pre-colonial Mexico,
16th-century Spain… and 1999 Paris.
But Fuentes doesn’t stop there.
He links Spain’s colonization of the Americas to a
much bigger story.
A New York Times review described “Terra Nostra”
as a “panoramic Hispano-American creation myth.”
And the scholar Lucille Kerr says that it explores
Mexican identity “in terms of
universal myth and history.”
In the world of “Terra Nostra,” the mystery of
Mexican identity is the
same mystery “of civilization
on which civilization itself is founded.”
Meaning, like: we’re all products of violent
histories, of borders that shifted over time.
All of civilization is the
story of different peoples
clashing and melding and becoming something new.
In this way, the Latin American story — or stories
really — shed light on all of our stories.
Much of “Terra Nostra” focuses on a fictionalized
account of the real-life
Spanish King Felipe the Second.
Who was a true nepo baby — he inherited his
entire kingdom from his dad.
Must be nice — all I got
from my dad was a used Honda.
Felipe obsessively constructed a massive
palace-slash-mausoleum called the Escorial.
And Fuentes portrays it in a real “the emperor has
no clothes” kind of way.
Even though Spain colonized and held power in the
Americas for centuries,
Felipe’s single-minded focus on what amounts to
an extremely elaborate coffin reflects the
emptiness of the whole colonial project as,
“based on death…on nada.”
And Fuentes wasn’t the only
writer to explore Latin
American identity by thinking globally.
Before him, in Argentina, Jorge Luis Borges
wrestled with these issues in his work.
He was of Spanish, Portuguese, and English
descent, educated in Switzerland,
and traveled often to Europe.
His whole life — and work — was at the crossroads
of these identity intersections.
And in his 1951 essay, “El escritor argentino y la
tradición,” “The Argentine Writer and Tradition,"
Borges encourages others to work at these
crossroads, too.
He resists the idea that to be an Argentine writer
means only dabbling in your own backyard:
“We must believe that the
universe is our birthright
and try out every subject.”
Borges is capturing a
tension between the local and
the global that can be found in a lot of Latin
American literature.
In communities living with the legacy of
colonization, you can’t
start asking a question like
“Who are we?” without searching the world for
answers.
So what do you do with that?
The Brazilian writer Oswald de Andrade suggests…
cannibalism.
Cultural cannibalism, that is.
He does it himself in his 1928 essay “Manifesto
Antropófago,” “Cannibalist
Manifesto,” with this line:
“Tupi or not tupi, that is the question.”
Sound familiar?
He’s reappropriating Shakespeare’s famous line
from “Hamlet,”
using the similar-sounding name of an Indigenous
people in Brazil.
Like, why not devour and
Brazil-ify one of the most
famous lines in English literature?
Andrade calls for Brazilians
to do the same: take in
the influences.
Blend them up.
And pour them out as something totally new.
Ooh! It’s my postcolonial protein smoothie.
I think it needs some work.
In a vastly diverse region,
you’re not going to find
one single answer to the question: Who are we?
Latin American literature is produced across many
different communities, in many different
languages, from a blend of influences.
And when Latin American writers explore identity,
they’re often navigating the tension between
influences from their own neighborhood… and the
other side of the world.
To which I say: ¿Por qué no los dos? Why not both?
Next time, we’ll talk about
how stories, history, and
politics collide.
See you then.
Thanks for watching this episode of Crash Course
Latin American Literature which was filmed at the
Carlos Hernandez Studio in Indianapolis, and was
made with the help of all these nice people.
If you want to help keep Crash Course free for
everyone, forever, you can
join our community on Patreon.
Oh, and if you're interested
in learning about some
of the topics covered in this episode, we pulled
together a playlist you can dig into.