Display Bilingual:

Life is fundamentally different from dead stuff—or is it? 00:00
Physicist Erwin Schrödinger defined life this way: 00:04
Living things avoid decay into disorder and equilibrium. 00:07
What does this mean? 00:13
Let’s pretend that your download folder is the universe. 00:14
It started orderly and got more and more chaotic over time. 00:17
By investing energy, you can create order and clean it up. 00:21
This is what living things do. 00:25
But what is life? 00:27
Every living thing on this planet is made of cells. 00:36
Basically, a cell is a protein-based robot too small to feel or experience anything. 00:39
It has the properties we just assign to life: 00:45
it has a wall that separates it from the surroundings, creating order; 00:48
it regulates itself and maintains a constant state; 00:51
it eats stuff to stay alive; 00:55
it grows and develops; 00:58
it reacts to the environment; 01:00
and it’s subject to evolution; 01:01
and it makes more of itself. 01:04
But of all the stuff that makes up a cell, no part is alive. 01:06
Stuff reacts chemically with other stuff, forming reactions 01:10
that start other reactions which start other reactions. 01:15
In a single cell, every second several million chemical reactions take place, 01:18
forming a complex orchestra. 01:23
A cell can build several thousand types of protein: 01:25
some very simple, some complex micromachines. 01:28
Imagine driving a car at 100 km/h while constantly rebuilding every single 01:32
part of it with stuff you collect from the street. 01:37
That is what cells do. 01:40
But no part of the cell is alive; everything is dead matter 01:43
moved by the laws of the universe. 01:46
So is life the aggregate of all these reaction processes that are taking place? 01:49
Eventually, every living thing will die. 01:55
The goal of the whole process is to prevent this by producing new entities; 01:58
and by this, we mean DNA. 02:03
Life is, in a way, just a lot of stuff that carries genetic information around. 02:06
Every living thing is subject to evolution, 02:10
and the DNA that develops the best living thing around it will stay in the game. 02:12
So, is DNA life, then? 02:18
If you take DNA out of its hull, it certainly is a very complex molecule, 02:20
but it can’t do anything by itself. 02:25
This is where viruses make everything more complicated. 02:28
They are basically strings of RNA or DNA in a small hull 02:32
and need cells to do something. 02:36
We’re not sure if they count as living or dead. 02:38
And still, there are 225,000,000 m³ of viruses on Earth. 02:41
They don’t seem to care what we think of them. 02:47
There are even viruses that invade dead cells and reanimate them 02:49
so they can be a host for them, which blurs the line even more. 02:53
Or mitochondria. 02:58
They are the power plants of most complex cells and 02:59
were previously free living bacteria that entered a partnership with bigger cells. 03:03
They still have their own DNA and can multiply on their own, but 03:08
they are not alive anymore; they are dead. 03:12
So they traded their own life for the survival of their DNA, 03:16
which means living things can evolve into dead things as long as it’s beneficial 03:20
to their genetic code. 03:25
So, maybe life is information that manages to ensure its continued existence. 03:27
But what about AI (artificial intelligence)? 03:33
By our most common definitions, we are very close to creating artificial life 03:37
in computers. 03:42
It’s just a question of time before the technology we build gets there. 03:43
And this is not science fiction, either; 03:47
there are a lot of smart people actively working on this. 03:49
You could already argue that computer viruses are alive. 03:53
Hm, okay. So what is life, then? 03:56
Things, processes, DNA, information? 04:00
This got confusing very fast. 04:04
One thing is for sure: 04:08
the idea that life is fundamentally different from non-living things 04:09
because they contain some non-physical element 04:13
or are governed by different principles than inanimate objects 04:15
turned out to be wrong. 04:19
Before Charles Darwin, humans drew a line between themselves and the rest 04:21
of living things; there was something magical about us that made us special. 04:26
Once we had to accept we are like every living being, a product of evolution, 04:31
we drew a different line. 04:35
But the more we learn about what computers can do and how life works, 04:38
the closer we get to creating the first machine that fits our desciption of life, 04:41
the more our image of ourselves is in danger again. 04:46
And this will happen sooner or later. 04:49
And here’s another question for you: 04:52
if everything in the universe is made of the same stuff, 04:54
does this mean everything in the universe is dead 04:57
or that everything in the universe is alive? 05:00
That it’s just a question of complexity? 05:03
Does this mean we can never die 05:06
because we were never alive in the first place? 05:08
Is life and death an irrelevant question and we haven’t noticed it yet? 05:11
Is it possible we are much more part of the universe around us than we thought? 05:15
Don’t look at us; we don’t have any answers for you. 05:20
Just questions for you to think about. 05:22
After all, it’s thinking about questions like this that makes us feel alive 05:25
and gives us some comfort. 05:29
Subtitles by the Amara.org community 05:54

– English Lyrics

💡 "" is packed with cool phrases waiting for you in the app!
By
Viewed
14,138,759
Language
Learn this song

Lyrics & Translation

[English]
Life is fundamentally different from dead stuff—or is it?
Physicist Erwin Schrödinger defined life this way:
Living things avoid decay into disorder and equilibrium.
What does this mean?
Let’s pretend that your download folder is the universe.
It started orderly and got more and more chaotic over time.
By investing energy, you can create order and clean it up.
This is what living things do.
But what is life?
Every living thing on this planet is made of cells.
Basically, a cell is a protein-based robot too small to feel or experience anything.
It has the properties we just assign to life:
it has a wall that separates it from the surroundings, creating order;
it regulates itself and maintains a constant state;
it eats stuff to stay alive;
it grows and develops;
it reacts to the environment;
and it’s subject to evolution;
and it makes more of itself.
But of all the stuff that makes up a cell, no part is alive.
Stuff reacts chemically with other stuff, forming reactions
that start other reactions which start other reactions.
In a single cell, every second several million chemical reactions take place,
forming a complex orchestra.
A cell can build several thousand types of protein:
some very simple, some complex micromachines.
Imagine driving a car at 100 km/h while constantly rebuilding every single
part of it with stuff you collect from the street.
That is what cells do.
But no part of the cell is alive; everything is dead matter
moved by the laws of the universe.
So is life the aggregate of all these reaction processes that are taking place?
Eventually, every living thing will die.
The goal of the whole process is to prevent this by producing new entities;
and by this, we mean DNA.
Life is, in a way, just a lot of stuff that carries genetic information around.
Every living thing is subject to evolution,
and the DNA that develops the best living thing around it will stay in the game.
So, is DNA life, then?
If you take DNA out of its hull, it certainly is a very complex molecule,
but it can’t do anything by itself.
This is where viruses make everything more complicated.
They are basically strings of RNA or DNA in a small hull
and need cells to do something.
We’re not sure if they count as living or dead.
And still, there are 225,000,000 m³ of viruses on Earth.
They don’t seem to care what we think of them.
There are even viruses that invade dead cells and reanimate them
so they can be a host for them, which blurs the line even more.
Or mitochondria.
They are the power plants of most complex cells and
were previously free living bacteria that entered a partnership with bigger cells.
They still have their own DNA and can multiply on their own, but
they are not alive anymore; they are dead.
So they traded their own life for the survival of their DNA,
which means living things can evolve into dead things as long as it’s beneficial
to their genetic code.
So, maybe life is information that manages to ensure its continued existence.
But what about AI (artificial intelligence)?
By our most common definitions, we are very close to creating artificial life
in computers.
It’s just a question of time before the technology we build gets there.
And this is not science fiction, either;
there are a lot of smart people actively working on this.
You could already argue that computer viruses are alive.
Hm, okay. So what is life, then?
Things, processes, DNA, information?
This got confusing very fast.
One thing is for sure:
the idea that life is fundamentally different from non-living things
because they contain some non-physical element
or are governed by different principles than inanimate objects
turned out to be wrong.
Before Charles Darwin, humans drew a line between themselves and the rest
of living things; there was something magical about us that made us special.
Once we had to accept we are like every living being, a product of evolution,
we drew a different line.
But the more we learn about what computers can do and how life works,
the closer we get to creating the first machine that fits our desciption of life,
the more our image of ourselves is in danger again.
And this will happen sooner or later.
And here’s another question for you:
if everything in the universe is made of the same stuff,
does this mean everything in the universe is dead
or that everything in the universe is alive?
That it’s just a question of complexity?
Does this mean we can never die
because we were never alive in the first place?
Is life and death an irrelevant question and we haven’t noticed it yet?
Is it possible we are much more part of the universe around us than we thought?
Don’t look at us; we don’t have any answers for you.
Just questions for you to think about.
After all, it’s thinking about questions like this that makes us feel alive
and gives us some comfort.
Subtitles by the Amara.org community

Key Vocabulary

Start Practicing
Vocabulary Meanings

fundamentally

/ˌfʌndəˈmentəli/

B2
  • adverb
  • - at the most basic level; essentially.

decay

/dɪˈkeɪ/

B1
  • verb
  • - to rot or decompose.

equilibrium

/ˌiːkwɪˈlɪbriəm/

C1
  • noun
  • - a state of balance.

chaotic

/ˈkeɪ.ɒt.ɪk/

B2
  • adjective
  • - in a state of complete confusion and disorder.

investing

/ɪnˈvestɪŋ/

B1
  • verb
  • - expending time, effort, or money with the expectation of a benefit.

orderly

/ˈɔːrdərli/

A2
  • adjective
  • - neat and organized.

properties

/ˈprɒpərtiz/

B1
  • noun
  • - characteristics or qualities.

assign

/əˈsaɪn/

B1
  • verb
  • - to allocate or designate.

separates

/ˈsepəreɪts/

A2
  • verb
  • - to divide or keep apart.

regulates

/ˈregjuleɪts/

B2
  • verb
  • - to control or maintain the rate or speed of.

environment

/ɪnˈvaɪrənmənt/

A2
  • noun
  • - the surroundings or conditions in which a person, animal, or plant lives or operates.

evolution

/ˌiːvəˈluːʃən/

C1
  • noun
  • - the process of developing gradually.

molecule

/ˈmɒlɪkjuːl/

B2
  • noun
  • - a group of atoms bonded together.

viruses

/ˈvaɪrəsɪz/

B2
  • noun
  • - infectious agents that replicate only inside the living cells of an organism.

bacteria

/bækˈtɪəriə/

B2
  • noun
  • - microscopic single-celled organisms.

partnership

/ˈpɑːrtnəʃɪp/

B2
  • noun
  • - the state of being partners.

beneficial

/ˌbenɪˈfɪʃəl/

B2
  • adjective
  • - resulting in good.

existence

/ɪɡˈzɪstəns/

C1
  • noun
  • - the fact of being.

🧩 Unlock "" – every sentence and word gets easier with the app!

💬 Don’t let tough words stop you – the app’s got your back!

Key Grammar Structures

  • Life is fundamentally different from dead stuff—or is it?

    ➔ Present simple (rhetorical question)

    ➔ The verb "is" is the present simple form of "to be" used both as a statement and as part of a rhetorical question.

  • Living things avoid decay into disorder and equilibrium.

    ➔ Present simple (habitual action)

    ➔ The verb "avoid" is in the present simple, showing a regular or habitual behavior of "living things".

  • By investing energy, you can create order and clean it up.

    ➔ Gerund phrase + modal + infinitive

    ➔ The gerund "investing" starts a prepositional phrase that shows means; the modal "can" is followed by the infinitives "create" and "clean".

  • It started orderly and got more and more chaotic over time.

    ➔ Past simple + comparative adverb "more and more"

    ➔ The verbs "started" and "got" are in the past simple; the phrase "more and more" intensifies the adjective "chaotic".

  • Everything is dead matter moved by the laws of the universe.

    ➔ Passive voice (past participle) + linking verb "is"

    ➔ The phrase "moved by the laws of the universe" is a past participle used in passive voice, linked to the subject by the verb "is".

  • If you take DNA out of its hull, it certainly is a very complex molecule, but it can’t do anything by itself.

    ➔ First conditional + contrastive conjunction "but"

    ➔ The clause "If you take DNA out of its hull" uses the present simple to express a real possibility; the main clause contains the contrastive "but" linking two results.

  • They’re basically strings of RNA or DNA in a small hull and need cells to do something.

    ➔ Present simple + coordination with "and" + infinitive of purpose

    "They’re" contracts "they are"; the verb "need" is followed by the infinitive "to do" showing purpose.

  • So maybe life is information that manages to ensure its continued existence.

    ➔ Relative clause introduced by "that"

    ➔ The clause "that manages to ensure its continued existence" modifies "information" and begins with the relative pronoun "that".

  • What about AI? By our most common definitions, we are very close to creating artificial life in computers.

    ➔ Present progressive + infinitive of purpose

    "are very close to creating" uses the present progressive "are" + "close to" + gerund "creating" to express an ongoing near‑future situation.

Related Songs