Display Bilingual:

L & D teams or cultural amplifiers. We 00:00
are more than just content creation 00:02
teams. It's on us to really own that 00:04
upgrade. We really need to nail hitting 00:06
those three dimensions of the human, 00:09
brand, and strategic realms so that 00:10
others can see us that way. 00:13
You're listening to How to Make a 00:17
Leader, a leadership development podcast 00:19
from Big Think Plus, where we take the 00:21
best ideas from the biggest minds in 00:24
learning and development and distill 00:26
them into actionable insights. I'm your 00:28
host, Hannah Beaver. Our guest this 00:31
month is Dwayne Britain. With over 15 00:34
years of experience shaping culture and 00:38
capability at brands like Apple on 00:40
Zelando, Lululemon and Atudas. Dwayne is 00:44
a firm believer in the truth that 00:48
learning amplifies culture. In a moment, 00:51
we'll be talking about all things 00:54
learning culture and learning 00:56
philosophy, including a breakdown of the 00:58
two, why they're so important, and the 01:01
best way to think about both as you 01:04
tackle learning at your organization. 01:06
Dwayne will share a case study example 01:09
of how he rolled out a learning 01:11
framework at OnRunning, and you'll hear 01:13
some little nuggets of musical theater 01:16
along the way. 01:18
Dwayne, welcome to How to Make a Leader. 01:21
>> Thank you so much. I'm so happy to be 01:25
here. 01:26
>> We met a couple months ago now at 01:28
Offbeatfest and Dwayne had a fantastic 01:30
presentation um in front of the 01:34
conference. So, we kind of got chatting 01:36
about that and we'll be digging a little 01:38
bit into that theme today. But, I am 01:39
very excited for Dwayne to share his 01:41
learnings with us today on the podcast. 01:44
>> Yeah. No, it was a great conversation we 01:46
had um and I'm happy to continue it. 01:47
>> Great. Well, Dwayne, I would say that a 01:50
common thread that we have with guests 01:53
on this podcast is kind of their varying 01:55
path into L & D. Um many people ended up 01:58
in one industry and kind of wound their 02:02
way into the world of learning and 02:05
development and you are no exception um 02:06
to this commonplace theme that I've 02:10
noticed. So can you talk to us a little 02:12
bit about where you started in your 02:14
career and how did you get here to where 02:16
you are now? 02:18
>> It actually started even as a young 02:19
child. I was a I think a sort of a 02:20
sensitive emotional young lad and I 02:22
really found my community in theater and 02:25
I found a space where people would hold 02:27
space for others and it was really all 02:29
about connecting on an emotional level 02:30
and I think that's what actually helped 02:32
me later in my career with really 02:34
connecting with audiences and getting a 02:36
sense of an audience's needs because 02:38
it's really more about it's not so much 02:39
about standing on stage in a spotlight. 02:41
It's really about meeting your audience 02:43
and what their needs are in that moment 02:44
and uh and connecting with them that 02:46
way. So I went to school on a musical 02:48
theater scholarship. I knew even back 02:49
then I didn't want to be an actor. So 02:51
got another degree in organizational 02:53
communication with an emphasis in 02:55
organizational diversity back when DEI 02:56
was just getting its legs. And I spent 02:58
the next part of 12 years as a performer 03:00
and ended my career about 12 years later 03:03
taking all of my experience and putting 03:06
it into a CD that I recorded that got 03:08
signed with an independent Broadway jazz 03:10
cabaret label. So I began actually then 03:12
teaching the software and hardware that 03:14
I use to make music and to market that 03:16
music as a retail trainer for Apple. And 03:18
that's how I started not in HR but 03:20
becoming a retail trainer for Apple 03:22
teaching folks on how I created uh and 03:24
what I did and went on to lead that 03:26
training program. 03:28
>> That is such an interesting background 03:28
and I love the way that you wo us 03:30
through the story there. And I think 03:31
what's interesting is we've had the a 03:33
conversation about this like in person 03:35
around how the importance of connecting 03:37
with the audience, inspiring kind of 03:40
engaging learning experiences. Like I 03:42
certainly see the parallels between 03:45
theater and the connection there and 03:47
then also L & D. So I think it's just 03:48
fascinating how that skill set has 03:51
translated so beautifully into L & D and 03:53
your career in L & D. 03:55
Well, on that same theme of connection, 04:02
that brings us to why we're here today. 04:04
Um, and that is to talk about learning 04:07
philosophies and learning cultures. So, 04:10
why don't we start with the basics? 04:13
Could you define for us what is a 04:15
learning philosophy and how does that 04:17
differ from a learning culture? 04:19
>> Yes. So, you know what I might do if 04:22
it's okay, I might flip it. I think in 04:23
order to understand the philosophy, we 04:25
might need to want to look at culture 04:27
first. And I think even to understand 04:28
learning culture, we might want to 04:30
understand organizational culture. 04:31
>> Let's take it all the way back to the 04:33
beginning. Let's do it. 04:34
>> Organizational culture as I know it and 04:36
define it is the way things are done 04:38
around here. Quite simple and 04:40
straightforward. I've also heard it 04:41
defined as the way decisions are made 04:43
when no one is looking. And also this 04:45
responsibility that it's not just passed 04:47
down, but that we all have a part to 04:50
play in it. And the reason why companies 04:51
are so explicit in defining their 04:53
cultures, their values, their vision, 04:55
their goals, their habits and rituals is 04:57
because if they don't, typically what 05:00
happens in organizations is, as we know, 05:02
the strongest and loudest voices kind of 05:04
come in and fill that vacuum. And the 05:05
same is true for learning culture. If a 05:07
company doesn't necessarily explicitly 05:10
express what they believe good learning 05:12
to look like, you can have a whole 05:14
hodgepodge of different types of 05:17
learning experiences and and and not 05:18
even in a maligned way or you know 05:20
people trying to uh sabotage the system 05:22
or whatever, but people have different 05:24
backgrounds, have different strengths 05:25
and they'll naturally gravitate towards 05:26
putting those forward. So a learning 05:28
culture can be skewed by people's 05:30
individual contributions unless there 05:33
are some clearly stated guard rails, 05:34
let's just call them. And that's what a 05:37
learning philosophy is. It is a north 05:38
star that an organization can detail 05:41
that aligns their learning and 05:44
development community, gives them 05:46
something to hold themselves accountable 05:47
to and can really tie in their 05:48
programming into sort of an umbrella 05:50
point of view foremost so that 05:53
everything that they make and everyone 05:56
that's paying into that learning culture 05:58
from interns to new managers to vendors 05:59
can really have a sense of what we're 06:02
trying to achieve here as a brand. And 06:04
in terms of learning, it's the same 06:07
thing. We might have marketing 06:09
philosophies on how we want to connect 06:10
with our audiences. We might have 06:12
product philosophies on how our products 06:13
and services should look and feel. 06:15
Having a learning philosophy helps the 06:17
organization know what we are a stand 06:19
for for how people grow and develop at 06:21
our organization. 06:23
>> Fantastic. I appreciate that breakdown. 06:25
And I know the last time we spoke you 06:27
kind of we were talking about 06:29
philosophies and cultures and you 06:30
mentioning it's kind of a chicken and 06:32
egg like which comes first. you have to 06:33
talk about one to talk about another. So 06:35
why do you think that distinction and 06:38
knowing the difference between the two 06:40
is so important? How does that show up 06:43
in an L & D program? 06:45
>> Yeah, when teams have a learning 06:47
philosophy and when they've articulated 06:48
and even shared it out with the 06:50
organization, what it does is it 06:51
positions a learning and development 06:53
team as a strategic partner to the 06:55
business more just a way of creating 06:56
content or attaching themselves to a a 06:59
strategic brand initiative or target. So 07:01
typically there are three realms that 07:04
we're working at within the learning and 07:05
development in my view. There's the 07:06
strategic realm where we're going after 07:08
business KPIs and trying to impact 07:09
behaviors and help achieve a a certain 07:11
goal. There's the brand component that 07:13
the learning philosophy serves which is 07:16
more like sort of the cultural elements 07:18
which is more what the brand is hoping 07:19
to achieve and be a stand for for 07:21
internal and external customers. And 07:23
then there's the human realm which is 07:24
how we can create and design learning 07:26
experiences and meet folks where they 07:28
are in it so they have individual 07:30
relevancy with the learning inside and 07:32
outside the organization. And so when 07:34
you clearly articulate how you're 07:36
working to design and target these you 07:39
elevate your L & D team to actual 07:41
strategic partners as opposed to 07:43
sometimes the content creation teams 07:45
that we're sometimes viewed and 07:47
sometimes we view ourselves as. And so I 07:49
recommend to CEOs, to CPOS, to learning 07:52
teams to really take that upgrade 07:55
because when you look at those different 07:57
realms that we impact, how we're 07:59
literally given permission to evangelize 08:00
the way things are done around here, you 08:03
can really see that we are poised to 08:04
really have a lot more impact within an 08:06
organization than just creating content. 08:08
>> And then further down the line, what 08:10
does building a learning philosophy 08:13
impact? Why is it important? 08:16
>> It can impact those three realms. the 08:18
strategic branded human realms, but also 08:20
it really holds the L & D team also 08:22
accountable to this north star. It also 08:24
can create a sense of efficiency in what 08:26
you're building. So rather than going 08:28
through so many iterations, if you have 08:30
a clear north star that you're you're 08:32
aiming towards from the beginning, you 08:33
can really align the learning towards it 08:35
and it can really make a off-the-shelf 08:37
training feel a little bit more 08:40
customized and translated for an 08:41
organization. on my website and and in a 08:42
recent podcast I gave an um an example 08:45
of translating radical cander into an 08:47
organization. So rather than just taking 08:49
radical cander which is a great uh 08:51
framework for giving feedback for those 08:52
who may not know it and just kind of 08:54
taking it as it is really looking at it 08:56
through the lens and seeing how we can 08:58
apply this to our systems and have it um 08:59
correlate to strategic goals that we're 09:02
impacting how we might tweak the the 09:04
verbiage or the the framework a little 09:06
bit to ensure that it's meeting our 09:08
brand and our culture. and then helping 09:10
folks immediately find the learning in 09:12
it from the very calendar prompt of 09:14
asking someone, you know, what's a piece 09:16
of feedback that you've delayed giving 09:18
and why or what's a great piece of 09:20
recognition that you um that you've been 09:21
meaning to share with someone and how 09:23
might it improve their performance, 09:24
their day, their quarter, whatever it 09:27
might be and getting folks thinking 09:28
through how this can really impact them 09:29
on a human level. And then additionally, 09:31
what I believe a learning philosophy has 09:33
the ability to do is create impact. So 09:35
when you have your entire team, everyone 09:37
that's creating learning experiences, 09:39
whether it's an intern who's giving an 09:41
office tour or a new manager that's 09:42
onboarding someone into their team, 09:44
>> starting at the beginning, how would a 09:52
listener listening today identify their 09:54
organization's learning beliefs? If 09:57
they're not clearly laid out, what's the 09:59
first step that you would take to 10:01
identify those? One question that I 10:02
would encourage you all to answer and 10:04
consider in tandem with your your 10:05
stakeholders and your your partners is 10:07
answering this one question foremost. 10:09
What do we believe about how people grow 10:11
and develop here? And by answering that 10:14
one question, you're going to find 10:16
different avenues to go down. But that 10:18
really is the essence of what a learning 10:20
philosophy is. You might consider 10:21
different ways that your values tie into 10:23
learning. You might consider the 10:26
different ways leadership shows up in 10:28
learning about how your brand 10:29
positioning your brand design shows up 10:31
about how what you uniquely believe 10:33
about people and the stand you want to 10:34
be for people in DEI topics in regional 10:36
concerns in operational on the ground 10:39
matters whether you know if you have 10:42
retail teams for example or people in 10:43
factories or if you have people 10:45
interacting everything via chat and then 10:47
finally what the you know what the 10:49
actual modalities look like you know 10:51
what types of learning experiences are 10:52
you creating these are all things that 10:55
could be answered 10:56
or uncovered and bubbled up through 10:57
answering that first uh question I think 10:59
foremost and then from there as you 11:01
detail this out what I would also 11:03
encourage you to do is consider the next 11:05
step is really within those guard rails 11:07
what freedom do people have to move 11:11
within those guard rails because adults 11:13
typically learn by making sense of the 11:15
information themselves and listen we're 11:18
all adults it's it's less about kind of 11:20
dictating what folks need to do but 11:22
giving them some guard rails and letting 11:23
them know how they uh implement and 11:25
tweak it. And then the final layer I 11:27
would encourage you to consider is 11:29
detailing in how the team can pay into 11:31
it. So what if they find more efficient 11:33
ways to pay into this? How can they 11:34
contribute feedback? How can they pay 11:36
into that document? In which places can 11:38
they contribute their unique expertise 11:40
and point of view. So then you have this 11:42
great foundation how it can be adapted 11:44
uh to fit certain needs and then how the 11:46
team also contributes and then by 11:48
sharing that out and making it public 11:49
you can also ask your team to hold you 11:51
accountable to that and that is a really 11:53
robust first step in generating a sense 11:54
and really detailing out your cultural 11:57
learning cultural ambition. 11:59
>> Fantastic. I appreciate that you're 12:01
laying it out so clearly with this with 12:03
this multi-step framework. I think 12:05
that's very digestible format to to 12:06
learn time for a little bit of a case 12:09
study. Can you talk to me about your 12:11
time at on and the work you did there 12:14
with the spark methodology? 12:17
>> Yeah, there's a lot in there and listen, 12:20
I think what what spark is is just a a 12:21
vivid example of what I just walked 12:23
through. So, um on my role as the first 12:25
dedicated head of global learning and 12:28
development was we needed a way to 12:30
protect our culture as we scale. We 12:34
didn't need another framework. We didn't 12:36
need another training on you know x y or 12:37
z. What we wanted to do was create our 12:39
point of view. So we created spark which 12:41
is an acronym sp a r k and the s stood 12:43
for spirits on calls their values their 12:46
spirits. So we felt that they were 12:48
really responsible for the success of 12:49
an. So we wanted our our learning 12:51
experiences to be grounded in those 12:53
spirits to tie our experiences back to 12:54
the bigger picture whenever possible and 12:56
when it made sense. At this particular 12:58
point we were really working to unify 13:00
the brand internally on leveraging the 13:02
brand design and point of view. So 13:04
whenever possible, we wanted our 13:06
learning experiences to be positioned 13:08
from fonts and colors to the tone of 13:10
voice and this sort of thing. We hired a 13:12
media designer to ensure that our 13:14
learning experiences were really on 13:16
brand. But one in particular was I think 13:17
particularly important to the human 13:20
spirit of learning it on and that was 13:22
the explorer spirit which was this 13:23
entrepreneurial way of thinking of 13:25
iterating of trying you know calculated 13:27
risk-taking and so forth and we really 13:29
wanted to protect this. So in our 13:32
learning experiences, we wanted them to 13:33
be agency enabling, and that's the AE. 13:35
We didn't want to just throw content at 13:37
folks one way. We wanted them to um be 13:39
in choice about how they learned when 13:42
they signed up for learning. And we 13:44
wanted to leverage learning discovery or 13:46
over sort of like a list of steps 13:48
whenever possible. 13:50
DEI is also very important on and so we 13:52
really wanted in addition to cultural 13:55
considerations we wanted to consider 13:56
things like contribution preference 13:58
scheduling needs session length and this 14:00
sort of thing within our offering and 14:02
design for that and then finally um 14:04
great learning takes place I think when 14:06
folks practice so at on we said that 14:07
learning is kinetic it's an active 14:09
participary sport so we wanted people 14:11
like practicing whenever possible new 14:13
behaviors trying on new thoughts and and 14:15
so forth so that is spark and then it's 14:18
giving teams parameters within which to 14:20
work. And then for those team members 14:23
that we did have to be really explicit 14:24
with customer service, maybe retail team 14:26
members, we still want them to feel 14:28
comfortable asking things like, okay, 14:30
this is great, but like what if I find a 14:32
better way to do this? What if I find a 14:34
more efficient way? How can I pay into 14:36
this? How is my feedback considered? 14:37
Where can I contribute my expertise and 14:40
my point of view? So that there was this 14:42
accountability to us as L & D2 that we 14:44
weren't just kind of pushing things on 14:46
to folks, but we were really treating 14:48
folks as the experts that we hired and 14:50
allowing them to pay into and to 14:53
contribute to that culture. 14:54
>> And what would you say was your biggest 14:56
learning and perhaps your biggest piece 14:58
of advice for someone listening that 15:00
might want to roll out a similar 15:02
initiative at their organization? In 15:04
general, I would say it's not, I think, 15:06
very common for folks to always view L & 15:09
D teams as this much of a strategic 15:12
partner. You might actually be 15:14
demonstrating this for the first time. 15:16
And what I would encourage you to do and 15:18
the only way I think I was able to get 15:20
this through a little bit even at on was 15:21
that we tied it to a strategic win. So 15:23
speak the language of the business and 15:25
we were able to tie that philosophy to a 15:27
big strategic retail win. We uh had our 15:29
retail trainers use Spark philosophy as 15:31
a lens to roll out onspurs customer 15:34
service training and they didn't even 15:36
have to do very much. They gave their 15:38
training a chiropractic adjustment to 15:40
the Spark philosophy. So they rooted 15:42
good service in our spirits. They worked 15:44
with our media designer to make sure it 15:46
looked perfectly positioned. They 15:47
created a space for the facilitators and 15:49
the team to make it their own. They 15:51
worked with our DEI team to make sure 15:53
that we were using inclusive language 15:55
and practices on our retail floor so 15:56
that our guests felt great. and they 15:58
made it come alive with real case 16:00
studies, practice and and follow-up 16:02
nudges and so forth. So they really 16:04
adapted it to that learning philosophy. 16:06
But what that did and this is the 16:08
important thing is that it made that 16:09
cultural component come alive at the 16:12
retail level which candidly sometimes 16:14
are the are the people that are that 16:17
probably feel furthest remove even if 16:19
they're not feel from the culture that 16:20
we might have at the headquarters the 16:23
main office. And so that's I think what 16:24
we do in learning and development. We 16:27
make that culture come alive. But 16:28
sometimes we have to show people the win 16:30
to get them to see like, aha, this is 16:33
what you mean. You know, it's 16:36
interesting as I share that as it's 16:37
coming out of my mouth. It actually 16:38
reminds me of when I was recording, I 16:39
was at the end of my my career and I 16:41
just wanted to record some beautiful 16:43
songs and as I was explaining this uh to 16:44
folks, they're like, "Well, what is 16:47
that? Is that like pop? Is it like 16:48
cabaret? Is it like what is that?" I'm 16:50
like, "No, it's my take on these on 16:51
these songs." And it wasn't until people 16:53
heard the music when they were like, 16:55
"Oh, I totally get this now. I see what 16:57
this is." You kind of have to show 16:59
people sometimes what it is for them to 17:01
completely understand what you're going 17:03
for. 17:04
>> And then aside from your work at On, do 17:05
you have any other examples of your 17:07
approach to storytelling and branding 17:10
within the L &D function? 17:13
>> During my time as an artist, I of course 17:15
when you're an artist, you're the the 17:17
manager, the product. I had to develop 17:18
skills to sort of market that. And so 17:20
when I first had the chance to actually 17:22
build my first learning and development 17:24
team, um I was working within a small 17:25
startup and I knew that I wanted to 17:27
bring on someone that could help elevate 17:29
the visual the audiovisisual look and uh 17:31
tone and feel of our learning 17:34
experiences. So uh we hired this 17:35
part-timer and the L & D team really 17:37
became known for this look, tone and 17:40
feel of our sessions and it actually 17:42
part of the reason we were asked to to 17:45
be involved in so many other areas of 17:46
the business and eventually get folded 17:48
into the greater business because folks 17:49
saw the way that we were working and we 17:52
were working to create learning 17:53
experiences. When I came over to 17:55
probably the coolest thing that we did 17:57
in terms of practical tool is we created 18:00
a website called the own your 18:02
development map. So many organizations 18:04
say folks own their development, but 18:06
what does it mean? And it on we really 18:07
tried to put that into words. So I 18:09
drafted 10 tenants about um different 18:11
steps that folks could take from getting 18:13
clear on their their values and their 18:15
why up to entertaining lattice um 18:17
lattice framework development. And we 18:20
created an interactive clickable uh 18:23
relief map with different brand imagery 18:25
and brand uh videos that would tie 18:27
people to different external sources 18:30
that were inspirational that clearly 18:32
articulated what that tenant meant and 18:34
internal resources to explore it 18:36
further. So for example, one of the 18:37
tenants might be uh discover uncharted 18:39
paths the the lattice framework and 18:42
internally it might link to our job 18:44
board for internal job placement this 18:45
sort of thing and at the top it would 18:47
just have three or four questions for 18:49
reflection to get the team member 18:51
thinking about where they are within 18:52
that particular tenant and it's a very 18:54
choose your own adventure style thing 18:56
and we rolled that uh out just before I 18:57
left. That's such a fantastic example of 19:00
how to really embed learning into your 19:03
organization. And I loved how you 19:05
mentioned too like even the different 19:07
mediums of kind of tear off or having 19:08
like visual maps because we all learn 19:11
differently and so trying to meet the 19:14
learner and any possible touch point 19:15
just to bring them in. I think that's 19:17
just such a fantastic example. Thank you 19:19
for sharing. 19:20
So Dwayne, we've covered a lot today, 19:26
but if listeners could take away one 19:28
piece of advice from today's 19:31
conversation, what would that one 19:32
learning be? 19:34
>> If you walk away with nothing else that 19:36
I would share is that L & D teams are 19:38
cultural amplifiers. We are more than 19:40
just content creation teams. It's on us 19:42
to really own that upgrade. We really 19:45
need to nail hitting those three 19:47
dimensions of a human, brand, and 19:48
strategic realms so that others can see 19:50
us that way. Um, so I would suggest 19:53
partnering, getting clear in that 19:56
learning philosophy, partnering with the 19:57
strategic win, and then being able to 19:59
speak to how you hit those three realms, 20:00
human, brand, and strategic. It's a 20:02
dance. 20:04
>> What's on your bookshelf in terms of 20:05
books or resources that you would 20:08
recommend to people within the industry? 20:10
Yeah, there are three books that I often 20:13
recommend, especially for those that are 20:15
really just getting started with L & D. 20:17
The first is The Accidental 20:19
Instructional Designer by Cammy Bean. 20:20
It's just got really great basic 20:22
instructional design technique and 20:23
really great foundational content. The 20:26
next is The Surprising Power of 20:27
Liberating Structure, which is a really 20:29
delicious book of like 40 different 20:31
types of modules that you can piece 20:33
together to create really engaging 20:35
learning experiences. And the third one 20:36
I recommend is called Map It by Kathy 20:38
Moore. And it's a way to really partner 20:40
with your subject matter experts and 20:42
really help them solve the problems that 20:44
they are trying to without necessarily 20:45
creating full-blown training, really 20:48
meeting the training need to solve the 20:49
problem. And and I think it's a really 20:51
great way to help your subject matter 20:53
experts really get clear on what it is 20:55
they're trying to impact and what would 20:57
be the the best remedy to solve their 20:59
woes. 21:01
>> Dwayne, what is the best piece of 21:02
leadership advice that you have ever 21:05
received? 21:07
>> Master and revisit the basics. And for 21:08
me that is really mastering the skills 21:09
around empathy, creating psychological 21:12
safety and being of service to your 21:13
team. Leaders need to be able to create 21:15
strategic visions and they need to have 21:17
business acumen for sure. But then they 21:18
also need to meet the individuals and 21:20
the teams and the people that make up 21:22
the organizations to really get enrolled 21:23
in those visions. And so that I think is 21:25
the core skill set that I think every 21:28
leader should really double down on and 21:30
even revisit later in their career and 21:31
bring all of that great experience back 21:33
and really recheck in and relearn or 21:35
even in some cases unlearn the basics. 21:37
>> As always, thank you so much for 21:40
listening. For more from Dwayne, check 21:42
out the show notes where we've linked 21:45
his website and his LinkedIn. For more 21:46
from How to Make a Leader, please 21:50
subscribe so you never miss an episode. 21:52
We'll be back next month and every month 21:55
with more insights from another L & D 21:58
leader. We'll catch you next time as we 22:00
learn how to make a leader. 22:03
[Music] 22:09

– English Lyrics

💥 Jamming to "" but don’t get the lyrics? Dive into the app for bilingual learning and level up your English!
By
Viewed
2,552
Language
Learn this song

Lyrics & Translation

[English]
L & D teams or cultural amplifiers. We
are more than just content creation
teams. It's on us to really own that
upgrade. We really need to nail hitting
those three dimensions of the human,
brand, and strategic realms so that
others can see us that way.
You're listening to How to Make a
Leader, a leadership development podcast
from Big Think Plus, where we take the
best ideas from the biggest minds in
learning and development and distill
them into actionable insights. I'm your
host, Hannah Beaver. Our guest this
month is Dwayne Britain. With over 15
years of experience shaping culture and
capability at brands like Apple on
Zelando, Lululemon and Atudas. Dwayne is
a firm believer in the truth that
learning amplifies culture. In a moment,
we'll be talking about all things
learning culture and learning
philosophy, including a breakdown of the
two, why they're so important, and the
best way to think about both as you
tackle learning at your organization.
Dwayne will share a case study example
of how he rolled out a learning
framework at OnRunning, and you'll hear
some little nuggets of musical theater
along the way.
Dwayne, welcome to How to Make a Leader.
>> Thank you so much. I'm so happy to be
here.
>> We met a couple months ago now at
Offbeatfest and Dwayne had a fantastic
presentation um in front of the
conference. So, we kind of got chatting
about that and we'll be digging a little
bit into that theme today. But, I am
very excited for Dwayne to share his
learnings with us today on the podcast.
>> Yeah. No, it was a great conversation we
had um and I'm happy to continue it.
>> Great. Well, Dwayne, I would say that a
common thread that we have with guests
on this podcast is kind of their varying
path into L & D. Um many people ended up
in one industry and kind of wound their
way into the world of learning and
development and you are no exception um
to this commonplace theme that I've
noticed. So can you talk to us a little
bit about where you started in your
career and how did you get here to where
you are now?
>> It actually started even as a young
child. I was a I think a sort of a
sensitive emotional young lad and I
really found my community in theater and
I found a space where people would hold
space for others and it was really all
about connecting on an emotional level
and I think that's what actually helped
me later in my career with really
connecting with audiences and getting a
sense of an audience's needs because
it's really more about it's not so much
about standing on stage in a spotlight.
It's really about meeting your audience
and what their needs are in that moment
and uh and connecting with them that
way. So I went to school on a musical
theater scholarship. I knew even back
then I didn't want to be an actor. So
got another degree in organizational
communication with an emphasis in
organizational diversity back when DEI
was just getting its legs. And I spent
the next part of 12 years as a performer
and ended my career about 12 years later
taking all of my experience and putting
it into a CD that I recorded that got
signed with an independent Broadway jazz
cabaret label. So I began actually then
teaching the software and hardware that
I use to make music and to market that
music as a retail trainer for Apple. And
that's how I started not in HR but
becoming a retail trainer for Apple
teaching folks on how I created uh and
what I did and went on to lead that
training program.
>> That is such an interesting background
and I love the way that you wo us
through the story there. And I think
what's interesting is we've had the a
conversation about this like in person
around how the importance of connecting
with the audience, inspiring kind of
engaging learning experiences. Like I
certainly see the parallels between
theater and the connection there and
then also L & D. So I think it's just
fascinating how that skill set has
translated so beautifully into L & D and
your career in L & D.
Well, on that same theme of connection,
that brings us to why we're here today.
Um, and that is to talk about learning
philosophies and learning cultures. So,
why don't we start with the basics?
Could you define for us what is a
learning philosophy and how does that
differ from a learning culture?
>> Yes. So, you know what I might do if
it's okay, I might flip it. I think in
order to understand the philosophy, we
might need to want to look at culture
first. And I think even to understand
learning culture, we might want to
understand organizational culture.
>> Let's take it all the way back to the
beginning. Let's do it.
>> Organizational culture as I know it and
define it is the way things are done
around here. Quite simple and
straightforward. I've also heard it
defined as the way decisions are made
when no one is looking. And also this
responsibility that it's not just passed
down, but that we all have a part to
play in it. And the reason why companies
are so explicit in defining their
cultures, their values, their vision,
their goals, their habits and rituals is
because if they don't, typically what
happens in organizations is, as we know,
the strongest and loudest voices kind of
come in and fill that vacuum. And the
same is true for learning culture. If a
company doesn't necessarily explicitly
express what they believe good learning
to look like, you can have a whole
hodgepodge of different types of
learning experiences and and and not
even in a maligned way or you know
people trying to uh sabotage the system
or whatever, but people have different
backgrounds, have different strengths
and they'll naturally gravitate towards
putting those forward. So a learning
culture can be skewed by people's
individual contributions unless there
are some clearly stated guard rails,
let's just call them. And that's what a
learning philosophy is. It is a north
star that an organization can detail
that aligns their learning and
development community, gives them
something to hold themselves accountable
to and can really tie in their
programming into sort of an umbrella
point of view foremost so that
everything that they make and everyone
that's paying into that learning culture
from interns to new managers to vendors
can really have a sense of what we're
trying to achieve here as a brand. And
in terms of learning, it's the same
thing. We might have marketing
philosophies on how we want to connect
with our audiences. We might have
product philosophies on how our products
and services should look and feel.
Having a learning philosophy helps the
organization know what we are a stand
for for how people grow and develop at
our organization.
>> Fantastic. I appreciate that breakdown.
And I know the last time we spoke you
kind of we were talking about
philosophies and cultures and you
mentioning it's kind of a chicken and
egg like which comes first. you have to
talk about one to talk about another. So
why do you think that distinction and
knowing the difference between the two
is so important? How does that show up
in an L & D program?
>> Yeah, when teams have a learning
philosophy and when they've articulated
and even shared it out with the
organization, what it does is it
positions a learning and development
team as a strategic partner to the
business more just a way of creating
content or attaching themselves to a a
strategic brand initiative or target. So
typically there are three realms that
we're working at within the learning and
development in my view. There's the
strategic realm where we're going after
business KPIs and trying to impact
behaviors and help achieve a a certain
goal. There's the brand component that
the learning philosophy serves which is
more like sort of the cultural elements
which is more what the brand is hoping
to achieve and be a stand for for
internal and external customers. And
then there's the human realm which is
how we can create and design learning
experiences and meet folks where they
are in it so they have individual
relevancy with the learning inside and
outside the organization. And so when
you clearly articulate how you're
working to design and target these you
elevate your L & D team to actual
strategic partners as opposed to
sometimes the content creation teams
that we're sometimes viewed and
sometimes we view ourselves as. And so I
recommend to CEOs, to CPOS, to learning
teams to really take that upgrade
because when you look at those different
realms that we impact, how we're
literally given permission to evangelize
the way things are done around here, you
can really see that we are poised to
really have a lot more impact within an
organization than just creating content.
>> And then further down the line, what
does building a learning philosophy
impact? Why is it important?
>> It can impact those three realms. the
strategic branded human realms, but also
it really holds the L & D team also
accountable to this north star. It also
can create a sense of efficiency in what
you're building. So rather than going
through so many iterations, if you have
a clear north star that you're you're
aiming towards from the beginning, you
can really align the learning towards it
and it can really make a off-the-shelf
training feel a little bit more
customized and translated for an
organization. on my website and and in a
recent podcast I gave an um an example
of translating radical cander into an
organization. So rather than just taking
radical cander which is a great uh
framework for giving feedback for those
who may not know it and just kind of
taking it as it is really looking at it
through the lens and seeing how we can
apply this to our systems and have it um
correlate to strategic goals that we're
impacting how we might tweak the the
verbiage or the the framework a little
bit to ensure that it's meeting our
brand and our culture. and then helping
folks immediately find the learning in
it from the very calendar prompt of
asking someone, you know, what's a piece
of feedback that you've delayed giving
and why or what's a great piece of
recognition that you um that you've been
meaning to share with someone and how
might it improve their performance,
their day, their quarter, whatever it
might be and getting folks thinking
through how this can really impact them
on a human level. And then additionally,
what I believe a learning philosophy has
the ability to do is create impact. So
when you have your entire team, everyone
that's creating learning experiences,
whether it's an intern who's giving an
office tour or a new manager that's
onboarding someone into their team,
>> starting at the beginning, how would a
listener listening today identify their
organization's learning beliefs? If
they're not clearly laid out, what's the
first step that you would take to
identify those? One question that I
would encourage you all to answer and
consider in tandem with your your
stakeholders and your your partners is
answering this one question foremost.
What do we believe about how people grow
and develop here? And by answering that
one question, you're going to find
different avenues to go down. But that
really is the essence of what a learning
philosophy is. You might consider
different ways that your values tie into
learning. You might consider the
different ways leadership shows up in
learning about how your brand
positioning your brand design shows up
about how what you uniquely believe
about people and the stand you want to
be for people in DEI topics in regional
concerns in operational on the ground
matters whether you know if you have
retail teams for example or people in
factories or if you have people
interacting everything via chat and then
finally what the you know what the
actual modalities look like you know
what types of learning experiences are
you creating these are all things that
could be answered
or uncovered and bubbled up through
answering that first uh question I think
foremost and then from there as you
detail this out what I would also
encourage you to do is consider the next
step is really within those guard rails
what freedom do people have to move
within those guard rails because adults
typically learn by making sense of the
information themselves and listen we're
all adults it's it's less about kind of
dictating what folks need to do but
giving them some guard rails and letting
them know how they uh implement and
tweak it. And then the final layer I
would encourage you to consider is
detailing in how the team can pay into
it. So what if they find more efficient
ways to pay into this? How can they
contribute feedback? How can they pay
into that document? In which places can
they contribute their unique expertise
and point of view. So then you have this
great foundation how it can be adapted
uh to fit certain needs and then how the
team also contributes and then by
sharing that out and making it public
you can also ask your team to hold you
accountable to that and that is a really
robust first step in generating a sense
and really detailing out your cultural
learning cultural ambition.
>> Fantastic. I appreciate that you're
laying it out so clearly with this with
this multi-step framework. I think
that's very digestible format to to
learn time for a little bit of a case
study. Can you talk to me about your
time at on and the work you did there
with the spark methodology?
>> Yeah, there's a lot in there and listen,
I think what what spark is is just a a
vivid example of what I just walked
through. So, um on my role as the first
dedicated head of global learning and
development was we needed a way to
protect our culture as we scale. We
didn't need another framework. We didn't
need another training on you know x y or
z. What we wanted to do was create our
point of view. So we created spark which
is an acronym sp a r k and the s stood
for spirits on calls their values their
spirits. So we felt that they were
really responsible for the success of
an. So we wanted our our learning
experiences to be grounded in those
spirits to tie our experiences back to
the bigger picture whenever possible and
when it made sense. At this particular
point we were really working to unify
the brand internally on leveraging the
brand design and point of view. So
whenever possible, we wanted our
learning experiences to be positioned
from fonts and colors to the tone of
voice and this sort of thing. We hired a
media designer to ensure that our
learning experiences were really on
brand. But one in particular was I think
particularly important to the human
spirit of learning it on and that was
the explorer spirit which was this
entrepreneurial way of thinking of
iterating of trying you know calculated
risk-taking and so forth and we really
wanted to protect this. So in our
learning experiences, we wanted them to
be agency enabling, and that's the AE.
We didn't want to just throw content at
folks one way. We wanted them to um be
in choice about how they learned when
they signed up for learning. And we
wanted to leverage learning discovery or
over sort of like a list of steps
whenever possible.
DEI is also very important on and so we
really wanted in addition to cultural
considerations we wanted to consider
things like contribution preference
scheduling needs session length and this
sort of thing within our offering and
design for that and then finally um
great learning takes place I think when
folks practice so at on we said that
learning is kinetic it's an active
participary sport so we wanted people
like practicing whenever possible new
behaviors trying on new thoughts and and
so forth so that is spark and then it's
giving teams parameters within which to
work. And then for those team members
that we did have to be really explicit
with customer service, maybe retail team
members, we still want them to feel
comfortable asking things like, okay,
this is great, but like what if I find a
better way to do this? What if I find a
more efficient way? How can I pay into
this? How is my feedback considered?
Where can I contribute my expertise and
my point of view? So that there was this
accountability to us as L & D2 that we
weren't just kind of pushing things on
to folks, but we were really treating
folks as the experts that we hired and
allowing them to pay into and to
contribute to that culture.
>> And what would you say was your biggest
learning and perhaps your biggest piece
of advice for someone listening that
might want to roll out a similar
initiative at their organization? In
general, I would say it's not, I think,
very common for folks to always view L &
D teams as this much of a strategic
partner. You might actually be
demonstrating this for the first time.
And what I would encourage you to do and
the only way I think I was able to get
this through a little bit even at on was
that we tied it to a strategic win. So
speak the language of the business and
we were able to tie that philosophy to a
big strategic retail win. We uh had our
retail trainers use Spark philosophy as
a lens to roll out onspurs customer
service training and they didn't even
have to do very much. They gave their
training a chiropractic adjustment to
the Spark philosophy. So they rooted
good service in our spirits. They worked
with our media designer to make sure it
looked perfectly positioned. They
created a space for the facilitators and
the team to make it their own. They
worked with our DEI team to make sure
that we were using inclusive language
and practices on our retail floor so
that our guests felt great. and they
made it come alive with real case
studies, practice and and follow-up
nudges and so forth. So they really
adapted it to that learning philosophy.
But what that did and this is the
important thing is that it made that
cultural component come alive at the
retail level which candidly sometimes
are the are the people that are that
probably feel furthest remove even if
they're not feel from the culture that
we might have at the headquarters the
main office. And so that's I think what
we do in learning and development. We
make that culture come alive. But
sometimes we have to show people the win
to get them to see like, aha, this is
what you mean. You know, it's
interesting as I share that as it's
coming out of my mouth. It actually
reminds me of when I was recording, I
was at the end of my my career and I
just wanted to record some beautiful
songs and as I was explaining this uh to
folks, they're like, "Well, what is
that? Is that like pop? Is it like
cabaret? Is it like what is that?" I'm
like, "No, it's my take on these on
these songs." And it wasn't until people
heard the music when they were like,
"Oh, I totally get this now. I see what
this is." You kind of have to show
people sometimes what it is for them to
completely understand what you're going
for.
>> And then aside from your work at On, do
you have any other examples of your
approach to storytelling and branding
within the L &D function?
>> During my time as an artist, I of course
when you're an artist, you're the the
manager, the product. I had to develop
skills to sort of market that. And so
when I first had the chance to actually
build my first learning and development
team, um I was working within a small
startup and I knew that I wanted to
bring on someone that could help elevate
the visual the audiovisisual look and uh
tone and feel of our learning
experiences. So uh we hired this
part-timer and the L & D team really
became known for this look, tone and
feel of our sessions and it actually
part of the reason we were asked to to
be involved in so many other areas of
the business and eventually get folded
into the greater business because folks
saw the way that we were working and we
were working to create learning
experiences. When I came over to
probably the coolest thing that we did
in terms of practical tool is we created
a website called the own your
development map. So many organizations
say folks own their development, but
what does it mean? And it on we really
tried to put that into words. So I
drafted 10 tenants about um different
steps that folks could take from getting
clear on their their values and their
why up to entertaining lattice um
lattice framework development. And we
created an interactive clickable uh
relief map with different brand imagery
and brand uh videos that would tie
people to different external sources
that were inspirational that clearly
articulated what that tenant meant and
internal resources to explore it
further. So for example, one of the
tenants might be uh discover uncharted
paths the the lattice framework and
internally it might link to our job
board for internal job placement this
sort of thing and at the top it would
just have three or four questions for
reflection to get the team member
thinking about where they are within
that particular tenant and it's a very
choose your own adventure style thing
and we rolled that uh out just before I
left. That's such a fantastic example of
how to really embed learning into your
organization. And I loved how you
mentioned too like even the different
mediums of kind of tear off or having
like visual maps because we all learn
differently and so trying to meet the
learner and any possible touch point
just to bring them in. I think that's
just such a fantastic example. Thank you
for sharing.
So Dwayne, we've covered a lot today,
but if listeners could take away one
piece of advice from today's
conversation, what would that one
learning be?
>> If you walk away with nothing else that
I would share is that L & D teams are
cultural amplifiers. We are more than
just content creation teams. It's on us
to really own that upgrade. We really
need to nail hitting those three
dimensions of a human, brand, and
strategic realms so that others can see
us that way. Um, so I would suggest
partnering, getting clear in that
learning philosophy, partnering with the
strategic win, and then being able to
speak to how you hit those three realms,
human, brand, and strategic. It's a
dance.
>> What's on your bookshelf in terms of
books or resources that you would
recommend to people within the industry?
Yeah, there are three books that I often
recommend, especially for those that are
really just getting started with L & D.
The first is The Accidental
Instructional Designer by Cammy Bean.
It's just got really great basic
instructional design technique and
really great foundational content. The
next is The Surprising Power of
Liberating Structure, which is a really
delicious book of like 40 different
types of modules that you can piece
together to create really engaging
learning experiences. And the third one
I recommend is called Map It by Kathy
Moore. And it's a way to really partner
with your subject matter experts and
really help them solve the problems that
they are trying to without necessarily
creating full-blown training, really
meeting the training need to solve the
problem. And and I think it's a really
great way to help your subject matter
experts really get clear on what it is
they're trying to impact and what would
be the the best remedy to solve their
woes.
>> Dwayne, what is the best piece of
leadership advice that you have ever
received?
>> Master and revisit the basics. And for
me that is really mastering the skills
around empathy, creating psychological
safety and being of service to your
team. Leaders need to be able to create
strategic visions and they need to have
business acumen for sure. But then they
also need to meet the individuals and
the teams and the people that make up
the organizations to really get enrolled
in those visions. And so that I think is
the core skill set that I think every
leader should really double down on and
even revisit later in their career and
bring all of that great experience back
and really recheck in and relearn or
even in some cases unlearn the basics.
>> As always, thank you so much for
listening. For more from Dwayne, check
out the show notes where we've linked
his website and his LinkedIn. For more
from How to Make a Leader, please
subscribe so you never miss an episode.
We'll be back next month and every month
with more insights from another L & D
leader. We'll catch you next time as we
learn how to make a leader.
[Music]

Key Vocabulary

Start Practicing
Vocabulary Meanings

amplifier

/ˈæmplɪfaɪər/

B2
  • noun
  • - A device or person that increases or strengthens something.

strategic

/strəˈtiːdʒɪk/

B2
  • adjective
  • - Relating to the identification of long-term or overall aims and interests.

distill

/dɪˈstɪl/

C1
  • verb
  • - To extract the essential meaning or most important aspects of something.

actionable

/ˈækʃənəbəl/

B2
  • adjective
  • - Able to be done or acted on; having practical value.

capability

/ˌkeɪpəˈbɪləti/

B2
  • noun
  • - The extent of someone's or something's ability.

philosophy

/fəˈlɒsəfi/

B2
  • noun
  • - A theory or attitude held by a person or organization that acts as a guiding principle.

framework

/ˈfreɪmwɜːrk/

B2
  • noun
  • - A basic structure underlying a system, concept, or text.

vacuum

/ˈvækjuːm/

B2
  • noun
  • - An absence of people or ideas in a place that should be filled.

accountable

/əˈkaʊntəbəl/

B2
  • adjective
  • - Required or expected to justify actions or decisions.

articulate

/ɑːrˈtɪkjuleɪt/

C1
  • verb
  • - To express an idea or feeling fluently and coherently.

iterate

/ˈɪtəreɪt/

C2
  • verb
  • - To perform or utter repeatedly; to refine a process or product.

empathy

/ˈempəθi/

B2
  • noun
  • - The ability to understand and share the feelings of another.

acumen

/əˈkjuːmən/

C2
  • noun
  • - The ability to make good judgments and quick decisions.

evangelize

/ɪˈvændʒəlaɪz/

C2
  • verb
  • - To advocate or promote a principle or belief intensely.

robust

/roʊˈbʌst/

B2
  • adjective
  • - Strong and healthy; vigorous; sturdy.

💡 Which new word in “” caught your eye?

📱 Open the app to check meanings, build sentences, and try them out in real convos!

Key Grammar Structures

Coming Soon!

We're updating this section. Stay tuned!

Related Songs