[English]
Hello, I'm Lucy Hockings. From the BBC
World Service, this is The Global Story.
For many thousands of years,
language has been changing.
Here in the UK, the gradual departure from
what became known as the Queen's English
is a trend which has often been characterised
as a threat to cultural identity.
But with the advent of social
media, the pace of change
may be running away from us.
Phrases like "it's giving", "rizz", "no cap",
these are all terms which we attribute
to internet culture and specifically to younger,
millennial and gen Z demographics.
Today we're considering how the mass migration
to living our lives online is having
an impact on the spoken
word in the real world.
It's even made its mark on
the Oxford English Dictionary.
Well, with me here in the studio today is
former BBC journalist, author and linguist
Sophia Smith Galer and Neil Edgeller,
who is from BBC Learning English.
Sophia, Neil, lovely to have
you with us on the pod. Hi.
Hi.
Hello, Lucy.
Neil, last night I sat with my teenage kids
as I now know you did as well and said,
"I'm discussing language tomorrow.
Things have changed.
I'm hearing these words from you
all the time. Can we talk about it?" And
they were straight away like, "Mum, don't do it.
Don't use the words. Don't embarrass yourself.
You will never come back from this at
all. You know, like this is just steer clear,
play it straight". What did you say
to your teenage kids?
Pretty much exactly the same conversation.
I've become aware of this whole range of
vocabulary used by this generation that
seems completely and utterly exclusive and
they find it funny when I try and use
those expressions because I use them badly.
I mean you're such a boomer, if you
basically you start using these words you're
tainted and it's a no-go.
And Sophia you don't have kids
but I mean you're so aware of how language is
changing. And you're even writing a book at the
moment about linguicide. What actually
is linguicide?
So linguicide is the phenomenon of a language
disappearing and perhaps even dying or
becoming extinct. And this is happening
around the world at an alarming rate. So a
language disappearing because it's been
criminalised, war, genocide, other obvious
examples. But linguicide equally can be
more covert. So linguists also described a
language becoming associated with
shame and speakers being so ashamed of
speaking that language,
they begin to speak another.
And tell us about your job, Neil. You're
creating content to help people learn English. We
make videos and podcasts and web pages to
help learners of English around the world,
whatever level they are, to teach them
English, but also to help them to enjoy
themselves in English.
Well, language is obviously the social
tool that we all use to communicate. But as we've
already discussed, it's so different depending on
the generation that's talking and we
alter our language depending on who
we're talking to. When it comes to our kids and
what we're seeing particularly with the younger
generations, Neil, what sort of words are
you seeing emerge at the moment?
Now we're gonna mention some of the
words that we're not supposed to mention.
Okay, I'm gonna let you do it.
So I think of all of the
things I've heard recently,
the most fascinating is this word, skibidi.
That was the first one that came up
at my dinner table as well.
Can you use it in a sentence?
Well, I don't think I can
effectively. I can try and I get
laughed at. But it's very,
very fluid grammatically.
So for example, I have heard the expression,
the skibidi rizzler.
Rizzler is connected to this word
rizz, which we may come on to talk
about as well. But skibidi seems to be
able to be thrown in almost anywhere.
And nobody, including my kids, can tell me what
it really means. I think that's part of the whole
sort of exclusivity of each generation's use
of language.
To the point about exclusivity and saying,
"Mum, please don't say this word." We should
think of language speaking also as identity
making. So if you are in a subgroup and you
use particular phrases to signify 'I am part
of this group', the minute you start hearing
these phrases adopted outside of the group,
it's not the in-group language anymore. So
it stops being the in-group language of teenagers,
for example, because mum's using it.
And then they'll just start using another one.
But Sophia, what Neil and I are finding
challenging is this is changing so quickly all the
time. Neil's already mentioned rizz. I
remember doing quite a kind of academic
interview around the word rizz when
it was the Oxford word of the year.
The Oxford word of the year has been revealed
and this year it's rizz. Now, if you've no
idea what that means, don't worry, you
might just be over 30. I'm lucky I've got
teenagers, I know this one.
The kids are not using rizz anymore. They might
use it in a slightly patronising ironic way.
But Neil's now saying they're
using rizzler. What's rizzler?
A rizzler is a person who has rizz.
Duh.
See? I'm getting myself into all sorts of trouble
here and all sorts of traps. But it is so, it's
evolving so quickly.
It's evolving really quickly. And if you
think about in the past how languages developed
and changed. A language will always change
because our needs as people change and
different and new things happen. And in the past,
you may have lived in a remote village
and the only language contact or contact
you had with any kind of linguistic innovation
would have been some trader rolling into town
and then moving forward or maybe
perhaps you would move. Today,
if you're consuming mass media in social media,
you're actually seeing a very diverse array of
different voices from around the world.
I can be speaking to my nephews at home
in New Zealand, a world away, it seems to
me, and yet they're using the same words
as my teenage kids here in London. That
wasn't the case when we were younger.
No, it wasn't. And that's part of this
homogenisation that social media brings, that the
kids are using the same slang globally. When
I was at school, the words that we would
use to describe a really bright person or a
less bright person might be different from the
words used by someone who was brought up
in a different part of the same country.
Neil is it just video-based social media or
is there influence here around text sites and
micro blogging and things as well?
Absolutely yes and a lot of the new
vocabulary that we've seen emerging over the
last few years comes from blogging and
from online communities communicating
through text. People are walking around
and saying LOL and FOMO and YOLO to each
other. That's an interesting development.
And we're saying LOL. We're not saying L-O-L.
We're not saying F-O-M-O. We've adopted
them into the sort of existing lexical
structure that we have so that they sound like
normal words.
And that didn't take long?
Didn't take long at all, no.
And with some of these words, the skibidi,
the rizz, rizzler, no cap. Where do they come
from? Is it just, is it from different cultural
groups? Is it from different sectors of society?
Where are they actually emerging from?
A lot of the words are being innovated within
in-groups and then they get introduced to
the mainstream. We're seeing a lot of
vocabulary coming from black and Latino LGBT
culture in the US. We're seeing loads of
expressions coming from that, like "it's giving",
"slay", all come from those spaces. We're
also seeing language emerging from what
actually were incel subculture words from
even the 2000s. Some of these expressions
don't even come from the 2010s. They're a
little older than we think. When it comes to
social media and language change, we think a
term is new, but in reality, it's likely been
in circulation for some time before a sort
of more influential person perhaps uses the
term and then we see the words leave these
peripheries and leave these subgroups they
become mainstream and it's these words
that then become more widely adopted.
And Neil do you think it's also like with our
kids and I'm trying to think back to when I was
young as well it's a bit of an act of rebellion?
Yeah absolutely yes and I think the interesting
thing about the language change we're
seeing at the moment is just the pace
in comparison to pre-internet discourse.
You know, the words are there all around
the world immediately. Some get picked up,
some don't. And that happened before,
but it was just much slower.
I mean, we need to cast our mind back
before 1989, the World Wide Web. What was
happening with language before then.
Well, I remember when I was at school.
Back in the day.
The reinvention of the word wicked, meaning
great or cool or whatever. I think I am just
by about a year too old to use that and feel
comfortable using it, even though it's been in
circulation for about 30 years now. So
these words have always come about and been
reinvented, this, what they call semantic
shift, where a word has an original meaning
and then suddenly has a new meaning. And it's
all tied up with the exclusivity and stuff.
But it's the pace with which it happens
these days, which is really astounding.
Sophia, you speak many languages.
A couple.
Italian, Arabic.
I studied Spanish and Arabic at university
and my family speaks Italian. I grew up
hearing it but not speaking it.
So what about these other languages in the
world? Is it the same? I mean, are they
experiencing the same kind of changes in
these words that we are seeing in English?
Oh, certainly. All languages are experiencing
the phenomena we've described, such as
linguistic innovation and adopting new
words. The obvious difference that we may
observe in other languages is the influence
of English and the fact that English as a
language, it holds prestige
in so many global domains.
And there are moves right around the world
to try and protect language. I mean, I spend
some time in French speaking Canada and
there's real moves to sort of stop the creep
of English into French that spoke in there.
Giorgia Meloni, the leader in Italy right now,
very protective of the Italian language.
Countries have different attitudes towards
how much they try and control linguistic
change, which defies control. Languages are,
even speaking to linguicide that I'm
writing about, the idea that a language
can die must therefore mean a language can live.
So as living things, they're really difficult to
control. And if you say to people, you can't
use this word that we're now hearing lots
of people say you must use the French
version. It's kind of coming a little bit
too late because the French version didn't
immediately dominate or resonate with
speakers. So it can actually be quite
challenging. You're trying to reverse
time almost in something like that.
Neil, I wonder if words as well and
phrases that we use can sometimes just be
fashionable. I mean, I'm not talking about rizz,
only lasting 18 months or whatever, but
other words and phrases that grab hold and
are trendy but then kind of die away again,
almost like fashion or clothing or music.
Yeah, I think that's right. You can look at
expressions which are used by many people
over a short period of time that then kind
of vanish. So we have at BBC Learning English
podcast called The English We Speak. We look
at idiomatic expressions that are sort of
trending at the time. A couple of years
ago, we were talking about blended working,
blended working, working
at home and in the office.
Yeah, I haven't heard that one for a while.
People don't use it anymore. We all say hybrid
working now. So yes, there is a fashion for
these words, they come and go.
And Sophia, you've not just been looking at
how our vocabulary has changed, but it's the
way we say things as well. And this notion of
up-talk, particularly sort of rising at the end
of a sentence. I'm from New Zealand. I
mean, we all speak like that at home and
in the antipodes. I also wondered if it's
not just social media that's influencing
the way that we speak. It's maybe
years of everyone watching Neighbours.
We have always used up-talk. I mean, it's
most characteristic, I think, for asking
questions. I just did it there, asking
questions. That would be up-talk with this rising
intonation at the end of the phrase. When
it comes to social media and using up-talk,
something that I've written about in the
past is how asking is there a TikTok voice or
accent, is there a way that I speak, that I
adopt when I'm making a TikTok video. The idea
is that when we make video content, we use a
lot of rising intonation possibly to relate
to our audience.
It's more engaging. It's more engaging.
Another theory is that I'm keeping you
listening. The rising intonation suggests there's
more to come.
You're hooking people.
Hooking people in. When it comes to social
media video, if I can complete a video
retaining someone's attention, it's more
likely to perform better on the algorithm. So
actually what's possibly happening is creators
are furthering linguistic innovation based
on algorithmic direction, which is fascinating.
Neil, speaking of intonation, what about the
change to pronunciation? Are we seeing
some British words change and they're
now said in a much more American way?
There used to be a much greater distinction
between the way Americans would say or
pronounce a word and the way that British
people would and now that's more fluid and
we're not able to say with such certainty that
that's American English and that's British
English, so let's have an example of the
word which I say as 'schedule'. Younger
members of BBC Learning English say 'schedule',
and 'schedule' is what we used to say
was the American pronunciation.
What about grammar then, Neil? Are we
seeing those changes? They must surely be
slower.
Grammar really does change slowly. You
can look at, for example, you could pick up a
copy of Frankenstein, which was written
200 years ago and absolutely understand it
completely. There's nothing in the grammatical
structures which will confuse you. But
something that has happened and has
happened more quickly recently because
probably of social media is something known
as verbing which is turning nouns into
verbs.
I love doing this.
And the most obvious one is
Google to Google or to friend.
We are podcasting.
And so that is actually a grammatical change
which we have seen accelerate recently.
Sophia, is language change picking
up momentum? Is it getting faster?
As media will change, linguistic innovation
will change. So it's already so hyperfast and
powerful in the current vertical video climate
that we're in and the amount of language
we are exposed to. It's hard to imagine how
that can get even sort of more hyperactive,
but I'm quite confident it will.
And Neil, in terms of your job, do you love
all these changes to the language? Are you
slightly horrified sometimes?
I'm not horrified in the slightest. I know lots
of people are, and they think that it's wrong
and that mistakes are being made. But
language is dynamic. No one here is sitting
talking like Chaucer, You know, language
changes and I think it's exciting and we need to
embrace it and at BBC Learning English we
try to describe language as it is rather than
prescribe the way it ought to be.
What about the future of language? If
we could look ahead Sophia, what do you think's
going to happen in the next 20, 30 years?
I think a lot of the future is predictable
in that when I am in my 40s, 50s, 60s, I'm
probably going to start thinking why are my
kids or the kids around me saying all these
bizarre words that I've sort of never heard of.
And what do you think, Neil, do you think the
other thing that might happen is that we'll
see some language sadly die out,
some languages, because of the prevalence of
English, the prevalence of what people are
consuming online is going to really influence
what's spoken in the home?
Yeah, unfortunately, that is a reality. I mean,
languages are dying all the time. And one of
the features of language in the
social media age is homogenisation.
Linguicide is such an urgent and pressing
issue because it's believed by the end of the
century that we are in half of the
world's languages will disappear.
I have a positive story to tell from New
Zealand about that, about how much more Māori
is spoken in New Zealand than when I was
young. And when we talk about how quickly
things change, when I go back home, I
can't believe how much more Māori has just
spoken in everyday life, among people just
casually, it's not a big thing at all.
They are an example to the world. They are
used all the time in language revitalisation
work as examples of how a language that
appears to be dying, becoming extinct,
whatever phrase you prefer, can
revitalise and acquire new speakers.
I can't have any conversation about anything
that looks at the future anymore without
mentioning AI. Oh yeah. Is there an
influence there as well? Is that going
to change
language?
Interestingly AI is being used again if we
look at linguicide and endangered languages.
I've done reporting looking at how AI is
helping people revive their languages or create
resources very quickly that are able to
support speakers who want to reclaim or
revitalise a language but again we're seeing
examples where perhaps the AI tools being
made, especially out of endangered languages
where accuracy is so important because
there aren't lots of sources necessarily
for them, and the AI hallucinating making up
words or expressions or grammars for these
languages we described as being of low
resource, like there's not loads of training data
to train in AI. I would say AI isn't all bad. It
brings lots of very useful tools for communities,
but it kind of has to be observed and
watched. And if it's misbehaving,
it has to be told off.
Well, it's been wicked to have you
both on the podcast. Sophia, thank you.
Thank you.
Neil, good to see you, thanks.
Thank you.
If you want more episodes of The Global
Story, you can find us wherever you get your
podcasts. We do one big story in depth every
day and don't forget to subscribe. Thanks
for watching, goodbye.