Display Bilingual:

陳力簡好 00:01
謝謝你又跟我們連線 00:02
來聊聊今天這兩天的一些大事 00:04
熱點事件吧 00:06
方菲好 00:09
觀眾朋友們好 00:09
今天就是有幾個事 00:10
想請你來跟我們聊聊 00:13
一個就是政府關門持續中 00:15
影響開始顯現 00:18
所以這個我們先聊一聊 00:20
然後再談一談今天爆出的 00:21
一個就是拜登期間 FBI 00:24
他監控八名共和黨議員這事 00:25
那參議員這現在是炸了鍋了 00:28
然後再有時間談一談 00:30
美國這個針對聯邦執法人員 00:31
這個暴力上升 00:34
但談這些事之前呢 00:35
先聊一聊今天美國總統川普 00:37
川普總統會見加拿大總統 00:39
那這個呢 00:41
白天他們剛剛開完會 00:43
我現在還沒有看到有什麼 00:46
最新的一個成果 00:47
只是說呢好像說美加呢 00:49
現在是AIM 00:51
就是說目標是要達成全面的貿易協議 00:53
但是今天有什麼成果還沒說 00:57
今天這兩人的會面 00:59
你有什麼看點 01:00
跟我們說一下你的看法 01:02
其實呢這個東西 01:03
就是你看一下他的聯合記者會 01:06
他們兩個人的聯合記者會 01:08
還有是川普總統 01:10
他們美國政府現在做出了一些讓步 01:12
說呢 對於美國和加拿大生產的關稅 01:15
原來生產的汽車 01:19
其實加拿大主要問題在於汽車 01:21
就是他有很多的汽車廠 01:23
他給你做好了之後 01:25
給你運到美國來 01:27
加拿大呢 01:28
現在徵收的關稅是25% 01:29
結果呢 美國呢 01:31
就說我們可以把加拿大的關稅 01:33
就是加拿大的汽車 01:37
當成跟本土的汽車同樣對待 01:39
然後呢可能要有一個(cota)之類的東西 01:42
就是這個是相當於說 01:45
川普總統做出的一個比較實質性的 01:46
一個姿態 01:49
進口到美國的 01:50
加拿大進口到美國的 01:52
就是說這個做一個 01:54
就是加拿大出 01:57
加拿大製造的汽車 01:58
其實加拿大的汽車也都是很多 01:59
都是什麼美國的工廠 02:01
這個是這樣子 02:03
所以說呢他呢就是現在做一個這樣的姿態 02:04
來出來 02:08
卡尼這邊呢 應該也是做出了一定的 02:08
這個讓步而已 02:12
不過呢這個加拿大最近確實是比較亂 02:13
加拿大的海關 02:16
加拿大的海關數據系統崩潰了 02:17
你說你聽說過一個國家的海關系統崩潰了嗎 02:20
是嗎 02:25
他們給你搞那個 02:27
現在凡是這兩天去過加拿大都知道 02:28
你別跟我說我開著車過邊界或者是怎麼著的 02:31
你坐飛機過邊界你得再等等 02:34
但那會兒就是他給你出關都比較慢 02:36
開著車過邊界的可以沒問題 02:38
你試試你開一個卡車 02:41
你開卡車東西你運一卡車或你過邊界 02:43
全都給你什麼呢 02:46
路上還是標記說 02:47
commercial truck go this way 02:49
就是然後直接就寫no commercial truck 02:51
就直接就這個commercial truck go this way 02:54
然後或者是 02:56
no commercial truck available 02:57
就直接就這麼點 02:58
就no commercial truck沒什麼說的 02:59
結果commercial truck 你比如說像巴佛羅啊 03:01
這些大的港口啊 03:04
巴佛羅啊什麼 這些大港口 03:06
還有蒙特利奧那些港口 03:09
堆積了無數的卡車 就在那等著 03:10
你知道嗎 03:13
司機就在卡車裡邊連吃帶住 03:14
然後這個 上休息區去上個廁所啊 03:16
什麼這那的 03:20
他們就一直在那等著 他很慢很慢很慢 03:20
現在海關數據崩潰了 03:23
那現在回復到拿紙 03:25
把這個這個你這貨 03:27
你這車裡什麼貨 給我登記 03:28
他紙上寫你知道嗎 03:29
天哪 03:32
加拿大搞這東西 03:33
加拿大現在就是 03:34
加拿大現在是搞這玩意兒 03:35
現在加拿大亂得很 03:36
就不是就是加拿大這個這個這個形勢 03:38
經濟形勢也不好 03:40
你知道嗎 03:41
現在的情況 03:41
但是卡尼目前 卡尼 03:42
我沒有看到卡尼對這個美國做出什麼 03:44
太實質性的讓步 03:48
可能是汽車關稅 03:49
這個也是屬於雙方 一個 做一個姿態吧 03:50
真正我沒有看到卡尼 03:54
做出讓步的一個 03:56
如果兩個人要是如果今天 03:57
如果川普總統和卡尼見面 03:59
能夠做出一個實質性的讓步 04:01
那你看那肯定川普 04:03
那個truth social肯定就貼出來了 04:05
什麼卡尼是個什麼什麼什麼 04:07
Gentle man Great man 什麼這那的說哎 04:09
對 是我的good friend呀 04:11
什麼這那的就來了 04:13
發完了這個記者會弄完 04:15
那會沒有什麼動靜 你知道嗎 04:16
沒有什麼動靜 04:18
對這我就看到一個笑話 04:20
說記者問問那個川普說 04:22
你既然說他是個good man 04:24
又怎麼怎麼樣 04:25
哎呦 怎麼怎麼樣 為什麼不能達成一個好的一個deal 04:26
然後川普說 04:29
因為我也想成一個good man 04:30
great man 04:32
他說我也想成為一個great man 04:33
然後大家就哄堂大笑 04:35
但是很多笑話出來 04:37
沒實質進展 04:38
暫時暫時沒有實質性進展 04:41
因為他們美國手裡還有一張牌 04:43
是因為USMCA的這個談判 04:45
要在26年開始 就開始重新談 04:48
所以說呢 04:51
這個美國手裡這張牌 04:52
卡尼始終摸不到底 04:53
所以現在呢 就是 就是這個他 04:55
卡尼這個人你別以為怎麼著 04:57
這個人你看他那個樣 04:59
他那個卡尼這個人 05:01
當過英格蘭銀行行長 05:02
然後呢他比較陰 你明白嗎 05:04
就是他呢就是可能不跟你 05:06
這是抬槓或者是怎麼著 05:08
但是他比較陰 他想的辦法 05:10
這個卡尼是要注意的 你知道嗎 05:12
他這個跟加拿大的deal 05:14
因為是這樣 05:15
你看美國跟別的國家 05:16
你跟加拿大這個deal達不成的話 05:18
這個讓人家說出去 總是覺得這個事情 05:20
總是覺得你加拿大 05:23
可以說是美國常年的盟友吧 05:25
咱不說小弟 就說盟友吧 05:27
之間他們之間 05:29
居然有這麼大的這個這個分歧 05:30
現在加拿大的關稅高於越南的關稅 05:32
你說你這樣玩 05:34
你說你你說你可怎麼讓 05:35
你說所以說這個事情 05:37
是比較被動的一個事情 05:39
是這個確實也我我我 05:42
我不知道加拿大能夠做什麼呢 05:44
讓什麼樣的讓步哈 05:46
但是呢 05:48
我覺得就是其中一個很大的原因 05:50
川普我看川普現在就是不太滿意的國家 05:53
可能就是都是理念上 05:56
跟現在的美國的這種保守理念不太一樣 05:58
我覺得這其中有這個這個因素 06:02
還不單純是一個經濟的問題 06:04
對對對對對 06:07
他好多時候都沒有什麼過 06:08
這是 是那樣的 是那樣的 06:10
對 嗯 是 那行 06:12
那我們在看加拿大 美加 06:15
看看他下面有什麼樣的新聞出來啊 06:17
政府關門呢 我覺得要談一談 06:19
因為政府關門現在已經進入第二週了 06:22
而且我覺得他的影響也是逐步顯現了 06:25
現在據說週一就昨天 06:27
據說美國很多的機場的航空 06:30
航班都大幅延遲推遲延誤啊 06:33
然後這個空管人員呢 06:37
交通部長說因為空管人員 06:39
空管人員的問題說缺勤 06:42
空管人員呢 是屬於必要的 06:45
但是呢 不發工資 06:47
按理說是吧 06:49
按理說不發工資你也上班 06:51
那你不應該影響工作 06:53
我估計就是不發工資 06:55
很多人是不是就請假 06:57
或者是真的很勞累 一直加班 所以呢 06:59
他真的就是缺這個事情缺勤 07:02
這個事情是這樣的 這個事情是這樣的 07:04
你看啊 你不發工資的話 07:07
我心裡就有情緒你 07:09
雖然你一個人上班 07:13
他不是為了掙那點工資也也有可能說你不說了 07:14
這就不說了 07:17
你本來應該發給人家的錢 你不發 07:18
就是說 07:22
對於空管局這種東西 07:23
你本來應該發給人家 07:24
你不發 furlough一下 07:25
這個東西他是肯定是有意見的 07:26
他這個意見肯定是兩黨的都有意見 07:28
那肯定是有意見 07:30
你不給人發錢 07:31
本來人幹活的不發錢 07:32
你那不行啊 07:34
嗯 這個事情這個有意見是正常的 07:35
這個事情有意見是正常的 07:38
是 所以就說呢 07:39
不管怎麼說吧 07:41
那個他就就是影響了 07:41
那現在現在這個航班開始延誤啊 07:43
然後隨著時間延長 07:46
可能更多的人會請假 07:47
然後可能更多的這個航班會延誤 07:49
所以呢這是一個問題 07:51
另外就說軍人好像說是 07:53
軍人的工資從10月15號開始也停了 07:55
軍人也沒有發工 也不能發工資了 08:00
所以我覺得這個時間延長的話呢 08:02
這個壓力會確實會增增大 08:05
所以我看川普總統呢 08:07
他是今天發了一個信息 08:09
他是說願意跟民主黨 08:10
在這個醫療補助上面去談 08:12
但是他後來澄清了 08:14
他說你要讓這個政府先開門 08:16
然後我們就可以跟你談 08:19
所以 我至少現在我還看不到雙方 08:20
讓步的跡象 08:25
就是說到底民主黨會讓步 08:28
還是共和黨會讓步 你怎麼看呢 08:29
是這樣的 08:31
我首先跟大家說一下 我很失望 08:33
這個事情 我覺得處理的事情 08:36
算是一個非常失望的一個過程 08:37
他這個事情是這樣的 08:39
你知道吧 08:40
他因為這個事情 08:42
全是卡在一個將會在12月31號 08:44
才過期的一個事情上 對吧 08:47
到12月31號才過期 08:51
現在沒有過期 08:53
所有的credit都沒有過期 08:54
結果呢 08:55
共和黨的那個就是這個CR啊 08:56
他沒有什麼自己的這個agenda 08:59
就是 就是CR 09:01
就是下面多少天的撥款法案 09:04
就是到這為止 就完了 09:06
結果民主黨呢 他就拿這個說 09:08
我拿出來必須要跟你談 09:11
然後而且我 09:13
而且你看有三個 有三個人 09:14
就是民主黨那一側的 09:17
不管他是不是民主黨也好 09:18
他都已經說是我我要那個什麼了 09:20
我現在要要已經投支持票了 09:23
這三票已經拿到了 09:25
不過不夠 應該要八票才夠 09:27
就這八票做了工作 09:30
就是這剩下的五票做了工作 09:32
就死活做不起來 就是死活就沒有 09:34
現在的就是現在看出來 09:37
這個民主黨那五票也未必能夠就是及時的過來 09:38
就是說這個讓人很失望 09:43
就說共和黨這一側呢 09:44
共和黨這一側 09:47
他基本上是沒有他沒有這裡面沒有給你塞一些 09:48
這個你看不進去的條款啊之類的東西沒有的 09:52
結果他就是為了這個不同意 09:55
就是給你這個不同意 09:57
你知道吧 10:00
就是這個不投這個票 10:00
所以說這個就是喪失兩黨能夠合作的這種機制 10:02
就是為了這個就是很簡單 10:07
如果你要想跟我合作 10:09
你就得給把非法移民這個錢發出來 10:10
另外他說的是給 10:13
大概最起碼要擴張一萬五千億的花銷 10:15
是就是要增加一萬五千億的花銷 10:19
其中有兩千億是給那個 10:22
是給那個1.5萬億對的 10:25
1.5萬億 就是說他要其中有兩千億是給那個非法移民 10:27
就是一個人去那個醫院裡去去看病 10:32
就是他們所說的ObamaCare的credit是吧 10:37
他是什麼 10:39
如果這個人去醫院裡去看病的話 10:40
他那個如果你是美國公民或者綠卡呢 10:42
這個聯邦給你報一部分錢 10:46
但是 如果是非法移民呢 10:49
報銷的錢比那個美國公民和綠卡還要高 10:51
哎呀 10:54
就到這種程度上呢 10:55
就是說 就是同樣都是人 10:55
但是說如果你是非法移民的話 報的就高 10:57
然後他呢 同時呢 11:00
這個民主黨玩的這個手段 11:02
要不說挺高 是怎麼著呢 11:03
他就在這那個 宣傳 11:05
當向全國那個搞宣傳的時候 11:06
就是民主黨那些fake news 11:09
那幫主流媒體這幫人給說的時候 11:11
說說你們這幫人 是不是讓我們ER的醫生 11:12
去詢問他們的移民的這個移民的status 11:16
就是說 這個問題 問這個問題 11:21
明擺的就是給人挖坑 11:23
就是聽眾就是給人挖坑 就是聽眾就會想到共和黨人去就腦補一下 11:24
就是共和黨人去挨個的去進ER的人去查 11:28
說你這個人是誰呀 11:31
就是進那個急診室的 11:33
就問你這個人是誰呀等等等等 11:34
去查人家這個移民狀態 11:36
其實這個說法是完全完全胡扯的一個說法 11:38
因為美國的那個里根總統 11:41
當時里根還在台上的時候 11:44
就通過了這個 ER這種地方 11:46
就是無條件接受 出於人道主義原則 11:49
不管你是什麼樣的 11:52
我都無條件接受 11:53
然後就是 沒有說是你站在那 去區別一下 11:55
你是非法移民 你是合法移民 11:58
沒有這個事情的 11:59
根本就沒有的 12:01
然後 他之所以 對呀 12:02
然後最後這個 很多人要是走了的話 12:05
或者是那個 這個逃單的話 12:07
政府買單 政府買單 12:10
如果是這個公民逃單 12:11
政府給他買這麼多 12:13
如果是非法移民政府買的還多嘞 12:14
那你說我作為一個醫院的話 12:17
如果這個醫院是咱也不敢說醫院 12:19
大部分有那非公那個非盈利醫院 12:21
我的醫院也得盈利吧 12:25
人家沒有必要去鑑別你是非法移民 12:26
我管你什麼移民 12:29
反正聯邦給我的錢 12:31
你要如果我是你 12:32
我說你就算你是合法的 12:33
我跟你說成你是非法移民 12:35
聯邦給我錢還多呢 12:37
對不對呀 12:38
這個事情是這麼回事啊 12:39
所以說我沒有必要我去鑑別你啊 12:41
所以說民主黨玩的這個手段比較dirty 12:43
然後呢 12:46
他們唯一我作為這個在整個的 12:47
就是這個shut down這個過程 12:50
他們唯一玩的這個 12:52
我認為他們說的有 12:53
一個point是 是可以做到的是什麼呢 12:55
他說是什麼呢 因為啊 12:57
他這個由於川普總統把這個通過美麗大法案 12:59
以及呢 13:02
他廢除了一些ObamaCare的這個 13:03
因為ObamaCare這個東西啊 13:06
就是他因為這個本身他設計的就就很爛 13:08
ObamaCare設計的就很爛 13:12
結果呢 他呢 13:14
就是逐漸他的成本呢 13:16
他不是說逐年減少 13:18
你要是說這錢呢 13:20
咱話就鋪開了說了 13:22
今天反正就不開了說 13:23
Obama那個很貴 13:25
當年通過ObamaCare的時候 13:27
Congrational budget office在那信誓旦旦的說 13:29
能夠把美國的那個美國人民的health care的 13:33
就是這幫CBO這幫人 13:36
就在那說要把health care的成本減少多少多少 13:37
民主黨就在那吹 13:40
結果居然呢 13:41
有人的腦袋不靈光的 還就真信 13:42
你民主黨說什麼 你反著來嗎 13:45
你怎麼可能是真的嗎 13:47
你想就ObamaCare的那種設計 13:49
他不把這個整個系統給你rundown 13:51
那都不叫 那都白設計 13:53
結果怎麼著呢 13:55
結果ObamaCare通過了之後 一直在打補丁 13:56
就是不停的往裡塞錢 14:00
川普當時呢 他的思路是什麼呢 14:02
川普當時這個repeal ObamaCare失敗了之後呢 14:04
他就不斷的在 就是通過什麼辦法呢 14:07
作為一個商人吧 14:09
他削減藥價 14:10
讓這個服務透明 14:11
讓他就是這個這個成本上升慢一點 14:13
他減緩一下他的這個爆炸過程 14:16
到了拜登一上臺 14:18
14:20
這幫人就開始就是用covid作為cover up 14:20
就開始玩命的往外發錢 14:24
就是說這個給個 這個我也給你增加補貼 14:26
那個我也增加補貼 14:29
好多人你想你這補貼拿到手裡了 14:30
你這不就拿著了嗎 14:32
等你日後你把這補貼給人拿走 14:33
你系統是越run越爛 越run越爛 14:35
他這個就像滾雪球一樣 14:38
成本越來越高 14:40
你給人 今天塞點補貼 明天塞點補貼 14:42
這個雪球他是不停的滾的呀 14:45
結果你今天不塞錢了 14:47
你哪怕你不塞錢了 14:49
人都說你在砍我的funding 14:50
明白我的意思嗎 14:52
就是這麼 14:53
現在這個問題呢 14:54
現在這問題就是到這種程度 14:55
川普呢做了一件事情 14:57
就是在美麗大法案的時候 14:59
川普在2017年的時候 15:01
就把ObamaCare的最核心的內容給廢掉了 15:02
就是那個 15:05
強制交錢那個 15:06
這個是有的 15:09
這個呢有了 15:10
另外還有一個呢 15:11
就是這個2025年上台之後 15:12
這個美麗大法案裡面呢 把那些補貼 15:15
而且這些補貼還不是原來的補貼 15:17
就是原來你給ObamaCare那些補貼 15:20
我都不抬槓 15:22
這些 15:23
這些補貼都是在covid 15:24
就是新冠疫情出現之後的這個 15:25
他們國會通過的給ObamaCare那些補貼 15:29
他把那個都去掉了 15:31
這個也是有道理的 你新冠都沒了呀 15:32
就是不管怎麼著他變成流行病了呀 15:35
他已經不是pandemic了呀 15:37
結果把那些補貼取消了 15:40
結果民主黨說我們要抗議什麼這個 15:41
其實他裡面好多東西 15:44
他是把那個就是非法移民那一塊他給取消了 15:45
結果回頭他們就得說哎呀 15:48
現在這保費要上升 我們要怎麼辦 15:50
然後民主黨就得說什麼呢 15:52
保費要上升 15:54
然後共和黨說的時候 15:55
我們是12月31號才這些補貼才取消 15:56
你保費上升 16:00
你也不至於現在就來 16:01
然後民主黨有一個argument 16:02
我認為是有道理的 他說什麼呢 16:04
他說大家都是11月份買保險 知道吧 16:06
都是11月份買保險 16:09
所以說你現在保費上升了 16:11
是不 你保費 人家這個據說 16:12
一個人要漲2000刀呢 16:15
就是說這個保險 16:17
就是一個人會漲2000刀 16:19
就是真正買的 16:21
所以說呢 16:22
這個就是一個 16:23
很大的一個這個增長 16:24
很多人付不起 16:25
然後呢 結果呢 16:26
民主黨就拿這個來說事 16:28
這個這個捅婁子也是你捅的 16:30
設計了那麼個爛系統 也是你弄的 16:32
結果回頭呢 16:35
現在的情況就是不停的往裡扔錢 16:36
不停的往里弄 16:38
有很多的浪費啊 還有是這個不該花的錢 16:39
結果往裡扔 16:42
在這種情況下 他呢共和黨說的是 16:43
我們在11月17號還是十幾號 16:46
就11月中旬吧 16:50
雙方達成一個撥款法案 16:51
這個撥款法案呢 16:54
定一下 我們是給Obama Care 16:55
交多少錢啊 16:56
或者是就這補貼 16:57
還這麼走下去 16:59
結果民主黨這段時間就等不了 16:59
從現在到十 17:02
就從現在是十月吧 17:04
十月到十月到十一月中旬 17:05
就是這四十來天就等不了了 17:07
然後就開始鬧現在這個情況 17:10
這個東西 17:13
你想想 17:15
你把這些東西 當你都明白之後 17:16
川普是要把這個 17:18
Healthcare的成本給他弄下來的 17:21
但是 17:23
這個Healthcare的成本弄下來 17:24
他不是一天兩天的 17:25
他得讓那個 就是這個醫院 17:26
得post出來這些東西 17:28
就是那個 貨比三家 17:30
你別給人做一個 17:31
咱們大家都知道 來美國這麼長時間了 17:32
你做一個那個什麼檢查 17:35
很普通的一個檢查 17:37
或者你上那個急診室 17:38
拔個魚刺你試試 17:39
比如說吃魚不小心拔個魚刺 17:41
你去那試試 你拔個魚刺你試試 17:43
他不收你個兩千塊錢以上 17:45
我跟你說兩千起 我都怎麼著 17:48
這個東西呢 是什麼呢 17:51
就是說這個成本呢 是在不斷的上升的 17:53
其實這應該是最核心的問題 17:57
是把成本給他拉下來 17:59
而不是說我靠政府補貼 18:01
你補貼 你那有個坑 18:04
你說你應該把它 18:06
就是相當於給他修補上 18:07
你不能說是往坑裡填 填錢扔錢啊 18:09
那不行啊 你知道 18:12
所以你說的這常識 18:13
但是民主黨問題是 18:16
我覺得 他現在並不是 18:17
並不是不懂這個道理 18:19
但是而是他並不care這個道理 18:21
就是說如果就是純粹出於黨派啊 18:24
特別是他黨內的一些激進左派 18:26
他就是要跟川普這樣對著幹的話 18:29
那他就是會要 18:32
會拿這個來作為要挾 18:34
或拿這個作為對抗 18:36
他就是要你去同意 18:38
甚至讓你把大法案通 18:40
美麗大法案通過的一些東西 18:42
包括Medicaid的那個東西要給弄回來 18:43
所以他現在要的就是這個 18:46
你比如說像非法移民那個 18:47
那確實是有給非法移民提供醫保啊 18:50
2023年呢當時NBC就有報道 18:52
說紐約市的那個急診室裡面25%是非法移民 18:55
那時候就有報道啊 19:00
那你現在說我不給非法移民發 19:02
可是你這個錢你到時候他就會給啊 19:04
所以他現在是要把這一塊 19:06
把什麼什麼Medicaid都弄回來 19:08
那如果他抱著這個目的 19:11
他不聽你這個道理 19:13
你現在就沒辦法 19:14
雙方就僵在這 19:15
這個事情也不是 19:17
共和黨也不是完全沒有辦法 19:19
因為這個事情是什麼呢 19:21
其實就是只要讓政府工作起來 19:22
就是現在先讓政府開門 19:25
開門之後 19:26
兩黨就協商這個該怎麼撥款 怎麼撥款 19:27
就是所有的idea都在桌上 19:30
川普總統也說了 19:32
我呢可以跟民主黨去談 19:33
就是說這個事情 19:35
他是說他已經表態了 19:36
就是說是可以談 19:37
他其實現在這個表態 19:38
給我感覺更大的作用是什麼呢 19:40
是給選民們看的 19:42
因為他知道這幫人 19:43
他不會給你這個 19:45
這個過來跟你談正經事 19:47
他要談正經事早就談了你知道嗎 19:49
他是主要現在是給選民看 你看啊 19:52
我跟他合作啊 19:54
他不來 這事不怪我啊 19:55
現在是感覺這樣的 19:56
同時呢 19:57
他得讓民主黨人感覺到疼 19:58
就是怎麼著呢 20:00
他說他現在呢 20:01
就是開始做一些 20:03
做一些工作啊 20:04
你比如說 20:05
我要把這個政府員工啊 20:06
砍一些啊 20:08
但是我跟你說 20:09
就是咱們大家 20:10
我覺得啊 20:11
看了這六天 這個過程走下來 20:12
給我感覺 20:16
川普還是想讓政府啊 開門 20:17
他不能現在就把這個人給砍掉 20:20
20:22
他現在砍的都對這無關緊要的東西 20:23
你像他砍了些項目是吧 20:25
一些什麼 紐約的那個項目 20:27
你那個項目砍其實沒事 20:30
因為什麼呢 20:32
你別砍到人頭上 20:32
你砍到項目呢 20:34
那你這個事呢 都還好 20:36
別砍到人頭上 20:37
他這雙方就罵 罵架 20:38
各個州的項目 20:40
他都砍了一些 20:41
第二部分呢 20:42
現在他現在要說的 20:43
川普說的是什麼呢 20:45
說這些furlough的員工啊 20:46
就是這個上班 你還得出錢出力 20:48
但是呢 你還沒工資 20:51
就這幫人的 員工呢 20:52
他說 我得看他是誰 20:53
我才能把furlough的錢給他發出去 20:56
在這個2019年國會曾經通過一個法律 20:58
是什麼呢 就是你那個 21:01
好比說在政府關門期間 21:03
政府所有的 現在員工的 21:06
所有的 pay 是保證的 21:08
結果川普說呢 21:09
我呢 不能保證你這個 21:11
就是說如果你是 21:13
我不能保證 現在所有furlough的人 21:14
他都能拿到他原來的工資 21:16
是這麼回事 21:19
這個其實 21:20
我給我感覺更多的是 21:20
向民主黨施加壓力 21:22
就是相當於說是 21:24
你看啊 你這麼弄 跟我這麼耗 21:25
這麼多人丟的工作 21:27
反正我挨罵 你也得挨罵 21:29
咱們大家都挨罵 21:31
這個給我感覺 是這麼個關係 21:32
你知道吧 21:35
就是說 他現在幹這個 21:35
但是我的最終 21:37
我覺得啊 川普應該不會 21:38
目前最起碼 21:40
還沒有做到 21:42
就是說 21:43
這個想砍人這事 21:44
他就是這砍一刀 那砍一刀 逼人就範 21:45
他現在應該不會說 21:48
目前我還沒看到 21:50
他要砍人 21:52
他現在應該不會說 21:52
他要把這個政府砍掉 21:53
這目前我還沒看到 21:54
對 他說什麼 21:55
三五天之後 21:57
會什麼大規模裁員 21:58
什麼 但是我們 22:00
他所謂大規模 22:01
是不是已經變成幾千啊 我不知道 22:02
但是他說 22:04
這個furlough的人不給補工資 22:05
應該是指的說 22:09
在furlough期間不上班的人 22:10
不應該給補他工資啊 22:12
但是在furlough期間上班的人 22:14
不是 那就不叫furlough了 22:16
因為furlough是指non-essential 22:18
就是說 你對不對 22:20
你不是說 屬於必要的部門 22:22
然後你這些人 臨時 22:24
我今兒下午啊 22:26
我今兒下午 22:27
還在跟一個 22:28
緬因州的一個朋友 在那聊天 22:29
他是緬因州農業部的 22:32
一個部門的經理 22:34
他呢 跟我講了具體的 22:36
這個 22:39
這個政府關門這個事情 22:39
對他的影響 22:41
他說影響呢 是這樣的 22:42
他說 22:45
但凡聯邦的項目 我都不能做了 22:46
現在好比說 22:49
美國一個本土的一個工廠 22:50
說我要到你那來 檢查一批東西 22:53
你幫我檢查一下 22:56
他說我沒法幫你做 22:57
我沒法做 22:59
出具一些證明什麼的沒法做 22:59
因為是什麼 23:01
這是因為他們美國國內的這個生意啊 23:02
他們去找他做生意的時候 23:06
官方出那些證明呢 23:07
那都是要是聯邦的這個 23:09
就是聯邦給你出 23:10
你根本不用交這個錢 23:12
所以說呢 23:14
聯邦給他出 23:14
但是如果要是私營企業 23:16
好比說是這個外國的私營企業 23:18
尤其是外國企業 23:20
找那個美國的農業部 23:21
要求出一些批文之類的東西 23:22
這個美國農業部呢 23:24
這個是找這些外國企業收錢 23:26
一個批文呢 23:29
大概收那麼個120塊錢 23:30
就是一個批文 23:33
就是你有一個 23:34
要他這個進行出具的一些材料啊 23:35
他給你出120塊錢 23:38
他就跟我說了 23:40
說這種情況下呢 我們就得做 23:41
我說為什麼呢 23:44
他說因為這120塊錢 23:45
足夠cover我們所有的費用 23:47
就是這個錢不是聯邦預算來的 23:50
但是呢 這個錢呢 23:53
能夠cover我所有的費用 23:54
我就得給人幹活 23:57
所以說我現在基本就是被外 23:58
給外國公司打工 24:00
他跟我講這東西 24:01
我說哎這好這個啊 24:02
美國國內的沒法弄 24:04
我說你就算想當義務勞動 24:05
你想去給美國國內的這些公司 24:07
開什麼都不行 他說對 24:09
哎我當義務勞動都是不允許的 24:10
政府不允許我 24:13
這是illegal的 就壓根不允許我 24:15
然後我說那你工資有沒有 24:17
他說我沒有工資 24:19
我說你沒有工資 那你怎麼辦 24:20
他說那我只能等 24:23
然後我又問他 24:24
我說那你要沒工資 你們同事呢 24:25
他們那個他們的同事 24:27
就包括他的老闆 24:29
就是他管他的那個農業部裡 24:30
管他那個老闆 24:33
都回家休息去了 furlough了 24:33
我說那你叫什麼 24:36
他說我又不是furlough 還沒錢拿還得幹活 24:37
哎就去跟我搞這玩意兒 24:41
我說我說哦 24:43
我說你挺慘的你 24:44
我說我去看看你吧 24:46
我覺得他就是essential 24:47
就屬於那種必備的 一定要有的 24:48
對的對的對的 對的對的對的 24:51
然後沒辦法 24:54
然後還有這個這個賓夕法尼亞的一個哥們 24:55
也給我打電話 24:58
我下午給他打電話 24:58
我問他你這怎麼回事 24:59
他說我現在是當一天和尚撞一天鐘 25:00
他就跟我說有工作了呢 25:04
我就點幾個鼠標 25:06
我就真正的事我也不幹 25:07
哎我說為什麼呢 25:09
我又沒有錢 我幹這玩意兒幹嘛呢 25:10
我沒有意義啊 25:13
我乾了不幹一個樣啊 25:14
然後說有的呢 25:15
有的州的聯邦的辦公室就關了 25:17
就是說相應的做 25:19
做檢查的聯邦辦公室 25:20
關了 因為沒錢了呀 25:21
但是呢 如果你這個州呢 25:22
是跟聯邦辦公室 25:25
共用一個這個辦公室的話 25:26
你呢用州預算 25:28
能拿著錢的話呢 25:30
你工資減到就是你的 25:31
這個有的人是一半聯邦的錢 一半州預算 25:33
然後州預算那錢呢 25:36
找法聯邦那塊furlough 25:38
你知道吧 現在是 25:40
你看人家多嚴格呀 25:43
你看人家這個錢 不是隨便弄的 25:44
還說說從哪給你點錢 25:47
哎我覺得這說明 25:49
對對對 這就是 25:51
這就是現在清明政府該應該的 25:51
你看你看川普啊 25:54
他不是剛那個什麼 25:56
剛有一個就是給 婦女兒童 25:57
食物補貼的一個項目對吧 26:00
我不知道叫什麼 26:03
他拿關稅 叫他拿關稅 26:04
他拿收到的關稅給人家提供 26:06
他說你看婦女兒童 這個你們不用停 26:09
你們還是有這種食物 26:12
該有食物補貼 有食物補貼 26:13
反正他就有地方出錢 他就可以弄 26:15
對了對了這是對的這是對 26:18
這是對的 這你不能說我這錢 26:21
從哪來了也不知道 去哪也不知道 26:25
然後是在誰手裡也不知道 26:26
那你當然不行這樣 26:28
所以我覺得他現在這個呢 26:29
還真的是覺得說哎 26:31
你知道這個錢是怎麼回事 26:32
但是我覺得這 被這些幹活的人應該沒事 26:34
就是說他一旦開門了 26:37
他還是能夠補上他那工資的 26:39
但是你真的沒幹活 26:41
你回家了我覺得有點懸 26:43
看你幹嘛去看情況就是這事是看你幹嘛 26:45
對你要是聯邦第一挨辦公室 26:49
那我估計夠嗆了 26:51
這個事情是這個事情是這樣的 26:52
你看啊美國這個憲法邏輯是什麼呢 26:54
政府這個機構呢是國會批錢 26:57
然後呢你政府開 26:59
然後呢總統啊無權把國會想花出去的錢 27:01
你再給弄回來 27:04
這個總統一般做不到 27:05
所以說呢 這個事情呢平時呢國會 27:07
一個國家run著正好 27:09
這個聯邦政府run著正好 27:11
你這個總統說我要把這個部門裁掉 27:12
還可能人就不幹 27:14
人說了 我這部門國會撥錢了 27:15
你給我裁掉憑什麼告你 27:17
你知道吧 給你搞這東西 27:20
現在好啊 現在國會沒撥錢啊 27:21
哎 我把你裁掉 27:23
這就沒辦法了你知道嗎 27:25
所以說現在應該是一個按我 27:26
我這種小見識來說 應該是一個比較好的 27:28
減少聯邦政府的時機 27:31
可是川普遲遲沒有行動 27:33
現在你看原來本的那個誰 27:35
原本那個Russell Watt說 27:37
一兩天我們就開始行動 27:39
後來然後還跟川普見了一個面 27:40
現在這都幾天六天了 27:42
明天這就眼見七天了 27:44
七天了 現在還沒有行動 27:46
大家好 27:50
祝眾養生的朋友 給大家推薦 27:51
來自韓國非常獨特的玄寶黑蔘 27:53
黑蔘是精選韓國六年生的高麗蔘 27:56
採用古法九蒸九曝而成 27:58
不僅去除了人蔘的燥火性 28:00
而且大幅提升了人蔘中的各種活性成分 28:02
能夠抗疲勞 提昇免疫力 28:05
還能夠調節血糖 28:08
適合各種高強度 腦力 體力勞動者 28:09
或者體虛氣弱 術後調養的朋友 28:12
有一位觀眾 來自美國的Mary 28:15
她就反饋說呢 28:17
她有甲狀腺功能低下症 28:18
以前常常感到疲勞 28:20
服用玄寶黑蔘之後 28:22
她的精神狀況和體力有了明顯的提升 28:23
感興趣的朋友可以點擊視頻下方鏈接 28:26
輸入我的專屬優惠碼【FF2023】 28:29
就可以享受全球的免費郵寄 28:32
買滿500美元還可以送 28:35
普瑞堂玄寶黑蔘一根 多買多送 28:37
對 我覺得川普說 28:41
他說三五天以後會有裁員 28:43
我覺得他會裁一些 28:45
看吧 28:48
但是可能人數 28:49
可能會會對比較保守 28:50
這個事說不說不準 28:52
我感覺川普他現在還沒有下定決心去裁人 28:55
就是現在用的這些東西 28:58
全是逼著民主黨就範 29:00
就是說你要如果不這麼弄 29:02
我就如何如何 29:04
民主黨那邊呢 現在看著呢 29:05
就是給我感覺 29:07
現在他也是我跟你剛上了 29:08
這次就跟你剛上了 29:10
是所以這個 29:11
現在還不知道這個事情怎麼收場的 29:13
說不準這一次 29:15
這一次的這個 這個時間 29:16
會時間會比較長一些 29:20
關鍵是雙方誰都不讓步 29:22
民主黨就差五個民主黨人 就拉不到 29:24
就差五個民主黨人 29:28
我也覺得很失望 29:29
我就覺得說你這麼這個這個 29:30
四十多個議員中 29:33
有五個或者八個有常識一點的人都沒有嗎 29:35
關鍵這個事情是這樣的 你看啊 29:39
在拜登總統當這個總統期間 29:42
民主黨呢 29:44
他當時掌握這個 29:45
前兩年掌握眾議院 29:48
後面掌握這個參議院是吧 29:50
他原來前兩年是掌握參眾兩院 29:51
然後 後來變掌握參議院 29:54
他們其實啊 29:55
就是像這種Clear CR這種 通過了13次 29:58
民主黨人主導這個Clear CR 30:02
這個東西通過了13次 30:05
共和黨每次都會找幾個人過去 30:07
就是捧捧場 讓你過60票 然後咱們別鬧 30:10
現在就剛共和黨剛上台 30:13
你知道嗎 30:16
這是共和黨剛上台 30:17
三月份有一場 30:18
三月份有一場呢 當時還算給面子 30:20
然後到現在來講 這就開始不弄了 30:23
你這玩意兒 你這有點說不過去 30:25
你就是說你兩黨 30:28
你總得你得給面子吧 30:29
你不能說是就是兩黨 30:31
這個尤其是民主黨 30:33
你不能被極左綁架呀 30:34
這就是問題 就是越來越 30:36
他已經越來越不是民主黨了 30:40
他越來越成了一個極左黨了 30:42
所以Mamdani這樣的人才能在紐約出現 30:43
像AOC這樣的人 30:47
他才能在民調中 初選中大比率的比舒默要高 30:48
但是我覺得舒默 就是說 30:54
這個東西就是 30:57
你到底是為政治利益還是為什麼 30:58
當然就是我們這可能想的比較理想 31:01
但是舒默你也40年 31:03
肯定是為政治利益 你在國會也40多年了 31:05
你下一次選舉是2028年 31:09
你好歹還有兩年多 31:11
你在現在這個點上 31:13
你就被民主黨 被AOC這種 31:15
沒有任何建樹 31:20
沒有任何理念 31:21
對民眾對美國也沒有任何的貢獻的 31:23
你被他劫持 31:27
我覺得真的 31:28
說輕了點就是失望 31:30
他就是怕primary 31:31
他就是怕 31:33
他要是AOC 31:34
真去run primary 31:36
這個查克舒默 31:37
真是要喝一壺的 31:38
他未必打得過AOC 31:40
這個事情是這樣的 31:41
他未必打得過 31:43
所以現在這個情況 31:44
他現在也未必打得過 31:45
他就算不讓步 31:47
他就算不讓步他現在也未必打得過 31:49
我的意思就是說是吧 31:51
你說你這麼多年的資深政客 31:53
你被一個這樣的人 31:57
或者這樣一個團夥去劫持 31:59
這個實在是有點讓人覺得 32:02
他這個東西是這樣 非常的hypocrite 32:05
民主黨人 32:08
原來共和黨人幫你們過了13次continue的CR 32:09
你怎麼這一次 怎麼就幹這些東西呢 32:13
而且你這麼一弄的話 32:16
很多人因為這個 32:18
就拿不著paycheck呀 32:19
你說實在的 美國人說實在的 32:21
家裡有幾個有錢呢 32:24
沒錢 平常都沒錢 32:25
家裡連個救急的錢都沒有 他沒有錢 32:27
你讓人喝西北風去啊 32:31
是是是 他真的沒有存款 32:34
而且還有一個 32:36
我看的有人經常說 32:38
就這空管啊 32:40
因為這個上一次35天的那個 也是因為空管 32:42
就是到最後這個航空壓力太大 32:46
空管這個就不能私有化嗎 32:48
空管服務這私有化 32:51
其實我覺得就是小政府的問題 就在於大政府小政府 32:54
這東西你就該私有化吧 32:58
你覺得呢 33:01
已經到這了你有什麼辦法 33:02
你現在你提私有化的話 肯定不行啊 33:04
你得把這事先過去咱有什麼話再說 33:07
你現在這個 33:09
我當然不說現在了 33:10
這個事情這個事情是 33:12
好像是 33:13
私有化 在空管 這個東西私有化呢 33:15
它會涉及到 33:18
我原來也做過這方面的研究 看了一些文獻給我感覺 33:19
空管這一塊 完全如果私有化的話 會有人會告說你像 33:25
我們這些工會嘛 航班啊 33:30
工會會告是不是 33:32
但是很多其他國家是私有化的 33:35
對的 歐盟歐盟很多的國家都是私有化的 對的他們效率很好 33:37
嗯就是說這個空管效率很好 33:41
效率這什麼東西啊 33:43
是這樣的你咱們大家都這麼大人了都應該明白 33:45
什麼東西 33:48
只要國家一參與 33:49
就一搞什麼國營啊或者是什麼這個 33:51
就完立刻就完蛋 33:54
你原來有多強都沒有用 33:55
33:57
嗯 對 反正川普剛上任的時候 33:57
拉尼跟他去提過就是這個美國郵政 34:00
不是說想把美國郵政私有化嗎 34:03
當然他現在他也顧不過來 34:05
但是他當時 就後來就想了一招 34:07
說讓郵政這幫人去做什麼 34:09
人口普查什麼的哈 反正你 34:11
坐著也是坐著 幹 出去幹點活 34:13
但是我覺得其實美國 34:17
嗯 你說 34:19
其實美國郵政是這樣子的 34:20
他已經做了很多的私有化工作了 34:22
你比如說usps.com 34:25
就是這個裡面的那些運營啊 34:28
那些東西不是不說是網站 還有電子商務還有 34:31
Stamps那些東西那都是私營的 34:35
就是都是私營的 那一塊都是私營的 34:38
私營企業在做的 34:40
所以說呢 34:42
就是說呢他也在做一些這方面的努力 34:42
就是各個方面都有努力 34:45
不過現在這問題擺在這 你先把這問題解決了 34:47
那咱以後再說再解決 34:49
是是是 34:51
對吧 現在把這問題解決了 現在不解決 34:51
哈哈哈 對 我就是我覺得就是說 34:54
當然他可能顧不過來 34:58
但是像這種東西如果說 35:00
以後這個東西 35:02
不是聯邦的了 35:03
在你下一次如果政府關門的時候 35:05
你至少壓力不會那麼大 35:08
至少這個他如果真的是較上勁了 35:10
那可以較時間長一點 35:13
反正美國美國民眾也不在意啊 35:14
跟我沒什麼關係 35:16
啊 但是 35:18
現在很多呢很多媒體很不要臉 35:19
他在那說什麼 35:22
說共和黨控制眾議院控制參議院控制什麼 35:23
你是真不懂參議院要通過這玩意兒他需要60票嗎 35:27
你是真不懂嗎 35:31
很多美國人民還真就不懂 35:33
他們就聽著說 35:35
這個就有些人就真不懂他們說 35:36
這個東西怎麼回事 35:39
就是說這個難道不應該是 35:40
共和黨控制所有嗎 你還不讓關門 35:42
他們真有人不懂 你別以為他們 35:45
他們懂的是真懂 35:47
他們不懂的那是真不懂 35:49
這個事情是 真是真是這個 35:51
你這句話對對你這句話說的還挺經典的 35:54
但是有一個好處就是說 35:57
今天好像參議院通過了100多 35:59
就川普任命的官員 107個 36:03
107個 對因為Johnson把那個規則改了 36:06
大家一塊過過過 走走走 36:11
所以這還這還挺好 36:13
政府關門期間還一下通過了這麼多任命 36:15
這是一個比較 36:17
這個任命其實 說這個沒什麼 36:18
這個當時啊 其實這個主意啊 36:22
是民主黨人提的 36:25
當時民主黨人提的 不是當時 36:28
當時是2023年 36:31
但2023年的時候 36:33
民主黨的來自明尼蘇達的聯邦參議員叫克魯布查 36:35
克魯布查提了 說現在這個拜登政府的這個 36:39
人員呢 就是說相當於說是比較緊張 36:43
我們現在需要那個 36:46
參議院確認 36:48
然後呢確認快一點他們說 36:49
12個人一撥 36:52
12個人一撥 然後大家舉一次 36:54
投一次票就放他過去 36:57
你知道嗎我也不知道為什麼 非得12個人 就不買雞蛋的 36:58
你說你弄12個 37:02
結果呢他呢就是12個人一撥弄一個去 37:03
12個人一撥 37:06
結果後來呢共和黨反對說 37:08
你怎麼能這麼幹呢 37:10
就給反對沒弄成 37:12
結果現在共和黨上了呢 民主黨是 37:13
川普的那個我們每一個人都要他呀給你搞 37:16
那東西搞得好複雜呀 37:18
然後結果這個共和黨就說了 37:20
我們要用new clear section 37:22
那就是option 37:24
就是相當於說是一次呢沒上線 37:25
你不說12個人嗎然後呢 37:28
我們現在這個我們一次弄第一次弄了48個 37:30
這次弄了107個 反正就通過 37:33
以前的時候兩黨這個政治在那個 37:35
有共識的時候啊 37:38
是基本上是比如說我認為你這個人 37:40
沒有什麼太大毛病 37:42
是是是 37:43
舉手大家說他提名大家誰反對 37:44
沒人反對 舉手一通 37:47
說就完了 37:48
哪那麼多事 37:50
現在是每一個都得說我得辯論一下 37:51
查一查他的歷史情況啊 37:54
祖孫三代啊什麼老少三輩啊什麼搞這東西 37:56
你這個就很煩 37:59
結果讓共和黨人就是說這個很煩 38:00
雙方這個不是個好事 38:02
就這個事情不是個好事是因為 38:04
你應該有兩黨的共識 38:07
你都是那個檯面上的人 38:09
你就都有點範兒 你甭那 38:10
嘰嘰歪歪的那麼 38:12
就是說幹點什麼事 38:14
就給你磨磨嘰嘰 嘰嘰歪歪 38:15
跟你那較真還討厭你知道嗎 38:16
那個東西就是這這現在這個事情 38:18
讓人挺難受你知道嗎 38:21
是就對立越來越嚴重哈 38:23
所以我也是覺得就是民主黨 38:25
那看他自己的內部想要怎麼樣走 38:27
如果他的這個溫和派啊中間派啊 38:29
他不能形成氣候的話 38:32
那這黨真的是越來越越來越左了 38:34
那可能真的就以後就成極左黨或者叫什麼黨了 38:37
哎那我們聊聊另外一個事 38:40
今天今天突發的一個事情也不能說突發但是 38:42
反正今天這共和黨的參議員 38:46
現在發現這麼一個事兒然後就炸了鍋了就是 38:48
其實是公司參議院這個司法委員會主席 38:53
Chuck Grassley他呢 38:57
發布了一個FBI的內部文件 38:58
這個文件就顯示說拜登政府去 39:00
期間呢FBI呢當時在做了一個什麼叫 39:03
Arctic Frost這個調查 39:07
這個調查中呢他就 39:09
去監控八個共和黨參議員的手機數據手機記錄 39:11
啊 12個 39:17
12個 39:19
12個 天哪 39:20
12個甚至於更多 39:21
他是這樣的他 39:23
他是不不僅是 39:24
議員他當然還有什麼相關團體 39:27
就是92個共和黨的相關團體 39:30
個人團體包括Turning Point USA 39:33
但是這個參議員呢 39:35
應該是參議員應該最主要就這八個 39:37
參議員是包括Lindsay Graham 39:39
Bill Hagerty還有 39:41
Josh Hawley啊什麼Ron Johnson啊什麼這些 39:43
反正基本上都是川普的支持者了 39:46
那現在呢這個這些共和黨議員就非常火 39:48
包括包括像Hawley 他說這個比水門事 39:52
水門事件更糟糕 39:55
這個肯定是違法的對不對 39:58
他沒有什麼真正的一個犯罪的調查 40:00
他純憑黨派 40:03
純憑黨派 去監控 40:04
你覺得未必 40:07
未必 這個事情是這樣子的 40:09
嗯就是說 這個事情是 40:12
因為他就是這個找 40:14
做這個事兒的人 40:17
是Jack Smith 40:18
當時他是 40:20
他是司法部長委任的特別檢察官 權力很大 40:21
就是特別檢察官的權力是相當的大 40:27
40:30
你知道嗎Jack Smith 40:31
他如果調閱各個部門的材料是可以的 40:32
之所以讓人很窩火呢其實呢 40:37
是因為美國一直都是共識政治 40:40
我給你面子 你給我面子 40:42
現在這就明白的是 40:44
我在 我在台上的 40:46
在台上的時候 40:48
我派我的人去挖你的黑料 40:49
這種事情是就是說 40:53
這個是這要在中國呢都不叫事 40:55
這就是所謂的美國人叫的司法武器化對不對 40:57
就是司法政治化 司法武器化就這意思 41:01
對的對的 這個事情是這個事情另外呢 41:04
他的思路是什麼呢 41:07
就是他是為了調查那個1月6號的這個 41:08
國會暴亂案啊他說所說是所謂暴亂 41:11
你我沒見過去暴亂的人連個 41:16
槍都不拿的 41:18
人家真要暴亂呢早都把你給撂那了 41:19
他都人家連個槍都不拿 他怎麼就暴亂呢 41:23
我都奇了怪 41:26
然後呢他這個然後 41:27
當時呢他就為調查這東西 41:29
調查這東西他主要調集的就是 41:31
調閱的材料啊 41:34
並不是說這個 41:36
並不是說這個人所有的通話他主要是集中在 41:38
1月5號到1月7號這段時間的 41:41
跟川普總統之間的 41:44
交流啊談話 41:47
看看中間有沒有什麼他主要找他們想弄川普 41:48
你知道嗎 41:51
然後把這些參議員的這些信息都調出來了 41:52
這個呢你要嚴格的說 41:55
你說人家是特別檢察官 41:57
想調查這東西 41:59
我想去調閱這個材料 42:00
是可以的 42:01
就是說你要是如果大的方方咱這麼說 42:03
還比如說他 42:05
他去職的時候 42:06
他離職的時候說了 42:07
我們進行這調查調查的文件都在那擺著 42:08
大家去看去 42:11
這倒沒毛病 42:12
因為這也算你光明磊落 42:13
因為我確實我調查你這事我 42:15
我這 42:17
但是你知道最讓人噁心的是什麼吧 42:18
他去職之後他沒把這些材料啊 42:21
給作為你說你 42:24
花了納稅人的老多錢 42:26
你總之你得把這材料給我們整理整理吧 42:28
結果他連材料都沒整理 42:31
東邊放一包 這庫房裡放一包 42:33
然後廁所裡放兩包 42:36
然後就是把這些材料東放東放 42:38
就在那個FBI辦公室裡就是那個大樓裡邊 42:40
東放點西放點 42:43
這是怎麼回事呢Cash Patel這個是個軸人 42:44
你知道吧好多人 42:47
人家不喜歡他說什麼這個 42:48
管他叫什麼不管用 42:49
其實他挺挺厲害的 42:51
他當時那個 42:53
這個通俄門就是他給挖出來他這麼挖出來的 42:54
Cash Patel特別會幹這種事情 42:57
結果他就是到處找 42:58
到處找這文件 43:00
這文件在哪呢 43:01
一輪一輪一輪一輪把那些垃圾桶裡的文件哪 43:02
哪這個庫房裡封著的文件 43:06
他都拿出來把這些文件 43:08
Prohibited access the folder什麼的 43:10
這個裡面他本身這個東西是一個什麼 43:12
你根本你要不這麼查了 43:16
根本你查不到 43:18
這個東西是雖然國會找你要了說 43:21
你把那記錄都給我 43:23
但是如果我不去到廁所裡去翻一翻 43:25
到儲物箱裡去翻一翻 43:28
根本這個記錄都不出來 43:30
就根本就出不來 43:32
結果現在的是那個Cash Patel把這個弄下來 43:33
那我問你 43:36
如果你是堂堂正正 43:37
好比說我調查你們這些參議員是不是有 43:38
圖謀不軌 或者是反對國會 43:41
這沒毛病這是這是這是司法部長委任你去的 43:43
你調查完了 你把你的材料放一起 43:46
我們要查的話那些記錄你都公開 43:49
你回頭你這東藏一包西藏一包這算什麼事 43:52
對不對呀 43:56
你你這玩現在這些材料剛剛你想 43:56
Cash Patel和Bang Kino 44:00
這倆人上台有半年了吧 44:02
上台半年才挖到這個 44:05
Tosca Garber的上台 上臺多長時間 44:08
上台幾個月了 44:11
才把那個Obama當年那個把這個是 44:12
當年的那個說要 44:16
把川普通俄門那個事情給弄出來 44:17
這是什麼說明有人蓄意的把這些材料給他蓋起來了 44:20
不讓你去查 44:24
只不過是Cash Patel這個人聰明足夠聰明 44:26
還有是Tosca Garber這個人足夠的堅決 44:30
把這些東西給弄出來了 44:32
你要是換一個人就沒戲的 44:34
是是 44:37
你知道這個事情是最讓人窩火的 44:37
對 你說的對他這個真的他有些文件他是從一個叫 44:40
Prohibit Access Folder裡面拿出來的 44:44
就說 禁止 44:46
禁止就什麼禁止去看的這樣一個東西裡面 44:47
是啊你說你這樣的話 你這樣的話 44:52
如果你要是說 如果我就這麼調查 44:55
我覺得你犯法了 我去調查 你沒毛病 44:58
這個事情你光明正大的你去調查 人家沒毛病 45:00
你拿人家這個 45:03
因為這些參議員他們拿的電話 45:04
這都是公眾記錄 45:06
這不是說你們私人電話 45:08
你看那參議員誰敢拿那電話搞一些亂七八糟的 45:09
那立馬都被逮著 45:14
那都是公眾記錄 45:15
你知道嗎 45:16
然後回頭他們這些東西 45:17
人家FBI調查是隨便可以調查的這個沒毛病 45:19
但是他 45:22
但你不能說是你調查你調查你 45:23
你你調查完了之後 45:26
你又沒跟人說我調查過你 45:28
這個事情不應該的 45:30
對你要說我調查 45:31
我就調查你了 我查了你的那個什麼了 45:32
這完了嗎 45:35
都不跟人說 45:36
這不明擺著是他想藏著什麼嗎 45:37
對他之所以想藏啊 45:40
是因為這些 45:41
還一個原因是因為這些是私人通信 45:42
他不是用政府的手機呀 45:45
他是用他私人的手機他是私人通信 45:47
私人通信的話 45:50
45:52
所以你這個其實你要除非有非常好的理由 45:53
你不可以去查的 45:56
然後呢我查了一下他說這個 45:57
如果說證明是針對共和黨員的身分 45:59
而不是具體犯罪證據 46:02
比如說我你說 我有一個具體的一個東西 46:04
你跟這個犯罪相關 46:07
犯罪行為相關 46:09
我要去查你Ron Johnson的可以 46:10
但你不能說Ron Johnson一直很支持川普 46:12
這八個人一直很支持川普 46:15
我就要去查這八個人對吧 46:17
如果這樣的話你可能是違反了 46:19
憲法第四修正案不合理搜查 46:21
和第一修正案政治言論保護以及DOJ的政策 46:24
就是說司法部特有自己的政策 46:27
就是禁止基於黨派偏見的調查 46:29
所以如果你這些是這些原因的話 46:32
你會違反很多法律的 46:34
哎呀現在的問題是 不是 46:37
他現在這種事情被爆出來了 46:39
46:42
關鍵我不想看到的是 46:42
我不想看你這個怎麼在那罵他們 46:45
說這個什麼玩意 46:47
尤其包括眾議院這幫人說 46:48
這是一個什麼什麼醜聞 46:51
說有些人有水門事件 46:52
甭跟我扯那個 46:54
誰進號子裡去吃窩頭去 這最重要 46:55
就是說把誰給抓起來 46:59
這個必須得有人進監獄才行 47:02
你像Jack Smith這貨 47:05
你把他多前你把他(index) 47:06
這不是現在Comey給(index)他了嗎 47:08
好 這就是個好的開端 47:10
得把這些人繩之以法 47:12
這才是能解決問題 47:14
你光在那說水門事件那有什麼用啊 47:16
都多少水門事件了 47:18
川普總統過的那通俄門 47:20
哪個不比水門事件狠啊 47:21
反正就是他這個啊 47:24
我也我覺得他是這樣的 47:26
今天呢 我看聽證會上 47:28
那個肯尼迪議員他就問這個Chuck Grassley 47:31
他說 47:34
我們是不是要有另外一個 47:35
專門針對這個的聽證 47:37
然後那個Grassley 就是司法委員會的那個主席 47:39
他說哦他說你給我點時間 47:41
這個事情剛發生 我還沒來得及弄呢 47:43
那個肯尼說 47:46
他說可以可以 47:47
但你不要讓我等24年 47:48
但是我覺得 47:50
聽證會只是一個 47:51
那當然現在還有議員說 47:52
Jack Smith的這個律師身分應該過去取消 47:54
但是我覺得確確實實 47:56
那有什麼用啊 47:58
這都是distraction啊 47:59
你說你辦完了壞事之後了 48:02
說你以後不能再穿西裝出門了 48:04
那這個玩意有什麼用啊 48:08
你讓這些人 得讓他進監獄才行啊 48:10
你知道嗎 這個得大陪審團(引戴克)他才行啊 48:14
就像科米這種啊 48:17
像下一個什麼 等著Brandon呢 48:19
你所以說現在說這種話的這個共和黨參議員 48:21
我都不知道他怎麼琢磨的 48:25
不要搞那些東西 48:26
就讓這幫人去吃牢飯去 48:27
吃兩天牢飯 就都懂了 48:29
我覺得是這樣的 48:31
參議員他可能只能從他這個角度去來推動 48:32
但是呢 48:37
他今天是問了那個 哈里是問司法部了 48:38
說你們下步打算怎麼做 48:41
誰 是誰 批准來 48:44
來對這個些參議員來 48:47
來這麼監控的 48:49
那麼是誰怎麼怎麼樣推動 是誰執行什麼 48:50
當然呢 48:53
那潘邦迪她就說 48:54
她說我現在還不能說這種具體的 48:56
但是我們一定會去查 48:58
所以呢 我自己覺得 就是一個呢 48:59
你從科米可以看出來 他們確實會推進 49:02
推進的程度 我不知道怎麼樣 49:05
因為科米畢竟 他明天 科米明天他就會去傳喚 49:07
接受傳喚 他在弗吉尼亞一個法庭 49:12
所以這個是第一步 49:15
我不知道對於Jack Smith 49:16
他對其他人 但是呢我覺得從這個事情來看 49:17
對於一般民眾比較震驚的就說 49:20
確確實實他這個司法武器化是存在的 49:23
而且是蠻嚴重的 49:26
因為你過去你聽到很多川普 49:27
或者說共和黨人或者保守派去指責 49:30
包括 這個什麼 49:33
Turning Point USA說你們對我在查 49:34
你們是不是在查我為什麼要查我 49:38
像這些東西你都是 49:40
這邊聽一點那邊聽一點 你也不知道是怎麼樣 49:42
但是現在慢慢這些東西出來之後你會覺得說 49:44
這個確實很嚴重啊在美國這樣一個 49:48
這樣一個民主共和制度的社會 49:50
你出現了這種僅僅因為黨派 49:53
然後你用FBI司法部 49:56
FBI司法部在美國 49:58
這屬於最強大的司法力量了 50:00
你用這麼最強大的司法力量去對付這個民選官員 50:02
對付民眾對付 對付公民 50:06
這個非常嚴重 50:08
這確實非常嚴重 50:10
是是 50:12
這就是這幫人 50:13
你就是把這個事情一勞永逸的 50:15
永逸解決 川普應該明白 他已經明白了 50:17
甚至有一段時間啊因為川普第一任期的時候 50:20
我對川普其實別的方面沒意見 50:24
就對川普掌控司法部和這個 50:26
這個FBI這個能力 表示嚴重的懷疑 50:30
你知道嗎 50:34
第一任的時候我非常的懷疑 非常的失望 50:35
就是說他 50:38
管經濟管軍事管什麼東西就是協調啊跟 50:40
這都沒有問題 而且主張和平啊這都沒問題就是他 50:44
在司法部這上面 50:47
他是分是負的 50:49
你知道嗎就是說 50:51
管理這個司法部之類的這上面他實在是坦誠 50:52
這一次還不錯 這一次的我們現在知道 50:56
很多的記錄人家故意給你藏起來 50:59
你得把它挖出來 51:01
得經過整理挖出來 51:03
還得把這個整個的還原起來 51:04
這個東西需要很多的時間 51:06
這我倒是相信的 51:07
所以說呢我想的是 51:09
我想的是川普呢這一任期 51:11
比上一任期明擺著要強很多很多 51:13
嗯不過最後還是 51:17
你如果讓這些人就是這些極左呀 51:20
或者是不管深層政府也好 51:23
不管他們這些人 51:24
他們如果這次還能夠大搖大擺的脫罪沒有什麼 51:26
沒有人受到懲罰的話 51:30
這個 51:32
這以後就甭想再有什麼justice 51:34
對因為因為現在你你 51:38
特別是像FBI呀 司法部啊 51:40
你用的這個都可以說是 51:42
基本上是 51:44
你確實他能夠來做這些事的 51:45
他這個批人如果過去的話 51:48
確實下一批真的不知道是什麼樣的人 51:50
但是我覺得還有一個問題 51:53
就很多人可能會說 51:54
那你也在用這種司法的手段司法武器化 51:55
你去indict Comey 51:59
你是不是這樣的我看今天那個 52:00
聽證會上就有那個民主黨議員 52:02
就問Pamela Bondi 52:04
你們在 52:06
川普一發推 52:07
你第2天你就去indict Comey 52:09
你這不就是一個政治 52:11
政治那個 52:13
司法政治化的這樣一個表現嗎 52:14
然後當然潘邦迪她回答我覺得挺好 她說 52:17
她說Comey 被indict的是一個 52:21
非常自由派的一個 52:23
grand jury大陪審團indict他的 52:25
是可以說是 這是一個 52:28
走司法程序的 不是說我們要去怎麼怎麼樣 52:31
對的 52:34
另外說話那人也不是什麼正經人 52:36
Bloom Enso 52:38
那個來自康涅狄格的那個聯邦參議員他當年初一 52:39
我在Da Nang什麼跟對日對月在Da Nang 52:44
在那個越南戰場上 52:47
我當時我是戰鬥英雄 52:48
結果後來一查他記錄 52:52
他連越南 你甭說越南了 你連美國都沒出國 52:54
知道嗎 52:58
結果後來他在那電視上痛哭流涕 52:59
說我撒謊啊或者怎麼著 53:01
結果居然這種人還選上了 53:03
你知道嗎就是康涅狄格還選上來 53:05
這謊殺的也太大了吧 53:08
你就查嘛他叫Da Nang匠 53:10
你就查嘛D-A-N-A-N-G Da Nang匠 53:12
這是醜聞啊 53:17
就是Blue Man's Soul 53:18
就是就這一貨 53:20
然後天天還得說我們要有integrity什麼的 53:23
所有的人都可以說integrity就這詞 53:27
就你這孫子不能說你知道嗎 53:31
結果今天那個潘邦迪就把他給說出來了 53:35
說尼勒當年為了選那個參議員 53:37
你說你服兵役的這個事 53:40
好像不太帶勁吧 53:42
你不要跟我講如何有integrity 53:44
當時給他就在 53:47
就在參議院的這個大廳裡面就給他打臉呢 53:48
是有短處握手裡了你知道嗎 53:51
不過Pan邦迪我覺得她是不是有點 53:54
對抗性太強啊 53:57
她今天 像她這樣的一個聽證會 53:58
我看她對這些議員民主黨議員有點太不留情了 54:01
沒有沒有 給他們留情有什麼用啊 54:05
你不留情 你要對他們狠一點呢 54:07
他興許他還尊重你 54:10
你要是對他們不狠呢 或者怎麼著 54:11
他們不是像那個Joe Manchin啊 54:14
或者是Sunny Mar這種可以聊得過來的 54:16
就是能夠cross the aisle合作的這種人 54:20
比較講理的 54:22
他們是要臉的 54:23
講理咱都不提 54:26
要臉的 你明白吧 54:28
那個人像什麼那個什麼 54:29
這些人是要臉的 54:31
你說你沒兵役 沒服過一天 54:32
號稱我是越南戰鬥英雄 54:36
你就這你還叫要臉嗎 54:38
還有維吉尼亞的那個 54:42
現在的那個總檢察長的候選人 54:44
他2022年發帖 說什麼 54:47
說我要把那個維吉尼亞前共和黨議長給崩了 54:50
說如果希特勒和那個人站到面前 我先打他 54:56
說拿槍 還是說我要打兩發子彈都說了 54:59
而且說完這話之後 還說什麼 55:02
還說他要拿這個剩下的子彈把他兒子殺了 55:05
這個人 說這種話的人 55:09
現在在競選 就是以民主黨候選人身分 55:12
競選維吉尼亞州總檢察長 55:16
現在大家你知道嗎 55:18
就是現在都是這種 55:20
而且他不退啊 55:22
就是人家把他那個挖出來他不退 55:22
當然不退了 55:25
人家說了 我裝死狗 我要選上了的話 55:27
那就行啊 55:30
你知道吧 他就不退啊 55:31
就是現在民主黨都到什麼程度了 55:32
你但凡要點臉 你也不能叫民主黨啊 55:35
不是什麼叫不叫民主黨 55:38
不過也是這真的不是民主黨了 55:41
真的已經 55:44
不是你這個跟我們所知道的那個 55:45
你就說吧 55:48
你說民主黨裡邊有沒有這個什麼正經的人 55:49
有正經人啊 55:51
你像那個什麼民主黨 55:52
託西卡本的 55:54
民主黨人家曾經當過民主黨的這個 55:55
DNC的副主席 55:59
那是個正經人 56:01
結果人家跳槽了 56:02
肯尼迪那算個正經人 哎也跳槽了 56:03
然後回頭 糾曼琴 56:08
糾曼琴這種人 56:10
那你說這絕對是個民主黨人吧 56:11
老民主黨就是說可以說是民主黨 56:14
這結果怎麼樣 56:17
人家現在號稱我independent了 56:19
你糾曼琴這種人 如果離開了民主黨的話 56:22
你說你民主黨還能剩什麼 56:25
就舉最簡單例子 56:27
就是那個bio Mar 56:28
就是在那個HBO那個做的 56:30
經常罵川普啊 56:33
反串 你這個什麼的那種人 56:34
現在他罵民主黨的不少於他罵共和黨 56:37
是是是是 56:41
他這個還是比較concerns的 56:42
對 人家還是比較 56:44
就是說他 他能 56:45
能夠真實的去面對這個事情 56:46
他不是說被他的就是什麼 56:48
說白了得要臉 56:50
你知道吧 56:52
就是但凡你要點臉這個事都好辦 56:53
你知道吧 56:56
就怕碰上那個就壓根就不要臉了 56:57
覺得我無所謂 56:59
你知道嗎 57:01
那就完蛋了 57:01
那你覺得明天就是因為Comey 57:03
就是這個前FBI局長啊 57:06
Comey他是明天上午呢 57:08
他要出行接受傳訊 57:10
然後呢 他是被提前了 57:13
因為 本來他是星期四 57:15
現在呢 57:17
就是據說他這個案子什麼高度敏感的 57:18
就是怕來的人太多 57:20
或者怎麼怎麼樣 57:22
就法庭把他提前了 57:23
而且據說他本來呢 57:25
要有人說他也是會被就什麼高調逮捕啊 57:28
還是怎麼怎麼樣 57:32
我也不知道他那個程序哈 57:33
就是像以前那個什麼rudge stone什麼的 57:35
早上六點鐘被從家裡的那個綁出來 57:38
但是後來他們可能還是給他留了 57:40
留了個那個什麼 57:42
這個decency吧 57:44
就是說啊我們就不這麼弄了 57:45
就直接讓他去法庭 這樣的 57:47
你怎麼看他這個 就是這種做法呢 57:50
就是反正就是我覺得還是 57:54
就是共和黨這邊還是保留了一些 57:57
基本的這種decency吧是吧 57:59
就是這種做法 58:02
共和黨這邊呢 58:02
還是就怎麼說呢 58:04
共和黨為什麼為什麼就是共和黨這邊呢 58:05
最起碼他還是要臉的 你知道吧 58:09
就是說你不管你有什麼這個不同的觀點呢 58:13
不同的這個意見的見解啊或者是怎麼著的 58:15
他還是要臉的還是尊重秩序的 58:18
民主黨那邊就壓根就開始 58:21
就已經就開始沒有什麼底線了 58:24
知道吧 58:27
就是你都不知道他們明天會做出什麼事情來 58:27
這個事情 是讓人覺得你想這麼一個政黨 58:30
這美國兩大政黨之一 58:34
他可以把有些事情就是拿著不是當理說 58:36
說到現在這種程度 58:39
那你說 你指望他以後而且關鍵他那 58:41
你要政策好也行 58:44
他政策也不給力 跟不上 58:46
然後就知道玩命的那花錢 58:49
我也不知道這幫人在琢磨什麼 58:51
58:53
但是我覺得這還不是個民主黨的問題啊 58:54
就是因為現在你像你剛才說的那個什麼什麼 58:57
他就還直接就說可以把他的對手殺了 59:02
或者把對手叫希特勒啊 納粹啊 59:05
現在就是美國現在這個問題就是很嚴重 59:07
因為他整個就是這種 59:10
極左的這種思潮或者是意識形態 59:12
他去做這種事情 59:15
就他把很多人都變成這樣的了 59:15
那包括民主黨的人也包括不是民主黨的人 59:18
所以現在這種對立 59:21
那一個最大的問題就是 59:23
現在我們看到的這個很多大城市的這種 59:26
對執法人員的暴力對吧 59:29
這兩天像波特蘭啊 像芝加哥啊 59:31
這都有針對ICE的這種暴力升級 59:35
什麼開車撞進去啊 59:38
然後還有什麼甚至用動用武器啊什麼的 59:40
那我看呢 59:44
包括啊 59:45
甚至非常離譜的在芝加哥 59:46
好像說有警察這邊內部 59:50
就跟那些芝加哥的警察說 59:52
你們不要去支援受到圍攻的聯邦執法人員 59:55
就是在警察內部就這麼說的 00:00
被人弄出來也是就是可能是ICE的人員 00:02
在什麼地方被圍攻 00:05
所以這個現在就是很嚴重 00:06
然後川普現在的辦法呢 00:08
他就是派聯邦 他就派這個 國民警衛隊 00:09
他把他聯邦化 00:15
現在最有意思的是德州的國民警衛隊 00:18
川普把他聯邦化 派到芝加哥去了 00:23
00:26
可以這麼派哈 00:27
可以可以 可以可以 沒事的 00:28
00:31
那如果這樣的話呢 00:31
那川普就是說他是他手裡是有人的 00:35
他可以用動用這種national guard來針對這種暴力行為 00:39
但是我覺得很奇怪 00:43
就是說 00:44
為什麼像antifa這樣的組織 00:45
川普已經說了 00:47
我把它定為國內國內恐怖組織 00:48
為什麼這些組織他可以大搖大擺的在芝加哥 00:51
波特蘭的街上在這衝擊啊 00:55
在那跟執法人員對峙 00:56
然後你什麼都做不了呢 00:58
因為你是聯邦層面的定義的呀 00:59
01:02
你聯邦層面定義的 01:04
你州層面沒定義啊 01:05
01:07
這樣啊 01:08
州層面人家警察 警察可以不抓 01:08
警察為什麼人家警察說了 你們去襲擊ICE 01:10
我們不抓警察 01:14
我不管這個事不違法 01:15
你明白嗎 01:18
就是說咱們以前曾經講過 01:19
就是說這個咱們 01:21
就是在咱們這個節目上面 01:22
曾經講過說是這個 01:24
Century City是怎麼回事 01:26
Century City很簡單 01:28
市政府下命令警察不允許跟ICE勾勾搭搭 01:29
不允許有跟ICE有聯繫 01:33
你抓住非法移民 01:35
你覺得可以放就放了他 01:36
但是你不允許你跟ICE有聯繫 01:37
就這麼簡單 01:40
嗯 就一句話就弄完了 01:41
所以說你你ICE是受襲擊了 01:43
我警察我不去 01:46
我上司命令我不去 這沒毛病 01:48
這個這個這個就算下命令 01:50
這人他也沒犯法呀 01:52
我又不合作啊 01:54
我又沒出去幫著他們去打人 01:55
我不合作就可以了 01:57
你不合作 01:59
你總不能把我抓起來吧 01:59
這個事情是這樣的呀 02:01
所以他不但不合作 02:03
他還抓了人 02:05
抓人家那個被打的記者呢 02:06
他不去抓打人的安提法 02:08
他抓那個被打的記者 02:10
那怎麼那你怎麼執法是人家的事呢 02:12
這個沒辦法 02:15
所以那如果這樣的話 02:18
川普派這種國民警衛隊 02:20
那能做的很有限啊 02:22
因為你做不了什麼 02:24
那這些人衝擊ICE你怎麼辦 02:25
你把他抓抓哪去啊 你關哪啊 02:27
那監獄不也是州州當地的監獄嗎 02:29
有聯邦監獄 02:32
這個有聯邦監獄 02:33
這個沒事的 02:35
那他就很被動了 02:37
他反正就是每次人家衝擊他的時候 02:38
他在那擋 02:40
是不是只能這樣 02:41
那也要也也要抓人呢 02:42
也要抓人呢 要抓人給逮捕的 02:45
或者這都是要有的 02:46
這是有執法權的 02:47
這個他們是有執法權能夠抓人的 02:48
這個沒問題 02:50
02:51
但是我的意思就是說 02:52
那他很被動 他沒有辦法 02:53
就是說每次他只能在那邊去守護 02:55
ICE的這些facility 對吧 02:57
在那守護 有人來衝擊 有人拿什麼 02:59
什麼各方面各種東西來衝擊你 03:02
那你就去擋 也只能這樣 03:05
是這樣的 他是這樣 其實呢 03:07
川普想對芝加哥這些人下手 03:09
還有非法移民這些人下手 03:12
已經很長時間了 03:13
然後呢 03:15
在那個誰呀 03:16
在那個剛上台那陣子 結果呢 03:17
這個Cash Patel就派人 03:19
派了好幾百個聯邦探員 03:22
到芝加哥去摸底兒 03:25
就這個區那個區 都摸明過了 03:27
這個區裡誰是那個非法移民啊 03:29
到在哪兒什麼的 03:31
這都已經摸清楚了 03:32
國民警備隊這次進去呢 主要是以抓人呢 03:33
還有說是遣返非法移民呢 這些東西為主 03:37
這個是有目的性的 03:39
這個事情也不是完全的就是 03:41
就是跟你在那耗 你知道吧 03:42
那不是川普的風格 03:45
他是解決問題去了 他有名單 03:46
你知道吧 03:49
他有他知道去 03:49
他知道去弄誰 03:50
這個事情是有的 03:52
你的意思是完成任務了 就走了就撤了 03:53
他現在你像洛杉磯那邊 03:56
不就是這樣 03:58
洛杉磯其實就是這樣的 03:59
但是我覺得川普的意思 04:02
不只是這些呀 04:04
因為他說的是 04:05
這些城市的犯罪問題呀 04:06
他今天在白宮 昨天在白宮 04:08
他說的 04:10
你只要把這幫人 04:11
你只要把這幫人給逮走了 04:13
他還犯個什麼罪呀 04:15
你知道吧 04:17
就是說這個人群裡頭 04:18
就那麼幾個人 04:19
就這幾個人啊 04:20
就所有犯事的全這幾個人 04:22
把這幾個人都給逮走了 04:25
他就不犯罪了呀 04:27
但是我覺得 04:29
非法移民可能是這樣 04:30
但是antifa很多都是國內的 04:32
antifa他要處理 04:35
他不是一個非法移民的問題 04:38
對對對對對 04:39
對吧 04:41
這個事情 04:42
這個事情走一步看一步 04:42
我覺得他 你覺得他有什麼辦法 04:44
現在那個誰 04:46
你比如說在華盛頓DC 04:48
就是這麼處理啊 04:49
華盛頓DC 04:50
前兩天華爾街日報有篇文章 04:51
介紹了川普總統 04:52
在華盛頓DC的成果 04:53
的確是就是犯罪率下降了 04:55
何止40%啊 04:58
就是嘩嘩的往下掉 04:59
這個犯罪率就基本掉下來了 05:01
但是抓人抓的也比較多 05:03
抓人抓的也比較多 然後呢 05:05
現在就是這個 現在呢 05:07
就是他也沒得出一個 05:10
就是哪個好哪個不好 05:11
反正這文章 寫文章那這幫人就是這樣對吧 05:13
然後呢 05:17
這個事咱就不說了 05:19
他不會說是川普 05:20
應該做的對與不對 05:21
他不會這樣弄的 05:22
他就是那點裝著了 端著 05:23
然後呢 他關鍵是 05:26
這個事情是 他這麼做完了 05:28
就是說這個有模板了 05:29
做完了有模板了 05:32
把這些人抓起來了 有模板了 05:34
你以後別的部門 可以去copy 05:35
就是別的城市 可以去copy 05:38
這麼做是可以的 05:40
而且這麼 05:42
如果在現在這個 05:42
比如是芝加哥 05:43
一個星期不死個六個到十個人 05:44
就是槍擊案 05:46
死到六個十個人 05:47
那不好意思出門打招呼 05:49
就是一個星期就是這樣 05:50
然後幾十人中彈 05:52
關鍵是你要是說 05:54
死就死這麼多人 05:56
就是六到十個人被打死這個事 05:58
然後幾十人中彈這種事情 06:01
無論如何 06:04
這個事情對於民主黨的這個州長 06:05
還有市長是不利的 06:08
就是說這個東西 06:09
早晚讓人聽起來這個時候是不利的 06:11
所以從這一點說 06:13
川普在這個角度上來說 06:14
他是佔優勢的你知道吧 06:16
就是他這麼弄下去 06:17
這是佔優勢的 是得民心的 你知道吧 06:19
但是這個東西 06:21
現在伊利諾伊州啊 什麼俄勒崗州 06:24
都起訴 起訴川普 對吧 06:26
起訴了他 然後說你不能 06:29
你州 06:32
現在就是挺有意思 06:33
就是說聯邦和州之間 06:35
按理說呢 這種三權分立 06:36
這是一個美國國父設計 06:38
挺好的一個架構 06:40
聯邦和州之間各自分界 06:42
州有很多是可以自治的 06:44
可是如果當你州 城市 06:47
你不管這個犯罪的時候 你怎麼辦 06:49
你聯邦能做到什麼程度 06:52
這是個法律問題了 變成 06:54
最後是不是又打到最高法院去啊 06:55
其實你做不到什麼 06:58
其實你做不到什麼 06:59
因為你仔細想 07:01
人家州州長都說了我都不關心 07:02
那芝加哥一宿死個十幾個人 07:05
那正常 這個屬於正常 07:08
就是你只要新聞不報是吧 07:10
只要沒有人拿這來說是吧 07:13
你死多少人跟我有什麼關係 07:14
這個話就是這樣的 07:16
就跟他們沒有什麼直接的關係 07:18
而且他也沒有什麼直接責任 07:20
這個得是選民們想明白了這事 07:23
然後回頭呢把他們給選下去 這才能行 07:26
但是現在這種情況是 07:30
這個伊利諾伊那左的 07:32
都是藍成什麼樣了 藍的 你知道嗎 07:34
伊利諾伊都藍成什麼樣了 07:36
就是說你呢 這只能說是 07:38
這個是當地選民的抉擇啊 07:40
選民你選民這麼選的 07:42
你選民怎麼選 那我也沒什麼辦法 這只能這樣了 07:44
那你有什麼辦法呢 07:46
州的系統跟聯邦的系統 07:48
那是可以說是井水不換河水的呀 07:50
你這個沒有隸屬關係啊 關鍵是 07:52
是是是 07:55
但當然安提法這方面 07:57
川普政府應該是可以做些什麼 對吧 07:58
因為畢竟如果說 08:00
正經人誰一天到晚 08:02
把人蒙著個臉出去 08:04
去衝擊什麼聯邦執法機構啊 08:05
那都是後面有錢的吧 08:08
ICE的官員都是蒙著臉出去的 08:10
這民主黨就在那罵 08:14
不 ICE當然可以 08:15
你說你說你先說 08:17
不是民主黨在那罵 08:20
他就是不分這個這個青紅皂白 08:21
給你罵一通說 08:24
你這個ICE的時候戴一面罩 08:25
你也不說ICE人家為什麼戴面罩 08:27
你把人家ICE 08:30
如果你的露著臉去執法的話 08:31
他就人肉搜索 就說ICE是什麼 08:34
然後第二天上你們家門口 08:36
那是砸玻璃啊 扔燃燒瓶啊 08:38
然後威脅你們家庭的這個家庭的安全 08:40
就這種下三濫的事都能幹起來 08:45
就這就這就不要臉了 你知道吧 08:47
08:49
對執法人員的安全這是肯定要有的 08:49
所以這沒什麼可說的 08:53
你現在這麼亂的時候 08:55
你你為了保護他的安全 08:57
你ICE執法當然要蒙臉 人家是執法 08:58
你現在這些暴徒蒙臉 09:02
你就要把他找出來 09:04
那可以蒙啊 沒有人不讓他蒙啊 09:05
但是問題是在聯邦的角度 09:07
如果他把ANTIFA定義成恐怖組織了 09:09
我覺得當然 09:12
司法部現在很忙啊 09:13
但是我覺得就是他們必須得趕快來做這個事 09:14
資金上怎麼切斷 人員上誰在支持 09:18
你在地方的話 你就要去找名單 09:22
然後你要提前把這些人鎖定 09:24
然後提前去抓也好 (影帶他)也好 09:26
你不能讓他每天晚上出門就在這弄啊 09:30
我覺得這方面是聯邦政府可以做的對不對 09:32
這具體細節我也不太懂 09:36
這個東西我不太懂 09:38
然後呢 09:40
這川普也不容易啊 09:43
反正我就覺得 09:46
我就覺得動不動就是要打到最高法院 09:47
反正現在最高法院開庭了 09:51
這個新的審理期開始了 09:53
什麼出生公民權啦 什麼關稅啦 09:55
說不定這個什麼 09:59
派國民警衛隊 到底能派到什麼程度啊 10:00
這玩意全都到 10:04
高院在川普紀念會非常忙 我看他們 10:05
是是是 10:08
你覺得 10:12
你覺得出生公民權在高院能有一個結果嗎 10:13
就是他會 10:17
真難說呀 10:18
我心裡真沒底啊你知道嗎 10:19
就是說這種東西他是他是一個真沒底 10:21
你說你怎麼能保證 10:24
但是你就看啊 10:26
我給我感覺是什麼 10:28
看這個勢頭在哪一側 10:29
他一般來講就沒什麼太大問題 10:31
你知道吧 10:33
因為他是勢頭在哪他就好辦 10:34
如果勢頭不在你這兒 10:36
你這怎麼說也沒有用 10:38
你知道吧 10:40
現在呢 就看美國 10:41
國內的對關於這個移民這方面的討論的勢頭在哪了 10:43
10:47
我覺得呢 10:48
也五五開 心裡真沒底 10:50
就是說 10:52
尤其你像什麼robot呀這種人啊 10:52
還有是什麼這個啊 這個誰呀 10:55
那那三個自由派法官 那是就你連想都別想啊 10:58
關鍵這六票裡邊我們能拿到多少票 11:02
就是這問題就是出生公民權這個事情 11:04
所以說呢 11:07
這個事情非常呆性 這個說不准 11:08
我當然是希望這個出生公民權 11:13
這個得到川普 像川普的 favor川普的判斷 11:15
就不要被鑽鑽空子 11:19
就是他這個出生公民權 出生公民權 11:21
只要一沒有的話 11:24
這個很多非法移民來美國的就釜底抽薪了 11:26
這還真是他沒有動力 11:30
真是他沒有動力來了 11:32
你知道嗎 11:33
就是說你以前有動力來啊 11:34
你來這兒叭唧生一孩子 11:36
結果回頭你就基本上公民 綠卡也都能搞定了 11:38
實在不行 等21年嗎 就是說對吧 11:41
但是呢 你現在的情況就沒有了 11:44
這個沒辦法 11:46
這個如果廢除了的話 11:48
這個事情就有意思了 11:49
哎呀 都是大事啊 11:53
包括關稅啊什麼都是大事 11:54
這川普這個 還拿著關稅 指望拿關稅發錢啊 11:56
千萬別說關稅不行了 你得還錢 11:59
這東西真是太戲劇性 12:02
他關稅收上來不少錢 關稅收上來不少錢 12:04
是啊是啊 12:07
我就說 12:08
如果高院 真做出一個不利的決定 12:08
他不得還錢嗎 12:11
是不是 關稅錢又得還回去 12:13
不會不會不會不會不會不會不會不會 12:15
哪那事啊 12:18
你也沒有 沒有 12:19
這個事情是就不用怕了 12:20
因為現在川普已經把那個 12:22
你記不記得那個10月1號對家具加的那關稅 12:24
對對對 12:27
他10月1號加的關稅的時候呢 12:28
他就是說這就是按照1974年的什麼經濟緊急狀態法 12:31
然後在10月14號的時候 12:35
到10月14號的時候 12:38
他還收這麼多關稅 12:40
但是呢 他還收這麼多關稅 12:42
但是他的名頭變了 12:43
他變成了232關稅 12:44
就相當於你對美國非法傾銷 什麼這那的 12:46
我給你 我要弄你這個弄一個這個東西 12:49
他232的關稅 變成232關稅的話 12:52
最高法院怎麼判這個關稅都在 12:55
對對對對對 12:58
是這樣的 12:59
他們好多都給變成232了 13:01
他現在把一個一個的 好多都變成232了 13:03
所以說這個事情沒事 13:05
沒事 這個沒事 13:07
我不從來不擔心 這個行政權在手 13:07
把它都變成232了 13:11
你拿什麼告 13:13
你原來告的那個 我給取消了 我變成232了 13:13
這不容易不容易 13:18
好 那我們今天就先聊這麼多了啊 13:20
已經很多事了 13:24
這個我們這整天的這個啊 13:25
雖然說看熱鬧 13:28
但實際上跟我們都很相關 謝謝陳博士 13:29
陳博士來美國 13:32
美國很重要啊 13:34
對對對 13:35
就是在美國的這些人 13:36
其實應該更加的更多的關注啊 13:37
叫你這節目啊 13:39
等等等等這些玩意兒 13:40
因為現在這個東西啊 13:42
你一天一個變化 13:43
真的你跟別人你跟不上 13:44
而且你這個中文的那個都是共產黨的 13:46
給你共產黨寫的那個美國怎麼著的 13:48
那個那個你能信嗎 13:50
那個不都詐騙嗎 13:51
所以說你只能只能挑一些媒體還敢說真話的 13:53
這跟著事實 跟著事實來分析的 13:57
就不是給你弄些什麼假的東西什麼的 14:02
14:06
那反正這個關注 14:07
持續關注我們 持續關注陳博士的自由第一頻道 14:08
哈哈哈哈 14:12
好的 那就謝謝了 14:13
謝謝陳博士 14:15
我們也謝謝觀眾 再見 bye-bye 14:16
大家好 14:22
這裡給大家提供一個信息 14:23
大家知道在華人社區 糖尿病和血糖偏高的情況非常普遍 14:25
很多朋友都在問 除了按時服藥飲食控制之外 14:30
有沒有一些日常健康輔助的方法 可以讓自己過得更輕鬆 14:35
現在有一款在韓國 14:40
已經做過試用 14:42
得到不少正面反饋的健康食品獨家秘方 14:43
廠方現在提供給我們幾套 14:47
每一套是一個月的用量 14:50
有需求的朋友 可以來參加免費試用 14:52
這個不是藥物 14:56
也不能替代醫生的治療 14:58
但是它是一種日常保健的輔助方式 14:59
我們希望通過這次活動 能夠幫助更多人探索 維護健康的新選擇 15:03
感興趣的朋友 15:09
您可以點擊視頻下方的這個鏈接 15:11
就是您如果想要參與這個免費試用計劃 15:14
可以發電郵到我的頻道郵箱 15:19
留下您的姓名和聯絡方式 15:22
我們會統一通知 15:24
那麼郵件呢 15:26
郵箱的地址是在視頻下方的描述欄 15:27
所以呢 15:31
就是如果您本人或者家人朋友 想要參加這個免費試用計劃 15:32
就趕快給我們發一個電子郵件 15:36
郵箱是在視頻下方的描述欄 15:40
名額是有限 15:43
如果感興趣的朋友 請趕快行動 15:44

– Bilingual Lyrics Chinese/English

💥 Jamming to "" but don’t get the lyrics? Dive into the app for bilingual learning and level up your English!
By
Viewed
21,729
Language
Learn this song

Lyrics & Translation

[English]
Hello Chen Lijian
Thank you for connecting with us again
Let’s talk about some major events in the past two days
Hot events
Hello Fang Fei
Hello viewers
There are a few things today
I want you to come and talk to us
One is that the government shutdown continues
The impact is beginning to show
So let’s talk about this first
Then let’s talk about the news that broke out today
One is the Biden period FBI
His surveillance of eight Republican congressmen
The senator is now blowing up
Then we have time to talk about it
The rise in violence against federal law enforcement officers in the United States
...
But before talking about these things
Let’s talk about today’s US President Trump
President Trump meets with the President of Canada
What about this
They just finished a meeting during the day
I haven't seen anything yet
The latest result
I just said it seems to be the United States and Canada
Now it is AIM
That means the goal is to reach a comprehensive trade agreement
But what results have not been said today
Today's meeting between the two people
What do you think
Tell us what you think
Actually, this thing
Just take a look at his joint press conference
The joint press conference between the two of them
And President Trump
Their US government has now made some concessions
As for the tariffs on the cars produced in the United States and Canada
Originally produced cars
In fact, the main problem in Canada is cars
It is that it has many car factories
After he has done it for you
Ship it to the United States for you
As for Canada
The current tariff levied is 25%
As a result, as for the United States
Let’s say that we can treat Canadian tariffs
and Canadian cars
as the same as local cars
Then there may be something like a (cota)
This is equivalent to saying
A more substantial
gesture made by President Trump.
Imported to the United States
Canada imports to the United States
It means making one
It means Canada exports
Canadian-made cars
In fact, there are many cars in Canada
They are all American factories
This is like this
So he is making such a gesture now
Come out
Carney's side should also have done something.
This is just a concession
However, Canada is really in chaos recently
Canadian Customs
Canada's customs data system collapsed
Did you say you heard of a country's customs system collapsing
Really
They did that for you
Anyone who has been to Canada in the past two days knows this
Don't tell me that I drove across the border in a car or what happened
If you cross the border by plane, you have to wait.
But at that time, it was slow to get you out of customs.
It's no problem if you drive across the border.
You try driving a truck.
If you drive a truck, you transport a truck or you cross the border. truck go this way
...
...
...
...
...
Then or
no commercial truck available
That's it
There is nothing to say about no commercial truck
In the end, commercial truck, for example, like Bavro
These big ports
Bavro, what are these big ports
And those ports in Monterio
Countless trucks are piled up and waiting there
Do you know
The driver was in the truck with food and accommodation
Then he went to the rest area to go to the toilet
What and this and that
They just kept waiting there. He was very slow, very slow, very slow
Now the customs data has collapsed
Now it's back to getting paper
Take this, you idiot
Register for me what kind of goods you have in the car
Do you know what he wrote on the paper
Oh my god
Canada is doing this
Canada is now
Canada is doing this now
Now Canada is in a mess
Isn’t it just Canada’s situation
The economic situation is not good
Do you know
The current situation
But Carney is currently Carney
I have not seen what Carney has done to the United States
Too substantial a concession
It could be car tariffs
This also belongs to both parties. One should make a gesture
Really I have not seen Carney
make a concession
If two people were to make a substantial concession today
If President Trump and Carney met
...
Then you see, it must be Trump
That truth social will definitely post it
What is Carney?
Gentle man Great man said this and that
Yes, he is my good friend
This and that will come
After sending out, this press conference will be finished
Then there will be no movement, you know
There will be no movement
I just saw a joke about this
Said the reporter asked that Trump said
Since you said he is a good man
So what
Ouch, how is it? Why can't we reach a good deal
Then Trump said
Because I also want to be a good man
great man
He said I also want to be a great man
Then everyone laughed
But a lot of jokes came out
No real progress
No real progress for the time being
Because they still have a card in the hand of the United States
It's because the USMCA negotiations
will start again in 2026
So,
This card in the hands of the United States
Carney has never been able to figure it out
So now, this is him
Don't think anything of Carney
Look at what he looks like
He, Carney,
was the governor of the Bank of England
Then he is more sinister Do you understand?
It’s him, but he may not agree with you
This is an argument or something
But he is more shady and the way he thinks of it
You need to pay attention to this Carney, you know
His deal with Canada
Because it is like this
Look at the United States and other countries
If you can’t reach a deal with Canada
Let people talk about this. I always feel that this is the case
I always feel like you are Canadian
It can be said that they are the long-term allies of the United States
Let's not talk about younger brothers, let's talk about allies
There is such a big difference between them
...
Now Canada's tariffs are higher than Vietnam's tariffs
You say you play like this
You say you, you say how can you let
You say that's why you say this matter
is a relatively passive matter
This is indeed me me me
I don’t know what Canada can do.
What kind of concessions can be made?
But
I think that is one of the big reasons. Yes, yes, yes, yes
...
...
...
...
...
...
He hasn't had anything happen for a long time
This is like that, that's like that
Yes, yes, that's OK
Then we are looking at Canada, the United States and Canada
Let's see what kind of news comes out
I think we need to talk about the government shutdown
Because the government shutdown has now entered its second week
And I think its influence is gradually showing
Now it is said that Monday was yesterday
It is said that airline
flights at many airports in the United States have been significantly delayed
And what about the air traffic control personnel
The Minister of Transportation said that the air traffic control personnel
are absent from work
Air traffic control personnel are necessary
But they are not paid
Logically speaking, right
Logically speaking, you can still work without being paid
Then you shouldn’t affect your work
I guess I just won’t pay you
Do many people just ask for leave?
Or are they really tired and work overtime all the time?
He is really absent from work for this reason
This thing is like this. This thing is like this
Look, if you don't pay wages
I have emotions in my heart for you
Even though you work alone
If he doesn't do it to earn that salary, there is a possibility that you won't say it
I won't say it anymore
You should not send the money to others
That is to say
For things like the Air Traffic Control Bureau
You should have sent them to people
If you don’t send them furlough
He must have opinions on this thing
His opinions must be shared by both parties
Then they must have opinions
You don’t send money to people
I don’t get paid for my work
You can’t do that
Hmm It is normal to have opinions on this matter
It is normal to have opinions on this matter
Yes So let’s just say
Anyway
That’s what he has affected
So now the flight is starting to be delayed
Then as time goes by
maybe more people will ask for leave
Then maybe more flights will be delayed
So this is a problem
In addition, it seems that the military is
The salary of the military has stopped starting from October 15th
The soldiers didn't get their jobs either Wages can no longer be paid
So I think if this time is extended
the pressure will indeed increase
So I see President Trump
He sent a message today
He said he was willing to talk to the Democratic Party
about Medicaid
But he later clarified
He said you need to let the government open the door first
Then we can talk to you
So I don't see any sign of
concessions from both sides at least now
In the final analysis, will the Democratic Party
or the Republican Party concessions? What do you think
It's like this
Let me first tell you that I am very disappointed
I think the handling of this matter
is a very disappointing process
This is what happened to him
You know
Because of this matter
It's all stuck on a thing that will expire on December 31st
, right
It will only expire on December 31st
It has not expired now
All credits have not expired
What is the result
The one in the Republican Party is this CR
He has no agenda of his own
It is CR
It’s the appropriation bill for the next few days
That’s it, it’s over
What about the Democratic Party? He took this and said
I took it out and had to talk to you
And I
And you see there are three. There are three people
They are from the Democratic side.
Regardless of whether he is the Democratic Party or not
He has already said it is me. I want that.
I have to vote for it now.
These three votes have been obtained.
But it is not enough. Eight votes should be enough.
These eight votes did the work
It was the remaining five votes that did the work
It's impossible to do life and death. It's life and death.
It's obvious now.
The five votes of the Democratic Party may not be able to come in time.
This is very disappointing.
Let's talk about the Republican side. In the end, he disagreed just for this
...
...
...
...
Just to give you this disagreement
You know,
That's why he didn't vote for this
So this is the loss of the mechanism for the two parties to cooperate
Just for this, it's very simple
If you want to cooperate with me
You have to give out the money for illegal immigrants
In addition, he said to give
It will probably cost at least 1.5 trillion to expand
Yes, it means an increase of 1.5 trillion in spending
Of which 200 billion is for that
It is for that 1.5 trillion.
1.5 trillion means that he wants 200 billion of it to be for the illegal immigrant
That means one person goes to the hospital to see a doctor alone
This is what they call ObamaCare's credit, right
What is he
If this person goes to the hospital to see a doctor
What if you are a US citizen or a green card?
The federal government will reimburse you a portion of the reimbursement
But if you are an illegal immigrant,
the reimbursement will be higher than that of a U.S. citizen and a green card.
Oops
That’s it.
In other words, they are all the same people.
But if you are an illegal immigrant, the reimbursement will be higher. Otherwise, why is it so tall?
...
...
...
He is promoting here and there
When doing propaganda to the whole country
It's the Democratic Party's fake news
When people from the mainstream media tell it
Tell us, you guys, should we let our ER doctors
ask their immigrants about their status
That is to say, ask this question
It is obvious that you are digging a hole for others
The audience is just digging holes for others The audience will think of Republicans and just think about it.
That means Republicans will go and check the people who go into the ER one by one.
Tell me who you are.
It’s the one who went into the emergency room.
Just ask you who this person is, etc.
Go check their immigration status
In fact, this statement is completely nonsense
Because President Reagan of the United States
When Reagan was still in power
passed this place like ER
It is unconditional acceptance out of humanitarian principles
No matter what you are
I will accept it unconditionally
Then there are It didn't say you were standing there, let's make a distinction
You are an illegal immigrant, you are a legal immigrant
There is no such thing
There is no such thing
Then the reason why he is right
And then the last thing, if many people leave
Or if this one evades the bill
The government pays the bill The government pays
If this citizen evades the bill
The government bought him so much
If he was an illegal immigrant, the government would have bought more
Then what do you say about me as a hospital?
If this hospital is a hospital, we don’t dare to call it a hospital.
Most of them are non-profit hospitals.
My hospital must also make a profit.
There is no need to identify you as an illegal immigrant. I told you that you were an illegal immigrant
...
...
...
...
...
The federal government gave me more money
Is that right
This is what happened
So there is no need for me to identify you
So the method played by the Democratic Party is rather dirty
And then
The only thing they use as this in the whole
is the shut down process
The only thing they play
I think what they say is
one point is, what can be done
What did he say? Because
Because President Trump passed this beautiful big bill
and
he repealed some of ObamaCare
because ObamaCare
It is because of this that the design of ObamaCare is terrible
The design of ObamaCare is terrible
As a result, he
is to gradually reduce his cost
He does not mean to reduce it year by year
What if you mean this money
Let’s just talk about it
I won’t talk about it today anyway
Obama’s is very expensive
When ObamaCare was passed,
the Congratulatory Budget Office vowed there
Those who can improve the health care of the American people in the United States
It’s this bunch of CBOs
They said they would reduce the cost of health care by a certain amount
The Democratic Party is just bragging
The result is unexpected
Some people don’t have a clear head and yet they really believe it
What did your Democratic Party say? Are you saying the opposite?
How could you be true?
Do you want the design of ObamaCare? Just keep stuffing money into it
...
...
...
...
...
What was Trump thinking at the time
After Trump's repeal of ObamaCare failed
He kept talking about how to use it
As a businessman
He cut drug prices
Make this service transparent
Let him do this and the cost rises more slowly
He slowed down his explosive process
As soon as Biden came to power
Wow
These people started using covid as a cover up
Just start sending money out like crazy
That is to say, I will increase the subsidy for this one
I will also increase the subsidy for that
Many people want you to get this subsidy
Don't you just take it now
Wait for you to take this subsidy away from others in the future
Your system will get worse the more it runs, the worse it gets
It's like a snowball for him
The cost is getting higher and higher
You give people some subsidies today Add some subsidies tomorrow
This snowball keeps rolling
As a result, you don’t add money today
Even if you don’t add money
People say you are cutting off my funding
Do you understand what I mean
That’s it
What about this problem now
This problem is to this extent now
Trump did something
It was at the time of the Big Beautiful Act
Trump in 2017
It abolished the core content of ObamaCare
That's the one
The forced payment
There is this
We have this
There is another one
It will be after taking office in 2025
What about those subsidies in this beautiful big bill
And these subsidies are not the original subsidies
They are the original subsidies you gave to ObamaCare
I won’t make any difference
These
These subsidies are all after covid
This is after the emergence of the new coronavirus epidemic
The subsidies passed by Congress for ObamaCare
He removed all of them
This is also reasonable. The new crown is gone
No matter what, it has become an epidemic
It is no longer a pandemic
As a result, those subsidies were canceled
As a result, the Democratic Party said we should protest against this
In fact, there are many things in it
He canceled the illegal immigration section
As a result, they have to say oops
Now the premiums are going to go up. What are we going to do?
Then the Democrats have to say what
The premiums are going to go up.
Then when the Republicans say,
we won’t cancel these subsidies until December 31st.
...
...
...
...
He said that everyone buys insurance in November, you know
They all buy insurance in November
So your premium has gone up now
Is it right? It is said that your premium will increase by 2,000 dollars per person
...
That is to say, this insurance
will increase by 2,000 dollars per person
It is the real purchase
So
This is a
big increase
many people can't afford it
and then what? The result is
The Democratic Party will use this as an example
This is also the fault of you
It was you who designed such a rotten system
The result is back
The current situation is to keep throwing money into it
Keep throwing money into it
There is a lot of waste, and there is money that should not be spent
It turns out that it is thrown in
In this case, what the Republican Party is saying is
We are on November 17th or ten
Let’s say mid-November
The two sides reached an appropriation bill
What about this appropriation bill
Let’s decide how much we will pay for Obama Care
...
Or just this subsidy
If we continue like this
As a result, the Democratic Party cannot wait during this time
From now to ten
It’s October now
October to October to mid-November
I just can’t wait for these forty days
Then the current situation started
This thing
Think about it
After you understand these things
Trump wants to get the cost of
Healthcare down to him
But
Get down the cost of Healthcare
He is not a day or two days
He has to let that This is the hospital
I have to post these things
That's it, shop around
Don't make one for others
We all know that I have been in the United States for such a long time
What kind of examination do you do
It's a very common examination
Or you go to the emergency room
Try to pull out a fish bone
For example, if you accidentally pull out a fish bone while eating fish
You go there and try it Try pulling out a fish bone
He won't charge you more than 2,000 yuan
Let me tell you, what will I do if it starts from 2,000 yuan?
What is this thing?
It means that the cost is constantly rising
In fact, this should be the core issue
It is to bring the cost down for him
Instead of saying that I rely on government subsidies
You subsidize, you have a pitfall
You said you should fix it
which is equivalent to patching it up
You can't say that you are filling the hole and throwing money away.
That won't work. You know
So this is common sense.
But the problem with the Democratic Party is
I don't think it's
that he doesn't understand this truth.
But it's that he doesn't care about this truth. If he just wants to confront Trump like this
...
...
...
then he will do it
He will use this as a blackmail
or use this as a confrontation
He just wants you to agree
and even let you pass the big bill
Some of the things passed by the beautiful big bill
Including Medicaid, we need to get it back
So what he wants now is this
For example, you are like illegal immigration
That does provide medical insurance to illegal immigrants
In 2023, NBC reported at that time
that 25% of the emergency rooms in New York City were illegal immigrants
There were reports at that time
So if you say now that I won’t provide illegal immigrants
, you will give it to them when the time comes
So now he wants to get this piece
and get all the Medicaid back
Then if he has this purpose
He doesn't listen to your reason
You can't do anything now
The two sides are deadlocked here
This matter is not
The Republican Party is not completely helpless
Because what is this matter
In fact, just let the government work
That is to open the government now
After the door is opened
The two parties will negotiate how to fund this and how to fund it
That is, all the ideas are on the table
President Trump also said
I can talk to the Democratic Party
That is to say, this matter
He said that he has expressed his stance
That is to say, it can be discussed
In fact, what is the greater role of his current stance
to me?
It is for the voters
Because he knows these people
He will not give you this
Come here to talk to you about serious matters
If he wants to talk about serious matters, he has already talked about it, you know?
He mainly wants to show voters now. You see,
I will cooperate with him.
If he doesn’t come, it’s not my fault.
Now I feel like this. Do some work
...
...
...
...
...
...
For example,
I want to cut off some government employees
...
But let me tell you
It’s all of us
I think
After watching this process for six days
I feel
Trump still wants the government to open the door
He can’t cut this person off now
Well
What he’s cutting now are all things that are irrelevant to this
You think he cut some projects, right?
Something like that project in New York
It’s actually okay if your project is canceled
Because of what?
Don’t cut off people’s heads
You cut off projects
What about you? It’s okay
Don’t cut off people’s heads
They both cursed and quarreled
Projects in various states
He cut some
What about the second part
Now what he wants to say now
What did Trump say?
Talk about these furlough employees
You still have to pay and contribute to this job
But what? You haven't been paid yet
As for the employees of this group
He said I have to see who he is
before I can send him furlough's money
In this year 2019, Congress passed a law
What is it? It's yours
For example, during the government shutdown
All the government owns
All pay for employees is guaranteed
As a result, Trump said
I can’t guarantee this for you
That is to say, if you are
I can't guarantee that all furlough people
can get their original salary
That's what it is
In fact,
I feel more like
putting pressure on the Democratic Party
It is equivalent to saying
Look, you are doing this and spending so much on me
So many people have lost their jobs
Anyway, I get scolded and you have to get scolded too
We all get scolded
This gives me the feeling that it is such a relationship
You know
That is to say, he is doing this now
But in the end
I think Trump will not
At least
has not done it yet
That is to say
He wants to chop people
He just chops here and there to force people to submit
He shouldn’t say anything now
I haven’t seen it yet
He wants to kill someone
He shouldn't say now
He wants to cut off this government
I haven't seen this yet
say anything to him
In three to five days
There will be massive layoffs
What But we
His so-called large-scale
has turned into thousands. I don't know
but he said
that people who work in furlough will not be compensated.
It should mean that
people who do not work during furlough
should not be compensated.
But people who work during furlough
are not Then it wouldn’t be called furlough.
Because furlough refers to non-essential
That is, are you right?
Didn't you mean that it belongs to the essential department
And you people are temporary
I am
this afternoon
I am still chatting with a
friend from Maine over there
He is the manager of a department in
the Maine Department of Agriculture
He told me the specifics
this
The impact of this government shutdown
on him
He said the impact is like this
He said
I can't do any federal projects
Now it's like
A local factory in the United States
said I want to come to your place to inspect a batch of things
You check it for me
He said I can't do it for you
I can't do it
There is no way to issue some certificates
Because what?
This is because of their business in the United States.
When they go to him to do business,
what certificates will the official issue?
That is all if it is from the federal government.
The federal government will provide it to you. For example, this is a foreign private enterprise
...
...
...
...
...
, especially a foreign enterprise
Go to the U.S. Department of Agriculture
and ask for some approval documents.
What about the U.S. Department of Agriculture?
This is asking these foreign companies to collect money.
An approval document.
It costs about 120 yuan.
...
...
...
...
He told me
What about this situation? We have to do
I said why
He said because this 120 yuan
is enough to cover all our expenses
This money does not come from the federal budget
But what about this money
If it can cover all my expenses
I have to work for others
So now I am basically being hired
to work for a foreign company
He told me about this
I said hey, this is great
There is no way to do it in the United States
I said that even if you want to be a voluntary laborer
If you want to work for these companies in the United States
it will not work. He said yes
Hey, I am not allowed to be a voluntary laborer
The government does not allow me
This is illegal, so I am not allowed at all
Then I asked, do you have a salary?
He said I have no salary
I said you have no salary what do you do
He said I can only wait
Then I asked him again
I said you will have no salary. Where are your colleagues
Their colleagues
Including his boss
He is in the Ministry of Agriculture
Who cares about his boss
They all went home to rest and furlough
I said what is your name
He said I'm not furlough, I still have to work without any money
Hey, just go and do this with me
I said, I said,
I said you are miserable
I said, let me go and see you
I think he is essential
It belongs to the kind of indispensable, must have
Right, right, right, right, right, right
Then there is no way
And then there is this guy from Pennsylvania
who also called me
I will call him in the afternoon
I asked him what happened to you
He said that I am now a monk hitting the clock every day
He told me that I have a job
I just click a few mouses
I don’t do anything real
Hey, I said why
I don’t have money, why should I do this
It makes no sense to me
I don’t do the same thing if I do it
Then he said there are some
In some states, federal offices have been closed
That is to say, we must act accordingly
The federal office
that does inspections is closed because it has no money
But what if your state
shares this office with the federal office
...
You use the state budget
If you can get the money
Your salary is reduced to yours
For some people, half of the federal money and half of the state budget
Then what about the money from the state budget?
Find the furlough from the French Federation.
You know, now is
You see how strict they are
You see they don’t get this money casually
Also tell me where to give you some money
Hey, I think this means
Right, right, right This is
This is what the Qingming government should do now
Look, look at Trump
Isn't he just that?
There is a food subsidy project for women and children
right
I don't know what it's called
He gets the tariff, ask him to get the tariff
He uses the tariff he receives to provide it to others
He said you don't need to stop this for women and children
You still have this kind of food
There should be food subsidies, there are food subsidies
Anyway, he has a place to pay. He can do it
That's right, that's right, that's right, that's right
This is right, you can't say that I have this money
I don't know where it comes from, I don't know where it goes
And I don't know in whose hands it is
Of course you can't do this
So I think he is like this now
I really feel like saying it
You know what this money is about
But I think the people who are being worked by these should be fine
That is to say, once he opens the door
He can still make up for his salary
But you really didn't work
I feel a little bit in doubt when you go home
It depends on what you do to see the situation. This matter depends on what you do
If you are the first federal office
I guess it will be difficult
This thing is like this
Look, what is the logic of the US Constitution
This government agency is funded by Congress.
Then your government opens
Then the president has no right to spend the money that Congress wants to spend
You get it back
This president generally can't do it
So what about this matter? Normally, Congress
A country is running just fine
This federal government is running just fine
You, the president, said I want to lay off this department
Maybe people will not do it
People said Congress has allocated money for my department.
If you cut me off, why should I sue you?
You know, let me get you this thing.
...
...
...
...
...
...
But Trump has not taken action
Now look at the original one
The original Russell Watt said
We will start taking action in a day or two
Later, we met with Trump
Now it has been six days
Tomorrow it will be seven days
It has been seven days and there is no action yet
Hello everyone
I wish all friends who are keeping in good health would like to recommend
to everyone. Black ginseng is a very unique black ginseng from South Korea.
Black ginseng is a selected six-year-old Korean ginseng.
It is made using the ancient method of nine steaming and nine exposure.
It not only removes the irritating property of ginseng
but also greatly increases the various active ingredients in ginseng.
It can resist fatigue and improve immunity.
It can also regulate blood sugar. Manual workers
...
or friends who are weak and recovering from surgery
There is an audience Mary from the United States
She gave feedback
She has hypothyroidism
She used to feel tired
After taking Xuanbao Black Ginseng
Her mental state and physical strength have improved significantly
Interested friends can click the link below the video
Enter my exclusive discount code [FF2023]
to enjoy free global shipping
If you purchase over US$500, you can get a free piece of
Purui Tang Xuan Bao Black Ginseng. Buy more and get free.
Yes, I think Trump said
He said there will be layoffs in three to five days
I think he will lay off some
Let's see
But maybe the number of people
may be more conservative
I can't say for sure
I feel that Trump has not made up his mind to lay off people yet
These are the things he is using now
It’s all about forcing the Democratic Party to submit
That is to say, if you don’t do this
I will do whatever you want
What about the Democratic Party? Watching it now
It just gives me a feeling
Now he is also the one I just had sex with you
This time I just had sex with you
So this
I still don’t know how this matter will end
I can’t tell this time
This time this time
The meeting will take longer
The key is that neither party will give in
The Democratic Party is only short of five Democrats.
It is just short of five Democrats.
I also feel very disappointed. He controlled this at that time
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
He controlled the House of Representatives in the first two years
Later he controlled the Senate, right
He originally controlled the House of Representatives and the Senate in the previous two years
Then later they became in control of the Senate
They actually
Just like this Clear CR passed 13 times
Democrats led this Clear CR
This thing passed 13 times
The Republican Party will find a few people every time
Just to support you and let you pass 60 votes, then let's not make trouble
Now the Republican Party has just come to power
Do you know
This is when the Republican Party just came to power.
There was one in March.
There was one in March. At that time, it was still a favor.
And now, it has started to stop.
You thing, this is a bit unjustifiable.
You just mean that you are two parties. You can't be kidnapped by the extreme left
...
...
...
...
This is the problem, it is getting more and more
He is no longer a Democratic Party
He is becoming more and more a far-left party
That's why people like Mamdani can appear in New York
People like AOC
Only then can he be in the polls and primary elections at a higher rate than Schumer
But I think Schumer means
This thing is
Are you doing it for political gain or why
Of course, we may think this is more ideal
But Schumer, you are also 40 years old
It must be for political gain You have been in Congress for more than 40 years
Your next election is in 2028
You still have more than two years after all
You are at this point
You are being controlled by the Democratic Party and AOC.
You have no achievements
No ideas
You have not made any contribution to the people and the United States
You are hijacked by him
I think it’s true
To put it mildly, it’s disappointing
He’s just afraid of primary
He’s just afraid
If he were AOC
Really run primary
This Chuck Schumer
really needs a drink
He may not be able to defeat AOC
This is the case
He may not be able to defeat it
So the current situation
He may not be able to defeat it now
Even if he does not give in
Even if he does not give in, he may not be able to defeat him now
What I mean is, right
You said that you have been a senior politician for so many years
You were raped by such a person
Or such a gang to hijack
This really makes people feel
This thing is so hypocrite
Democrats
It turns out that Republicans have helped you through 13 continue CRs
Why do you do these things this time
And if you do it like this
Many people can't get paycheck because of this
...
Tell the truth To be honest, Americans
How many families have money?
No money, usually no money
The family doesn’t even have emergency money. He has no money
Why don’t you let someone drink the northwest wind?
Yes, yes, yes, he really has no savings
And there is another one
I see people often say
Just this air traffic control
Because this was the one that lasted 35 days It's also because air traffic control
is that the aviation pressure was too high in the end.
Can't air traffic control be privatized?
Privatization of air traffic control services
In fact, I think the problem is small government. It lies in big government and small government.
You should privatize this thing.
What do you think?
What can you do now?
If you mention privatization now, it will definitely not work.
...
What you are doing now
Of course I won’t talk about it now
This matter is
It seems to be
Privatization of this thing in air traffic control
It will involve
I have done research in this area before. I read some literature and I feel
If air traffic control is completely privatized, some people will sue you like
We are unions and flights.
Will the union sue
But many other countries are privatized
Yes, many countries in the European Union are privatized. Yes, they are very efficient.
Well, it means that the efficiency of this air traffic control is very good.
What is efficiency?
That’s right. You and all of us are such adults, we should understand
what is it.
...
...
...
...
...
Yeah, right. Anyway, when Trump first took office
Lani had mentioned to him that this was the USPS
Didn’t he say he wanted to privatize the USPS?
Of course he couldn’t take care of it now
But he thought of a move at the time and later.
What do you want the postal people to do?
Census and so on. Anyway, you
sit and do it. Go out and do some work.
But I think in fact, the United States
Well, you say
In fact, the US Postal Service is like this.
He has done a lot of privatization work. There are also e-commerce and
...
...
...
Those things in Stamps are all privately owned
That is, they are all privately owned. That is all privately owned.
Private enterprises are doing it.
So,
that is to say, he is also making some efforts in this area. Right. Now we have solved this problem. If we don’t solve it now
...
...
...
...
...
Hahaha, yes. I just think that
Of course he may not be able to take care of it
But if something like this is said
In the future, this thing
will no longer be federal
Next time if the government shuts down,
you will at least not be so stressed
At least if he is really more aggressive about this
It can last a little longer
Anyway, the American people don't care.
It has nothing to do with me
Ah but
Nowadays, many media are very shameless
What is he talking about?
What does it mean that the Republican Party controls the House of Representatives and controls the Senate?
Do you really not understand that the Senate needs 60 votes to pass this thing?
Do you really not understand?
Many American people really don’t understand. That is to say, shouldn’t this be
...
...
...
...
Does the Republican Party control everything? Why don't you stop the shutdown?
Some of them really don't understand. Don't think that they
They really understand.
What they don't understand, they really don't understand. 107
...
...
...
...
...
107 Yes, because Johnson changed the rule
Everyone has gone through it together, go around
So this is pretty good
During the government shutdown, so many appointments were approved at once
This is a comparison
In fact, this appointment is nothing
This was at the time, in fact, this idea was
It was proposed by the Democrats
It was proposed by the Democrats at that time, not at that time
It was 2023
But in 2023,
the Democratic senator from Minnesota was named Klubuchar
Klubuchar mentioned that the
personnel in the Biden administration are relatively nervous
We need that
Senate confirmation now
Then the confirmation should be faster, they said
12 people
12 people in a group and then everyone raises it once
Vote once and let him go
You know, I don’t know why, if there are 12 people, I won’t buy eggs
You said you would do 12
But he ended up with 12 people in a group
12 people in a group
As a result, the Republican Party objected later and said
How can you do this?
It didn’t work out because of the opposition
As a result, the Republican Party is now in power The Democratic Party is
Trump's one, and each of us wants him to do it for you
That thing is so complicated
Then the Republican Party said
We have to use new clear section
That is the option
It is equivalent to saying that it is one time and not online
Didn't you say 12 people and then what?
We now do this at one time and the first time we did 48
I got 107 this time and passed anyway
In the past, when the two parties
had a consensus on politics,
basically, for example, I think there is nothing wrong with you
...
Yes, yes, yes
Raise your hands and tell everyone who objects to his nomination
No one objects, just raise your hands
That's all
There are so many things
Now everyone has to say that I have to debate
Check his history
Three generations of grandparents, grandchildren, old and young, what are you doing?
This is very annoying to you
As a result, the Republicans are saying that this is very annoying
This is not a good thing on both sides
This is not a good thing because
You should have a consensus between the two parties
You are all the people on the stage
You all have a certain style, don't be that
so jijiwawai
That means doing something
I'll grind it for you jijiji, jijiwaiwai
I hate you for being more serious with you, you know
That thing is this and this thing now
It's quite uncomfortable, you know
The confrontation is getting more and more serious.
So I also think it is the Democratic Party
It depends on how he wants to go internally
If his moderate and centrist
cannot form a climate
then this party is really getting more and more left
Then it may really become an extreme left party or something called a party in the future
Hey, let’s talk about another thing
What happened today cannot be said to be sudden, but
Anyway, today the Republican senator
now discovered such a thing and exploded.
In fact, it was the Chairman of the Judiciary Committee of the Corporate Senate
Chuck Grassley
who released an internal FBI document
This document showed that during the Biden administration's
period, the FBI was doing what was called the
Arctic Frost investigation
During this investigation, he
monitored the mobile phone data and mobile phone records of eight Republican senators
ah 12
12
12 oh my god
12 or even more
He is like this
Is he not only a
congressman, of course he also has any related groups
It is 92 Republican related groups
Individual groups include Turning Point USA
But what about this senator
It should be the senator, the most important ones are these eight
Senators include Lindsay Graham
Bill Hagerty and
Josh Hawley, Ron Johnson, etc.
Anyway, they are basically supporters of Trump
Now these Republican congressmen are very popular
Including people like Hawley, who said this is worse than Watergate
Watergate
This must be illegal, right
He has nothing really to do with the investigation of a crime
He monitors purely based on party
Purely based on party
You may not think so
Not necessarily this is what happened
Well, that is to say, this is
because he is the one who asked
to do this
It was Jack Smith
At that time, he was
He was a special prosecutor appointed by the Attorney General, and he had great power
The power of the special prosecutor is quite large
Right
Did you know Jack Smith
It's okay if he accesses materials from various departments
The reason why people are really upset is actually
because the United States has always been a consensus politics
I give you face and you give me face
Now what I understand is
I am on stage
When I am on stage
I send my people to dig up dirt on you
This kind of thing is just saying
This is not a big deal in China
This is what Americans call the weaponization of justice, right?
It's the politicization of the judiciary. That's what weaponization of the judiciary means
That's right, that's right. This is the other thing.
What's his idea?
It's because he was investigating the January 6th
Congressional riot case. He said it was a so-called riot.
You and I have never seen anyone who rioted in the past.
You don’t even have a gun
If they really want to riot, I’ve already left you alone.
He didn't even have a gun. Why did he riot?
I was surprised.
Then he, and then
At that time, he was investigating this thing.
To investigate this thing, he mainly collected
materials.
It's not that this
It's not that he mainly focused on all the calls made by this person.
The relationship between
and President Trump from January 5th to January 7th
Communicate and talk
See if there is anything in between. He is mainly looking for them to get Trump
Do you know?
Then he pulled out all the information about these senators
You have to say this strictly
You said he is a special prosecutor
Want to investigate this thing
I want to access this material
It's okay
That is to say, if you are a big Fangfang, let’s say so
How about him
When he left his job
He said it when he left his job
The documents for our investigation are all there
Everyone, go take a look
There is nothing wrong with this
Because this counts as you being aboveboard
Because I am indeed investigating this matter of yours
I
But you know what's the most disgusting thing, right?
He didn't put these materials away after he left his job.
As you said, you
spent a lot of taxpayers' money
You have to organize these materials for us anyway.
...
...
...
...
It's in the FBI office, in that building
Put some things here and there
What's going on? Cash Patel is a bastard
You know, there are many people
People don't like what he says
It doesn't matter what he calls him
In fact, he is quite powerful
He was the one
He dug up the Russian collusion scandal like this
Cash Patel is particularly good at doing this kind of thing
As a result, he is looking for this file everywhere
Looking for this file everywhere
Where is this file?
Round by round, round by round, he takes out the files in the trash can
Which files are sealed in the warehouse
He takes out these files
Prohibited access the folder or something
What is this thing inside of him
You wouldn’t have checked it like this at all.
You wouldn’t have been able to check it at all.
Although Congress is asking you for this thing
You give me all the records
But if I don’t go to the toilet and look it up
Go to the storage box and look it up
The record won’t come out at all
It won’t come out at all
As it turns out, it’s Cash Patel who got this down
Then let me ask you
If you are upright
For example, let me investigate whether you senators have any
You are plotting evil or opposing Congress
There is nothing wrong with this. This is what the Attorney General has appointed you to do.
You have finished the investigation. Put your materials together.
If we want to check, you will make those records public.
...
...
...
...
It’s been half a year since these two came to power
It took half a year after taking office to dig out this
How long did Tosca Garber take to take office?
It took him a few months to take office. It’s just that Cash Patel is smart enough
...
...
...
...
...
...
And Tosca Garber was determined enough
to get these things out
If you had changed to another person, you would have been in trouble
Yes, yes
You know this is the most irritating
Yes, you are right about him, he has some files that he took out from a called
Prohibit Access Folder
Just say prohibited
It is forbidden to look at something like this
Yes, you said this, you said this
If you say that, if I investigate like this
I think you are breaking the law, I will investigate, there is nothing wrong with you
You are aboveboard and you investigate this matter, there is nothing wrong with others
You take this
Because the phones these senators have
These are public records
This is not your private phone number
Look, whoever dares to use that phone to do something messy
will be arrested immediately
Those are all public records
Do you know
Then go back to these things
The FBI can investigate casually, there is nothing wrong with this
But he
But you can't say that you are investigating you, you are investigating you
After you have finished the investigation
You didn’t tell anyone that I investigated you
This shouldn’t be done
Yes, if you want me to investigate
, I will investigate you. I have checked your or something
Is this over?
He won’t tell anyone
Isn’t it obvious that he wants to hide something? He is using his personal mobile phone for private communication
...
...
...
...
...
For private communication
Yes
So you actually have to do it unless you have a very good reason
You can't check
Then I checked and he said this
If the proof is for the identity of a Republican member
rather than specific criminal evidence
For example, if you say I have a specific thing
you are related to this crime
Related to criminal behavior
I can check on Ron Johnson
But you can't say that Ron Johnson has always supported Trump
These eight people have always supported Trump
I'm going to check on these eight people, right
If so, you may have violated the
Fourth Amendment to the Constitution, unreasonable search
and the First Amendment political speech protection and DOJ policy
That is to say, the Department of Justice has its own policy
It is to prohibit investigations based on partisanship
So if these are your reasons
You will break a lot of laws
Oops, the problem now is, isn't it
Now that this kind of thing has been exposed
You
The key thing I don't want to see is
I don't want to see how you scold them over there
What the hell are you talking about
Especially the people in the House of Representatives say
What kind of scandal is this
Say some people have the Watergate incident
Don't talk about that with me
Who enters the house to eat steamed buns? This is the most important
That is to say, who should be arrested
Someone must go to jail
You are like Jack Smith
You put him in front of him (index)
Isn't Comey giving it to him now
Okay, this is a good start
These people must be brought to justice
This is the only way to solve the problem
What’s the use of just talking about Watergate?
How many Watergate incidents have there been
The Russian collusion scandal that President Trump passed
Which one is not more serious than the Watergate incident?
Anyway, it’s him
I think he is like this too
Today I saw the hearing
The Kennedy congressman asked this Chuck Grassley
He said
Should we have another one?
Hearing specifically for this
Then that Grassley It was the chairman of the Judiciary Committee
He said oh, he said give me some time
This thing just happened and I haven't had time to do it
That Kenny said
He said yes, yes
But don't make me wait for 24 years
But I think
the hearing is just a
Of course, there are still members who say
Jack Smith's lawyer status should be canceled in the past
But I think it’s true
What’s the use?
This is all distraction.
You said you’ve done bad things.
You said you can’t wear a suit anymore.
What’s the use of this thing?
You have to put these people in jail.
Do you know that this requires a grand jury (leading to Decker)?
Just like Comey.
What is waiting for Brandon next
Why are you talking about the Republican senator who is saying this now?
I don’t know how he thinks about it
Don’t engage in those things
Just let these people go to jail
After two days of jail food, they will all understand
I think it is like this
Senator, he may only be able to push it from his perspective
But
He asked that today, and Harry asked the Department of Justice
Tell me what you plan to do next
Who Who approved
to monitor these senators
to monitor in this way
So who and how promoted and who implemented what
Of course
Then Pan Bondi said
She said I can't say this specific yet
But we will definitely check
So I think it is one
You can see from Comey that they will indeed advance
I don’t know how far it will go
Because after all, Comey will be subpoenaed tomorrow. Comey will be subpoenaed tomorrow.
He is in a court in Virginia
So this is the first step
I don’t know about Jack Smith
and others, but I think from this matter
For the general public, let’s just say
It is true that his weaponization of justice exists
And it’s quite serious
Because in the past, you heard a lot of Trump
or Republicans or conservatives to accuse
including this or something
Turning Point USA said you are checking me
Are you checking me? Why are you checking me
Like these things, you
listen to a little here and a little there, you don’t know what it is like
But now slowly when these things come out, you will feel like
This is indeed very serious in the United States, a
society with a democratic republic
You have this kind of situation just because of party
Then you use the FBI Department of Justice
FBI Department of Justice in the United States
This is the most powerful judicial force
You use such the most powerful judicial force to deal with this elected official
To deal with the people, to deal with the citizens
This is very serious
This is indeed very serious
Yes, yes
This is this group of people
You are the one who will solve this matter once and for all
Solve it permanently. Trump should understand that he already understands
There was even a period of time because during Trump’s first term
I actually have no objections to Trump in other aspects.
I have serious doubts about Trump's ability to control the Department of Justice and the
FBI.
Do you know?
When I was first in office, I was very skeptical and very disappointed.
...
...
...
...
He is a negative score
Do you know that
He is really honest about managing the Ministry of Justice
This time is not bad. This time we now know
Many records were deliberately hidden for you
You have to dig it out
It has to be sorted and dug out
You have to restore the whole thing
This thing takes a lot of time
I believe this
So what I think is
What I think is that Trump's current term
is obviously much stronger than the previous one
Well, but in the end
If you let these people be the extreme left
Or regardless of the deep state
Regardless of these people
If they can blatantly get away with it this time, it won't matter
If no one is punished
This
Don’t think about any more justice after this
Yes, because now you, you
Especially like the FBI and the Department of Justice
What you use can be said to be
Basically
you are sure that he can do these things
If this group of people passes
I really don’t know what kind of people the next group will be
But I think there is another problem
Many people may say
Then you are also using this judicial method to weaponize justice
Go indict Comey
Are you like this? I saw today's
hearing that there was a Democratic congressman
and asked Pamela Bondi
As soon as Trump tweeted
you went to indict Comey on the second day
...
Isn't this just a political
political that
Such a manifestation of judicial politicization
And of course Pamela Bondi replied, I think it's good She said
She said Comey was indicted by a
A very liberal
grand jury indicted his
It can be said that this is a
that goes through the judicial process, not that we are going to do it
That's right
In addition, the person who spoke is not a serious person
Bloom Enso
The federal senator from Connecticut was in his first year of junior high school
I am in Da Nang, what is the difference between the sun and the moon in Da Nang
On that Vietnam battlefield
I was a combat hero at the time
Then I checked his records
He was even in Vietnam, let alone Vietnam, and you didn't even go abroad to the United States
Do you know
Then he cried bitterly on TV
He said I was lying or something
In the end, this kind of person was still selected
Did you know that even Connecticut was selected
This is too much of a lie.
Just check. His name is Da Nang.
Just check it out D-A-N-A-N-G Da Nangjiang
This is a scandal
It's Blue Man's Soul
That's it
Then every day we have to say we need integrity or something
Everyone can say integrity is just this word
Just you grandson can't say you know
As a result, Pan Bondi told him today
He said that Nile wanted to elect that senator.
What you said about your military service
doesn't seem very exciting
Don't tell me how to have integrity
I slapped him in the face right there in the hall of the Senate
Do you know there is a shortcoming in the handshake
...
But Pan Bundy, I think she is a little
too confrontational
She is today A hearing like hers
I think she is a little too merciless to these Democratic congressmen.
No, no, what's the use of showing mercy to them?
If you are not merciful, you have to be harsher to them.
Maybe he still respects you
What if you are not cruel to them or what?
They are not like that Joe Manchin
Or someone like Sunny Mar who you can talk to
They are the kind of people who can cross the aisle and cooperate
More reasonable
They want to be shameless
Let’s not mention being reasonable
Want to be shameless You understand
What does that person look like?
These people are shameless
You said you have no military service I haven’t served a day
Called me a Vietnam fighting hero
Are you still saying that you need face
And the one in Virginia
The current candidate for attorney general
What did he post in 2022?
Said I will destroy the former Republican speaker of Virginia
Said that if Hitler and that person stand in front of him, I will shoot him first
Said to get a gun Or did I say I was going to shoot two bullets
And what else did he say after saying this
He also said that he would use the remaining bullets to kill his son
This person who said this
is now running as a Democratic candidate
for Virginia Attorney General
Do you know now
This is the case now
And he won't quit.
Even if someone digs him out, he won't retreat
Of course he won't retreat
People said I'm pretending to be a dead dog. If I want to be elected
That's fine
You know, he won't retreat
Even if the Democratic Party has reached a point now
If you want to save face, you can't call it the Democratic Party
It's not called the Democratic Party
But it's really not the Democratic Party anymore
It’s really
It’s not you and the one we know
Just say it
Do you think there are any serious people in the Democratic Party?
There are serious people.
What kind of Democratic party are you like? Jiu Manqin
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
People like Jiu Manqin
Then you say this is definitely a Democrat
The old Democratic Party means that it can be said to be a Democratic Party
What is the result
People now call me independent
If you challenge people like Manchin if you leave the Democratic Party
What do you think your Democratic Party has left
Let’s take the simplest example
It’s that bio Mar
He did it at HBO
I often scold Trump
Cross-dressing What kind of person are you
Now he scolds the Democratic Party no less than he scolds the Republican Party
Yes, yes, yes
He is still more concerned
Yes, others are still more
That means he can
be able to face this matter truly
He doesn't mean to be criticized by him
To put it bluntly, it is shameful
You know
It’s easy to do whatever you want to do with your face
You know, right
I'm afraid that I will be shameless if I meet that person
Think I don't care
You know what?
Then it's over
Then do you think tomorrow is because of Comey
He is the former FBI director
Comey is tomorrow morning
He has to travel to be summoned
And then he was moved forward
Because originally he was Thursday
Now
it is said that his case is highly sensitive
I am afraid that too many people will come
Or something
The court brought him forward
And it is said that he was originally
Someone said that he would also be arrested in a high-profile manner
Or something like
I don’t know his procedure either
It was just like the rudge stone or something like before
He was kidnapped from the house at six o'clock in the morning
But then they might still keep him
What is left behind?
This decency
That means we won’t do it like this
Let him go to court directly
What do you think of him? This is the approach
Anyway, I think it is still
Even the Republican Party still retains some
This is the basic decency, right
This is the approach
What about the Republican Party
Or just say it
Why is the Republican Party the Republican Party?
At least he still wants to lose face, you know.
That is to say, it doesn’t matter what different views you have.
What are the different opinions?
He still wants to lose face and respect order.
The Democratic Party has just started.
There is no bottom line.
You know.
Even you don’t know what they will do tomorrow. If you want good policies, that’s fine
...
...
...
...
...
...
His policies are not strong either. Can't keep up
Then I know how much money is being spent to death
I don't know what these people are thinking
Well
But I don't think this is a problem of the Democratic Party
Just because now you are like what you just said
He directly said that he can kill his opponent
Or call the opponent Hitler, Nazi
Now in the United States, this problem is very serious.
Because he is like this
This ultra-left trend of thought or ideology
He does this kind of thing
He turns many people into this
That includes people from the Democratic Party and people who are not Democrats
So now this kind of confrontation
The biggest problem is
Now we see this kind of
violence against law enforcement officers in many big cities, right
These days are like Portland, like Chicago.
This is an escalation of violence against ICE
What about driving into it?
And then there are even the use of weapons and so on
Well, let me see
Including
Even very outrageous in Chicago
It seems that there is an internal police force here
Just tell those Chicago police officers
Don't support federal law enforcement officers who are under siege
That's what the police say
They may be ICE personnel
Where are they being besieged
So this is very serious now
And what is Trump's current approach
He just sends the federal, he sends this National Guard
He federalizes it
The most interesting thing now is the Texas National Guard
Trump federalized it and sent it to Chicago
Alas
It’s okay
It’s okay It’s okay
Oh
What if this is the case
Then Trump is saying that he has someone in his hands
He can use this kind of national guard to deal with this kind of violence
But I find it strange
That is to say
Why are organizations like antifa
Trump has already said
I designate it as a domestic domestic terrorist organization
Why can he be so arrogant about these organizations in Chicago?
The streets of Portland are pounding here
There are confrontations with law enforcement officers
Then you can't do anything
Because you are defined at the federal level
Oh
You are defined at the federal level
You are not defined at the state level
Oh
That's right
The police at the state level, the police don't have to arrest them
The police, why did the police say that You go attack ICE
We won’t arrest the police
I don’t care if this is illegal
Do you understand
That is to say, we have talked about it before
That is to say, we
are on our program
We have talked about this before
What is going on in Century City
Century City is very simple
The city government ordered the police not to collude with ICE
No contact with ICE is allowed
You catch illegal immigrants
If you think you can let him go, let him go
But you are not allowed to have contact with ICE
It’s that simple
Yeah It's all done in one sentence
So you and your ICE are under attack
I'm a policeman and I won't go
My boss ordered me not to go, there's nothing wrong with that
Even if I give an order to this and this
This guy didn't break the law
I'm not cooperating
I didn't go out to help them beat people
It's fine if I don't cooperate
You don't cooperate
You can't arrest me
This is what happened
So not only did he not cooperate
He also arrested someone
What about arresting the reporter who was beaten
He didn't arrest the Antifa who beat him
He arrested the reporter who was beaten
Then how do you enforce the law is someone else's business
There is no way
So if this is the case
Trump sends this kind of National Guard
What can be done is very limited
Because you can't do anything
What will you do if these people attack ICE?
Where will you arrest them? Where will you imprison them?
Isn’t that prison also a local prison in the state?
There is a federal prison
This one has a federal prison
This is okay
Then he is very passive
Anyway, he is there every time when someone attacks him
He is there to block
Is this the only way
Then we have to arrest people
We also have to arrest people Those who want to arrest people are arrested
Or this is all necessary
This has the power of law enforcement
They have the power of law enforcement to arrest people
This is no problem
Yes
But what I mean is
Then he is very passive and he has no choice
That is to say, every time he can only guard over there
These facilities of ICE, right
Guard there Someone came to attack. What did someone take?
If all kinds of things hit you
Then you have to block it. That’s all you can do
That’s the case. He is like this. In fact,
Trump wants to attack these people in Chicago.
There are also illegal immigrants.
It’s been a long time.
And then
Who is that?
When he first came to power, what happened?
This Cash Patel sent people
and sent hundreds of federal agents.
Go to Chicago to find out
I have found out in this district and that district
Who is the illegal immigrant in this district
Where is it
This has been figured out
The National Guard went in this time, mainly to arrest people
It is also said to deport illegal immigrants. These things are mainly
This is purposeful
This matter is not complete, just
I'm just spending time with you, you know
That's not Trump's style
He's going to solve the problem. He has a list
You know, right
He has it. He knows where to go
He knows who to get
This matter exists
You mean to complete the task, just leave and withdraw
Now you are like the one in Los Angeles
Isn't that the case
This is actually what Los Angeles is like
But I think Trump means
more than just that
because he is talking about
the crime problem in these cities
He was in the White House today. He was in the White House yesterday.
What he said was
You just need to arrest these people.
You just need to arrest these people. Arrest these people
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
and they won’t commit any crime
But I think
Illegal immigration may be like this
But many antifa are domestic
antifa he has to deal with
He is not a problem of illegal immigrants
Yes, yes, yes, yes
Right
This matter
Let’s take it one step at a time
I think he What do you think he can do
Who is that now
For example, in Washington DC
this is how it is handled
Washington DC
Two days ago there was an article in the Wall Street Journal
introducing President Trump
's achievements in Washington DC
It is true that the crime rate has dropped
It's more than 40%
It's just falling down.
The crime rate has basically dropped
But there are more arrests.
More people have been arrested. Then
This is what it is now. Now
Even he can’t figure out which one is good.
It’s just which one is good and which one is bad.
Anyway, this article is what these people are like when writing articles, right?
Then
I won’t talk about this matter.
He won’t say it’s Trump.
What should be done is right or wrong
He won't do it like this
He's just pretending to do it
Then his key point is
This thing is that he has finished doing this
That is to say, there is a template for this
After it is done, there is a template
Arrest these people and there is a template
In the future, you can go to other departments to copy
or other cities, you can go to copy
This is okay
And so
If it were
like Chicago
now, six to ten people would die a week.
It's a shooting case
Six or ten people died
I'm too embarrassed to go out to say hello
It's just like this in a week
Then dozens of people were shot
The key is if you say
So many people died
It's the matter of six to ten people being killed
Then dozens of people were shot.
No matter what
This matter is very important to the Democratic governor.
And the mayor is unfavorable
That’s what I mean
Sooner or later, it sounds like it is unfavorable at this time
So from this point of view
From this perspective, Trump
He has an advantage, you know.
It’s just that he keeps doing it like this
This is an advantage and it wins the hearts of the people, you know
But this thing
Now Illinois, Oregon,
are all suing, suing Trump, right
Sue him Then say you can't
your state
It’s very interesting now
That is, between the federal and state
Logically speaking, this separation of powers
This is a design of the founding fathers of the United States
It is a very good structure
The federal and state boundaries
Many states can be autonomous
But if your state, city
do not care about this crime, what will you do
How far can your federal government go?
This is a legal issue and becomes
Did you go to the Supreme Court again in the end?
In fact, there is nothing you can do.
In fact, there is nothing you can do.
Because if you think about it carefully,
I don’t care even if the governor of other states said it.
Then a dozen people died in Chicago in one night.
...
...
...
...
This is what it means
It has no direct relationship with them.
And he has no direct responsibility.
The voters have to figure this out.
Then go back and elect them. This will work.
...
...
...
...
...
This is the choice of local voters.
Voters, your voters chose this way.
How did your voters choose? Then I have no choice, this can only be like this
Then what can you do
The state system and the federal system
It can be said that the water in the well does not change the water in the river
You have no affiliation. The key is
Yes, yes,
But of course in terms of Antifa
The Trump administration should be able to do something, right
Because after all, if
Who is a serious person all day long?
Go out with your face covered
What kind of federal law enforcement agency are you going to attack?
Those are the ones with money behind them.
ICE officials all go out with their faces covered. Wear a mask when you are an ICE
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
You don’t say why ICE people wear masks
You use ICE
If you go to law enforcement with your face exposed
He will do a human flesh search and say what ICE is
Then come to your door the next day
That’s smashing glass and throwing Molotov cocktails
Then threaten the safety of your family
You can do such dirty things
That’s it, it’s shameless You know, right
Well
This is definitely necessary for the safety of law enforcement officers.
So there is nothing to say
When you are in such chaos now
You, in order to protect his safety
Of course your ICE law enforcement must cover your face, they are law enforcement
Now these thugs cover their faces
You have to find him
That can be covered, no one will not let him cover it
But the problem is from the federal point of view
If he defines ANTIFA as a terrorist organization
I think of course
The Ministry of Justice is very busy now
But I think they have to do this quickly
How to cut off funding and who is supporting personnel
If you are in a local area, you have to find the list
Then you have to lock these people in advance
Then arrest them in advance (film them)
You can't let him go out and do it here every night
I think this is something the federal government can do, right
I don’t quite understand the specific details
I don’t quite understand this thing
And then
It’s not easy for Trump
Anyway, I feel
I feel that I have to go to the Supreme Court at every turn
Anyway, now the Supreme Court is in session
This new trial period has begun
What about birthright citizenship, what about tariffs
Maybe this is something
How far can the National Guard be sent?
This stuff is all here
The Supreme Court is very busy at the Trump Memorial Ceremony. I see them
Yes, yes, yes
Do you think
Do you think birthright citizenship can have a result in the High Court
That is, he will
It’s really hard to say
I'm really unsure about this, you know
That is to say, he is really unsure about this kind of thing
You said how can you guarantee
But just look at it
What does it feel like to me
Look at which side the momentum is
Generally speaking, he doesn't have much of a problem
You know
Because he is easy to handle wherever the momentum is
If the momentum is not with you
It's useless no matter what you say
You know, right?
Now let’s just look at the United States
Where is the momentum of the domestic discussion on immigration
Well
I think so
It’s 50/50 and I feel really unsure
That is to say
Especially you look like a robot
What else is this? Who is this
Then those three liberal judges That’s just you, don’t even think about it
The key is how many votes we can get among these six votes
The issue is birthright citizenship
So,
This matter is very stupid and I can’t say for sure
Of course I hope that birthright citizenship
will be favored by Trump like Trump Trump’s judgment
Don’t be taken advantage of
It’s his birthright citizenship birthright citizenship
As long as there is no one
Many illegal immigrants who come to the United States are completely drained of their salary.
It’s true that he has no motivation.
It’s true that he has no motivation to come.
Do you know?
It means you had the motivation to come before.
You come here and have a baby.
...
...
But your current situation is gone
There is no way
If this is abolished
This matter will be interesting
Oops, it’s all a big deal
Everything is a big deal, including tariffs
This Trump is still holding tariffs and expecting to be paid with tariffs
Don’t say that tariffs are no longer enough, you have to pay back the money
This thing is so dramatic
He raised a lot of money from tariffs, a lot of money from tariffs
Yeah, yeah
I will say
If the High Court I really made an unfavorable decision
Doesn't he have to pay back the money
Does the tariff money have to be paid back
No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. Yes, yes, yes
...
...
...
...
...
...
When he added tariffs on October 1st
he said it was in accordance with the Economic Emergency Law of 1974
Then on October 14th
By October 14th
he still collected so many tariffs
But what? He still collects so many tariffs
But his name has changed
He has turned into 232 tariffs
It is equivalent to your illegal dumping on the United States, this and that
I will give it to you, I will make you get this thing
If his 232 tariffs become 232 tariffs
How does the Supreme Court rule that this tariff is all
Yes, yes, yes, yes
That's it
Many of them have been turned into 232
Now he has turned many of them into 232 one by one
So this matter is okay
It's okay, this is okay
I have never worried about this administrative power
Turn them all into 232
What are you suing
I canceled the one you originally sued and turned it into 232
It's not easy, it's not easy
Okay, let’s talk so much for today.
There are already a lot of things.
This is what we have been doing all day
Although we say we are watching the fun
, it is actually very relevant to us. Thank you Dr. Chen
Dr. Chen came to the United States
The United States is very important
Yes, yes, yes
It is these people in the United States
In fact, we should pay more attention to it
I call you this program
Wait, wait, wait, these things
Because now this thing
You change every day
It’s true that you can’t keep up with others
And your Chinese one is from the Communist Party
Let me tell you what the Communist Party wrote about America.
Can you believe that one?
Isn’t that one a scam?
So you can only choose some media who dare to tell the truth
This is analyzed according to the facts.
I’m not getting you some fake stuff
Yes
Anyway, this is the attention
Keep following us and keep following Dr. Chen’s Free First Channel
Hahahaha
Okay then thank you
Thank you Dr. Chen
We also thank the audience Goodbye bye-bye
Hello everyone
Here is some information for you
We all know that diabetes and high blood sugar are very common in the Chinese community
Many friends are asking
In addition to taking medicine on time and diet control, are there any daily health supplements that can make my life easier
Now there is an exclusive secret recipe of healthy food in Korea
that has been tried
and has received a lot of positive feedback
The factory now provides us with several sets
Each set is enough for one month
Friends in need You can come and participate in a free trial
This is not a drug
nor can it replace the treatment of a doctor
but it is an auxiliary way of daily health care
We hope that through this event, we can help more people explore new options for maintaining health
Interested friends
You can click on this link below the video
If you want to participate in this free trial plan
you can send an email to my channel email
Leave your name and contact information
We will notify you
What about the email
The email address is in the description column below the video
So
if you or your family or friends want to participate in this free trial plan
please send us an email quickly
The email address is in the description column below the video
The number of places is limited
If you are interested, please act quickly
[Chinese] Show

Key Vocabulary

Start Practicing
Vocabulary Meanings

government

/ˈɡʌvərnmənt/

B2
  • noun
  • - the group of people who control and make decisions for a country

president

/ˈprɛzɪdənt/

B1
  • noun
  • - the elected head of a republican state

shutdown

/ˈʃʌt.daʊn/

B2
  • noun
  • - the act of closing a business or government temporarily
  • verb
  • - to close a business or service temporarily

agreement

/əˈɡriːmənt/

B1
  • noun
  • - a negotiated and typically legally binding arrangement between parties

trade

/treɪd/

B1
  • noun
  • - the activity of buying, selling, or exchanging goods or services
  • verb
  • - to buy and sell goods or services

tariff

/ˈtærɪf/

C1
  • noun
  • - a tax or duty to be paid on a particular class of imports or exports

customs

/ˈkʌstəmz/

B2
  • noun
  • - the official department that administers and collects duties on imports and exports

truck

/trʌk/

B1
  • noun
  • - a large motor vehicle for carrying goods
  • verb
  • - to transport goods by truck

border

/ˈbɔːrdər/

B1
  • noun
  • - the official line separating two countries

customs officer

/ˈkʌstəmz ˈɒfɪsər/

B2
  • noun
  • - a government official who enforces regulations at borders

furlough

/ˈfɜːr.loʊ/

C1
  • noun
  • - a temporary leave of absence from work without pay
  • verb
  • - to give a worker temporary unpaid leave

negotiation

/nɪˌɡoʊʃiˈeɪʃən/

B2
  • noun
  • - discussion aimed at reaching an agreement

compromise

/ˈkɒmprəmaɪz/

B2
  • noun
  • - an agreement in which each party gives up some demands
  • verb
  • - to settle a dispute by mutual concession

consequence

/ˈkɒnsɪkwəns/

B2
  • noun
  • - a result or effect of an action or condition

neglect

/nɪˈɡlɛkt/

C1
  • verb
  • - to fail to care for properly
  • noun
  • - lack of proper care or attention

surge

/sɜːrdʒ/

B2
  • noun
  • - a sudden powerful forward or upward movement
  • verb
  • - to rise suddenly and powerfully

investigate

/ɪnˈvɛstɪɡeɪt/

B2
  • verb
  • - to carry out research or study into a subject

dispute

/dɪˈspjuːt/

B2
  • noun
  • - a disagreement or argument
  • verb
  • - to argue about something

Are there any new words in “” you don’t know yet?

💡 Hint: government, president… Jump into the app and start learning now!

Key Grammar Structures

Coming Soon!

We're updating this section. Stay tuned!

Related Songs