Display Bilingual:

So I am here in Laura Coonsburg's normal 00:00
seat. So Laura Coonsburg is obviously 00:03
not here. It looks like you're in a 00:05
containment vessel somewhere. Where are 00:08
you? 00:10
>> I am in the glorious BBC studios in 00:10
Salford 00:13
>> just next to the fine fine city of 00:14
Manchester 00:16
>> because the conservatives are going to 00:16
uh Manchester. 00:19
>> They are. They are. And so we were 00:20
always planning to be here this weekend 00:23
to bring our program on Sunday mornings 00:25
to our viewers from the venue of the 00:28
Troy party conference as is tradition 00:30
and convention and speak to the party 00:32
leader which we will be doing this 00:34
morning. However, for all the wrong 00:35
reasons to come to Manchester, this 00:38
weekend has proven to be as an 00:40
opportunity to go and see and speak to 00:44
some of the people in the community 00:48
who've been caught up in a terrible 00:49
attack on Thursday morning. So, we'll be 00:51
talking about the Conservatives hopes 00:54
and dreams and fears for the next few 00:56
days, but also the ongoing aftermath of 00:58
the terrible attack on the synagogue in 01:01
Manchester. all on Saturday's newscast. 01:03
>> Hello, it's Patty in the studio 01:08
>> and it's Laura in the studio in Sulford. 01:11
>> So, as you've rightly reminded us, there 01:14
are two rivers meeting. Uh, one a terror 01:16
attack on British Jews, the other the 01:20
annual conference of the conservatives, 01:24
the first of for the leader Kem Benedok. 01:26
So it seems to me that you've been 01:30
bringing these issues together because 01:32
is it right you've met Kem Benedok at a 01:34
synagogue? 01:37
>> Yes. So we went this morning to the 01:38
synagogue where the attack took place at 01:41
9:31 on Thursday morning. Kem Benedok 01:43
made the trip herself to go to the 01:46
synagogue to meet the mayor of Greater 01:48
Manchester, Andy Barnham, there and also 01:50
to speak to some of the police officers 01:52
who were on duty today and some of those 01:54
also who were part of the effort to help 01:57
on Thursday morning after the attack 02:00
unfolded. 02:02
And while we were there, we spoke to 02:03
Cammy Bedno. Um she talked about how 02:05
appalled she was at the attack, but she 02:08
also had quite a strong criticism of the 02:11
government. I think Patty and I do want 02:14
to talk about speaking to some of the 02:16
people in that community in a second, 02:17
but I think that she has this afternoon 02:19
sort of upped the political pressure on 02:22
the government in terms not of course of 02:24
their role in anything to do with this 02:26
individual who was killed by the police 02:29
to prevent more bloodshed, but in terms 02:32
of the government, as she would say, 02:35
being responsible for allowing a climate 02:37
to develop in this country in the last 02:41
couple of years. And she told me that 02:42
Kstama and Labor had been responsible 02:45
and not done nearly enough to tackle 02:48
what she described as homegrown terror. 02:51
Those ideologies, extremist ideologies 02:53
that she believes have taken hold in 02:56
some communities in this country and 02:59
that are creating a real climate of fear 03:02
for some British Jews. This is how she 03:04
explained it. 03:07
>> I think that the government could have 03:07
been stronger. I think that over the 03:09
last few years a lot more should have 03:11
been said and done. We cannot tackle 03:13
this with nice words and you know asking 03:15
everybody to come together faith and 03:17
togetherness these it's nice to say 03:19
those things but words are not enough. 03:21
We need action. We have seen protests uh 03:23
since October 7th itself happen in 03:26
London and all around our country. A lot 03:29
of them being used as a cover for 03:31
intimidating Jews. Not enough has been 03:32
done to shut them down. The fact that we 03:35
had a protest on Yom Kipur after a 03:37
terrorist incident that killed Jewish 03:40
people I think was extraordinary. The 03:42
the way that we're applying our laws is 03:44
too feeble. But the prime minister 03:46
himself needs to show that he can come 03:48
out as strongly against the people who 03:49
do this sort of thing as he does against 03:51
others. I don't think that that is uh 03:53
happening enough. I want to see a lot 03:55
more tough action from the prime 03:57
minister and a lot more words that will 03:58
show Jewish people that they are safe in 04:00
this country because what worries me now 04:02
is that quite a lot of them are leaving. 04:04
I mean, there's been a very strong 04:05
conversation in the newspapers and 04:07
online and on the airwaves about whether 04:10
or not the government went too far to 04:13
prescribe Palestine action. And the then 04:15
Home Secretary Iet Cooper took to the 04:18
newspapers to say there's information 04:20
you don't know about, oh member of the 04:23
British public, that led us to take this 04:25
decision. So although we've heard the 04:28
leader of the opposition say the 04:30
government hasn't gone far enough, 04:32
Laura, both you and I have read 04:33
newscasters who feel and viewers to your 04:35
program and listeners to mine who feel 04:38
actually the government's taken a 04:40
misstep. Uh and so there really is a 04:42
reminder there for me of the perilous 04:45
place we're in in the British 04:48
conversation where there is polarization 04:50
around all the key issues and now a 04:52
political line being drawn when it could 04:56
have been an opportunity for unity of 04:58
the political classes. 05:00
>> It's just an incredibly fraught 05:01
situation whichever direction you look 05:02
in. And as we are chatting, I'm looking 05:04
then at pictures on the screen in the 05:06
studio where I'm sitting, which have 05:08
just flashed up pictures of people being 05:10
arrested at the protest in London for 05:12
being in support of Palestine action, 05:15
which is a prescribed terror group, 05:17
which means that supporting them and 05:18
showing support for them is illegal. 05:20
There was a protest here also in 05:22
Manchester of people wanting to show 05:24
their support for Palestinians. But a 05:26
counterprotest turned up as well to 05:28
object to people protesting. The prime 05:31
minister and the home secretary both 05:33
went public yesterday and said, "Please 05:34
do not, as a mark of respect to the 05:36
Jewish community this weekend, please do 05:38
not go and exercise your right to 05:40
protest on these issues." And then the 05:42
prime minister himself this morning was 05:45
firmly and roundly criticized by some 05:49
Jews who were attending synagogue that 05:52
he went to with his wife Victoria this 05:54
morning. And that comes the day after 05:57
the deputy prime minister was heckled by 05:59
people outside the synagogue where the 06:02
attack was on Thursday shouting shame on 06:04
you. So everywhere you look this 06:07
conversation is incredibly fraught and 06:11
hot and difficult. and the sort of 06:15
politics of terror, if you want to call 06:19
it that, are sort of terrifying also for 06:23
politicians because everywhere they 06:25
look, there is danger and risk. I think 06:27
it's also, of course, important to say 06:31
that in the Jewish community, like any 06:32
other community in this country, nobody 06:34
thinks the same. So, while there were 06:35
some people 06:38
incredibly upset heckling the deputy 06:40
prime minister in the street yesterday 06:42
when he attended a vigil, there were 06:44
also two rabbis that I spoke to today at 06:46
a different synagogue in a different 06:49
part of Manchester. We'll play some of 06:51
that conversation on the program 06:52
tomorrow, but they did not share that 06:54
level of anger and vitriol almost 06:56
towards the government. So certainly 06:59
they had very strong concerns about 07:01
rising levels of anti-semitism 07:04
but they did not hold that kind of 07:06
attitude of and bear that real anger 07:09
towards government for in their in their 07:12
view you know that accusation that they 07:15
hadn't done nearly enough. So this is 07:17
just about as fraught and tangled as it 07:18
gets. And you sort of think Patty, it's 07:21
one of those political situations 07:23
where you it's very easy to say, "Ah, 07:26
you mustn't allow people to do that, but 07:28
then what's about this?" Oh, and it's 07:30
completely unacceptable to do that. Oh, 07:32
but then what about this? And then, of 07:34
course, you talked to people who are 07:36
right in it as part of their lives. And 07:39
I'm aware I've now been talking for a 07:42
very, very long time. But I spoke to 07:43
three little boys this morning who had 07:45
turned up to see what was happening at 07:47
the synagogue. three little Jewish boys, 07:50
8, 12, and 14. 07:52
And they were telling me about how it's 07:54
perfectly normal at their school, not 07:58
just that they have security, but one of 08:00
them said to me, "Every day someone 08:02
comes into school and something else has 08:04
happened, they might have been shouted 08:05
at in the street or had something thrown 08:07
at them in the street or something 08:09
sprayed at them in the street." And for 08:10
these three little boys growing up in 08:14
the UK, 08:16
that's their norm. 08:18
Yes. And I mean it's right to speak and 08:20
give airtime to those voices who you've 08:22
met this morning. That's the point. 08:24
That's why we I think we were hoping you 08:26
would expound on how you'd spent the 08:28
morning in Manchester and we'll go on to 08:29
talk about the conference in more 08:31
detail. For my part, I've I've been 08:33
speaking to people in Gaza. We've been 08:35
calling them today about this trap of 08:39
hope and fear. And also I've been 08:42
speaking to the family of British 08:45
Issraeli hostages who were held or have 08:47
been held in Gaza. People do want to 08:50
know what kind of message the political 08:53
class have for this moment in time. Both 08:56
what's happening on our streets in the 08:58
United Kingdom and what is happening in 09:00
the destroyed streets and in the 09:02
destroyed hearts of people uh in the 09:04
Middle East. So with that in mind, we 09:06
have these protests and this conference 09:09
beginning just as we have the biggest 09:10
momentum for some kind of stop coming 09:13
from the White House who is now 09:17
amazingly in dialogue with Hamas. 09:19
>> Yeah. And while it seems and our 09:23
colleagues in the Middle East have been 09:25
reporting very clearly that there are 09:26
still many obstacles here, it's also 09:28
very clear and a senior figure of the 09:32
British government indicated this to me 09:34
too that this is the best chance yet 09:35
and that the stars do seem to be 09:40
aligning at least to make some end to 09:43
the bloodshed appear much more likely 09:45
than it has 09:47
up until this point. So we will we will 09:49
see. Um 09:53
>> can we say that the political 09:55
temperature will go down if the war is 09:57
paused? Is that can we say that? 10:01
>> I think that's a likely outcome. You 10:04
know I think never say never. I mean but 10:07
but I think that is a likely outcome. If 10:10
you remove 10:12
a situation that is so upsetting, so 10:14
aggravating 10:18
for anyone looking at looking in on it, 10:20
if you remove that, 10:22
then you might expect that the political 10:25
temperature would come down. And 10:28
certainly people I spoke to this morning 10:31
all said explicitly that the levels of 10:33
anti-semitism that dayto-day experience 10:35
for Jews in this country has become much 10:38
more difficult and much more fraught 10:42
since the conflict in Gaza began. Now 10:44
can we mean can we therefore conclude 10:47
that automatically if there's a solution 10:49
and the fighting ends and the killing 10:52
ends 10:55
that definitively that will cool 10:57
temperatures in the UK? I mean I think 10:59
we can say that's likely. I don't think 11:00
we can say that's automatic. 11:02
Um but I think we can say that's we can 11:05
say that's likely if because it was the 11:08
many people would say this is the it was 11:11
the cause of things becoming worse and 11:13
more difficult and more fraught. And 11:16
certainly people said to me this morning 11:18
that that was their experience. I mean 11:21
there was one one man I spoke to, one 11:23
father I spoke to who told me that his 11:26
grandfather had come to the UK having 11:29
survived Avitz. He was had always been 11:31
proud that Britain was the place that 11:35
gave his family a home. Um and he said 11:36
you know what I'm not really he said I'm 11:40
not I'm not political and said I I look 11:41
at what's happening in Gaza. I think 11:43
it's terrible but I'm not political and 11:44
I don't you know I don't see this as 11:46
being anything to do with to do with me. 11:48
I'm I'm paraphrasing. We didn't record 11:50
this conversation, but he said that what 11:51
people had been shouting at him in the 11:54
street in the last couple of years was 11:56
free Palestine 11:57
as a result of what has been happening 11:59
in the war in Gaza. And he was 12:01
not not not baffled or bewildered but I 12:05
think frustrated thinking this is 12:08
nothing to do this is nothing to do with 12:11
me. I too as a human being look at that 12:13
situation and deplore what is happening. 12:15
>> Yeah. Because I mean I I have this in my 12:17
own experience. So if you take Shiron 12:18
Livshitz who I'm speaking to again on BH 12:20
tomorrow and who you've spoken to her 12:23
father Oded who was murdered as a 12:25
hostage in Gaza just three weeks after 12:27
he was taken. He all his life fought for 12:29
a free Palestinian state. So he was 12:33
living in a kabutz. He was a peace. He 12:36
drove Palestinians to hospitals in 12:38
Israel in happier times. He was taken 12:40
hostage. He wanted himself a free 12:42
Palestine. 12:45
>> He was taken hostage. So the the the 12:46
reason why the man the gentleman you've 12:49
met whose family fled the Holocaust is 12:51
surprised is because to he did not 12:53
expect the actions of the Israeli state 12:56
which are disputed within Israel itself 13:00
by fierce opponents to be directed at 13:02
him on the streets in Britain. And 13:04
normally what would happen is the 13:06
political class would coales to say he's 13:08
right. He he should not have shouts on 13:10
the street. And that's where that's why 13:14
I'm intrigued that there could be a 13:16
political fault line between the big 13:18
parties about how to respond right now 13:20
and what message to give to us as 13:23
citizens sharing the same pavements. 13:25
>> I think that's exactly right. And what 13:27
what do they do? You know, the right to 13:29
protest if we think about the protest 13:31
for example, the right to protest is a 13:32
fundamental right of this country, 13:34
right? That is absolutely think of 13:36
speaker's corner in years gone by in 13:37
hide park or you know it's it's a 13:39
fundamental right. No politician is ever 13:42
going to say you're not allowed to 13:44
protest in the UK. And yet here we are 13:45
in this position where it is a subject 13:48
of political debate. What are people 13:50
allowed to write on placards? Which 13:51
particular groups are they allowed to 13:53
say that they advocate for? Who is there 13:55
a case to say actually on some days of 13:59
the year you should be allowed to ban a 14:01
march or allowed to ban a protest? Well, 14:02
at the same time all our politicians 14:04
would say, well, of course free speech 14:06
is a good thing. That's a fundamental 14:07
British value. But the world that we 14:08
live in is so complex that many of these 14:10
values are really being tested. I think 14:12
it's I think it's fair to say that 14:14
without wanting to have a very pompous 14:16
philosophical debate on a Saturday 14:18
afternoon when you might be, you know, 14:20
wanting to watch the football or have a 14:21
cup of tea. 14:23
>> Well, if anyone if anyone has had a 14:23
pompous philosophical debate, it's this 14:25
uh weekend newscast. So, we're we're on 14:28
good. But let's bring this section to a 14:30
close if you like by saying there have 14:32
been some fabulous episodes getting to 14:34
grips with what happened in Manchester 14:37
hosted by Adam in the week and we are 14:39
bringing you the flavor of what's 14:42
happened with law uh interviews this 14:44
morning in Manchester about the 14:46
synagogue attack and now we are as 14:48
promised going to move on to talk about 14:51
the simple old-fashioned business of a 14:52
party conference albeit set against 14:55
tumultuous times. So let us get to grips 14:58
with that. She's new. She's new at 15:00
conference as the leader even though 15:03
it's 11 months I think now. 15:05
>> That's right. And I think Tammy 15:06
Benedok's newness 15:08
is seen as lots of people is something 15:10
that she has not exploited. So there are 15:13
lots and lots of problems with the 15:16
Conservative party. Newscasters know 15:17
this. They're way way way behind in the 15:19
polls. They're very unhappy. They're 15:22
very disgruntled. chem doesn't really 15:25
seem to have been able to catch a break. 15:27
And one of the interesting analyses that 15:29
was put to me, to use another pompous 15:33
word, how unlike me, um was that because 15:35
we're now 11 months in, she's sort of 15:38
stuck in this place where she's no 15:41
longer really new 15:42
>> and she didn't grab that opportunity to 15:43
make a first impression, 15:45
but she's also not been there long 15:48
enough to have much public recognition. 15:49
>> Yes. much authority 15:53
>> because she she said, didn't she as she 15:54
took the job, hang on, I want to listen. 15:56
I want to go around. I want to groove 15:58
the groove. I don't think she said that. 16:01
I think that's me. But she said, 16:02
>> you always grooving the groove. 16:04
>> She was, but what she was saying was, 16:05
"I'm in listen mode. We are obviously 16:07
going to relaunch." But I think the 16:09
launch date she set was 2030, wasn't it? 16:11
>> Well, yeah. I mean the the the tag of 16:14
fire leadership campaign which now I was 16:15
joking with a conservative yesterday 16:19
because you know when I was trying to 16:21
pick their brains about things and they 16:23
were bemoning the fact that basically in 16:24
their view she's taken far too long to 16:26
come up with anything. I did sort of 16:28
gently tease them and say well actually 16:29
it did say 2030. You know she she's done 16:32
what it said on the on the tin. 16:34
>> Yeah. I mean and because the thing is 16:37
the drubbing was so severe wasn't it? 16:39
They ran out of prime ministers. The 16:41
voters told them in no uncertain terms 16:44
to get out of office. That happened. 16:46
It's so contrasting to the fact that 16:48
they appear to be saying the same in 16:50
polls to Labor. But on the other hand, 16:52
when she took over, that was the 16:55
atmosphere that we were reporting at the 16:57
time. She had to be humble in the face 16:59
of the poll of what had happened. 17:01
>> It was. But there are a lot of people in 17:02
the Tory party who would tell you that 17:04
character-wise she is not a humble 17:05
person and that she decided that the 17:07
best thing to do was to basically stay 17:10
quiet for some time, try and sort the 17:12
party out, try and make sure that money 17:13
was still coming in from donors and then 17:15
at some point come up with a whole load 17:17
of policy. Now we are going to see lots 17:18
and lots of policy this week, 17:20
>> right? 17:22
However, I think it's really worth 17:23
noting. It's 17:26
there's a fair body of opinion in the 17:29
Tory party that essentially agrees that 17:32
she fudged her chance to make a first 17:37
impression and you don't ever get that 17:39
back. And while she was hanging back, 17:41
Nigel Farage was stepping in to that 17:44
vacuum, right? And you know, if you 17:47
never quite get it, you don't quite put 17:49
your hand up quick enough because 17:52
politics is so fast. If you've got a 17:53
rival on the right of politics, 17:56
obviously discuss actually some of 17:58
reform stuff is not particularly 18:00
right-wing, but broadly speaking, let's 18:01
say if you've got a rival on the right, 18:04
the tries don't have the luxury of time. 18:06
And that I think is the debate that is 18:08
really going on in the background in the 18:10
Tory party. right? 18:12
>> It's do they have enough time to give 18:13
her a chance to sort it out or actually 18:15
is the conclusion really that it's 18:18
already gone? 18:20
>> So in the short time that remains there 18:21
are sort of three P's, aren't there? 18:24
There's policies, there's personalities 18:26
and there's process. Newscasters take it 18:29
when we just do personalities and 18:31
process. So let's promise to do 18:33
policies. But just is it really true 18:35
that there is a threat to her leadership 18:37
from supporters of Robert Genrich or is 18:40
that a flyer? 18:43
>> I think it's not true right now at this 18:44
very moment in time. Is it a threat that 18:48
exists? 18:51
Yes, absolutely. Um, is it a threat that 18:53
is definitely going to come to pass 18:58
before Christmas? Not necessarily. But 19:00
is there a very likely very real threat 19:03
to her leadership after what they expect 19:05
to be a dubbing at the elections in May? 19:07
Yes, 100%. 19:09
And the only person at this moment in 19:12
time who looks like, to quote one source 19:15
of mine, he wants to rip up the grass is 19:17
Robert Genre. Um, but no, I mean I was 19:20
told very clearly, and maybe they would 19:23
say this, wouldn't they? I was told very 19:25
clearly by by um his camp that there is 19:26
no truth in this suggestion that they 19:29
are trying to overtly organize at the 19:31
moment. Right. 19:33
>> Um and I I think and it'll be 19:33
interesting to see I suspect that he 19:36
might try to do a reverse burnum like 19:38
basically not be spotted that much at a 19:40
conference deliberately rather than 19:42
having a huge profile before. You know, 19:45
he could have for example done a few 19:47
newspaper interviews or something in the 19:48
run-up to conference. Actually, he's not 19:50
been out there making headlines 19:52
deliberately. Right. 19:53
>> So that's quite interesting. 19:55
>> A reverse burnum. It's it's it's 2025 19:56
lingo that we all suddenly now 19:59
understand. But and he was seen as going 20:00
too early, wasn't he? So generic might 20:03
be saying I must go late. So this 20:06
conference I read in your online piece 20:08
is all about her says one source. Yes. 20:11
But we rule out a weekend uh generic 20:13
style challenge. So we're going to just 20:16
get scamper through the issues. 20:18
>> We'll never rule it out Patty. Don't say 20:20
that. 20:21
>> But this weekend. I'm ruling it out this 20:22
weekend. 20:23
>> Well, it's fine if we're wrong. We're 20:24
always happy to be wrong. 20:25
>> Well, you would be me would be wrong 20:26
because you said don't rule it out. So, 20:28
I'm ruling it out. But what do I know? 20:29
So, what I do know is that at 10:00 last 20:32
night, they put out a new policy. Yes. 20:34
>> So, and let's turn to some policies 20:37
which that they would leave the ECR. 20:39
>> Yes. 20:43
>> Now, um do we need to say that that's 20:43
surprising or because the prime minister 20:46
has spoken about tinkering with the ECR? 20:48
It is entirely unsurprising that Kemi 20:50
Baden is finally going to say out loud 20:52
what everybody in her party has been 20:55
expecting her to end up saying, that the 20:57
Conservatives would leave the European 21:00
Convention on Human Rights if they win 21:01
the next election. Uh it's entirely 21:03
unsurprising that she's saying it now. 21:05
Uh it's still undesirable to the 21:07
vestigages of the rump of the softy bit 21:09
of the Tory party who think why would 21:11
you want the UK to be like Barus and 21:13
Russia? 21:16
>> I want softy bit as a podcast. softy 21:16
bit, soft cast. That could be about ice 21:18
cream or it could be it could be about 21:21
all sorts of things. Let's not go there, 21:22
right? 21:24
>> Um but that so that's unsurprising. 21:24
Here's the question. Uh given that 21:27
reform have been saying this for months 21:29
and months and months and months and 21:31
months. 21:32
>> Uh is it going to get them any traction? 21:33
So there is a I mean I know I'm a 21:35
terrible political nerd rather than 21:36
thinking about the policy, but here's 21:39
the question. Is it actually going to 21:40
get them anywhere by saying this now 21:42
debate? Is it going to shift a single 21:44
bit of the polls? probably not. You're 21:46
right to say and the government actually 21:49
is involved in talks on this with other 21:51
European countries. The government is 21:52
looking at tweaking how it's applied, 21:54
how the courts actually use the ECR. 21:56
Important also to say for newscasters 21:59
that frankly the government has been 22:01
saying that for a long time. I think 22:02
Iette Cooper even said that to us in 22:04
opposition that she would look at some 22:06
of it. The big picture is do you need to 22:08
tack to the center as Kem Bayox 22:11
Conservative Party or do you need to do 22:14
what K star is doing which is tackle 22:16
reform and it seems to me that there is 22:18
an open question. No one can decide. You 22:21
need more events to see um well, you 22:23
need more policies. Uh and whether 22:26
you're not going to go heart and soul 22:28
for the center ground, which is kind of 22:30
what Tony Blair put as 22:32
>> and David Cameron and George Osborne and 22:34
kind of Theresa May and sort of Boris 22:37
Johnson in his own way, but then you had 22:38
Brexit. I was going to say Breakfast, 22:40
then you Brexit coming in to surprise 22:42
that bit. But I think this is the point. 22:44
The Tory party still hasn't really 22:46
resolved that, 22:47
>> right? 22:48
>> So Kemmy Bnock is someone look at her 22:48
other policy. She says she'd scrap the 22:50
climate change act. Okay. Well, that's 22:52
definitely reformy tending, righty 22:54
tending rather than the sort of Amber 22:56
Rudd, David Cameron, green 22:58
conservatives. I still remember the 23:00
conference where he appeared in front of 23:02
a large tree and the whole thing looked 23:03
like the Teletubbies with a sort of 23:05
green and pleasant land and all this 23:07
kind of stuff. We're not in that mode at 23:09
all. But this is what somebody else said 23:12
to me. Look, if I want a full fat coke, 23:14
I'll have a full fat coke. In other 23:15
words, why would you go for the Tories 23:17
if they're sort of a slightly softer 23:19
version of reform or what they would say 23:22
is a much more serious version of a 23:23
party on the right because they don't 23:25
see reform as a serious party. But if 23:26
you're if immigration is your top issue, 23:29
this source was suggesting to me you'd 23:32
go for reform. You wouldn't go for the 23:33
Tories. So the gap in the market that 23:35
some conservatives identify is in the 23:38
center and the right kind of where the 23:41
Lib Dems are. It's not where reform are 23:43
and this is debate I think fundamentally 23:47
I think the Tory party hasn't resolved 23:48
this debate chem's team believe that she 23:50
will be able to resolve it this week 23:52
that she will stamp her authority she 23:54
will say this is what it means to be an 23:56
authentic conservative come with me we 23:57
will turn it around 24:01
but there's a huge question mark about 24:03
whether she'll be able to pull it off 24:05
and we don't know you know conferences 24:06
can be when we were talking last week 24:07
right about Kstarma would he have a 24:09
terrible week or a decent week would he 24:11
be able to do a good speech or Not 24:13
actually uh for Kier Armor, he did have 24:15
a pretty decent week. Not an easy week, 24:18
but he certainly settled the nerves 24:20
probably temporarily, frankly, but he 24:22
did do some nerve settling because his 24:25
speech was one of the better speeches 24:27
that he has given. His performance in 24:29
various interviews and millions that he 24:31
did was a bit more punchy than it has 24:33
been for some time. Of course, it's 24:35
perfectly possible that Kemmy Blinder 24:38
would play Kem Ben will say blinder. Kem 24:39
Blinder will play a Bnock. It's 24:44
perfectly possible that Kemmy Bnock will 24:46
play a Blinder this week, but she'll 24:48
surprise people if she does. Right. 24:50
>> Well, what they have in common is the 24:52
ism though. People said, "What's the 24:54
starism?" And they say, "What's the 24:56
Benoism?" And with his back against the 24:59
wall at his leader speech, he found a 25:01
bit more ism said his friends. Do you 25:03
know what the ism is in bedism? I think 25:06
it is 25:10
what she will try and say is a modern 25:12
conservatism. 25:16
So, not the softy stuff. I think we'll 25:17
hear from her things like we've had 25:20
enough of foreign courts telling us who 25:22
we can deport. We've had enough of 25:24
greenies telling us that we have to put 25:27
extra cash on energy bills to pay for 25:29
wind turbines. We've had enough of 25:31
government telling us what we can do and 25:33
how to run a business. So, I think that 25:35
is the line that we'll sort of hear. So 25:37
that takes us to some issues like drill, 25:39
baby drill, doesn't it? Because I mean 25:41
there's a issue that all of our 25:43
listeners in the oil and gas industry 25:45
would really understand a big fight 25:48
about whether we should give new 25:51
licenses for new exploration 25:53
>> versus allowing continuing sites to be 25:56
continually explored which is a 25:59
different sort of license and I think 26:01
there's also policy sort of emerging 26:02
policy gap emerging there isn't there 26:05
>> I think that's absolutely right there is 26:07
because you know labor came into 26:09
government saying ah everyone will have 26:11
clean energy by 2035. It'll all be 26:12
marvelous. Now they are sort of say, 26:14
"Oh, well, we have to kind of keep oil 26:18
and gas for a while and it'll still be 26:19
part of the mix for a long time." And oh 26:21
dear, let's not make lots of people in 26:23
Aberdine particularly incredibly unhappy 26:25
by going too fast. You know, it's 26:27
talking about a fair transition or a 26:29
just transition to green energies. But 26:31
Kemmy Badnock is be really trying to 26:34
insert the tries into this debate um by 26:37
saying she'd get rid of the climate 26:40
change act, getting rid of the net zero 26:42
target of net zero in the UK by 2050. 26:44
That's made Theresa May very very 26:47
unhappy because she brought that in as 26:48
prime minister. And you know Kevin Bait 26:50
not did vote for it at the time. So 26:52
she's trying to put herself into that. 26:54
>> Well, that is that is an ism. I think 26:56
there am I saying in a cynical way, 26:58
where's the ism? 27:00
>> Well, I think there is an ism. 27:01
>> That is an ism, isn't it? which I think 27:02
she would say modern conservatism. So 27:03
not not your Cameroonianism. 27:06
>> Yeah. 27:08
>> Not mayism. I think I mean I think when 27:09
you talk to her and her her people and 27:12
people who back her I think what they 27:14
say is look she is trying to carve out a 27:16
sort of conservatism for the 2020s that 27:19
is culturally conservative. You know, 27:22
don't forget one of the reasons people 27:25
respect her in the conservative movement 27:26
and beyond is because she spoke out in 27:28
favor of single sex spaces for women 27:31
when that was politically quite a lonely 27:32
thing to do. Um, she talked about some 27:34
cultures being less valid than others, 27:38
which is now uh since she first said it, 27:42
I think that's the kind of language that 27:45
more politicians might be comfortable 27:47
using. So, she was admired for the sort 27:49
of plain speaking. So maybe a sort of 27:51
plainspeaking 27:54
light touch authentic conservatism. I 27:57
think we will hear the word authentic 28:00
conservatism. Of course to most 28:02
newscasters and most like normal 28:03
ordinary people unlike a shadow like me. 28:04
I mean authentic conservatism. What does 28:06
what does that mean? Does that mean like 28:08
it really is an antique Chesterfield? Uh 28:10
what is that? What what does that mean? 28:14
However, I you can see that they are 28:16
trying to develop a brand and an 28:18
ideology. And I don't mean that 28:21
cynically. You know, genuinely here is a 28:23
sort of body of thinking, an identity 28:25
for the party now. 28:27
But the questions about her political 28:30
ability to pull it off, the questions 28:31
about whether they've left it far too 28:34
late because she decided deliberately to 28:35
stand back and work through her plans 28:38
properly. Those are going to hang over 28:40
this conference very, very heavily 28:42
indeed. 28:44
>> Okay. And I'm not just being a mean old 28:45
hack to say it's very common in 28:47
conservative circles. You hear people 28:50
talking very very freely about the fact 28:52
not the fact the conjecture that Kem Bay 28:56
may well not be the Tory leader by the 28:59
time they gather again for their 29:02
conference next year. And beyond that, 29:03
you know, senior Tory was saying to me 29:06
this morning, it's, you know, it's 29:08
perfectly possible to imagine a scenario 29:09
where the party kind of falls over and 29:11
then doesn't really exist anymore. 29:16
>> Ben, you did also say that this is a 29:18
moment and she could grasp the moment 29:20
and that's why we are going to be 29:22
covering the conference. You'll be 29:24
interviewing Kobe B. A couple of quick 29:26
details. one, November the 2nd is 29:28
important in a leadership uh vote this 29:31
side of the new year, I understand. And 29:34
then there's a karaoke story with which 29:36
we need to go out, otherwise the editor 29:38
will sack us because the karaoke story 29:40
is one of Tim Shipman's many scoops. So 29:42
for those people who've never been lucky 29:45
enough to come to a political party 29:46
conference, uh karaoke is one of the 29:48
fine traditions of uh one of the 29:51
companies that comes regularly to 29:53
conferences and plays host to lots of 29:55
the exciting social events around the 29:57
conference fringe. And on the last night 29:59
of party conference, they put on a 30:01
karaoke party at which all sorts of 30:04
grizzly performances and events take 30:09
place. at which I was once accused of 30:12
having danced with Michael Gove, which 30:14
was a total fabrication, and then ended 30:16
up, however, in Her Majesty's Press, 30:19
which was totally untrue, and I was 30:21
never stupid enough to sing at a karaoke 30:23
party at any of these kinds of events, 30:26
although I know many people who did. 30:28
>> Ah, I was wondering if you were going to 30:30
say Her Majesty's Prisons then, but if 30:32
the singing was that 30:34
>> Oh, no. That was at the end of the 30:35
party. 30:36
>> Right. So she said when asked that her 30:37
track would not be Gloria Gainer I will 30:39
survive because she has more 30:41
self-confidence and it's a great scoop 30:42
from Tim Shipman. Although I always 30:45
thought I will survive is about 30:47
self-confidence but then what would I 30:48
know? It's a long time ago now. Glory 30:50
gain is I will survive. 30:52
>> Well it is but it's a great song isn't 30:53
it? It's a cracking. I mean I see what 30:55
Tim was trying to do there. He said 30:56
trying to get a line to say the cadet to 30:58
say yes I'll survive and then you have a 31:00
headline thanks very much but didn't 31:01
quite go there. It reminds me of when we 31:03
tal the weekend, you remember we talked 31:04
to Paul McCartney and we had Rachel 31:06
Reeves and Kemmy Bnock on at the 31:08
beginning of the program and I asked 31:10
them both what their favorite Beatles 31:11
song was. 31:12
>> Yes. I mean, you say we, it was you 31:14
both. 31:16
>> It was me. Sorry. Yeah, it was me. And 31:16
then and then Rachel Reeves said, "Oh, 31:18
actually I'm a Beyonce fan. I'm not 31:20
really into the Beatles." But then did 31:21
Name One, I think, or I think she said, 31:22
"Hey, Jude." And then Kevin Bagnot did 31:24
this big dramatic pause and just said 31:26
yellow submarine 31:28
which then lots of people went oh but 31:30
that's a Ringo Star song or George 31:31
Harrison song. Sorry it was George 31:33
Harrison wrote it, wasn't it? But then 31:34
lots of people got in touch said well 31:36
Maka didn't even write that one. So uh I 31:37
wasn't that surprised that she didn't 31:40
come forward with the karaoke fave. But 31:41
maybe we should ask her again tomorrow. 31:43
>> Well it's all down to what happens on 31:45
the live TV sofa with you. Um well I 31:47
think we've got 31:50
>> and in the radio studio with you. What 31:50
are you doing tomorrow? Well, as I've 31:52
said, we will speak to British Israeli 31:53
hostage family member Chiron Liv Shitz. 31:56
Also joining us is Lord Kinnick to 31:59
reflect on current Labor woes. And we'll 32:01
talk about reinventing George Smiley in 32:03
the new era. 32:06
>> Ah, are the malefluous Welsh tones of 32:07
Lord Kinn? 32:10
>> Yes. And who have you got besides the 32:11
Conservative Party leader? 32:13
>> Uh, we will be joined back to our first 32:15
story that we were discussing. We'll be 32:18
joined here in Manchester by the Home 32:19
Secretary Shabbana Mammud. So 32:20
Shabbanamood and Kelly Bade not both 32:22
with us tomorrow. 32:24
>> Please join Laura or and or join me by 32:26
all the electronic means you prefer and 32:30
we'll see you here on or hope you'll see 32:32
us to join us here for newscast on 32:35
Sunday tomorrow. Thanks very much and 32:37
goodbye. 32:38
>> Thanks very much. Although that's just 32:39
has made me wonder. I wonder if there 32:40
are any newscasters who actually watch 32:41
the telly and listen to you at the same 32:43
time. Be quite a weird experiment. They 32:45
could have your voice, which let's face 32:47
it, is much nicer, easier on the ears 32:48
than mine, and then me wanging on the 32:50
telly with the sound down. Or maybe vice 32:53
versa. 32:55
>> Oh, yeah. And the other option, which we 32:56
haven't discussed, is turning turning 32:57
turning them both off. So, look, we're 32:59
definitely at the end, Laura. Thank you 33:01
very much. And goodbye. 33:03
>> Goodbye. 33:04

– English Lyrics

💥 Jamming to "" but don’t get the lyrics? Dive into the app for bilingual learning and level up your English!
By
Viewed
38,602
Language
Learn this song

Lyrics & Translation

[English]
So I am here in Laura Coonsburg's normal
seat. So Laura Coonsburg is obviously
not here. It looks like you're in a
containment vessel somewhere. Where are
you?
>> I am in the glorious BBC studios in
Salford
>> just next to the fine fine city of
Manchester
>> because the conservatives are going to
uh Manchester.
>> They are. They are. And so we were
always planning to be here this weekend
to bring our program on Sunday mornings
to our viewers from the venue of the
Troy party conference as is tradition
and convention and speak to the party
leader which we will be doing this
morning. However, for all the wrong
reasons to come to Manchester, this
weekend has proven to be as an
opportunity to go and see and speak to
some of the people in the community
who've been caught up in a terrible
attack on Thursday morning. So, we'll be
talking about the Conservatives hopes
and dreams and fears for the next few
days, but also the ongoing aftermath of
the terrible attack on the synagogue in
Manchester. all on Saturday's newscast.
>> Hello, it's Patty in the studio
>> and it's Laura in the studio in Sulford.
>> So, as you've rightly reminded us, there
are two rivers meeting. Uh, one a terror
attack on British Jews, the other the
annual conference of the conservatives,
the first of for the leader Kem Benedok.
So it seems to me that you've been
bringing these issues together because
is it right you've met Kem Benedok at a
synagogue?
>> Yes. So we went this morning to the
synagogue where the attack took place at
9:31 on Thursday morning. Kem Benedok
made the trip herself to go to the
synagogue to meet the mayor of Greater
Manchester, Andy Barnham, there and also
to speak to some of the police officers
who were on duty today and some of those
also who were part of the effort to help
on Thursday morning after the attack
unfolded.
And while we were there, we spoke to
Cammy Bedno. Um she talked about how
appalled she was at the attack, but she
also had quite a strong criticism of the
government. I think Patty and I do want
to talk about speaking to some of the
people in that community in a second,
but I think that she has this afternoon
sort of upped the political pressure on
the government in terms not of course of
their role in anything to do with this
individual who was killed by the police
to prevent more bloodshed, but in terms
of the government, as she would say,
being responsible for allowing a climate
to develop in this country in the last
couple of years. And she told me that
Kstama and Labor had been responsible
and not done nearly enough to tackle
what she described as homegrown terror.
Those ideologies, extremist ideologies
that she believes have taken hold in
some communities in this country and
that are creating a real climate of fear
for some British Jews. This is how she
explained it.
>> I think that the government could have
been stronger. I think that over the
last few years a lot more should have
been said and done. We cannot tackle
this with nice words and you know asking
everybody to come together faith and
togetherness these it's nice to say
those things but words are not enough.
We need action. We have seen protests uh
since October 7th itself happen in
London and all around our country. A lot
of them being used as a cover for
intimidating Jews. Not enough has been
done to shut them down. The fact that we
had a protest on Yom Kipur after a
terrorist incident that killed Jewish
people I think was extraordinary. The
the way that we're applying our laws is
too feeble. But the prime minister
himself needs to show that he can come
out as strongly against the people who
do this sort of thing as he does against
others. I don't think that that is uh
happening enough. I want to see a lot
more tough action from the prime
minister and a lot more words that will
show Jewish people that they are safe in
this country because what worries me now
is that quite a lot of them are leaving.
I mean, there's been a very strong
conversation in the newspapers and
online and on the airwaves about whether
or not the government went too far to
prescribe Palestine action. And the then
Home Secretary Iet Cooper took to the
newspapers to say there's information
you don't know about, oh member of the
British public, that led us to take this
decision. So although we've heard the
leader of the opposition say the
government hasn't gone far enough,
Laura, both you and I have read
newscasters who feel and viewers to your
program and listeners to mine who feel
actually the government's taken a
misstep. Uh and so there really is a
reminder there for me of the perilous
place we're in in the British
conversation where there is polarization
around all the key issues and now a
political line being drawn when it could
have been an opportunity for unity of
the political classes.
>> It's just an incredibly fraught
situation whichever direction you look
in. And as we are chatting, I'm looking
then at pictures on the screen in the
studio where I'm sitting, which have
just flashed up pictures of people being
arrested at the protest in London for
being in support of Palestine action,
which is a prescribed terror group,
which means that supporting them and
showing support for them is illegal.
There was a protest here also in
Manchester of people wanting to show
their support for Palestinians. But a
counterprotest turned up as well to
object to people protesting. The prime
minister and the home secretary both
went public yesterday and said, "Please
do not, as a mark of respect to the
Jewish community this weekend, please do
not go and exercise your right to
protest on these issues." And then the
prime minister himself this morning was
firmly and roundly criticized by some
Jews who were attending synagogue that
he went to with his wife Victoria this
morning. And that comes the day after
the deputy prime minister was heckled by
people outside the synagogue where the
attack was on Thursday shouting shame on
you. So everywhere you look this
conversation is incredibly fraught and
hot and difficult. and the sort of
politics of terror, if you want to call
it that, are sort of terrifying also for
politicians because everywhere they
look, there is danger and risk. I think
it's also, of course, important to say
that in the Jewish community, like any
other community in this country, nobody
thinks the same. So, while there were
some people
incredibly upset heckling the deputy
prime minister in the street yesterday
when he attended a vigil, there were
also two rabbis that I spoke to today at
a different synagogue in a different
part of Manchester. We'll play some of
that conversation on the program
tomorrow, but they did not share that
level of anger and vitriol almost
towards the government. So certainly
they had very strong concerns about
rising levels of anti-semitism
but they did not hold that kind of
attitude of and bear that real anger
towards government for in their in their
view you know that accusation that they
hadn't done nearly enough. So this is
just about as fraught and tangled as it
gets. And you sort of think Patty, it's
one of those political situations
where you it's very easy to say, "Ah,
you mustn't allow people to do that, but
then what's about this?" Oh, and it's
completely unacceptable to do that. Oh,
but then what about this? And then, of
course, you talked to people who are
right in it as part of their lives. And
I'm aware I've now been talking for a
very, very long time. But I spoke to
three little boys this morning who had
turned up to see what was happening at
the synagogue. three little Jewish boys,
8, 12, and 14.
And they were telling me about how it's
perfectly normal at their school, not
just that they have security, but one of
them said to me, "Every day someone
comes into school and something else has
happened, they might have been shouted
at in the street or had something thrown
at them in the street or something
sprayed at them in the street." And for
these three little boys growing up in
the UK,
that's their norm.
Yes. And I mean it's right to speak and
give airtime to those voices who you've
met this morning. That's the point.
That's why we I think we were hoping you
would expound on how you'd spent the
morning in Manchester and we'll go on to
talk about the conference in more
detail. For my part, I've I've been
speaking to people in Gaza. We've been
calling them today about this trap of
hope and fear. And also I've been
speaking to the family of British
Issraeli hostages who were held or have
been held in Gaza. People do want to
know what kind of message the political
class have for this moment in time. Both
what's happening on our streets in the
United Kingdom and what is happening in
the destroyed streets and in the
destroyed hearts of people uh in the
Middle East. So with that in mind, we
have these protests and this conference
beginning just as we have the biggest
momentum for some kind of stop coming
from the White House who is now
amazingly in dialogue with Hamas.
>> Yeah. And while it seems and our
colleagues in the Middle East have been
reporting very clearly that there are
still many obstacles here, it's also
very clear and a senior figure of the
British government indicated this to me
too that this is the best chance yet
and that the stars do seem to be
aligning at least to make some end to
the bloodshed appear much more likely
than it has
up until this point. So we will we will
see. Um
>> can we say that the political
temperature will go down if the war is
paused? Is that can we say that?
>> I think that's a likely outcome. You
know I think never say never. I mean but
but I think that is a likely outcome. If
you remove
a situation that is so upsetting, so
aggravating
for anyone looking at looking in on it,
if you remove that,
then you might expect that the political
temperature would come down. And
certainly people I spoke to this morning
all said explicitly that the levels of
anti-semitism that dayto-day experience
for Jews in this country has become much
more difficult and much more fraught
since the conflict in Gaza began. Now
can we mean can we therefore conclude
that automatically if there's a solution
and the fighting ends and the killing
ends
that definitively that will cool
temperatures in the UK? I mean I think
we can say that's likely. I don't think
we can say that's automatic.
Um but I think we can say that's we can
say that's likely if because it was the
many people would say this is the it was
the cause of things becoming worse and
more difficult and more fraught. And
certainly people said to me this morning
that that was their experience. I mean
there was one one man I spoke to, one
father I spoke to who told me that his
grandfather had come to the UK having
survived Avitz. He was had always been
proud that Britain was the place that
gave his family a home. Um and he said
you know what I'm not really he said I'm
not I'm not political and said I I look
at what's happening in Gaza. I think
it's terrible but I'm not political and
I don't you know I don't see this as
being anything to do with to do with me.
I'm I'm paraphrasing. We didn't record
this conversation, but he said that what
people had been shouting at him in the
street in the last couple of years was
free Palestine
as a result of what has been happening
in the war in Gaza. And he was
not not not baffled or bewildered but I
think frustrated thinking this is
nothing to do this is nothing to do with
me. I too as a human being look at that
situation and deplore what is happening.
>> Yeah. Because I mean I I have this in my
own experience. So if you take Shiron
Livshitz who I'm speaking to again on BH
tomorrow and who you've spoken to her
father Oded who was murdered as a
hostage in Gaza just three weeks after
he was taken. He all his life fought for
a free Palestinian state. So he was
living in a kabutz. He was a peace. He
drove Palestinians to hospitals in
Israel in happier times. He was taken
hostage. He wanted himself a free
Palestine.
>> He was taken hostage. So the the the
reason why the man the gentleman you've
met whose family fled the Holocaust is
surprised is because to he did not
expect the actions of the Israeli state
which are disputed within Israel itself
by fierce opponents to be directed at
him on the streets in Britain. And
normally what would happen is the
political class would coales to say he's
right. He he should not have shouts on
the street. And that's where that's why
I'm intrigued that there could be a
political fault line between the big
parties about how to respond right now
and what message to give to us as
citizens sharing the same pavements.
>> I think that's exactly right. And what
what do they do? You know, the right to
protest if we think about the protest
for example, the right to protest is a
fundamental right of this country,
right? That is absolutely think of
speaker's corner in years gone by in
hide park or you know it's it's a
fundamental right. No politician is ever
going to say you're not allowed to
protest in the UK. And yet here we are
in this position where it is a subject
of political debate. What are people
allowed to write on placards? Which
particular groups are they allowed to
say that they advocate for? Who is there
a case to say actually on some days of
the year you should be allowed to ban a
march or allowed to ban a protest? Well,
at the same time all our politicians
would say, well, of course free speech
is a good thing. That's a fundamental
British value. But the world that we
live in is so complex that many of these
values are really being tested. I think
it's I think it's fair to say that
without wanting to have a very pompous
philosophical debate on a Saturday
afternoon when you might be, you know,
wanting to watch the football or have a
cup of tea.
>> Well, if anyone if anyone has had a
pompous philosophical debate, it's this
uh weekend newscast. So, we're we're on
good. But let's bring this section to a
close if you like by saying there have
been some fabulous episodes getting to
grips with what happened in Manchester
hosted by Adam in the week and we are
bringing you the flavor of what's
happened with law uh interviews this
morning in Manchester about the
synagogue attack and now we are as
promised going to move on to talk about
the simple old-fashioned business of a
party conference albeit set against
tumultuous times. So let us get to grips
with that. She's new. She's new at
conference as the leader even though
it's 11 months I think now.
>> That's right. And I think Tammy
Benedok's newness
is seen as lots of people is something
that she has not exploited. So there are
lots and lots of problems with the
Conservative party. Newscasters know
this. They're way way way behind in the
polls. They're very unhappy. They're
very disgruntled. chem doesn't really
seem to have been able to catch a break.
And one of the interesting analyses that
was put to me, to use another pompous
word, how unlike me, um was that because
we're now 11 months in, she's sort of
stuck in this place where she's no
longer really new
>> and she didn't grab that opportunity to
make a first impression,
but she's also not been there long
enough to have much public recognition.
>> Yes. much authority
>> because she she said, didn't she as she
took the job, hang on, I want to listen.
I want to go around. I want to groove
the groove. I don't think she said that.
I think that's me. But she said,
>> you always grooving the groove.
>> She was, but what she was saying was,
"I'm in listen mode. We are obviously
going to relaunch." But I think the
launch date she set was 2030, wasn't it?
>> Well, yeah. I mean the the the tag of
fire leadership campaign which now I was
joking with a conservative yesterday
because you know when I was trying to
pick their brains about things and they
were bemoning the fact that basically in
their view she's taken far too long to
come up with anything. I did sort of
gently tease them and say well actually
it did say 2030. You know she she's done
what it said on the on the tin.
>> Yeah. I mean and because the thing is
the drubbing was so severe wasn't it?
They ran out of prime ministers. The
voters told them in no uncertain terms
to get out of office. That happened.
It's so contrasting to the fact that
they appear to be saying the same in
polls to Labor. But on the other hand,
when she took over, that was the
atmosphere that we were reporting at the
time. She had to be humble in the face
of the poll of what had happened.
>> It was. But there are a lot of people in
the Tory party who would tell you that
character-wise she is not a humble
person and that she decided that the
best thing to do was to basically stay
quiet for some time, try and sort the
party out, try and make sure that money
was still coming in from donors and then
at some point come up with a whole load
of policy. Now we are going to see lots
and lots of policy this week,
>> right?
However, I think it's really worth
noting. It's
there's a fair body of opinion in the
Tory party that essentially agrees that
she fudged her chance to make a first
impression and you don't ever get that
back. And while she was hanging back,
Nigel Farage was stepping in to that
vacuum, right? And you know, if you
never quite get it, you don't quite put
your hand up quick enough because
politics is so fast. If you've got a
rival on the right of politics,
obviously discuss actually some of
reform stuff is not particularly
right-wing, but broadly speaking, let's
say if you've got a rival on the right,
the tries don't have the luxury of time.
And that I think is the debate that is
really going on in the background in the
Tory party. right?
>> It's do they have enough time to give
her a chance to sort it out or actually
is the conclusion really that it's
already gone?
>> So in the short time that remains there
are sort of three P's, aren't there?
There's policies, there's personalities
and there's process. Newscasters take it
when we just do personalities and
process. So let's promise to do
policies. But just is it really true
that there is a threat to her leadership
from supporters of Robert Genrich or is
that a flyer?
>> I think it's not true right now at this
very moment in time. Is it a threat that
exists?
Yes, absolutely. Um, is it a threat that
is definitely going to come to pass
before Christmas? Not necessarily. But
is there a very likely very real threat
to her leadership after what they expect
to be a dubbing at the elections in May?
Yes, 100%.
And the only person at this moment in
time who looks like, to quote one source
of mine, he wants to rip up the grass is
Robert Genre. Um, but no, I mean I was
told very clearly, and maybe they would
say this, wouldn't they? I was told very
clearly by by um his camp that there is
no truth in this suggestion that they
are trying to overtly organize at the
moment. Right.
>> Um and I I think and it'll be
interesting to see I suspect that he
might try to do a reverse burnum like
basically not be spotted that much at a
conference deliberately rather than
having a huge profile before. You know,
he could have for example done a few
newspaper interviews or something in the
run-up to conference. Actually, he's not
been out there making headlines
deliberately. Right.
>> So that's quite interesting.
>> A reverse burnum. It's it's it's 2025
lingo that we all suddenly now
understand. But and he was seen as going
too early, wasn't he? So generic might
be saying I must go late. So this
conference I read in your online piece
is all about her says one source. Yes.
But we rule out a weekend uh generic
style challenge. So we're going to just
get scamper through the issues.
>> We'll never rule it out Patty. Don't say
that.
>> But this weekend. I'm ruling it out this
weekend.
>> Well, it's fine if we're wrong. We're
always happy to be wrong.
>> Well, you would be me would be wrong
because you said don't rule it out. So,
I'm ruling it out. But what do I know?
So, what I do know is that at 10:00 last
night, they put out a new policy. Yes.
>> So, and let's turn to some policies
which that they would leave the ECR.
>> Yes.
>> Now, um do we need to say that that's
surprising or because the prime minister
has spoken about tinkering with the ECR?
It is entirely unsurprising that Kemi
Baden is finally going to say out loud
what everybody in her party has been
expecting her to end up saying, that the
Conservatives would leave the European
Convention on Human Rights if they win
the next election. Uh it's entirely
unsurprising that she's saying it now.
Uh it's still undesirable to the
vestigages of the rump of the softy bit
of the Tory party who think why would
you want the UK to be like Barus and
Russia?
>> I want softy bit as a podcast. softy
bit, soft cast. That could be about ice
cream or it could be it could be about
all sorts of things. Let's not go there,
right?
>> Um but that so that's unsurprising.
Here's the question. Uh given that
reform have been saying this for months
and months and months and months and
months.
>> Uh is it going to get them any traction?
So there is a I mean I know I'm a
terrible political nerd rather than
thinking about the policy, but here's
the question. Is it actually going to
get them anywhere by saying this now
debate? Is it going to shift a single
bit of the polls? probably not. You're
right to say and the government actually
is involved in talks on this with other
European countries. The government is
looking at tweaking how it's applied,
how the courts actually use the ECR.
Important also to say for newscasters
that frankly the government has been
saying that for a long time. I think
Iette Cooper even said that to us in
opposition that she would look at some
of it. The big picture is do you need to
tack to the center as Kem Bayox
Conservative Party or do you need to do
what K star is doing which is tackle
reform and it seems to me that there is
an open question. No one can decide. You
need more events to see um well, you
need more policies. Uh and whether
you're not going to go heart and soul
for the center ground, which is kind of
what Tony Blair put as
>> and David Cameron and George Osborne and
kind of Theresa May and sort of Boris
Johnson in his own way, but then you had
Brexit. I was going to say Breakfast,
then you Brexit coming in to surprise
that bit. But I think this is the point.
The Tory party still hasn't really
resolved that,
>> right?
>> So Kemmy Bnock is someone look at her
other policy. She says she'd scrap the
climate change act. Okay. Well, that's
definitely reformy tending, righty
tending rather than the sort of Amber
Rudd, David Cameron, green
conservatives. I still remember the
conference where he appeared in front of
a large tree and the whole thing looked
like the Teletubbies with a sort of
green and pleasant land and all this
kind of stuff. We're not in that mode at
all. But this is what somebody else said
to me. Look, if I want a full fat coke,
I'll have a full fat coke. In other
words, why would you go for the Tories
if they're sort of a slightly softer
version of reform or what they would say
is a much more serious version of a
party on the right because they don't
see reform as a serious party. But if
you're if immigration is your top issue,
this source was suggesting to me you'd
go for reform. You wouldn't go for the
Tories. So the gap in the market that
some conservatives identify is in the
center and the right kind of where the
Lib Dems are. It's not where reform are
and this is debate I think fundamentally
I think the Tory party hasn't resolved
this debate chem's team believe that she
will be able to resolve it this week
that she will stamp her authority she
will say this is what it means to be an
authentic conservative come with me we
will turn it around
but there's a huge question mark about
whether she'll be able to pull it off
and we don't know you know conferences
can be when we were talking last week
right about Kstarma would he have a
terrible week or a decent week would he
be able to do a good speech or Not
actually uh for Kier Armor, he did have
a pretty decent week. Not an easy week,
but he certainly settled the nerves
probably temporarily, frankly, but he
did do some nerve settling because his
speech was one of the better speeches
that he has given. His performance in
various interviews and millions that he
did was a bit more punchy than it has
been for some time. Of course, it's
perfectly possible that Kemmy Blinder
would play Kem Ben will say blinder. Kem
Blinder will play a Bnock. It's
perfectly possible that Kemmy Bnock will
play a Blinder this week, but she'll
surprise people if she does. Right.
>> Well, what they have in common is the
ism though. People said, "What's the
starism?" And they say, "What's the
Benoism?" And with his back against the
wall at his leader speech, he found a
bit more ism said his friends. Do you
know what the ism is in bedism? I think
it is
what she will try and say is a modern
conservatism.
So, not the softy stuff. I think we'll
hear from her things like we've had
enough of foreign courts telling us who
we can deport. We've had enough of
greenies telling us that we have to put
extra cash on energy bills to pay for
wind turbines. We've had enough of
government telling us what we can do and
how to run a business. So, I think that
is the line that we'll sort of hear. So
that takes us to some issues like drill,
baby drill, doesn't it? Because I mean
there's a issue that all of our
listeners in the oil and gas industry
would really understand a big fight
about whether we should give new
licenses for new exploration
>> versus allowing continuing sites to be
continually explored which is a
different sort of license and I think
there's also policy sort of emerging
policy gap emerging there isn't there
>> I think that's absolutely right there is
because you know labor came into
government saying ah everyone will have
clean energy by 2035. It'll all be
marvelous. Now they are sort of say,
"Oh, well, we have to kind of keep oil
and gas for a while and it'll still be
part of the mix for a long time." And oh
dear, let's not make lots of people in
Aberdine particularly incredibly unhappy
by going too fast. You know, it's
talking about a fair transition or a
just transition to green energies. But
Kemmy Badnock is be really trying to
insert the tries into this debate um by
saying she'd get rid of the climate
change act, getting rid of the net zero
target of net zero in the UK by 2050.
That's made Theresa May very very
unhappy because she brought that in as
prime minister. And you know Kevin Bait
not did vote for it at the time. So
she's trying to put herself into that.
>> Well, that is that is an ism. I think
there am I saying in a cynical way,
where's the ism?
>> Well, I think there is an ism.
>> That is an ism, isn't it? which I think
she would say modern conservatism. So
not not your Cameroonianism.
>> Yeah.
>> Not mayism. I think I mean I think when
you talk to her and her her people and
people who back her I think what they
say is look she is trying to carve out a
sort of conservatism for the 2020s that
is culturally conservative. You know,
don't forget one of the reasons people
respect her in the conservative movement
and beyond is because she spoke out in
favor of single sex spaces for women
when that was politically quite a lonely
thing to do. Um, she talked about some
cultures being less valid than others,
which is now uh since she first said it,
I think that's the kind of language that
more politicians might be comfortable
using. So, she was admired for the sort
of plain speaking. So maybe a sort of
plainspeaking
light touch authentic conservatism. I
think we will hear the word authentic
conservatism. Of course to most
newscasters and most like normal
ordinary people unlike a shadow like me.
I mean authentic conservatism. What does
what does that mean? Does that mean like
it really is an antique Chesterfield? Uh
what is that? What what does that mean?
However, I you can see that they are
trying to develop a brand and an
ideology. And I don't mean that
cynically. You know, genuinely here is a
sort of body of thinking, an identity
for the party now.
But the questions about her political
ability to pull it off, the questions
about whether they've left it far too
late because she decided deliberately to
stand back and work through her plans
properly. Those are going to hang over
this conference very, very heavily
indeed.
>> Okay. And I'm not just being a mean old
hack to say it's very common in
conservative circles. You hear people
talking very very freely about the fact
not the fact the conjecture that Kem Bay
may well not be the Tory leader by the
time they gather again for their
conference next year. And beyond that,
you know, senior Tory was saying to me
this morning, it's, you know, it's
perfectly possible to imagine a scenario
where the party kind of falls over and
then doesn't really exist anymore.
>> Ben, you did also say that this is a
moment and she could grasp the moment
and that's why we are going to be
covering the conference. You'll be
interviewing Kobe B. A couple of quick
details. one, November the 2nd is
important in a leadership uh vote this
side of the new year, I understand. And
then there's a karaoke story with which
we need to go out, otherwise the editor
will sack us because the karaoke story
is one of Tim Shipman's many scoops. So
for those people who've never been lucky
enough to come to a political party
conference, uh karaoke is one of the
fine traditions of uh one of the
companies that comes regularly to
conferences and plays host to lots of
the exciting social events around the
conference fringe. And on the last night
of party conference, they put on a
karaoke party at which all sorts of
grizzly performances and events take
place. at which I was once accused of
having danced with Michael Gove, which
was a total fabrication, and then ended
up, however, in Her Majesty's Press,
which was totally untrue, and I was
never stupid enough to sing at a karaoke
party at any of these kinds of events,
although I know many people who did.
>> Ah, I was wondering if you were going to
say Her Majesty's Prisons then, but if
the singing was that
>> Oh, no. That was at the end of the
party.
>> Right. So she said when asked that her
track would not be Gloria Gainer I will
survive because she has more
self-confidence and it's a great scoop
from Tim Shipman. Although I always
thought I will survive is about
self-confidence but then what would I
know? It's a long time ago now. Glory
gain is I will survive.
>> Well it is but it's a great song isn't
it? It's a cracking. I mean I see what
Tim was trying to do there. He said
trying to get a line to say the cadet to
say yes I'll survive and then you have a
headline thanks very much but didn't
quite go there. It reminds me of when we
tal the weekend, you remember we talked
to Paul McCartney and we had Rachel
Reeves and Kemmy Bnock on at the
beginning of the program and I asked
them both what their favorite Beatles
song was.
>> Yes. I mean, you say we, it was you
both.
>> It was me. Sorry. Yeah, it was me. And
then and then Rachel Reeves said, "Oh,
actually I'm a Beyonce fan. I'm not
really into the Beatles." But then did
Name One, I think, or I think she said,
"Hey, Jude." And then Kevin Bagnot did
this big dramatic pause and just said
yellow submarine
which then lots of people went oh but
that's a Ringo Star song or George
Harrison song. Sorry it was George
Harrison wrote it, wasn't it? But then
lots of people got in touch said well
Maka didn't even write that one. So uh I
wasn't that surprised that she didn't
come forward with the karaoke fave. But
maybe we should ask her again tomorrow.
>> Well it's all down to what happens on
the live TV sofa with you. Um well I
think we've got
>> and in the radio studio with you. What
are you doing tomorrow? Well, as I've
said, we will speak to British Israeli
hostage family member Chiron Liv Shitz.
Also joining us is Lord Kinnick to
reflect on current Labor woes. And we'll
talk about reinventing George Smiley in
the new era.
>> Ah, are the malefluous Welsh tones of
Lord Kinn?
>> Yes. And who have you got besides the
Conservative Party leader?
>> Uh, we will be joined back to our first
story that we were discussing. We'll be
joined here in Manchester by the Home
Secretary Shabbana Mammud. So
Shabbanamood and Kelly Bade not both
with us tomorrow.
>> Please join Laura or and or join me by
all the electronic means you prefer and
we'll see you here on or hope you'll see
us to join us here for newscast on
Sunday tomorrow. Thanks very much and
goodbye.
>> Thanks very much. Although that's just
has made me wonder. I wonder if there
are any newscasters who actually watch
the telly and listen to you at the same
time. Be quite a weird experiment. They
could have your voice, which let's face
it, is much nicer, easier on the ears
than mine, and then me wanging on the
telly with the sound down. Or maybe vice
versa.
>> Oh, yeah. And the other option, which we
haven't discussed, is turning turning
turning them both off. So, look, we're
definitely at the end, Laura. Thank you
very much. And goodbye.
>> Goodbye.

Key Vocabulary

Start Practicing
Vocabulary Meanings

attack

/əˈtæk/

A2
  • noun
  • - an aggressive and violent action against a person or place
  • verb
  • - to take aggressive action against someone or something

community

/kəˈmjuːnəti/

A2
  • noun
  • - a group of people living in the same area or sharing interests

government

/ˈɡʌvərmənt/

A2
  • noun
  • - the group of people with authority to govern a country or state

leader

/ˈliːdər/

A2
  • noun
  • - a person who leads or commands a group, organization, or country

policy

/ˈpɑːləsi/

B1
  • noun
  • - a course or principle of action adopted by a government, party, business, etc.

conference

/ˈkɑːnfərəns/

B1
  • noun
  • - a formal meeting for discussion

terror

/ˈterər/

B1
  • noun
  • - extreme fear

security

/sɪˈkjʊrəti/

A2
  • noun
  • - the state of being free from danger or threat

fear

/fɪr/

A1
  • noun
  • - an unpleasant emotion caused by the belief that someone or something is dangerous

protest

/ˈproʊtest/

B1
  • noun
  • - an expression of objection or disapproval
  • verb
  • - to express an objection or disapproval

synagogue

/ˈsɪnəɡɔːɡ/

B2
  • noun
  • - a Jewish place of worship

hostage

/ˈhɑːstɪdʒ/

B2
  • noun
  • - a person seized or held as a security for the fulfillment of a condition

bloodshed

/ˈblʌdʃɛd/

C1
  • noun
  • - the killing or wounding of people

speak

/spik/

A1
  • verb
  • - to use words to express thoughts or ideas

meet

/mit/

A1
  • verb
  • - to come into the presence or company of someone

criticize

/ˈkrɪtɪsaɪz/

B2
  • verb
  • - to indicate the faults of someone or something in a disapproving way

tackle

/ˈtækəl/

B1
  • verb
  • - to deal with a difficult problem or task

arrest

/əˈrest/

A2
  • verb
  • - to seize someone and take them into custody, typically because they might be guilty of a crime

terrible

/ˈterəbl/

A1
  • adjective
  • - extremely unpleasant or bad

fraught

/frɔːt/

B2
  • adjective
  • - causing or full of great worry or anxiety

🚀 "attack", "community" – from “” still a mystery?

Learn trendy vocab – vibe with music, get the meaning, and use it right away without sounding awkward!

Key Grammar Structures

Coming Soon!

We're updating this section. Stay tuned!

Related Songs