Display Bilingual:

Tell me about the letter cuz I don't 00:00
know what people are saying about the 00:01
letter. 00:02
>> Okay, here is the actual letter. I 00:02
haven't heard anything about like I I I 00:04
heard about it but I didn't read any of 00:06
it. 00:08
>> I It's pretty long. 00:08
>> I'm not I'm not going to read. It's I'll 00:10
summarize it. 00:12
>> Rob, can you put it on Chad GPT and say 00:12
summarize what's in the list? 00:14
>> Sure. Thank you. 00:15
>> And I'll do my best. Dear Mr. Prime 00:16
Minister, I'm your friend. I want the 00:18
best for you. I'll always be by your 00:20
side. At the same time, here's a few 00:22
suggestions that I would recommend to 00:24
win the hearts and minds of people to 00:27
come on your side, 00:29
>> which is the right way to write a 00:29
letter. 00:30
>> You're losing the PR war 00:31
>> because Tik Tok owned by China and the 00:33
the the youth is following the lead of 00:36
the Gays for Gaza Brigade and the Free 00:38
Palestine brigade and the Tik Tok owns 00:40
our youth. Here's my suggestion to 00:42
combat what we're seeing. I'm here for 00:44
you. I want to be your friend. Allow me 00:46
to help you. Here's my suggestions. It 00:49
came as a friend 00:52
>> here. Let me read it from his letters 00:52
from a place of deep love for Israel. 00:54
Jewish beggressives alarm over rising 00:56
anti-Israel anti-semitic numbers. Okay, 00:58
got it. His core argument is that Israel 01:00
lose an information over especially 01:01
online which he warns will erode 01:02
political and military support for us. 01:04
He states that this negative message 01:06
flows downstream from social media to 01:07
campuses to even conservative circles. 01:10
Kirk recounts how during the campus 01:12
speaking towards a large share of the 01:14
questions he received are hostile 01:16
towards Israel. apartheid, ethnic 01:17
cleansing, uh subsidizing genocide. He 01:19
notes that sometimes he feels like he 01:22
ends up defending Israel more vehemently 01:24
than the Israeli government itself on 01:26
those fronts. criticism Israel. He takes 01:28
issues with Israeli uh Israel relying 01:30
heavily on surrogates and non-Israel to 01:33
defend its narrative of he criticized uh 01:36
the style of Israel's public diplomacy 01:38
press briefings and spokespeople that 01:40
seem outdated and passive standing a at 01:42
a dimly lit podium reminiscent of 1970s 01:45
duce coverage in interesting very 01:48
detailed he gives a sevenpoint uh uh 01:49
proposal build a rapid response media 01:52
communications team a keen a political 01:54
campaign okay create an Israel truth 01:56
network a and central hub platform from 01:58
debunking misinformation aggressive 02:01
pro-Israel content and coordinating with 02:02
influencers, educators, and social media 02:04
voices. Okay, go a little bit higher, 02:06
Rob. Sending release hostages on a US 02:07
speaking tour. Interesting. Promote 02:10
Israel's everyday life stories. 02:12
Interviewing ordinary Israelis, Jews, 02:14
Arab, secular, religious about what they 02:16
love about Israel and responding to 02:18
misinformation directly. framing the 02:19
Israel narrative more like a political 02:21
campaign, defining Israel's uh identity, 02:23
proactively uh responding to attacks, 02:26
deploying surrogates, and building a 02:28
first-person voice for Israel in 02:29
English, more clearly articulating the 02:31
Iranian threat and Israel position 02:33
to skeptical younger audience and 02:36
targeting younger communicate recruit 02:37
more staff in their 20s, 30s. Let me 02:39
tell you, this is why I missed the guy. 02:41
Are you freaking kidding me? Like, this 02:44
is why I loved Charlie Kirk. 02:46
like this is how you this is diplomacy, 02:50
you know, he's telling you I'm talking 02:52
to kids and they're not siding with you. 02:54
But here's my suggestion to you. And he 02:56
didn't do this publicly to get credit 02:59
for it. 03:01
>> He had to get killed for us to read 03:02
this. 03:03
What I take away from this has nothing 03:05
to do with Israel, has nothing to do 03:07
with kids. It has to do with how special 03:08
of a guy this guy was. 03:11
>> Yes. 03:12
>> It upsets the hell out of me that we 03:13
lost this guy. The more I hear stories 03:15
like this, this guy was this guy was 03:17
truly a sinnerist get killed, man. It's 03:18
unfortunate. Synergist, you know, is a 03:21
very tough job to have because when 03:24
you're a synergist, you know what you're 03:27
trying to do? You're in the middle 03:28
telling both sides your stinks. 03:29
>> Yeah. 03:31
>> And guess who likes you? Both sides end 03:32
up hating you because you're willing to 03:34
stand up and say, "Relax. Pump the 03:36
brakes." Like, I'm giving sincere 03:38
feedback. And you take a guy out like 03:40
this that his influence was growing 03:42
exponentially. Anyways, what were you 03:44
gonna Were you going to make a point 03:46
with this letter because we didn't 03:47
address that or 03:48
>> the whole concept of what we're talking 03:49
about is Charlie Kirk. It was, you know, 03:51
people have used Charlie Kirk's death to 03:53
uh gain eyeballs and followers and 03:57
promote their own opinions and their own 04:00
agenda. And you know exactly who I'm 04:02
talking about. But the reality is this. 04:04
This letter of Charlie Kirk denouncing 04:07
Israel is anything but that. I want to 04:09
say something on that. Let me say 04:11
something on that. Let me say something 04:12
on that. And I I'm not one that is 04:13
>> uncomfortable 04:16
uh uh uh uh in any of these situations. 04:18
This is what I'll tell you. 04:21
If we follow Hanland's razor, okay, you 04:24
have to follow it for people you like 04:27
and people you don't like. 04:29
>> Mhm. Hanland's razors never attribute a 04:30
malice at that which is adequately 04:32
explained by stupidity or what it 04:34
encourages people to consider less 04:37
malleant more mundane explanation such 04:38
as incompetence error or lack of 04:42
information before assuming someone 04:44
acted with bad intentions there's also a 04:45
quote in this 04:47
>> by Napoleon which I'll read a lot of 04:48
time people quote give credit to this 04:50
quote to Napoleon here's what Napoleon 04:52
once said Napoleon once said I want to 04:54
read this to you never ascribe to malice 04:56
that which is adequate explained by 04:59
incompetence and Goet if I'm saying it 05:01
correctly old guy that would write plays 05:04
from 1774 in one of the plays he wrote 05:07
it said the following misunderstanding 05:11
and neglect create more confusion in the 05:12
world than deceit and malice let me read 05:15
it again misunderstanding and neglect 05:17
create more confusion in the world than 05:20
deceit and malice misunderstanding and 05:23
neglect it's a misunderstanding it's a 05:26
neglect more than the city of Malice. A 05:28
part of what you're saying right now is 05:32
to say that u they're using this to make 05:33
money. I don't know. I mean, somebody 05:37
could honestly say you guys have done 20 05:39
clips on Charlie Kirk and they could 05:42
actually make the argument about that. 05:43
We have and our AdSense is on. So, what 05:45
are people going to say? We're not doing 05:48
this and we're not doing this. You're 05:49
running a business and you're talking 05:51
about the story and and and you're doing 05:52
whatever questioning you may have on 05:55
this. What I will tell you with this on 05:56
where I'm at today personally and I want 05:59
to transition out of this cuz I didn't 06:01
mean to spend I wasn't planning on going 06:02
into reading this letter. I've not even 06:04
read this. I just know there was a 06:07
letter. I hadn't read the whole thing 06:08
for the first time. I read the seven 06:09
points that he had is the following. I 06:10
have no problem 06:13
with anybody questioning on what 06:15
happened here. No problem. Even if you 06:18
get paid, I have no problem. What upsets 06:22
me is federal employees whose job is you 06:25
get paid to question who has access to 06:29
the information. Why are you not? That's 06:32
where I'm at. The problem I had at the 06:35
beginning was jump into conclusion that 06:37
Israel's behind it. That's Hanland's 06:39
razor. That that's that's lack of, you 06:41
know, you just want to find somebody to 06:44
blame because it validates your 06:46
argument. We don't need that. That's 06:47
divisive. That's what gets even more. 06:48
But what I what I kind of want to know 06:50
is, you know, this guy was good for 06:52
America, the country I live in, with 06:55
raising four kids. 06:56
>> Selfishly, I wanted Charlie to live to 06:58
95 years old cuz I got four kids. 07:00
Selfishly, you need more brave men like 07:02
this. We lost one of the most important 07:05
guys in the future. Now, don't get me 07:07
wrong. This is not like it's the end of 07:09
the world. Let's sit there and we're not 07:10
going to be able to figure out leaders. 07:12
Step up. We're going to step up and do 07:13
our part. I'm not sitting here worried 07:15
about it. Neither should you. God is on 07:16
our side. We're going to figure this 07:18
thing out. Yep. collectively together. 07:19
But I don't mind if somebody who gets 07:21
paid to do a podcast asks some questions 07:23
who federal employees don't want to ask. 07:26
And whether you like or don't like that 07:28
individual, ask away. Oh, Pat, I I'm 07:29
with you. But there's a big distinction 07:32
here in my opinion. We've talked about 07:35
how many times when you have an opinion, 07:37
you say the following. Here's what I 07:39
think. This is my opinion. I could be 07:42
wrong, but this is what I think. I have 07:44
no problem with anybody, literally 07:46
anybody asking questions. This is what 07:48
happened. 07:50
>> There's a difference between a question, 07:50
my opinion, and then facts, and then I 07:52
have the receipts, trust me, trust me, 07:55
bro, and you're literally lying. So, we 07:58
have to call out 08:02
>> You know what I think? You know what I 08:03
think it is? You know what I think it 08:05
is? 08:06
>> Here's what I think. I think you're you 08:07
make a very good point when somebody 08:08
comes out and says, "What? I know 08:11
exactly what happened without showing 08:13
the receipts." Very annoying. 08:14
>> Yeah. 08:16
>> Very annoying. And you lose credibility 08:16
with that. gaslight everybody 08:18
>> and and and sometimes you know sometimes 08:20
there is that uh what's the word in 08:22
media where you have um uh 08:24
>> journalistic integrity. No, no, it's not 08:27
journalistic integrity 08:29
>> where you are tempted 08:30
>> to be the first to be like you got it 08:32
breaking news 08:35
>> cuz it brings so much eyeballs 08:35
>> of course 08:37
>> but dude if you were wrong man let me 08:37
we're on flight back I don't know what 08:39
flight I'm on a flight back yesterday 08:40
and we're talking about somebody in 08:42
business 08:43
>> and I I always ask this question I used 08:44
to ask this question on PHP 20 years ago 08:45
15 years I used to say who do you think 08:47
is going to be the biggest player 10 08:49
years from now in the company and I'll 08:50
never forget one time we're at this 08:52
event at Palm Springs Las Vegas July 08:54
15th of09 night, 08:56
July 15th of09. And this one girl gets 09:00
up on stage, 09:03
who was at our Arizona office. She gets 09:06
up on stage. She hands this gift to me. 09:08
It was a tsp gift with pictures and 09:12
everything in it and things written by 09:14
her. She's on stage crying for 5 10 09:15
minutes on how much I've changed her 09:18
life. And we're outside my office in 09:21
Northridge and we're walking 09:24
And I'm asking the question, who's going 09:27
to be the player? T on everybody's list. 09:29
She was on the list. 09:32
>> You know what she did a month later? 09:34
Left, took business, talk trash, and we 09:37
had the best relationship together. 09:41
>> Wow. 09:43
>> I was good with her boyfriend at the 09:44
time, her fiance. We'd go to church. We 09:46
introduced her to the church that we go 09:47
to. Phenomenal. Like overnight, this 09:49
happens because another guy got in her 09:51
ear and overnight this happened. What's 09:53
the point here, dude? We have no idea 09:55
what's going to happen with these 09:57
stories another 12, 24, 36 months. You 09:58
have no idea who's going to be in 10:00
business 5, 10 years from now. You have 10:01
no idea what's going to happen with 10:03
business. You You hear a lot of 10:04
different people. 10:05
>> But in the interim today, I have no 10:06
problem with anybody that's questioning 10:08
anything. I will say pump the brakes of 10:10
jumping into conclusion that you know 10:12
for a fact what happened. You lose 10:13
credibility when you do that. Fair point 10:15
there. But I have no problem with 10:16
anybody that's questioning things today. 10:17
Last night was a great night. 10:19
>> The Yankees beat the Red Sox. Okay. 10:22
Notice one person not clapping. Okay. 10:24
And that is none other than Tom 10:27
Ellsworth. So here's what we want to do 10:28
with you. Here's what Look at that. Look 10:30
at the Look at the Halo look. Zoom in on 10:31
his face. By the way, I want people Can 10:33
you zoom in on his face? Zoom in on his 10:36
face and tell me everybody in the group 10:38
text last night was texting back except 10:42
for one guy. And the one guy who didn't 10:43
respond back was this guy. He says he 10:45
doesn't have hate towards the Yankees. I 10:48
believe he does. Having said that, the 10:50
pitcher of the Yankees yesterday pitched 10:52
a 10:55
>> lights out 10:55
>> 12 strike. You know, he hasn't pitched a 10:56
12 strikeout, not in a minor leagues, 10:58
not this is the first time he does it. 11:00
Lights out. Great stuff. 11:02
>> But here's what we like to see. For some 11:04
of you guys that are Dodger fans, you're 11:06
from LA and you're on Tom's side. We got 11:08
the Dodger blue future looks bright. 11:10
Check this out. Look at the timing of 11:12
it. 11:14
>> What a sick hat that is. By the way, 11:14
whether you're a Dodgers fan or not, 11:17
that is legit one of the sickest blue 11:19
colored future looks bright hat we have. 11:22
But if you're a Yankees fan, folks, we 11:25
also got the Yankees hat. 11:27
>> The navy blue future looks bright hat. 11:28
So, here's a contest we're going to be 11:31
playing. 11:33
>> We're going to be watching to see which 11:33
of these two is going to get more love. 11:35
Now, Yankees Tom was upset because Tom 11:37
said people in LA are sleeping. Pat, 11:39
Yankees fans are up. 11:41
>> Yeah, we are. 11:42
>> But but listen, California is one of the 11:43
biggest viewers of the podcast. So Rob, 11:44
we have to find a way to put the links 11:46
of both hats there. Folks, if you're 11:48
searching it, you could put navy hat. 11:49
It'll come up. And what's the other 11:52
hat's title? If somebody is searching 11:54
this or they want to find it, it's royal 11:56
royal hat. You type in royal, but both 11:59
hats are colors. Maybe you're somebody 12:02
that's kind of like, you know, you're 12:04
you're neither the Yankees or the 12:06
Dodgers. Some of you guys may be 12:07
watching this. You're pirates. You're 12:09
ready to go after the ump. 12:10
>> Some of you guys are like, "Where's 12:11
that? Give me the I want to go find that 12:12
man. I'm going to go chase that man. I 12:14
don't know if you guys saw it or not. 12:15
They were chasing. Did you see that 12:16
afterward? Oh my god. 12:17
>> They chased the 12:19
>> They're holding the Pirates players back 12:20
from destroying this ump 12:22
>> because of couple bad pitches that they 12:24
had Cubs obviously. 12:25
>> Yeah, it's done, guys. 12:27
>> Next year is a robot. 12:28
>> Yeah. Yeah, it's true. 12:29
>> Well, we're going to see what's going to 12:31
happen. If you enjoyed this video, you 12:31
want to watch more videos like this, 12:33
click here. And if you want to watch the 12:34
entire podcast, click here. 12:35

– English Lyrics

💡 "" is packed with cool phrases waiting for you in the app!
By
Viewed
73,624
Language
Learn this song

Lyrics & Translation

[English]
Tell me about the letter cuz I don't
know what people are saying about the
letter.
>> Okay, here is the actual letter. I
haven't heard anything about like I I I
heard about it but I didn't read any of
it.
>> I It's pretty long.
>> I'm not I'm not going to read. It's I'll
summarize it.
>> Rob, can you put it on Chad GPT and say
summarize what's in the list?
>> Sure. Thank you.
>> And I'll do my best. Dear Mr. Prime
Minister, I'm your friend. I want the
best for you. I'll always be by your
side. At the same time, here's a few
suggestions that I would recommend to
win the hearts and minds of people to
come on your side,
>> which is the right way to write a
letter.
>> You're losing the PR war
>> because Tik Tok owned by China and the
the the youth is following the lead of
the Gays for Gaza Brigade and the Free
Palestine brigade and the Tik Tok owns
our youth. Here's my suggestion to
combat what we're seeing. I'm here for
you. I want to be your friend. Allow me
to help you. Here's my suggestions. It
came as a friend
>> here. Let me read it from his letters
from a place of deep love for Israel.
Jewish beggressives alarm over rising
anti-Israel anti-semitic numbers. Okay,
got it. His core argument is that Israel
lose an information over especially
online which he warns will erode
political and military support for us.
He states that this negative message
flows downstream from social media to
campuses to even conservative circles.
Kirk recounts how during the campus
speaking towards a large share of the
questions he received are hostile
towards Israel. apartheid, ethnic
cleansing, uh subsidizing genocide. He
notes that sometimes he feels like he
ends up defending Israel more vehemently
than the Israeli government itself on
those fronts. criticism Israel. He takes
issues with Israeli uh Israel relying
heavily on surrogates and non-Israel to
defend its narrative of he criticized uh
the style of Israel's public diplomacy
press briefings and spokespeople that
seem outdated and passive standing a at
a dimly lit podium reminiscent of 1970s
duce coverage in interesting very
detailed he gives a sevenpoint uh uh
proposal build a rapid response media
communications team a keen a political
campaign okay create an Israel truth
network a and central hub platform from
debunking misinformation aggressive
pro-Israel content and coordinating with
influencers, educators, and social media
voices. Okay, go a little bit higher,
Rob. Sending release hostages on a US
speaking tour. Interesting. Promote
Israel's everyday life stories.
Interviewing ordinary Israelis, Jews,
Arab, secular, religious about what they
love about Israel and responding to
misinformation directly. framing the
Israel narrative more like a political
campaign, defining Israel's uh identity,
proactively uh responding to attacks,
deploying surrogates, and building a
first-person voice for Israel in
English, more clearly articulating the
Iranian threat and Israel position
to skeptical younger audience and
targeting younger communicate recruit
more staff in their 20s, 30s. Let me
tell you, this is why I missed the guy.
Are you freaking kidding me? Like, this
is why I loved Charlie Kirk.
like this is how you this is diplomacy,
you know, he's telling you I'm talking
to kids and they're not siding with you.
But here's my suggestion to you. And he
didn't do this publicly to get credit
for it.
>> He had to get killed for us to read
this.
What I take away from this has nothing
to do with Israel, has nothing to do
with kids. It has to do with how special
of a guy this guy was.
>> Yes.
>> It upsets the hell out of me that we
lost this guy. The more I hear stories
like this, this guy was this guy was
truly a sinnerist get killed, man. It's
unfortunate. Synergist, you know, is a
very tough job to have because when
you're a synergist, you know what you're
trying to do? You're in the middle
telling both sides your stinks.
>> Yeah.
>> And guess who likes you? Both sides end
up hating you because you're willing to
stand up and say, "Relax. Pump the
brakes." Like, I'm giving sincere
feedback. And you take a guy out like
this that his influence was growing
exponentially. Anyways, what were you
gonna Were you going to make a point
with this letter because we didn't
address that or
>> the whole concept of what we're talking
about is Charlie Kirk. It was, you know,
people have used Charlie Kirk's death to
uh gain eyeballs and followers and
promote their own opinions and their own
agenda. And you know exactly who I'm
talking about. But the reality is this.
This letter of Charlie Kirk denouncing
Israel is anything but that. I want to
say something on that. Let me say
something on that. Let me say something
on that. And I I'm not one that is
>> uncomfortable
uh uh uh uh in any of these situations.
This is what I'll tell you.
If we follow Hanland's razor, okay, you
have to follow it for people you like
and people you don't like.
>> Mhm. Hanland's razors never attribute a
malice at that which is adequately
explained by stupidity or what it
encourages people to consider less
malleant more mundane explanation such
as incompetence error or lack of
information before assuming someone
acted with bad intentions there's also a
quote in this
>> by Napoleon which I'll read a lot of
time people quote give credit to this
quote to Napoleon here's what Napoleon
once said Napoleon once said I want to
read this to you never ascribe to malice
that which is adequate explained by
incompetence and Goet if I'm saying it
correctly old guy that would write plays
from 1774 in one of the plays he wrote
it said the following misunderstanding
and neglect create more confusion in the
world than deceit and malice let me read
it again misunderstanding and neglect
create more confusion in the world than
deceit and malice misunderstanding and
neglect it's a misunderstanding it's a
neglect more than the city of Malice. A
part of what you're saying right now is
to say that u they're using this to make
money. I don't know. I mean, somebody
could honestly say you guys have done 20
clips on Charlie Kirk and they could
actually make the argument about that.
We have and our AdSense is on. So, what
are people going to say? We're not doing
this and we're not doing this. You're
running a business and you're talking
about the story and and and you're doing
whatever questioning you may have on
this. What I will tell you with this on
where I'm at today personally and I want
to transition out of this cuz I didn't
mean to spend I wasn't planning on going
into reading this letter. I've not even
read this. I just know there was a
letter. I hadn't read the whole thing
for the first time. I read the seven
points that he had is the following. I
have no problem
with anybody questioning on what
happened here. No problem. Even if you
get paid, I have no problem. What upsets
me is federal employees whose job is you
get paid to question who has access to
the information. Why are you not? That's
where I'm at. The problem I had at the
beginning was jump into conclusion that
Israel's behind it. That's Hanland's
razor. That that's that's lack of, you
know, you just want to find somebody to
blame because it validates your
argument. We don't need that. That's
divisive. That's what gets even more.
But what I what I kind of want to know
is, you know, this guy was good for
America, the country I live in, with
raising four kids.
>> Selfishly, I wanted Charlie to live to
95 years old cuz I got four kids.
Selfishly, you need more brave men like
this. We lost one of the most important
guys in the future. Now, don't get me
wrong. This is not like it's the end of
the world. Let's sit there and we're not
going to be able to figure out leaders.
Step up. We're going to step up and do
our part. I'm not sitting here worried
about it. Neither should you. God is on
our side. We're going to figure this
thing out. Yep. collectively together.
But I don't mind if somebody who gets
paid to do a podcast asks some questions
who federal employees don't want to ask.
And whether you like or don't like that
individual, ask away. Oh, Pat, I I'm
with you. But there's a big distinction
here in my opinion. We've talked about
how many times when you have an opinion,
you say the following. Here's what I
think. This is my opinion. I could be
wrong, but this is what I think. I have
no problem with anybody, literally
anybody asking questions. This is what
happened.
>> There's a difference between a question,
my opinion, and then facts, and then I
have the receipts, trust me, trust me,
bro, and you're literally lying. So, we
have to call out
>> You know what I think? You know what I
think it is? You know what I think it
is?
>> Here's what I think. I think you're you
make a very good point when somebody
comes out and says, "What? I know
exactly what happened without showing
the receipts." Very annoying.
>> Yeah.
>> Very annoying. And you lose credibility
with that. gaslight everybody
>> and and and sometimes you know sometimes
there is that uh what's the word in
media where you have um uh
>> journalistic integrity. No, no, it's not
journalistic integrity
>> where you are tempted
>> to be the first to be like you got it
breaking news
>> cuz it brings so much eyeballs
>> of course
>> but dude if you were wrong man let me
we're on flight back I don't know what
flight I'm on a flight back yesterday
and we're talking about somebody in
business
>> and I I always ask this question I used
to ask this question on PHP 20 years ago
15 years I used to say who do you think
is going to be the biggest player 10
years from now in the company and I'll
never forget one time we're at this
event at Palm Springs Las Vegas July
15th of09 night,
July 15th of09. And this one girl gets
up on stage,
who was at our Arizona office. She gets
up on stage. She hands this gift to me.
It was a tsp gift with pictures and
everything in it and things written by
her. She's on stage crying for 5 10
minutes on how much I've changed her
life. And we're outside my office in
Northridge and we're walking
And I'm asking the question, who's going
to be the player? T on everybody's list.
She was on the list.
>> You know what she did a month later?
Left, took business, talk trash, and we
had the best relationship together.
>> Wow.
>> I was good with her boyfriend at the
time, her fiance. We'd go to church. We
introduced her to the church that we go
to. Phenomenal. Like overnight, this
happens because another guy got in her
ear and overnight this happened. What's
the point here, dude? We have no idea
what's going to happen with these
stories another 12, 24, 36 months. You
have no idea who's going to be in
business 5, 10 years from now. You have
no idea what's going to happen with
business. You You hear a lot of
different people.
>> But in the interim today, I have no
problem with anybody that's questioning
anything. I will say pump the brakes of
jumping into conclusion that you know
for a fact what happened. You lose
credibility when you do that. Fair point
there. But I have no problem with
anybody that's questioning things today.
Last night was a great night.
>> The Yankees beat the Red Sox. Okay.
Notice one person not clapping. Okay.
And that is none other than Tom
Ellsworth. So here's what we want to do
with you. Here's what Look at that. Look
at the Look at the Halo look. Zoom in on
his face. By the way, I want people Can
you zoom in on his face? Zoom in on his
face and tell me everybody in the group
text last night was texting back except
for one guy. And the one guy who didn't
respond back was this guy. He says he
doesn't have hate towards the Yankees. I
believe he does. Having said that, the
pitcher of the Yankees yesterday pitched
a
>> lights out
>> 12 strike. You know, he hasn't pitched a
12 strikeout, not in a minor leagues,
not this is the first time he does it.
Lights out. Great stuff.
>> But here's what we like to see. For some
of you guys that are Dodger fans, you're
from LA and you're on Tom's side. We got
the Dodger blue future looks bright.
Check this out. Look at the timing of
it.
>> What a sick hat that is. By the way,
whether you're a Dodgers fan or not,
that is legit one of the sickest blue
colored future looks bright hat we have.
But if you're a Yankees fan, folks, we
also got the Yankees hat.
>> The navy blue future looks bright hat.
So, here's a contest we're going to be
playing.
>> We're going to be watching to see which
of these two is going to get more love.
Now, Yankees Tom was upset because Tom
said people in LA are sleeping. Pat,
Yankees fans are up.
>> Yeah, we are.
>> But but listen, California is one of the
biggest viewers of the podcast. So Rob,
we have to find a way to put the links
of both hats there. Folks, if you're
searching it, you could put navy hat.
It'll come up. And what's the other
hat's title? If somebody is searching
this or they want to find it, it's royal
royal hat. You type in royal, but both
hats are colors. Maybe you're somebody
that's kind of like, you know, you're
you're neither the Yankees or the
Dodgers. Some of you guys may be
watching this. You're pirates. You're
ready to go after the ump.
>> Some of you guys are like, "Where's
that? Give me the I want to go find that
man. I'm going to go chase that man. I
don't know if you guys saw it or not.
They were chasing. Did you see that
afterward? Oh my god.
>> They chased the
>> They're holding the Pirates players back
from destroying this ump
>> because of couple bad pitches that they
had Cubs obviously.
>> Yeah, it's done, guys.
>> Next year is a robot.
>> Yeah. Yeah, it's true.
>> Well, we're going to see what's going to
happen. If you enjoyed this video, you
want to watch more videos like this,
click here. And if you want to watch the
entire podcast, click here.

Key Vocabulary

Start Practicing
Vocabulary Meanings

letter

/ˈlɛtər/

A1
  • noun
  • - a written or printed message

people

/ˈpiːpəl/

A1
  • noun
  • - human beings

hear

/hɪər/

A1
  • verb
  • - to perceive sounds with the ears

read

/riːd/

A1
  • verb
  • - to look at and understand written words

summarize

/ˈsʌməraɪz/

B1
  • verb
  • - to give a brief statement of the main points

friend

/frɛnd/

A1
  • noun
  • - a person you know well and like

suggestions

/səˈdʒɛstʃənz/

A2
  • noun
  • - ideas or proposals offered

win

/wɪn/

A1
  • verb
  • - to be victorious in a contest

hearts

/hɑrts/

A2
  • noun
  • - the organ pumping blood or emotions

minds

/maɪndz/

A2
  • noun
  • - the faculty of consciousness and thought

losing

/ˈluːzɪŋ/

A2
  • verb
  • - to fail to keep or maintain

war

/wɔr/

A2
  • noun
  • - a state of armed conflict between nations

social

/ˈsoʊʃəl/

A2
  • adjective
  • - relating to society or community

media

/ˈmidiə/

B1
  • noun
  • - channels of mass communication

youth

/juːθ/

A2
  • noun
  • - young people collectively

combat

/ˈkɒmbat/

B1
  • noun
  • - fighting between armed forces
  • verb
  • - to fight or oppose

special

/ˈspɛʃəl/

A2
  • adjective
  • - better or greater than usual

letter

/ˈlɛtər/

A1
  • noun
  • - a written message from A to Z

“letter, people, hear” – got them all figured out?

⚡ Dive into vocabulary challenges in the app and lock in your knowledge right after jamming to ""

Key Grammar Structures

Coming Soon!

We're updating this section. Stay tuned!

Related Songs