Display Bilingual:

We've had 28 women murdered in the last 00:00
five years. It seems like there's less 00:02
appetite to come out and riot whenever 00:05
the perpetrator looks like someone you 00:07
might work with or play football with. 00:08
>> Why do the government and left-wing 00:11
politicians continue to call concerned 00:13
citizens far right when the vast 00:16
majority are just concerned about 00:18
illegal immigration. 00:20
>> Right. So we mentioned rhetoric already. 00:23
Um Hillary, let me come to you. 00:25
Obviously K star at the labor conference 00:26
today referred to uh a policy of of 00:28
reform as a racist policy when it comes 00:32
to immigration. 00:35
>> Yeah. 00:36
>> I mean racist far right. Do you agree 00:36
with that? 00:40
>> Yes I do because if you look at what 00:42
reform has proposed on indefinite leave 00:44
to remain because controlling migration 00:47
is absolutely right and proper. 00:49
something the government is committed to 00:51
which is why we are making changes to 00:52
the immigration system. That is one 00:55
thing. Tightening up the rules for 00:57
settlement and so on. It is completely 00:59
different to say to people who have 01:01
lived in this country for a long time, 01:04
paid taxes, worked, contributed that 01:06
their right to remain in Britain, we 01:09
gave a promise, is could be taken away 01:11
from them and they could be deported. 01:14
And when people think about it, who do 01:16
you know who has indefinite leave to 01:19
remain? It could be the carer who's 01:21
looking after your ill mother. It could 01:22
be your neighbor. It could be an in-law. 01:25
It could be the doctor who treated you 01:27
at the hospital. And I think it is an 01:29
immoral policy and the prime minister 01:32
was right quite right to call it out 01:34
because it is in the end divisive. And 01:36
as we've just discussed in the wake of 01:39
the terrible events in Manchester today, 01:42
there are enough people out there who 01:45
want to divide the nation and we should 01:46
be trying to bring people together and 01:48
have a sensible debate about the 01:50
difference between proper controls on 01:52
migration and not breaking the word that 01:55
we've given to people about their 01:57
ability to continue to contribute to 01:59
this country. 02:01
The question was asked uh about 02:07
concerned citizens not about reform but 02:09
about concerned citizens uh which there 02:12
is a vast majority that are concerned 02:16
about illegal immigration which I don't 02:19
think you answered 02:22
>> and do you feel that they are being 02:23
wrongly referred to as far right 02:24
>> wrongly referred to as far right uh as 02:27
well as being ignored 02:29
Um I accept that there are many people 02:33
who are concerned about migration. That 02:35
is why the government is taking a number 02:37
of steps and Paul's point is that you 02:39
feel that they're being called far right 02:42
when in fact they're not. That's your 02:44
view. 02:45
>> Yes. Yes. 02:45
>> Well, I I I don't accept that the 02:46
government is doing that. We've called 02:49
out what Nigel Farage proposed and 02:51
reform proposed, but we're also making 02:52
changes to the immigration system which 02:55
I hope people will recognize as they 02:58
unfold. say changing the arrangements 03:01
for getting indefinite leave to remain 03:03
people have to make a contribution not 03:07
be claiming benefits spotless criminal 03:09
record all of those things that we've 03:11
announced looking at the way in which 03:13
the European Convention of Human Rights 03:15
is interpreted not leaving it because if 03:17
we left the European Convention we'd be 03:20
in a club of three in Europe Russia 03:22
Bellarus and the United Kingdom and 03:25
there are parties on the panel that are 03:28
in favor of us leaving 03:29
>> Alex Look, uh, in answer to your 03:31
question, there isn't, uh, I haven't 03:33
seen any justification for the use of 03:35
those terms. And you're right, there are 03:37
a lot of people who are concerned about 03:39
levels of immigration. They're perfectly 03:41
entitled to hold those views and to not 03:42
be shouted down. And and I before I was 03:44
a politician, I was a history teacher. 03:47
And in my lifetime, I have watched 03:49
people take words that meant one thing 03:51
in the 1930s and try to apply them to 03:53
entirely different situations in the 03:56
modern age and distort them. far right 03:58
used to mean uh the Nazis who rounded 04:00
people up and you committed the worst 04:03
atrocities in history and put them in 04:04
camps and murdered them. It's now used 04:06
to accuse people who raise concerns 04:09
about immigration of being the same 04:11
thing is totally unacceptable. What's 04:12
what's happened here very clearly is 04:14
that the prime minister went to Labour 04:16
Party conference and did not want to 04:18
talk about all of the scandals 04:20
enveloping his government. Didn't want 04:22
to talk about Angela Rainy. Didn't want 04:23
to talk about Peter Mandlesson. Didn't 04:25
want to talk about Morgan Mcweeny. 04:26
didn't want to talk about the state of 04:27
the economy. What he tried to do was 04:29
distract everybody from that by saying 04:31
something stupid. And unfortunately, he 04:34
had a degree of success with that. I 04:37
don't think we should put up with it. I 04:39
think we should talk about the main 04:40
issues and not be calling each other 04:41
names. woman in the middle. 04:43
>> Um, I believe in an inclusive society, 04:48
but I think when Paul said that people 04:52
were concerned, they're concerned 04:55
because they see it as an insidious 04:57
erosion of our culture and identity. And 05:00
Mr. Ben, your government don't seem to 05:05
want to protect that. In the south of 05:08
Ireland, there's been a 10% rise in 05:10
population and the last consensus in 05:14
2023 in the south of Ireland there was 05:16
20% of the people identified as not 05:21
being born in the country. I I I think 05:23
that was conservative estimate and I 05:27
believe it's probably more like 30%. 05:30
>> I mean obviously we we don't know that 05:33
statistic. I I should just point out 05:34
that the UK will soon be going in that 05:37
direction and will soon reach those 05:40
figures. 05:42
>> Okay. Can I just take issue with the 05:42
terms like insidious erosion of our 05:44
culture that is 05:47
this is our human beings that we are 05:52
talking about. We know in this part of 05:54
the world what it's like to go away to 05:56
get a job to start a new life away from 05:58
war and how we were treated when we 06:00
moved away. I think what's happened to 06:02
Kier Star Dmer is that Nigel Farage is 06:04
dragging him around by the tea. I think 06:07
he is hemorrhaging votes on the right 06:09
and the and the left and what he's 06:11
struggling to do is explain to people 06:13
that the reason you're on a housing 06:15
waiting list and the reason that the NHS 06:17
is underfunded and that your child can't 06:19
get a special school place is not 06:21
because of immigrants. It is because of 06:23
successive governments in Westminster 06:25
and in this part of the country that is 06:27
the reason as well. And now Kirst has 06:29
decided to go after people like delivery 06:32
drivers and bring in something like a 06:34
brickyard. None of that is going to 06:36
build houses here. None of that is going 06:37
to bring school places and none of it is 06:39
going to affect the NHS. We need to be 06:41
very careful when politicians start 06:43
punching down because it means they 06:44
don't have any policies that can help 06:46
you. 06:47
Uh I think it's important in these kind 06:54
of discussions because they t can tend 06:56
to get very sort of emotive very quickly 06:57
is to sort of look at the facts and 06:58
there were figures out this week or last 07:00
week that showed that in the last 12 07:02
months the population of Northern 07:04
Ireland has grown by 07:05
>> a fraction of a percent. It's been quite 07:06
small in the grand scheme of things and 07:08
there the context is different in the 07:09
republic and different in GB 07:11
>> but I think here we have to be very wary 07:13
of what is really happening here and not 07:15
sort of somewhere else that we see and 07:18
try and get caught up in those kind of 07:19
conversations. The most important thing 07:20
I think is to deal with this as it 07:22
happens and as it sort of affects us. 07:23
>> Well, let's just get some statistics 07:26
then. So 3.4% of the population in 07:28
Northern Ireland is from an ethnic 07:31
minority. uh that compares to England 07:33
and Wales where it's 18 over 18% but in 07:35
in Northern Ireland just in 2011 it was 07:39
1.8 so it has gone up but it's it's it's 07:42
still very small. Yeah, I I think it's 07:45
very easy to hide behind some of the 07:47
statistics and I actually agree with the 07:49
original question because it has been a 07:51
deliberate attempt by Labor and 07:55
previously the Conservative government 07:57
to brand anybody that showed any concern 07:59
with illegal and uncontrolled 08:02
immigration as racist. That was wrong. 08:04
And I'll tell you why. because people 08:07
with genuine heartfelt lived experience 08:10
seen as so I I look for example in 08:13
Belfast it is the second highest 08:16
dispersal rates for asylum seekers from 08:18
hotels into accommodation in local 08:21
communities right HMOs have h changed 08:24
the landscape of some of comm some of 08:27
our communities it is without doubt that 08:29
immigration particularly the cost 08:31
associated has had a dramatic impact and 08:33
I listen how people can say well It's 08:36
not because of the levels of illegal 08:38
immigration that's affecting our health 08:41
service and GP access and housing and 08:43
school places. But look at the figures. 08:46
15.3 billion across the UK by 2029 to 08:48
provide asylum accommodation and 08:53
support. That's not including other 08:55
costs such as legal cost. 08:57
>> All right. 15.3 billion what? 08:58
>> H pounds right across the UK for housing 09:00
asylum seekers and other associated 09:03
costs. In Northern Ireland alone, that 09:05
figure will balloon to 400 million. Now, 09:07
this is the point. 09:10
>> That's assuming the status quo remains. 09:11
>> Yes. And it may well get worse. So, and 09:12
it has got worse when we look at the 09:14
statistics. 50,000 people came by boat 09:15
into GB in this past year. That's what 09:19
we know of. But let's look at what that 09:23
money could actually do. Could that 09:25
money fund health care? Could it help to 09:27
the 400 million alone would would be the 09:30
entire capital budget for education in 09:32
Northern Ireland alone. So I do not 09:35
accept that anybody that has a 09:37
legitimate concern in relation to 09:39
illegal and uncontrolled immigration is 09:41
racist. That's lazy politics. Just this 09:43
week David Lami tried to insinuate that 09:46
Nigel Farage was in some way connected 09:48
to the Hitler youth. How low can you go? 09:51
The Labor government are catching on 09:56
very quick. The silent majority want 09:58
common sense. They want border 10:01
enforcement and they want to ensure that 10:03
this country that those that come to it 10:06
respect our laws, contribute and most 10:08
importantly ensure that our culture and 10:11
our values are not in competition with 10:13
theirs. 10:16
>> Man here in the glasses. 10:16
I completely agree with Jonathan just 10:18
going back to Hillary's point saying 10:20
that reforms uh rhetoric is divisive. 10:22
The prime minister of the country said a 10:27
few months ago that we risk becoming an 10:28
island of strangers. Why isn't that 10:30
divisive? But as soon as it is Nigel 10:32
Farage will say it. It's a it's racist. 10:35
His supporters are far right. He's far 10:37
right. But when Kier Star says it, it's 10:39
an accident. It's a mistake. 10:41
>> Okay. Man here in with a blair. Yes. 10:43
Uh just to bring it back to the original 10:47
question, um 10:49
to target someone on the basis of where 10:52
they come from or their identity or 10:54
ethnicity in particular, that is racist. 10:56
>> Um so I don't see how it could be 10:58
described any other way. I understand 11:00
that people are having to deal with um 11:01
the cost of living being untenable. Um 11:04
but that's nothing to do with um where 11:07
people are coming from. 11:09
>> Uh 11:11
that's right. 11:13
>> Okay, you made your point. big woman 11:13
here in the front. 11:15
>> Uh, can I just over the summer we had 11:16
riots and vigilante groups here and a 11:18
lot of politicians came out and said 11:21
that well these people had legitimate 11:23
concerns. We've had 28 women murdered in 11:25
the last 5 years. 11:28
>> It seems like there's less appetite to 11:30
come out and riot whenever the 11:32
perpetrator looks like someone you might 11:33
work with or play football with. 11:35
I I completely endorse that point and 11:43
and unfortunately my own constituency in 11:45
North Belfast witnessed some horrific uh 11:47
racist attacks and intimidation. And 11:49
there's an ability to come out and 11:52
condemn that without using the word but 11:54
at at the end of it. And I don't see 11:56
enough of that whenever we talk about 11:58
acts of racism and intimidation or 12:01
sectarianism that was quite rampant in 12:03
this part of the world. certainly at at 12:05
the beginning of the summer. I I think 12:07
the the debate itself for me is 12:09
primarily focused in England at the 12:11
minute. Um whether it's reform or 12:13
whether it's the points that have been 12:15
made uh between Hillary and Alex so far 12:16
this evening. But this conversation and 12:19
it goes back to the question I'm not 12:21
avoiding that this conversation demands 12:23
it demands accuracy and integrity when 12:27
we talk about it. So there is a way in 12:29
which you can ask a question on 12:31
immigration which has integrity and 12:33
accuracy at its heart or that you may 12:35
have a have an honest um an honest 12:37
appetite to get information that is 12:39
relevant to that. But there's also 12:41
another way to go about that 12:43
conversation and unfortunately that's 12:44
what we've seen too much of. We've seen 12:46
that type of dog whistle politics. Uh 12:48
we've already seen it so far this 12:50
evening with statistics being thrown 12:51
here there and everywhere. The issues 12:53
that the issues that come into my door 12:55
in my constituency office, the issues 12:57
that I talk about with people on the 12:59
street or people who are asking for our 13:01
help is not on the boats that are coming 13:03
up Belfast lock the way some local 13:06
politicians would have you believe 13:08
because that's completely fanciful. It's 13:09
about cost of living. It's about 13:11
demanding a a better a better um outcome 13:13
from Westminster. It's about seeing an 13:16
executive working together to tackle the 13:18
problems in our health service. We need 13:20
more workers coming into particularly 13:22
that area of life as well as delivering 13:24
on everything else. So I do take issue 13:27
with anybody who would infer that the 13:30
number one issue here is around 13:32
migrants. We've already had the the 13:34
statistic that there's only 3.4% of 13:36
ethnic minorities that live in this part 13:39
of the world that call it home. For me, 13:41
anybody who wants to call this place 13:43
home, we have a duty to put our arms 13:45
around them and make them feel as 13:47
welcome as possible. 13:49
>> So unlimited immigration into 13:50
No, let's and and let's just 13:54
>> you say anyone who wants to come here, 13:55
you need to welcome them. I just know 13:57
what you meant by 13:58
>> I I didn't appreciate you were going to 13:59
jump on that word, but I see Johnny is 14:00
trying to do the same. So, let's let's 14:02
make it very clear. Nobody would want 14:04
that. And and let's be very clear about 14:06
that. any responsible government or 14:08
authority around the world wants to have 14:10
a lawful, legally compassionate and 14:14
enforced and resourced immigration 14:18
policy. To say that anybody is for open 14:20
borders is nonsensical. And it goes back 14:23
to the point that I'm making about 14:25
accuracy. 14:26
>> It's only reflecting what you wasn't 14:26
directing that at you. I was directing 14:28
that at Johnny who's saying who's saying 14:30
that that's exactly what I want. It 14:31
isn't what I want. It is not what Shinfe 14:33
wants. You do have the ability and there 14:35
are examples of this to talk about 14:37
immigration to have an immigration 14:39
policy which obviously isn't evolved 14:41
that in this part of the world that 14:42
comes from Westminster but to have an 14:44
immigration policy that needs to be 14:46
resourced because that's a big problem 14:48
in this as well and needs to be 14:49
enforced. But there's an ability to do 14:51
that that is completely compliant with 14:53
human rights and international law where 14:55
you are treating people with compassion 14:57
and not in the way in which we've heard 14:59
some people talk so far this evening. 15:00
briefly. 15:02
>> Briefly, but John, that's part of the 15:02
problem because your actions don't match 15:04
uh the rhetoric because not so long ago 15:06
in the Northern Ireland Assembly, I 15:09
brought a motion calling for action on 15:10
uncontrolled and illegal immigration. 15:13
Your party voted it down. So, you can 15:15
say what you want in the audience 15:18
tonight, but your actions do not do not 15:19
bear out that you're a party that is 15:22
part of legal immigration. No, but it 15:25
showed the sentiment. And here here's 15:28
the other problem. There's a huge 15:29
conversation happening across Northern 15:30
Ireland right now. There are people from 15:32
traditional nationalists and Republican 15:34
backgrounds alongside unionists and 15:36
loyalists who feel that enough is enough 15:39
when it comes to pansying around on 15:42
illegal immigration. Control our borders 15:44
being yes. Control our borders and 15:47
restore order. And that's certainly a 15:49
policy that I'll be pushing for and 15:51
continue to 15:52
>> mean. That is a word that is often used 15:53
as a derogatory term for people who 15:55
homosexual. Is that what 15:57
>> No, that is exactly not what I mean. 15:58
That is exactly what I mean. 15:59
>> No, it is not. No, that is not what I 16:00
mean. 16:02
>> I say very, very clearly that is not 16:03
what I mean. I'm saying clearly to the 16:05
audience tonight, there's a conversation 16:07
happening in Northern Ireland. Other 16:09
people want to deflect from it. Let's 16:11
get serious. Let's ensure that we have 16:12
border policies that reflect a country 16:14
that is in control of its borders. 16:17
>> All right. I'm and I'm going to if you 16:19
forgive me I'm going to move 16:21

– English Lyrics

📲 "" is trending – don’t miss the chance to learn it in the app!
By
Viewed
207,984
Language
Learn this song

Lyrics & Translation

[English]
We've had 28 women murdered in the last
five years. It seems like there's less
appetite to come out and riot whenever
the perpetrator looks like someone you
might work with or play football with.
>> Why do the government and left-wing
politicians continue to call concerned
citizens far right when the vast
majority are just concerned about
illegal immigration.
>> Right. So we mentioned rhetoric already.
Um Hillary, let me come to you.
Obviously K star at the labor conference
today referred to uh a policy of of
reform as a racist policy when it comes
to immigration.
>> Yeah.
>> I mean racist far right. Do you agree
with that?
>> Yes I do because if you look at what
reform has proposed on indefinite leave
to remain because controlling migration
is absolutely right and proper.
something the government is committed to
which is why we are making changes to
the immigration system. That is one
thing. Tightening up the rules for
settlement and so on. It is completely
different to say to people who have
lived in this country for a long time,
paid taxes, worked, contributed that
their right to remain in Britain, we
gave a promise, is could be taken away
from them and they could be deported.
And when people think about it, who do
you know who has indefinite leave to
remain? It could be the carer who's
looking after your ill mother. It could
be your neighbor. It could be an in-law.
It could be the doctor who treated you
at the hospital. And I think it is an
immoral policy and the prime minister
was right quite right to call it out
because it is in the end divisive. And
as we've just discussed in the wake of
the terrible events in Manchester today,
there are enough people out there who
want to divide the nation and we should
be trying to bring people together and
have a sensible debate about the
difference between proper controls on
migration and not breaking the word that
we've given to people about their
ability to continue to contribute to
this country.
The question was asked uh about
concerned citizens not about reform but
about concerned citizens uh which there
is a vast majority that are concerned
about illegal immigration which I don't
think you answered
>> and do you feel that they are being
wrongly referred to as far right
>> wrongly referred to as far right uh as
well as being ignored
Um I accept that there are many people
who are concerned about migration. That
is why the government is taking a number
of steps and Paul's point is that you
feel that they're being called far right
when in fact they're not. That's your
view.
>> Yes. Yes.
>> Well, I I I don't accept that the
government is doing that. We've called
out what Nigel Farage proposed and
reform proposed, but we're also making
changes to the immigration system which
I hope people will recognize as they
unfold. say changing the arrangements
for getting indefinite leave to remain
people have to make a contribution not
be claiming benefits spotless criminal
record all of those things that we've
announced looking at the way in which
the European Convention of Human Rights
is interpreted not leaving it because if
we left the European Convention we'd be
in a club of three in Europe Russia
Bellarus and the United Kingdom and
there are parties on the panel that are
in favor of us leaving
>> Alex Look, uh, in answer to your
question, there isn't, uh, I haven't
seen any justification for the use of
those terms. And you're right, there are
a lot of people who are concerned about
levels of immigration. They're perfectly
entitled to hold those views and to not
be shouted down. And and I before I was
a politician, I was a history teacher.
And in my lifetime, I have watched
people take words that meant one thing
in the 1930s and try to apply them to
entirely different situations in the
modern age and distort them. far right
used to mean uh the Nazis who rounded
people up and you committed the worst
atrocities in history and put them in
camps and murdered them. It's now used
to accuse people who raise concerns
about immigration of being the same
thing is totally unacceptable. What's
what's happened here very clearly is
that the prime minister went to Labour
Party conference and did not want to
talk about all of the scandals
enveloping his government. Didn't want
to talk about Angela Rainy. Didn't want
to talk about Peter Mandlesson. Didn't
want to talk about Morgan Mcweeny.
didn't want to talk about the state of
the economy. What he tried to do was
distract everybody from that by saying
something stupid. And unfortunately, he
had a degree of success with that. I
don't think we should put up with it. I
think we should talk about the main
issues and not be calling each other
names. woman in the middle.
>> Um, I believe in an inclusive society,
but I think when Paul said that people
were concerned, they're concerned
because they see it as an insidious
erosion of our culture and identity. And
Mr. Ben, your government don't seem to
want to protect that. In the south of
Ireland, there's been a 10% rise in
population and the last consensus in
2023 in the south of Ireland there was
20% of the people identified as not
being born in the country. I I I think
that was conservative estimate and I
believe it's probably more like 30%.
>> I mean obviously we we don't know that
statistic. I I should just point out
that the UK will soon be going in that
direction and will soon reach those
figures.
>> Okay. Can I just take issue with the
terms like insidious erosion of our
culture that is
this is our human beings that we are
talking about. We know in this part of
the world what it's like to go away to
get a job to start a new life away from
war and how we were treated when we
moved away. I think what's happened to
Kier Star Dmer is that Nigel Farage is
dragging him around by the tea. I think
he is hemorrhaging votes on the right
and the and the left and what he's
struggling to do is explain to people
that the reason you're on a housing
waiting list and the reason that the NHS
is underfunded and that your child can't
get a special school place is not
because of immigrants. It is because of
successive governments in Westminster
and in this part of the country that is
the reason as well. And now Kirst has
decided to go after people like delivery
drivers and bring in something like a
brickyard. None of that is going to
build houses here. None of that is going
to bring school places and none of it is
going to affect the NHS. We need to be
very careful when politicians start
punching down because it means they
don't have any policies that can help
you.
Uh I think it's important in these kind
of discussions because they t can tend
to get very sort of emotive very quickly
is to sort of look at the facts and
there were figures out this week or last
week that showed that in the last 12
months the population of Northern
Ireland has grown by
>> a fraction of a percent. It's been quite
small in the grand scheme of things and
there the context is different in the
republic and different in GB
>> but I think here we have to be very wary
of what is really happening here and not
sort of somewhere else that we see and
try and get caught up in those kind of
conversations. The most important thing
I think is to deal with this as it
happens and as it sort of affects us.
>> Well, let's just get some statistics
then. So 3.4% of the population in
Northern Ireland is from an ethnic
minority. uh that compares to England
and Wales where it's 18 over 18% but in
in Northern Ireland just in 2011 it was
1.8 so it has gone up but it's it's it's
still very small. Yeah, I I think it's
very easy to hide behind some of the
statistics and I actually agree with the
original question because it has been a
deliberate attempt by Labor and
previously the Conservative government
to brand anybody that showed any concern
with illegal and uncontrolled
immigration as racist. That was wrong.
And I'll tell you why. because people
with genuine heartfelt lived experience
seen as so I I look for example in
Belfast it is the second highest
dispersal rates for asylum seekers from
hotels into accommodation in local
communities right HMOs have h changed
the landscape of some of comm some of
our communities it is without doubt that
immigration particularly the cost
associated has had a dramatic impact and
I listen how people can say well It's
not because of the levels of illegal
immigration that's affecting our health
service and GP access and housing and
school places. But look at the figures.
15.3 billion across the UK by 2029 to
provide asylum accommodation and
support. That's not including other
costs such as legal cost.
>> All right. 15.3 billion what?
>> H pounds right across the UK for housing
asylum seekers and other associated
costs. In Northern Ireland alone, that
figure will balloon to 400 million. Now,
this is the point.
>> That's assuming the status quo remains.
>> Yes. And it may well get worse. So, and
it has got worse when we look at the
statistics. 50,000 people came by boat
into GB in this past year. That's what
we know of. But let's look at what that
money could actually do. Could that
money fund health care? Could it help to
the 400 million alone would would be the
entire capital budget for education in
Northern Ireland alone. So I do not
accept that anybody that has a
legitimate concern in relation to
illegal and uncontrolled immigration is
racist. That's lazy politics. Just this
week David Lami tried to insinuate that
Nigel Farage was in some way connected
to the Hitler youth. How low can you go?
The Labor government are catching on
very quick. The silent majority want
common sense. They want border
enforcement and they want to ensure that
this country that those that come to it
respect our laws, contribute and most
importantly ensure that our culture and
our values are not in competition with
theirs.
>> Man here in the glasses.
I completely agree with Jonathan just
going back to Hillary's point saying
that reforms uh rhetoric is divisive.
The prime minister of the country said a
few months ago that we risk becoming an
island of strangers. Why isn't that
divisive? But as soon as it is Nigel
Farage will say it. It's a it's racist.
His supporters are far right. He's far
right. But when Kier Star says it, it's
an accident. It's a mistake.
>> Okay. Man here in with a blair. Yes.
Uh just to bring it back to the original
question, um
to target someone on the basis of where
they come from or their identity or
ethnicity in particular, that is racist.
>> Um so I don't see how it could be
described any other way. I understand
that people are having to deal with um
the cost of living being untenable. Um
but that's nothing to do with um where
people are coming from.
>> Uh
that's right.
>> Okay, you made your point. big woman
here in the front.
>> Uh, can I just over the summer we had
riots and vigilante groups here and a
lot of politicians came out and said
that well these people had legitimate
concerns. We've had 28 women murdered in
the last 5 years.
>> It seems like there's less appetite to
come out and riot whenever the
perpetrator looks like someone you might
work with or play football with.
I I completely endorse that point and
and unfortunately my own constituency in
North Belfast witnessed some horrific uh
racist attacks and intimidation. And
there's an ability to come out and
condemn that without using the word but
at at the end of it. And I don't see
enough of that whenever we talk about
acts of racism and intimidation or
sectarianism that was quite rampant in
this part of the world. certainly at at
the beginning of the summer. I I think
the the debate itself for me is
primarily focused in England at the
minute. Um whether it's reform or
whether it's the points that have been
made uh between Hillary and Alex so far
this evening. But this conversation and
it goes back to the question I'm not
avoiding that this conversation demands
it demands accuracy and integrity when
we talk about it. So there is a way in
which you can ask a question on
immigration which has integrity and
accuracy at its heart or that you may
have a have an honest um an honest
appetite to get information that is
relevant to that. But there's also
another way to go about that
conversation and unfortunately that's
what we've seen too much of. We've seen
that type of dog whistle politics. Uh
we've already seen it so far this
evening with statistics being thrown
here there and everywhere. The issues
that the issues that come into my door
in my constituency office, the issues
that I talk about with people on the
street or people who are asking for our
help is not on the boats that are coming
up Belfast lock the way some local
politicians would have you believe
because that's completely fanciful. It's
about cost of living. It's about
demanding a a better a better um outcome
from Westminster. It's about seeing an
executive working together to tackle the
problems in our health service. We need
more workers coming into particularly
that area of life as well as delivering
on everything else. So I do take issue
with anybody who would infer that the
number one issue here is around
migrants. We've already had the the
statistic that there's only 3.4% of
ethnic minorities that live in this part
of the world that call it home. For me,
anybody who wants to call this place
home, we have a duty to put our arms
around them and make them feel as
welcome as possible.
>> So unlimited immigration into
No, let's and and let's just
>> you say anyone who wants to come here,
you need to welcome them. I just know
what you meant by
>> I I didn't appreciate you were going to
jump on that word, but I see Johnny is
trying to do the same. So, let's let's
make it very clear. Nobody would want
that. And and let's be very clear about
that. any responsible government or
authority around the world wants to have
a lawful, legally compassionate and
enforced and resourced immigration
policy. To say that anybody is for open
borders is nonsensical. And it goes back
to the point that I'm making about
accuracy.
>> It's only reflecting what you wasn't
directing that at you. I was directing
that at Johnny who's saying who's saying
that that's exactly what I want. It
isn't what I want. It is not what Shinfe
wants. You do have the ability and there
are examples of this to talk about
immigration to have an immigration
policy which obviously isn't evolved
that in this part of the world that
comes from Westminster but to have an
immigration policy that needs to be
resourced because that's a big problem
in this as well and needs to be
enforced. But there's an ability to do
that that is completely compliant with
human rights and international law where
you are treating people with compassion
and not in the way in which we've heard
some people talk so far this evening.
briefly.
>> Briefly, but John, that's part of the
problem because your actions don't match
uh the rhetoric because not so long ago
in the Northern Ireland Assembly, I
brought a motion calling for action on
uncontrolled and illegal immigration.
Your party voted it down. So, you can
say what you want in the audience
tonight, but your actions do not do not
bear out that you're a party that is
part of legal immigration. No, but it
showed the sentiment. And here here's
the other problem. There's a huge
conversation happening across Northern
Ireland right now. There are people from
traditional nationalists and Republican
backgrounds alongside unionists and
loyalists who feel that enough is enough
when it comes to pansying around on
illegal immigration. Control our borders
being yes. Control our borders and
restore order. And that's certainly a
policy that I'll be pushing for and
continue to
>> mean. That is a word that is often used
as a derogatory term for people who
homosexual. Is that what
>> No, that is exactly not what I mean.
That is exactly what I mean.
>> No, it is not. No, that is not what I
mean.
>> I say very, very clearly that is not
what I mean. I'm saying clearly to the
audience tonight, there's a conversation
happening in Northern Ireland. Other
people want to deflect from it. Let's
get serious. Let's ensure that we have
border policies that reflect a country
that is in control of its borders.
>> All right. I'm and I'm going to if you
forgive me I'm going to move

Key Vocabulary

Start Practicing
Vocabulary Meanings

concern

/kənˈsɜːrn/

B1
  • noun
  • - a matter of interest or importance
  • verb
  • - to relate to or affect

immigration

/ˌɪmɪˈɡreɪʃən/

B2
  • noun
  • - the act of coming to live permanently in a foreign country

policy

/ˈpɒləsi/

B1
  • noun
  • - a course of action intended to achieve something

government

/ˈɡʌvənmənt/

A2
  • noun
  • - the group of people with the authority to govern a country

citizen

/ˈsɪtɪzən/

A2
  • noun
  • - a legally recognized subject or national of a state

illegal

/ɪˈliːɡəl/

B1
  • adjective
  • - not authorized by the law

control

/kənˈtroʊl/

A2
  • verb
  • - to manage or exercise restraint over
  • noun
  • - the power to influence or direct people's behavior

riot

/ˈraɪət/

B2
  • noun
  • - a violent disturbance of the peace by a crowd
  • verb
  • - to take part in a violent public disturbance

perpetrator

/ˈpɜːrpətreɪtər/

C1
  • noun
  • - a person who carries out a harmful, illegal, or immoral act

racist

/ˈreɪsɪst/

B2
  • adjective
  • - showing prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism based on race
  • noun
  • - a person who believes in racism

reform

/rɪˈfɔːrm/

B2
  • noun
  • - the action or process of reforming an institution or practice
  • verb
  • - to make changes to improve something

divisive

/dɪˈvaɪsɪv/

C1
  • adjective
  • - tending to cause disagreement or hostility between people

deport

/dɪˈpɔːrt/

B2
  • verb
  • - to expel someone from a country

contribution

/ˌkɒntrɪˈbjuːʃən/

B1
  • noun
  • - the act of giving something to a common supply or fund

erosion

/ɪˈroʊʒən/

B2
  • noun
  • - the gradual destruction of something

inclusive

/ɪnˈkluːsɪv/

B2
  • adjective
  • - not excluding any group or part

insidious

/ɪnˈsɪdiəs/

C1
  • adjective
  • - proceeding in a gradual, subtle way, but with very harmful effects

aggregate

/ˈæɡrɪɡət/

C1
  • noun
  • - a sum total of many parts
  • verb
  • - to collect or form into a mass or whole

rhetoric

/ˈrɛtərɪk/

C1
  • noun
  • - the art of effective or persuasive speaking or writing

🧩 Unlock "" – every sentence and word gets easier with the app!

💬 Don’t let tough words stop you – the app’s got your back!

Key Grammar Structures

Coming Soon!

We're updating this section. Stay tuned!

Related Songs