– 英语/中文 双语歌词

歌词与翻译

[中文]

能在这里见到各位，我倍感荣幸。

非常感谢大家今晚的光临，

这让今晚变得非常特别。

嗯，如果你听到后面有高跟鞋的脚步声，

听起来像个幽灵，

那是我像只吉娃娃一样在来回踱步。

嗯，我得先赶紧澄清一件事。

其实在“五百个披萨”之前，

我曾是一名芭蕾舞者。而且，

呃，是的，我们只需要……

我就直接说吧。每个人都……

>> 如此强大的力量，在于逃离数字化的

幽闭恐惧感。今天，我将带大家

了解三个简短的篇章。

第一是“碰撞”：当不同的世界交汇，

从而创造出新的可能性。

第二是“压缩”：当这些可能性

从我们的日常生活中被挤压出来，以及

第三是“释放”：我们如何将这些元素重新

设计回现实世界，并融入我们的生活？

大约八九年前，社交

机器人专家 Heather Knight

和我，以及一群疯狂、

才华横溢、古灵精怪的人，聚在了一起，

开始尝试一项名为

“机器人芭蕾”的项目。不仅是因为机器人

应该与人类共舞，更因为

当它们起舞时，发生了一些非凡而

美好的事情。艺术家们出现了，

工程师、机器人专家、世界级的

运动员、作家、哲学家、

法律专家，还有政策制定者。

那些通常不会共处一室的人们聚在一起，

交织着各自的本能、知识体系、

术语体系以及

语言风格。

回首过去，我们审视这一切后

意识到，机器人本身并不是

核心目的。

“碰撞”不是一个地点，而是一种

状态。它是一个门槛，让不同的

世界在此汇合，时间恰到好处，

足以让新的事物形成并涌现。

它是不同背景的人们与从业者之间，

一种临时的或共享的

交流方式。

因为“跨界融合”不会发生在

战略会议上，它发生在

那些能够吸引注意力、激发好奇心

并让人全身心投入的事物中。

如果大家能稍等片刻，

请关注这段精美的视频，

你们将看到一些在现实中发生的

跨界融合。

转过身来。你们其实可以……

这些人虽然不属于同一个学科，

但他们正在共享注意力，

我认为很多奇迹都发生在这里。这不只是一场表演，

happens. This wasn't a performance. It

也不是产品或演示，它仅仅是

一种建立连接的契机，

而我认为现在很多人都非常

渴望这种连接。这正是连接的开始。

连接的起点。

大约400年来，我们一直在为“连接”进行优化。

我们优化了速度、

规模和效率。但我们

忘记了为“邂逅”进行设计。

人们感到的不是脱节，

而是被压缩。

我们生活在信息流、信息茧房

和算法镜像之中。当我们停止

与差异和多样性进行邂逅时，

跨界融合就会崩溃。有人

曾对我说：“表达是一种‘想要’，

而不是一种‘必须’。”我认为

这一原则和概念正在悄无声息地

瓦解社会，

因为表达是我们传递

安全感的方式，是我们认同彼此的方式，

也是连接的起点。

表达并非新奇事物，也不是

装饰品。它是基础设施，

是社交的、情感的，也是极其人性化的。

人们并不缺乏身份认同，相反，

他们的身份认同非常丰富。我们

在网上构建了整个世界，但我们

却在某种程度上感到疏离。

我们构建了规模如城市般的身份，

却试图把它们塞进

单间公寓里。当身份认同

无法呼吸时，跨界融合就会

崩溃。所以问题不在于我们如何

构建更好的平台和系统，

而在于身份认同该去哪里栖居？

当我们的现实身份和

数字身份可以离开屏幕，

进入现实世界，进入

物理领域时，会发生什么？进入身体、

物体和表面。当这些东西

变得像信号而非单纯的

内容，像会说话的羽毛一样时，会发生什么？

我们直觉上已经知道这一点。孩子们

会对着玩具说话，他们与事物

建立关系。他们以成人的思维，

为抽象物体赋予了海量的价值。

然而在成长的某个阶段，在

漫漫人生路上，他们被告知，我们也

被告知，这些东西是没有价值的。

并且，如果说价值确实存在，

那这种意义也只能存在于脑海中

或屏幕之上。我根本不同意

这种观点。我们早已知道，纵观历史，

物体承载了如此深厚的文化

和意义。这有无数的

证据可以佐证。比如帽子、

图腾、服饰等等。

那么，

该如何设计出那些能引发

互动、许可

和故事感的东西呢？

让物体在我们的语言开口之前，

就先开口讲述故事。既然我们知道物体承载着

巨大的意义，那么核心问题就是：

我们如何进行自觉的设计？如何将

故事注入物体，让它们能够

替我们开口说话？让我们的“羽毛”开口说话。

你们即将看到的不是产品演示，而是

一种愿景：当你进行自觉的设计，

创造出能讲述故事的有意识物体时，

会发生什么——这些物体将帮助我们

脱离数字世界，将身份认同

带入我们真实的

物理生活中。

所以，改变的并不是

技术本身。改变的是互动的机会，

以及跨界融合的机会。

表达先行。让“羽毛”开口说话。

我们的表达既是一种身份，

也能激发他人的许可感、

好奇心和互动欲望。

我最喜欢的两位人类伙伴、

同事兼合作伙伴 Orurid Gal 和 Robert Leonard，

将此称为“积极的社交摩擦点”。

两个人类，两个陌生人，一根烟和

一个打火机。

5秒钟的协作，一个充满人情味的时刻。

而那一瞬间可以引发极其丰富、

各种各样的结果。我把这些思考留给各位。

嗯，跨界融合并非偶然，

它是被刻意设计在我们的聚集空间、

随身携带的物件，以及

周围的环境之中的。表达绝非

装饰品，它是让身份认同

得以呼吸的基础设施。回首过去，机器人

从来不是目的，具有表现力的

可穿戴设备也从来不是目的，

真正的核心是那些“碰撞”。

未来需要的不是更聪明的机器，

而是更勇敢的相遇方式。谢谢大家。

infrastructure that lets identity

breathe. Looking back, the robot was

never the point. The expressive

wearables were never the point.

the collisions were.

And the future doesn't need smarter

machines. It needs braver ways of

meeting. Thank you.

[英语]

So, it's an honor to be amongst all of

you. Thank you so much for coming here

tonight, making it a very special

evening. Um, if you heard the uh steps

of a woman, a ghost in heels out back,

that was me pacing like a Chihuahua.

Um, I need to get one thing out of the

way very quickly. I actually was a

ballet dancer about 500 pizzas ago. And

uh yeah, and we just need to kind of

I'll just go ahead and do it. EVERYONE'S

>> so power of the liinal escaping digital

claustrophobia. Today I'm going to take

you through three quick chapters.

Collision, when different worlds combine

and new possibilities are created.

Compression, when these possibilities

are squeezed out of our daily lives, and

release. How do we design these back

into the real world and into our lives?

About eight or nine years ago, social

roboticist Heather Knight

and I, as well as a huge group of wild,

brilliant, muppety people, came together

and started working on a thing called

robot ballets. Not just because robots

should dance with humans, but because

when they did, something remarkable and

beautiful happened. artists showed up,

engineers, roboticists, world-class

athletes, writers, philosophers,

legal minds, and policy makers.

People who normally wouldn't share a

room came together and braided instincts

and knowledge sets and vernaculars and

language styles.

And we looked back on everything and we

realized that the robots were not the

point.

The collision was not a place but a

condition. A threshold where different

worlds come together just long enough

that something new can form and emerge.

A temporary or shared vernacular amongst

people and practitioners of every

background

because crosspollination doesn't happen

in strategy meetings. It happens around

things that invite attention, curiosity,

and presence.

Uh if you'll bear with me for a moment,

uh please pay attention to this lovely

video and uh you'll see a little bit of

crosspollination in the wild.

Turn around. You can actually

These people do not share disciplines

but they are sharing attention and

that's where I think a lot of the magic

happens. This wasn't a performance. It

was not a product or demo. It was just a

condition for connection

and I think a lot of people are really

starving for that right now. And that's

where connection begins.

For about 400 years, we've optimized for

connection. We've optimized for speed,

scale, and efficiency. But we've

forgotten to design for encounter.

People don't feel disconnected. They

feel compressed.

We live inside of feeds and silos and

algorithmic mirrors. And when we stop

encountering difference and diversity,

cross-pollination collapses. Someone

once told me, "Expression is a want to

have, not a need to have." I think that

that principle and that concept quietly

breaks society

because expression is how we signal

safety. It's how we recognize each other

and it's where connection begins.

Expression isn't a novelty nor is it

decoration. It is infrastructure,

social, emotional, and very, very human.

People don't lack identities. They have

extremely rich identities. We've built

these entire worlds online, and yet

we're somehow disconnected.

We've built identities the sizes of

cities, but we try to store them in

studio apartments. And where identity

can't breathe, cross-pollination

collapses. So the question isn't how do

we build better platforms and systems.

It's where does identity go to live?

What happens when our identities and our

digital identities can leave the screen

and enter into the real world into the

physical realm? Move onto bodies and

objects and surfaces. What happens when

these things become like signals and not

content like feathers that can talk? We

already know this intuitively. Children

talk to their toys. They create

relationships with things. They project

huge amounts of value onto abstract

objects by adult minds. And then

somewhere along our journey, somewhere

along the way, they are told and we are

told that these things have no value.

And that that value, if it does exist,

that meaning belongs in our head and on

screens. And I fundamentally disagree

with that. We already know that objects

throughout history carry so much culture

and so much meaning. And there's tons

and tons of proof around that. Hats,

totems, clothing, etc.

And so,

how do you design things that invite

interaction, permission,

and stories?

Objects that tell stories before our

words do. So, we know objects carry a

ton of meaning. So, the big question is,

how do we design consciously? How do we

put stories into objects so they can do

the talking before us? So our feathers

can do the talking. What you're going to

see is not a product demo. It's a

glimpse into what happens when you

design consciously and create conscious

objects that tell stories and that help

us leave the digital world and move that

identity into the physical lives that we

have.

So what changes there is not the

technology. What changes is the risk for

interaction, the risk for cross

cross-pollination.

Expression does the work first. The

feathers do the talking.

And our expression is both an identity

but also invites permission and

curiosity and interaction.

Two of my favorite humans, colleagues

and collaborators and friends, Orurid

Gal and Robert Leonard refer to this as

positive social friction points. Two

humans, two strangers, a cigarette and a

lighter.

5 seconds of cooperation and a human

moment. And that moment can lead to so

much and so many outcomes. I'll leave

you guys with these thoughts. Um

cross-pollination is not accidental. It

is very much so designed into the spaces

we gather, the objects we carry, and the

surfaces around us. Expression is by no

means decoration. It's the

infrastructure that lets identity

breathe. Looking back, the robot was

never the point. The expressive

wearables were never the point.

the collisions were.

And the future doesn't need smarter

machines. It needs braver ways of

meeting. Thank you.

重点词汇

词汇	含义
honor /ˈɒnər/ B2	noun - 荣誉
pacing /ˈpeɪsɪŋ/ B2	verb - 踱步
collision /kəˈlɪʒən/ B2	noun - 碰撞
compression /kəmˈprɛʃən/ C1	noun - 压缩
remarkable /rɪˈmɑːkəbl/ B2	adjective - 非凡的
threshold /ˈθrɛʃhoʊld/ C1	noun - 门槛
vernaculars /vərˈnækjələr/ C2	noun - 方言
crosspollination /ˌkrɔːsˌpɒləˈneɪʃən/ C2	noun - 交叉授粉
curiosity /ˌkjʊəriˈɒsəti/ B2	noun - 好奇心
starving /ˈstɑːrvɪŋ/ B1	adjective - 渴望
optimized /ˈɒptɪmaɪzd/ C1	verb - 优化
algorithmic /ˌælɡəˈrɪðmɪk/ C2	adjective - 算法的
infrastructure /ˈɪnfrəˌstrʌktʃər/ C1	noun - 基础设施
intuitively /ɪnˈtuːɪtɪvli/ C2	adjective - 直觉地
consciously /ˈkɒnʃəsli/ C1	adjective - 有意识地

重点语法结构

• If you heard the uh steps of a woman, a ghost in heels out back, that was me pacing like a Chihuahua.

  ➔ 虚拟语气（假设情况）

  ➔ 使用 'if + 过去式' 来描述假设情况。

• People who normally wouldn't share a room came together and braided instincts.

  ➔ 定语从句

  ➔ 'who...' 从句用来限定前面的 'People'。

• The collision was not a place but a condition.

  ➔ 相关连词

  ➔ 用于强调两个名词之间的对比。

• We've optimized for speed, scale, and efficiency.

  ➔ 现在完成时

  ➔ 表示过去发生并持续影响到现在的事情。

• Someone once told me, 'Expression is a want to have, not a need to have.'

  ➔ 直接引语

  ➔ 使用引号来引用他人的原话。

• What happens when our identities can leave the screen and enter into the real world?

  ➔ 从句作主语

  ➔ 'What happens...' 从句在句中充当主语。

• They project huge amounts of value onto abstract objects by adult minds.

  ➔ 被动语态

  ➔ 虽然是主动语态结构，但描述了意义被投射到对象上的过程。

• The future doesn't need smarter machines. It needs braver ways of meeting.

  ➔ 比较级形容词

  ➔ 使用 '-er' 后缀来表示比较。